Genetic Analysis of Termite Colonies in Wisconsin

Genetic Analysis of Termite Colonies in Wisconsin

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION Genetic Analysis of Termite Colonies in Wisconsin 1,2,3 2,4 1 2 5 R. A. ARANGO, D. A. MARSCHALEK, F. GREEN III, K. F. RAFFA, AND M. E. BERRES Environ. Entomol. 44(3): 890–897 (2015); DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvv023 ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to document current areas of subterranean termite activity in Wisconsin and to evaluate genetic characteristics of these northern, peripheral colonies. Here, ampli- fied fragment-length polymorphism was used to characterize levels of inbreeding, expected heterozygos- ity, and percent polymorphism within colonies as well as genetic structure among populations sampled. Genetic analysis revealed two species of termites occur in Wisconsin, Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) and Reticulitermes tibialis Banks, both found in the southern half of the state. Colonies of both species in Wisconsin are thought to represent the northern boundary of their current distributions. Measurements of within colony genetic variation showed the proportion of polymorphic loci to be between 52.9–63.9% and expected heterozygosity to range from 0.122–0.189. Consistent with geographical isolation, strong intercolony genetic differences were observed, with over 50% of FST values above 0.25 and the remain- ing showing moderate levels of genetic differentiation. Combined with low levels of inbreeding in most collection locations (FIS 0.042–0.123), we hypothesize termites were introduced numerous times in the state, likely by anthropogenic means. We discuss the potential effects of these genetic characteristics on successful colony establishment of termites along the northern boundary compared with termites in the core region of their distribution. KEY WORDS Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar), Reticulitermes tibialis Banks, amplified fragment- length polymorphism, GENELAND, genetic population structure Worldwide, an estimated US$22 billion is spent annu- number of studies (Esenther 1969, Raffoul et al. 2011, ally on termite control and repair costs, with 80% of Vargo 2003, Vargo and Husseneder 2009). In particular, this cost thought to be associated with subterranean termite colonies located along their northern range termites specifically (Rust and Su 2012). In North have shown differences in reproduction and dispersal America, much of this damage is caused by two subter- compared to colonies from the southern United States. ranean termite species, the widely distributed, eastern For example, colonies along their northern range are subterranean termite, Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar), thought to grow primarily by means of secondary re- and the invasive species, Coptotermes formosanus Shir- productives and subsequent budding (Esenther 1969, aki, which is distributed along the southern United Raffoul et al. 2011), which is underground colony ex- States in the Gulf coast region (Austin et al. 2006). pansion or isolation of parts of a larger colony, rather Colonies of R. flavipes are most prevalent in the than nuptial alate flights. This phenomenon tends to warmer, southeastern region of North America, al- limit the spread of termites geographically, and creates though their range does extend to a number of loca- large, long-lived, super colonies in northern regions tions further north. Currently, it is thought that termite compared with their counterparts further south colonies in Wisconsin are located along the northern (Esenther 1969, 1980; Grace et al. 1989). edge for the known distribution of this species. North Differences in colony establishment can be reflected of this range, cold winters and deep soil frost lines are in genetic trends that can be seen at the colony level. A thought to impede colony establishment (Esenther number of studies have attempted to elucidate mecha- 1961, 1969). nisms of colony formation (e.g., alate flights vs. intro- Although subterranean termites are widely distrib- duction and budding) and subsequent colony structure uted in North America, characteristics of these colonies in termites using genetic techniques (e.g., microsatel- have been shown to vary by geographic location in a lites, amplified fragment-length polymorphisms [AFLP], T-RFLP; Reilly 1987; Wang and Grace 1995; Husseneder et al. 1998; Thompson and Hebert 1998; 1 USDA Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Products Laboratory, Forschler and Jenkins 1999; Bulmer et al. 2001; Garcı´a One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53726. 2 Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, et al. 2002; Austin et al. 2005, 2006; Vargo and Husse- 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706. neder 2009; Scaduto et al. 2012). These studies have 3 Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]. shown significant variation in patterns of colony estab- 4 Department of Biology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campa- lishment and reproduction, not only among species, nile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182. 