Gerard-Josep Alcalde Gascón

Gerard-Josep Alcalde Gascón

An Approach to design criteria for long -span floating bridges MÀSTER Treball realitzat per: Gerard-Josep Alcalde Gascón Dirigit per: Joan Ramon Casas Rius Climent Molins Borrell Màster en: Enginyeria de Camins, Canals i Ports Barcelona, 26 de Juny de 2020 Departament d’Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental PQ3W9G0723554900108970J TREBALL FINAL DE FINAL TREBALL GERARD-JOSEP ALCALDE GASCÓN AN APPROACH TO DESIGN CRITERIA FOR LONG-SPAN FLOATING BRIDGES Index INDEX ................................................................................................................................................... I INDEX OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ III INDEX OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... V ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................... IX ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................... X RESUMEN ........................................................................................................................................... XI RESUM .............................................................................................................................................. XII 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 2. OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................. 2 3. STATE OF THE ART ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.1. BRIDGES IN DEEP WATER AREAS .......................................................................................................... 3 3.1.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.1.2. Offshore engineering ......................................................................................................... 3 3.2. BRIDGE SOLUTIONS FOR DEEP WATERS ................................................................................................. 7 3.2.1. Suspension bridges ............................................................................................................ 8 3.2.2. Floating bridges ............................................................................................................... 11 3.2.3. Floating suspension or cable-stayed bridge ..................................................................... 12 3.2.4. Pontoon bridge combined with a cable stayed bridge .................................................... 15 3.2.5. Pontoon bridge combined with a submerged floating tunnel at mid-fiord ..................... 15 3.3. PLACES REQUIRING A SOLUTION FOR DEEP WATER CROSSINGS ................................................................ 16 3.3.1. The E39 project ................................................................................................................ 16 3.3.2. The Messina strait ........................................................................................................... 18 3.3.3. Scotland and Northern Ireland bridge ............................................................................. 19 3.4. CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................. 21 4. TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON AND ALTERNATIVE SELECTION. A CASE STUDY ............................. 22 4.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 22 4.2. STUDY SPECIFICATIONS AND DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS .............................................................................. 22 4.3. SOGNEFJORD INFORMATION ............................................................................................................ 23 4.3.1. Physical data .................................................................................................................... 24 4.3.2. Meteorological data ........................................................................................................ 24 4.3.3. DecK section ..................................................................................................................... 29 4.3.4. Extreme events ................................................................................................................ 30 4.4. BRIDGE LAYOUT ............................................................................................................................ 31 4.4.1. Cable-stayed bridge ......................................................................................................... 31 4.4.2. Suspension bridge ............................................................................................................ 33 4.5. PRELIMINARY BRIDGE DESIGN .......................................................................................................... 34 4.5.1. General considerations for both designs ......................................................................... 34 4.5.2. Cable-stayed bridge ......................................................................................................... 41 4.5.3. Suspension bridge ............................................................................................................ 52 4.6. PRELIMINARY PONTOON DESIGN ....................................................................................................... 59 4.6.1. Evaluation of the loads at the pontoons .......................................................................... 60 4.6.2. Tension leg platform (TLP) ............................................................................................... 75 4.6.3. Tethered spar-buoy .......................................................................................................... 82 4.6.4. Anchoring ........................................................................................................................ 89 I GERARD-JOSEP ALCALDE GASCÓN AN APPROACH TO DESIGN CRITERIA FOR LONG-SPAN FLOATING BRIDGES 4.7. ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF THE ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................. 95 4.8. DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 96 4.8.1. Conclusions obtained from the other alternatives ........................................................... 98 4.8.2. Design criteria for long-span floating bridges ............................................................... 100 5. CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................................... 101 5.1. FUTURE RESEARCH LINES ............................................................................................................... 103 6. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 104 ANNEX 1. OPTIMIZATION OF THE SPAR-BUOY ANCHOR POSITION .................................................... 109 ANNEX 2. ALTERNATIVE BLUEPRINTS ................................................................................................ 131 II GERARD-JOSEP ALCALDE GASCÓN AN APPROACH TO DESIGN CRITERIA FOR LONG-SPAN FLOATING BRIDGES Index of tables Table 1: Load coefficients ........................................................................................................... 23 Table 2: Material coefficients ..................................................................................................... 23 Table 3: Current data for a return period of 50 years ................................................................ 24 Table 4: Wave parameters ......................................................................................................... 25 Table 5: Tower-span ratio of the longest cable-stayed bridges ................................................. 32 Table 6: Results cable dimensioning for cable-stayed bridge ..................................................... 44 Table 7: Results cable prestressing force for cable-stayed bridge ............................................. 45 Table 8: Area needed in the tower to bear the axial forces in the cable-stayed bridge ............ 46 Table 9: Design of the towers for the cable-stayed bridge ........................................................ 47 Table 10: Loads transferred to the platform .............................................................................. 47 Table 11: Longitudinal and transversal stiffeners design. Measures in mm .............................. 49 Table 12: Volume of the different parts. Cable-stayed bridge with steel pylons ....................... 50 Table 13: Volume of the different materials. Cable-stayed bridge with steel pylons ................ 51 Table 14: Weight of the different materials. Cable-stayed bridge with steel pylons ................. 51 Table 15: Volume of the different parts. Cable-stayed bridge with concrete pylons

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    120 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us