Mycorrhizae in Hawaiian Epiphytes!

Mycorrhizae in Hawaiian Epiphytes!

Pacific Science (1995), vol. 49, no. 2: 175-180 © 1995 by University of Hawai'i Press. All rights reserved Mycorrhizae in Hawaiian Epiphytes! 2 J. N. GEMMA AND R. E. KOSKE ABSTRACT: In surveys in the Hawaiian Islands, mycorrhizae occurred fre­ quently in epiphytic, nonorchidaceous angiosperms and pteridophytes. Both vesicular-arbuscular (VA) and ericoid mycorrhizae were present in epiphytes growing 1-3 m above the forest floor on dead and living tree trunks and on living tree ferns in montane wet forest sites. All eight angiosperm species were mycorrhizal, and 13 of 22 pteridophytes possessed VA mycorrhizae. The high frequency of mycorrhizae in epiphytic species suggests that propagules of my­ corrhizal fungi routinely are dispersed to these microsites. Possible means of dispersal are discussed. IN THE MONTANE WET forests ofthe Hawaiian June 1990. Roots of the epiphytes typically Islands a dense epiphytic flora ofangiosperms were growing in thick mats of moss that and pteridophytes flourishes. Intensive studies covered the trunks. Sampled plants were at­ of Hawaiian angiosperms and pteridophytes tached to their substrate at elevations of 1-3 growing in a variety of habitats (Gemma m above ground level. Care was taken during et al. 1992, Koske et al. 1992) revealed that collecting to sample individual plants for a high percentage of these species form ve­ which roots could be positively identified as sicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae (VAM). In belonging to the particular plant. Most col­ those surveys mycorrhizae were found to be lections were made in the Koke'e and Alaka'i common among the epiphytes. Because VA Swamp areas (Koke'e State Park) at eleva­ and ericoid mycorrhizae seldom are reported tions of ca. 1100 m above sea level on the is­ to occur in epiphytic, nonorchidaceous an­ land of Kaua'i. A few samples were collected giosperms and pteridophytes (Boullard 1957, from similar sites on the islands of Maui and Cooper 1976, Nadkami 1981, Berch and Moloka'i. Kendrick 1982, Trappe 1987, Lesica and Roots were preserved in 50% isopropyl Antibus 1990, Maffia et al. 1990), we were alcohol and later were cleared in hot 2.5% prompted to sample a greater diversity of KOH and stained with 0.05% trypan blue in species to better assess the prevalence of an acidified glycerol solution (Koske and mycotrophy among Hawaiian epiphytes. Gemma 1989). Stained roots were mounted on slides in a polyvinyl alcohol-based solu­ tion (PVLG) (Koske and Tessier 1983). En­ tire root systems were examined at 40-60 x MATERIALS AND METHODS with a dissecting microscope, and portions of Root samples (10-40 cm long) were col­ each root system were examined at 400 x lected from plants growing on living and with a compound microscope. The presence dead trunks of trees (mostly of Metrosideros of vesicles, arbuscules, hyphal coils, and in­ polymorpha Gaud.) and tree ferns (Cibotium ternal hyphae was noted for each specimen. glaucum [J. E. Sm.]" Hook. & Amott) in Only those species in which arbuscules were montane wet forests between July 1987 and found were considered to have functional VAM. ExtenlqfYAM jI1f~ctj()!1 \V~~ _gl.tanti­ fiedhy asSigning a mycorrhizal index (MI) value of 0-3 to stained root samples, where 0 1 Manuscript accepted 28 March 1994. 2 Department of Botany, University of Rhode Island, indicates no VAM infection, 1 = up to 25% Kingston, Rhode Island 02881. of root length infected (i.e., containing any 175 176 PACIFIC SCIENCE, Volume 49, April 1995 combination of the VAM fungal structures fern species examined (Tables 1, 2). Among listed above), 2 = 25-50% infected, and 3 = the angiosperms, a high MI was recorded > 50% infected. The MI of each species was for Astelia menziesiana Sm., Cheirodendron calculated by averaging the MI of each sam­ sp., Coprosma kauensis (A. Gray) A. Heller, ple of the species examined. Dianella sandwicensis Hook. & Amott, M. Differences between intensity of infection polymorpha, and Peperomia hesperomannii of Anthophyta and Pterophyta were ana­ Wawra (Table 2). All 13 samples of M. lyzed using a t test, and differences in polymorpha were densely colonized by VAM incidence of mycorrhizae in members of fungi. Both VA and ericoid mycorrhizae were the two groups were assessed using the chi­ present in all collections of Vaccinium calyci­ square test, adjusted for small sample size. num Sm. and Styphelia tameiameiae (Cham. & For both tests,significance was indicated Schlee.) F. v. Muell., members of families when P < 0.05. whose members typically form only ericoid When ericoid mycorrhizae were found in mycorrhizae (Harley and Smith 1983). VAM roots, their presence was noted, but no rating previously have been reported to occur in of intensity of infection was assigned. these two species in Hawai'i (Koske et al. Voucher slides of roots have been pre­ 1990). served in the authors' collection. Voucher Among the pteridophytes, Vittaria