5 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin- but also within a single species (Bulmer et al. 2001). In Madison, 542 Animal Sciences Building, 1675 Observatory Drive, areas where termite swarms are common, an unrelated Madison, WI 53706. alate pair can establish new colonies with subsequent Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2015. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US. June 2015 ARANGO ET AL.: GENETIC ANALYSIS OF TERMITE COLONIES IN WISCONSIN 891 reproduction by their descendants or by secondary re- Each sample was diluted to 50 ng/mlinTrisbuffer(pH productives formed within the colony. In more north- 8.0) and electrophoresed a second time to visually con- ern areas, especially where colonies may be established firm the uniformity of each dilution. by anthropogenic movement of infested material, pop- Genetic fingerprints were generated with AFLP ulations are thought to grow by differentiation of work- (Vos et al. 1995) following modified protocols described ers into secondary reproductives (Esenther 1969, in Berres (2003). First, 200 ng of DNA was digested to 1980). Despite evidence that termite colonies in the completion with 20 U EcoRI (50-GjAATTC-30)and10 northern range differ from southern colonies, few stud- U AseI (50-ATjTAAT-30). Following heat inactivation at ies have focused specifically on these northern colonies 65C for 20 min, double-stranded adaptor sequences of R. flavipes particularly in terms of colony distribution EcoRI-AD and BfaI-AD (75 pmoles each) with over- and development, and degrees of genetic variation and hangs complementary to the digested ends were ligated differentiation (e.g., gene flow). overnightat16C with 400U T4 DNA ligase. Ligated Advances in molecular based technologies have cre- samples were diluted 1:4 with sterile 10 mM Tris-HCl ated the ability to use genetic markers to examine the (pH 8.0). genetic population structure in termites. The primary Preselective PCR amplifications were performed objective of this study was to document all known areas in 50 ml volumes (1X GoTaq Flexi Buffer, 1.5 mM of termite activity in Wisconsin and to evaluate the de- MgCl2, 0.05 mM dNTP, 2% freshly prepared/deionized gree of genetic variation and differentiation among sam- formamide, 1.25U Taq DNA Pol I) containing 10 ml ples from these colonies. Based on current field diluted ligation mixture and 15 pmoles each of observations and published reports, we hypothesized primers EcoRIþG(50-GACTGCGTACCAATTCG-30) that the isolated nature and lack of winged reproductives and AseIþG(50- GATGAGTCCTGAGTAATG-30). has potential to create high levels of inbreeding within Thermocycling consisted of one cycle of 72Cfor termite colonies in turn, reducing intracolony genetic di- 2 min, an initial denature at 94C for 1 min followed by versity while increasing among-colony genetic differ- 25cycleseachof94C for 50 s, 56C anneal for 1 min, ences. Studying termite populations along their northern and 72C extension for 2 min. Preselective amplifica- range will provide insight into colony formation and per- tion products were normally diluted 1:19 in sterile sistence in a colder climate. Additionally, characteristics 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) but those with lower amplifi- within these peripheral populations will provide infor- cation (determined qualitatively by agarose gel electro- mation to better evaluate environmental factors that in- phoresis) were diluted 1:9. This extra step was included fluence or control population dispersal, which may so that the selective PCR would start with similar become important if rising global temperatures allow template concentrations. termites to continue expanding their northern range. Selective PCR amplification was performed in 25 ml volumes (1X GoTaq Flexi Buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.3 mM dNTP, 2% freshly prepared/deionized formamide, Materials and Methods 0.625U Taq DNA Pol I) containing 5 ml diluted pream- An extensive survey of termite populations through- plification mixture, 5 pmoles HPLC-purified primer out Wisconsin was conducted using pest control opera- EcoRIþGG (50- GACTGCGTACCAATTCGG-30)la- tors, extension agencies and field observations. beled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM), and 25 Termites were collected from 12 of the 18 known active pmoles AseI þ GT (50-GATGAGTCCTGAGTAATGT- colonies, which included two separate colonies in both 30). Thermocycling consisted of an initial 94Cdenature La Crosse and Oshkosh. A sample from Mississippi for 1 min followed by 10 cycles of a 1-min annealing (Harrison County, MS) was also collected to serve as a touchdown (1C decrease

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us