Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan

Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan

Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan for Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon Central Valley spring-run Chinook Salmon Central Valley Steelhead National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Region November 2009 1 Themes of the CV Recovery Plan • This is a long-term plan that will take several decades to fully implement • The recovery plan is intended to be a “living document” that is periodically updated to include the best available information regarding the status or needs of the species • Implementation will be challenging and will require the help of many stakeholders • The plan is intended to have realistic and attainable recovery criteria (i.e, de-listing criteria) 2 What are Recovery Plans? • Purpose of the Endangered Species Act: To conserve (recover) listed species and their ecosystems • Required under section 4(f) of the ESA for all Federally listed species • Provide the road map to species recovery • Must contain objective, measurable criteria for delisting a species • Guidance documents, not regulations 3 Winter-run Chinook salmon (Endangered) 4 Status of Species – Winter-run Chinook 5 Central Valley Spring-run Chinook salmon (Threatened) 6 Status of Species – Spring-run Chinook Declining abundance across range: Extinction risk is increasing Central Valley Spring-run Chinook Salmon Adult Summer Holding Escapement Rivers/Creeks 25,000 Sacramento Battle 20,000 Clear Beegum 15,000 Antelope Mill 10,000 Deer Big Chico 5,000 Butte 0 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 7 Central Valley steelhead (Threatened) 8 Key Threats • Dams: Block passage; 95% loss of spawning habitat for Central Valley salmonids • Water Diversions: Juvenile entrainment and flow modifications • In-river Predation: Contributes to low juvenile survival rates • Climate: Recent coastal upwelling conditions, long-term precipitation patterns • Habitat Loss and Fragmentation: loss of floodplain and riparian habitat • Hatcheries: Hybridization and reduced fitness • Fishery Effects: Ocean harvest of winter-run and spring-run Chinook salmon • Water Quality: Impaired water quality in the lower river systems and the Delta 9 Recovery Planning Foundational Principles: • Apply concepts of VSP Viable Salmonid Populations (VSP) • Technical Recovery Team: Population structure, extinction risk, species viability • Recovery must address the entire natural ecosystem (freshwater spawning, rearing and migration areas; estuarine habitats, and the Pacific Ocean) • Viable populations require a network of complex and interconnected habitats, which are created, altered, and maintained by natural physical process • Recovery strategies must address key threats 10 Central Valley r Chinook Salmon e iv R r o e t v n i e R m d a r u Diversity Groups c lo a C S c le M r t ive it it R L P Basalt and Porous Lava r Redding C C r ow C a reek e l C eek Northern Sierra Nevada tle Cr ek Bat um Cre Cottonwood Cr S Beeg .F. Ba ttle Cr eek e Cr Northwestern California elop Ant Red Bluff k ree ill C ek M Cre er Southern Sierra Nevada De eek Cr r s e me v ho i T R r e City h o t S c a to i e ny h F C C Central Valley r e g ek i B River/Creek k e e North Yuba River k r e C e te r t u C B y Diversity Groups n m to e t S s n i a South Yuba River M - r e v i R North Fork American River r e h t a e F These are ecoregions for Middle Fork American River spawning populations South Fork American River Sacramento • NW California Mokelumne River North Fork Stanislaus River Delta Stockton • Basalt and Porous Lava Tuolumne River Merced River Modesto • Northern Sierra Merced S a n J o a q u in • Southern Sierra R iv e r Fresno 11 Proposed Recovery Strategy A two-pronged approach • Secure existing populations (and habitat) — Core 1 Populations: Independent populations — Core 2 Populations: Dependent populations — Core 3 Populations: Small, ephemeral populations • Reintroduce fish to historic habitats — Primary candidate reintroduction areas — Secondary candidate reintroduction areas — Areas not considered for reintroduction 12 Area of Detail R OTT CR NES SC UM COS MO KELU K r MN F e E R, v S F N i K , R R S s PARDEE RE S u C U la A s a L i l IS n K if N ta F o A N T S , r S R n E i N a M U L O U er T iv e R Southern Sierra ! mn olu Tu NE R ! TUOLUM New! FK Melones , M E R Diversity Group R MN U GoodwinS! Tulloch OL U!! TU LA ! IS ! N ! ! A !! ! T ! !!! K S ! F ! !!!!!!!!! ! L