elon­ specimens ofmost plant materials are lodged gata Sw., Mecodium recurvum (Gaud.) Co­ in the herbarium at the National Tropical pel., Elaphoglossum aemulum (Kaulf.) Brack, Botanical Garden, Uiwa'i, Kaua'i. Nomen­ and E. crassifolium (Gaud.) Anderson & clature for angiosperms is based on Wagner Crosby had the highest MI values (Table 2). et al. (1990) and for pteridophytes on Wagner Rhizome scales of E. wawrae (Luerss.) C. (1981) and Takhtajan (1986). Some data for Chr. often contained hyphae and vesicles the pteridophytes that are included in the re­ of VAM fungi. Mycorrhizae were present in sults section have been reported previously the epiphytic lycopod Huperzia phyllantha (Gemma et al. 1992). They are cited here for (Hook. & Amott) Holub. and absent from completeness. Psi/otum complanatum Sw. The average MI of all specimens was sig­ nificantly higher for the angiosperms (2.3) than for the pteridophytes (1.1), as was the RESULTS AND DISCUSSION frequency of mycorrhizae in the specimens VAM occurred in 62 ofthe 91 root systems examined (Table 1). Mycorrhizae were more examined. They were present in every angio­ common in the endemic species (18 of 23) sperm specimen examined (31 samples en­ than in the indigenous species (three of compassing eight species) and in 13 of the 22 seven), but the difference was not significant. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF OCCURRENCE OF MYCORRHIZAE IN HAWAllAN EpIPHYTES PARAMETERS ANTHOPHYTA PfEROPHYTAa TOTAL No. species examined 8 22 30 No. species mycorrhizalb 8a 13a 21 Average MI of species' 2.3a (±0.6) 1.1b (± 1.1) 1.6 (± 1.1) No. specimens examined 31 60 91 No. specimens mycorrhizal 3la 31b 62 aAlso includes Lycopodophyta and Psilophyta. bVA and ericoid mycorrhizae; values in rows followed by the same letter did not differ significantly (P = 0.05). 'MI, mycorrhizal index (see text). SD in parentheses. iJlii&& !'dlW'IP,npsNl$i W,@,! @§iPM. iiiM£i@ m • TABLE 2 MYCORRffiZAE IN HAWAllAN EpIPHYTES o TAXA M/n MI' STATUS' Anthophyta Araliaceae Cheirodendron sp. 1/1 3.0 E Epacridaceae Styphelia tameiameiae (Cham. & Schlee.) F. v. Muell. 2/2d 1.5 Ericaceae Vaccinium calycinum Sm. 2/2d 1.5 E Liliaceae Astelia menziesiana Sm. 5/5 3.0 E Dianel/a sandwicensis Hook. & Arnott 2/2 2.5 E Myrtaceae Metrosideros polymorpha Gaud. B/B 23 E Piperaceae Peperomia hesperomannii Wawra 4/4 2.3 E Rubiaceae Coprosma kauensis (A. Gray) A. Heller 2/2 2.5 E Psilophyta Psilotaceae Psilotum complanatum Sw. 2/0 0 Lycopodophyta Lycopodiaceae Huperzia phyl/antha (Hook. & Arnott) Holub. 1/1 1.0 E Pterophyta Ophioglossaceae Ophioglossum pendulum L. 3/4 2.3 Vittariaceae Vittaria elongata Sw. 2/2 3.0 Gramittidaceae Adenophorus abietinus (D.c. Eaton) K. A. Wilson 1/2 1.5 E A. pinnatifidus Gaud. 0/3 0 E A. tamariscinus (Kaulf.) Hook & Grev. 4/5 1.2 E Grammitis tenel/a Kaulf. 1/5 0.4 E G. baldwinii (Baker) Copel. 0/1 0 E Xiphiopteris saffordii (Maxon) Copel. 0/2 0 E Polypodiaceae Pleopeltis thundbergiana Kaulf. 0/1 0 Hymenophyllaceae Mecodium recurvum (Gaud.) Copel. 2/2 3.0 E Sphaerocionium lanceolatum (Hook. & Arnott) Copel. 3/5 1.0 E Vandenboscia daval/iodes (Gaud.) Copel. 0/1 0 E V. cyrtotheca (Hillebr.) Copel. 0/1 0 E Aspleniacae Asplenium nidus L. 0/1 0 Elaphoglossaceae Elaphoglossum aemulum (Kaulf.) Brack 4/4 2.5 E E. alatum Gaud. 3/4 1.2 E E. crassifolium (Gaud.) Anderson & Crosby 2/2 3.0 E E. hirtum (Sw.) C. Chr. 0/4 0 I E. pel/ucidum Gaud. 2/3 0.9 E E. wawrae (Luerss.) C. Chr. 2/3 1.7 E a M, no. of specimens with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae; n, no. of specimens examined. 'MI, average mycorrhizal index for the species (see text). eE, endemic; I, indigenous. d All specimens bore both ericoid and VA mycorrhizae. 178 PACIFIC SCIENCE, Volume 49, April 1995 The frequent occurrence of VAM in Ha­ thought to be rare or absent in epiphytic waiian epiphytes suggests that the fungi are pteridophytes (Boullard 1957, Cooper 1976, easily dispersed to the mossy mats that blan­ Berch and Kendrick 1982). The mycorrhizal ket the dead and living vegetation. Elevation status of epiphytic ferns and nonorchida­ of the substrate above the soil surface did not ceous angiosperms in tropical sites has only appear to correlate with MI, and MI values recently received much attention (Trappe of 3.0 were recorded from specimens col­ 1987, Lesica and Antibus 1990, Maffia et lected at all sampling heights. al. 1990). Of 12 species of epiphytic pter­ The means by which propagules of my­ idophytes examined in Costa Rican rain corrhizal fungi reach epiphytic habitats are forests, none was mycorrhizal (Lesica and not known. However, Hawaiian birds collect Antibus 1990). In that same survey, of 56 and transport fern rhizomes and roots, angiosperm species, only eight formed VAM, mosses, and other plant materials for nest four formed ericoid mycorrhizae, and six of building (van Riper and Scott 1979, Carl­ the 14 orchid species were mycorrhizal.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us