Bat Activity Survey Over Millponds in South Lancashire

Bat Activity Survey Over Millponds in South Lancashire

JANUARY 2007 South Lancashire Bat Group Bat Activity Survey over millponds in South Lancashire CONSERVE BATS CONSERVE HERITAGE ACROSS NORTHERN ENGLAND Contents Introduction 1 Abstract 2 Methodology used during bat survey 3 Preliminary survey in Kirklees Valley 3 Daylight Survey 3 Other ponds and water bodies included in the Survey 4 The Dusk Bat Survey 4 Species Distribution in Kirklees Valley 5 Changes in Bat Activity over time 6 Bat Activity through the Valley 7 Possible Factors Aecting Bat Activity 8 Kirklees Valley Map 9 A Brief History of Kirklees Valley 10 Population and Habitat Changes 11 Other Survey Sites 12 Conclusions 13 Current Projects 15 Lobbying & Publicity 18 Further Information 19 Figures and Tables Changes in Bat Activity 1994-2006 6 Mean Bat Species Activity over the Valley 7 Breakdown of Bat Activity in Kirklees Valley 2006 by Species 11 Physical Characteristics of ponds 15 The South Lancashire Bat Group is a large and active group as important wildlife rich areas. Since the start of the survey there has working for bat conservation in and around the vice-county of South been a net loss of ponds, both in the Kirklees Valley, where some Lancashire, excluding Merseyside. The area includes Greater Manchester ponds have now been completely consumed by reeds and have and the south-eastern parts of the present county of Lancashire. dried out, and at sites like the East Lancashire Paper Mill, where ponds have been drained for development. The threat of draining This is a report summary of a survey initially covering 29 millponds in and inll is ever present. the Kirklees Valley, Tottington, Bury, as well as a number of additional ponds in the South Lancashire area that have not been previously The following provides information on the methods used during the surveyed to any degree by the Group. The project took three years surveys, the changes recorded in Bat activity, changes at breeding to complete. and feeding areas, and proposes active lobbying for the conservation of bats and local heritage. Initial surveys 1-3 were completed in the Kirklees Valley: Survey 1: 1994 - 1997 Survey 2: 1998 - 1999 Survey 3: 2003 Pilot Survey for LHI Survey 4: 2004 Survey 5: 2005 Survey 6: 2006 SOUTH LANCASHIRE BAT GROUP Bats were found at all the ponds in all the sites of the survey area. The Registered Charity Number 1109519 survey results show how important it is to protect millponds, not only as historical features, as in many cases they are the last Martin Prescott remaining fragments of the North West’s industrial heritage, but also Chair, South Lancashire Bat Group 01 The Kirklees Valley Other Sites Surveyed Between 1994 and 2006 the following six/seven species have been Pyramid park in Bury gave evidence proving the importance of a water detected in the Kirklees Valley: body. When the pond dried out, the numbers of bat passes fell 45 KHz Pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus), 55 KHz Pipistrelle (Pipistrellus dramatically. At the East Lancashire Paper Mill, after three ponds were pygmaeus) (Pp), Daubenton’s Bat (Myotis daubentonii) (Md), Noctule drained, the bats moved to use the remaining pond. It is considered (Nyctalus noctula) (Nn), Brown Long-Eared Bat (Plecotus auritus (Pa), likely that bats displaced from a pond which has been lost, or where and Whiskered/Brandt’s Bat (Myotis mystacinus/brandtii) (Mm). The the quality of a pond is reduced, will only remain at a favourable Whiskered and Brandt’s bats are inseparable when using bat conservation status in the area if there are alternatives within close detectors as they both sound the same. It is normal to bracket the proximity with suitable habitat connectivity to guide them. two species together. There was a considerable increase in bat activity at the small pond in The average species richness for an individual pond was two; the Redisher Woods, Ramsbottom, following some alterations to the pond pond with the highest species richness recorded during the survey which included raising the water level. The Wigan sites, especially the was MK16, Island Lodge, in 2004, with four species. A signicant Wigan Flashes are a stronghold for Noctule bats in the South positive correlation between both M. daubentonii, Lancashire area. The increase in Myotis (Whiskered Bat) activity on M. mystacinus/brandtii and pond size was found. The larger the pond, the River Spodden at Healey Dell is considered to be of importance the better, for these bat species. for South Lancashire. 