r N ! A ! e ! Don Pedro , ! K iv R R R E D E ! MERC ed c D Mer La Grange M ! E TUOLUM !!! C N C E R! C !! !! ! ! ! R !! !! ! L !!! ! ! ! New U E R S FK M , Exchequer RCED R Core 1 and 2 Populations E ME !! R D ! ! E !! ! McSwain r C Oroville! e R ! iv E !!!!!! ! !! M !! R !!!! in • Calaveras steelhead !! u q New Bullards a o J an • Stanislaus steelhead S Englebright rre gue • Tuolumne steelhead Da r Friant ive • Merced steelhead Kings R ! ! ! !! R !! UIN !!! OAQ !!!! !!! ! AN J S ! ! Priority Areas for Reintroduction Fresno ! • San Joaquin River spring-run Chinook below Friant • Conduct feasibility studies and CV Spring Chinook habitat evaluations in other historic ! Passage Impediment " Dams watersheds # City ± River/Creeks Southern Sierra Nevada Populations 04.5 9 18 27 36 45 County Boundaries Miles 13 Multispecies Recovery Actions • Restore the ecological habitat function and reduce non-native fish predation in the lower Sacramento and San Joaquin River and the Delta • Provide ecological flows throughout the Sacramento and San Joaquin River basins and the Delta • Develop phased reintroduction plans for primary candidate watersheds • Implement all phases of the Battle Creek Restoration Program • Implement the San Joaquin River Restoration Program • Reduce the harvest of listed salmon in commercial and recreational ocean fisheries 14 Area of Detail R OTT CR NES SC UM COS MO KE K r LU F MN e E R, v S F N i K , R R S s PARDEE RE S u C U a A l a L is S l I n K if N ta F o A N T S , r S R n E ia MN U L O U er T iv e R ! mn olu Tu NE R ! TUOLUM New! FK Melones , M E R R UMN GoodwinS! Tulloch UOL U!! T LA ! IS ! N ! ! A !! ! T ! !!! K S ! F ! !!!!!!!!! ! L r ! N ! A e ! Don Pedro , ! K iv R R R E D E ! MERC ed c D er La Grange M M ! E TUOLUM !!! C NE C !! R! ! C !! ! L R !! !! ! !!! ! ! ! New U E R S FK M Exchequer CED R, E MER !! R D ! ! ! EOroville! ! McSwain r C ! e R ! iv E !!!!!! ! !! M !! R !!!! in !! u Southern Sierra New Bullards q a o J an S Englebright rre gue Diversity Group Da r Friant ive Kings R ! ! ! !! R !! UIN !!! OAQ !!!! !!! ! AN J S ! ! Fresno ! Recovery Actions CV Spring Chinook • Evaluate fish passage feasibility throughout SJ basin ! Passage Impediment " Dams # City ± River/Creeks Southern Sierra Nevada Populations 04.5 9 18 27 36 45 County Boundaries Miles • Develop and implement instream flow schedules in consideration of physical habitat modeling and life stage requirements — Cold water pool management • Improve lower San Joaquin River habitat conditions: — Floodplain availability, contaminant reductions, Stockton Ship Channel • Implement the San Joaquin River Restoration Program 15 Central Valley r Chinook Salmon e iv R r o e t v n i e R m d a r u Diversity Groups c lo a C S c le M r t ive it it R L P Basalt and Porous Lava r Redding C C r ow C a reek e l C reek Northern Sierra Nevada ttle C eek Ba m Cr Cottonwood Cr S Beegu .F. Ba ttle Cr eek e Cr Northwestern California elop Ant Red Bluff k ree ill C ek M Cre er Southern Sierra Nevada De eek Cr r s e me v ho i T R r e City h o t S c a to i e ny h F C C r e g ek i B River/Creek k e e North Yuba River k r e C e te r t u C B y n m o t e t S s n i a South Yuba River M - r e v i R North Fork American River r e h t a e F Middle Fork American River South Fork American River Sacramento Proposed Recovery Criteria Mokelumne River North Fork Stanislaus River Delta Stockton Tuolumne Rive r Merced River Modesto Merced S a n J o a q u in R iv e r DPS/ESU scale Fresno • At least two viable independent populations per diversity group • One dependent population per diversity group Population scale • Viable populations: >2,500 spawning adults & low hatchery influence each year for at least 10 years Threat abatement criteria • Specific criteria that address threats and factors affecting the species 16 Achieving Recovery NMFS Agencies Environmental Factors Institutional Stakeholders Education/ Outreach Changes 17 Next Steps • Draft Recovery Plan available at: http://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/recovery/centralvalleyplan.htm • 120-day Public Comment Period October 7 – February 3 • Review all comments and revise Recovery Plan accordingly • Issue Final Recovery Plan 2010 Comments may be submitted: • Via email - CentralValleyPlan.SWR@noaa.gov • Via regular mail - National Marine Fisheries Service, 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 8-300, Sacramento, CA 95814 18.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    18 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us