02 They were recorded as a percentage of each of the following types: 1. Buildings, brickwork, bare ground etc. 2. Still water 3. Flowing water 4. Improved pasture and arable 5. Unimproved and semi-improved pasture, hay meadow 6. Hedgerow and scrub - less than 5m tall 7. Broadleaved woodland - more than 5m tall 8. Rank herbage, rough grassland 9. Marsh, reed bed 10. Parks, gardens, playing elds 11. Other- specied Methodology used during bat surveys An estimate of the degree of wind shelter (by PRELIMINARY SURVEY IN THE KIRKLEES DAYLIGHT SURVEY valley sides, high banks, trees etc.) around the VALLEY pond was made: In 1994, the main habitat types around each A survey by map (Pathnder 700, Bolton North & millpond were systematically recorded within: 0 = exposed Horwich) and by walk-through was carried out to 1 = slightly sheltered nd where ponds survive or have been lost since a) 10 metres of the pond; and 2 = moderately sheltered the map data was collated. It was found that 10 b) 50 metres of the pond. ponds shown on the map (compiled 1953-1984) 3 = highly sheltered were already missing. One extra pond was found. Two ponds were considered inaccessible. The following were noted: Height above sea level The valley was divided into 3 sections: Approximate area of open water Lower Kirklees (LK); A position from which to carry out the evening Mid Kirklees (MK); and survey close to the pond edge with regard to Upper Kirklees (UK). accessibility, safety, and where possible to the south-east of the pond in order to make best Each pond was given a reference number with use of the light north-western sky after sunset. prexes LK (12 ponds), MK (16 ponds) or UK (4 ponds) placing them in a particular section. Above: Lodge at Kirklees Right: Fishing on Island Lodge, Kirklees 03 OTHER PONDS AND WATER BODIES Each pond was surveyed avoiding heavy rain, high 2. The period of time between 60 and 75 minutes INCLUDED IN THE SURVEY winds and unusually low temperatures. after sunset was chosen for counting, as this is On the survey evening, at 15 minutes after sunset, likely to be part of the most active time for We decided to include other water bodies within the following were recorded: foraging bats, including late emergent species. the scope of the Project, specically choosing 1. Temperature (Deg C) at waist height at the those that may have been in danger of observation point. 3. It is almost impossible to count the number of development, and those associated with industry, 2. Approximate wind strength (Beaufort) waist bats foraging over a pond; less possible to such as canals, and subsidence ashes. Requests height at observation point. measure the time each bat spends there, so from a number of organisations to survey 3. Approximate wind strength (Beaufort) and counting every time a bat passes through the millponds or lodges were made to the Group in direction generally. range of the bat detector was considered the order to collect data on bat activity. These were best way of gauging bat activity. At the same time, a Batbox III, Duet, or Petterson The Parkers & Whitehead Lodges – The bat detector was tuned to 45 KHz, and turned to The count numbers, therefore, do not directly Friends of Cockey Moor and Whitehead full volume. relate to bat numbers but to the level of bat activity, which indicates the importance of the Lodges The time of rst contact with each bat species was pond to bats during the counting period. Hollins Vale – Hollins Conservation Group noted. The details of any observed behaviour such Healey Dell – Friends of Healey Dell as commuting or squeaking was also noted. A suggestion that a count of feeding buzzes Cliviger – Pond Conservation Trust Any identication doubt was noted. Bats were (that is a rapid increase in click rate heard as a recorded to species level where possible, although “raspberry” on a bat detector when a bat East Lancs Paper Mill – Angling Club & Local genus was commonly used, especially for homes in on an insect) be used as a gauge of Residents. Pipistrellus bats. bat activity was not taken up because: Wigan Flashes – Wigan Countryside Service Philips Park – Bury MBC Between 60 and 75 minutes after sunset the It may produce a bias in favour of bats Worsley Basin – Salford MBC number of bat passes was counted for each hunting small prey items. A large prey species. In the case of continuous contact, a count item may be worth several passes, Redisher Woods – Friends of Redisher Woods of one pass was made for each 10 seconds of whereas a bat taking midges may produce and Bury LNR Ocer contact. Therefore, a continuous contact for 15 several feeding buzzes in a single pass. Pyramid Park – Bury MBC minutes would give a count of 90 (per species). The number of feeding buzzes would THE DUSK BAT SURVEY The survey ended 75 minutes after sunset. generally be less, often much less than the number of passes and would be In order to minimise the eects of large COMMENTS ON METHOD statistically less signicant. uctuations in numbers of feeding bats such as may occur when young begin to y in early and 1.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    22 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us