Catalogue of Latvian Leaf-Beetles (Coleoptera: Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae & Chrysomelidae)

Catalogue of Latvian Leaf-Beetles (Coleoptera: Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae & Chrysomelidae)

Latvijas Entomologs 2013, 52: 3-57. 3 Catalogue of Latvian leaf-beetles (Coleoptera: Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae & Chrysomelidae) ANDRIS BUKEJS Vienības iela 42-29, LV-5401, Daugavpils, Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] BUKEjS A. 2013. Catalogue OF Latvian LEAF-BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: MEGALOPODIDAE, ORSODACNIDAE & Chrysomelidae). – Latvijas Entomologs 52: 3-57. Abstract: Critical catalogue of Latvian leaf-beetles (Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae & Chrysomelidae) is presented. In the current work all available bibliography on Latvian leaf-beetles are reviewed and analyzed. In total, 326 species are confirmed from Latvia till now, although few of them are known from the old records only, and their occurrence in the local fauna should be confirmed by new material. All doubtful species recorded till now from Latvia are commented and removed from the list. Key words: Coleoptera, Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae, Chrysomelidae, Latvia, fauna, bibliography, catalogue. Introduction Kaliningrad region (Russian enclave in Central Europe) – 280 (Alekseev 2003; Leaf-beetles, represented by 30 000–50 Bukejs, Alekseev 2009, 2012; Alekseev, 000 species, are one of the largest families of Bukejs 2010, 2011; Alekseev et al. 2012). the order Coleoptera worldwide (Bieńkowski The first information on leaf-beetles 2004; Brovdij 1985; jolivet 1988). They (Chrysomelidae s. l.) from the present territory are phytophagous: imagines mostly occur of Latvia was published in the second half of on leaves and flowers, larvae mostly feed the 18th century in the works of j.B. Fischer on leaves and roots, occasionally larvae are (1778, 1784, 1791). In the first edition of saprophagous or carpophagous. Some species his monograph describing nature of Livland of leaf-beetles are considered serious pests (Fischer 1778), three species of leaf-beetles, of agriculture and forestry (Kryzhanovskij Cassida viridis LINNAEUS, 1758, Phratora 1974; Lopatin, Nesterova 2005). vulgatissima (LINNAEUS, 1758) and Chysolina At the moment of publishing of sturmi (WESTHOFF, 1882) were mentioned. this catalogue (March 2013), 5 species of After some additions (Fischer 1784), in the Megalopodidae, 1 species of Orsodacnidae second edition of the monograph (Fischer and 320 species of Chrysomelidae are 1791) 18 species were already mentioned. confirmed in Latvian fauna. The number Till now, 176 works containing of known species of Chrysomelidae s. l. in information on leaf-beetles in Latvia were adjacent territories slightly varies: Belarus published. The research history of Latvian – 350 species (Alexandrovitch et al. 1996; Chrysomelidae s. l. has been summarized Barševskis 2001; Lopatin, Nesterova 2005), in Bukejs (2008) where all available Estonia – 267 species (Silfverberg 2010a; bibliographic information was reviewed Bukejs 2012), Lithuania – 317 species and analyzed. Since that, 35 additional (Tamutis et al. 2011; Bukejs et al. 2012), papers were published, in which data on 4 Catalogue of Latvian leaf-beetles (Coleoptera: Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae ... chrysomelids of the Latvian fauna can be Methods obtained. Taxonomical and biogeographical analysis of Latvian leaf-beetle fauna was The species listed in the current made in Bukejs (2012a). catalogue are arranged in families, Several papers with reviews of subfamilies, tribes and subtribes. The order leaf-beetle taxa of the Latvian fauna of higher taxa is arranged according to the were published: on Neocrepidodera and Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, volume Crepidodera (Bukejs 2009b), Aphthona 6 (Löbl, Smetana 2010), synonymy and (Bukejs 2009d), Psylliodes (Bukejs 2009g), nomenclature for species level were used Phratora (Bukejs 2009j), Chrysomela after this catalogue also. Species and genera (Bukejs 2010a), Longitarsus (Bukejs are arranged alphabetically. 2010h), Chrysolina (Bukejs et al. 2010a), Species certainly recorded from Latvia Gonioctena (Bukejs et al. 2010b), Altica are marked with index number; excluded (Bukejs 2011a), Galerucinae (Bukejs 2009f), and doubtful species are marked with (-). In Cassidinae (Bukejs et al. 2009), Bruchinae catalogue synonyms, if any, and references to (Bukejs 2010j), Donaciinae (Bukejs 2010k), bibliographic sources, where the appropriate Eumolpinae (Bukejs 2010l). species indicated for the Latvian fauna, were New faunal data on Latvian leaf- mentioned for species after its scientific beetles were published in Barševskis et al. name. (2008, 2009), Bukejs (2009c, 2009e, 2009h, 2009i, 2010b, 2010c, 2010f, 2010g, 2011b, 2012b), Telnov et al. (2010, 2011). Annotated catalogue of Latvian In Ulanowsky (1883) faunal data on Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae & leaf-beetles from eastern Latvia is given. Chrysomelidae However, part of records is doubtful and occurrence of some mentioned species in Family Megalopodidae LATREILLE, 1802 local fauna is incredible. Barševskis (1993a) Subfamily Zeugophorinae BÖVING et has the same opinion. In the current catalogue CRAIGHEAD, 1931 data from Ulanowsky (1883) are not used. In Genus Zeugophora KUNZE, 1818 other lists of Latvian beetle families (Spuris 1981, 1983, 1984, 1990, 1991, 1991a; 1. Z. flavicollis (MARSHAM, 1802) Barševskis 2003; Barševskis et al. 2005) this Šmits 1962; Pūtele 1974, 1980, 1981, paper is not also mentioned. 1981a, 1984; Barševskis, Savenkovs 1992; Several leaf-beetle species were Barševskis 1992, 1993a; Telnov et al. 1997; removed from the Latvian fauna in recent Telnov 2004; Kalniņš et al. 2007; Bukejs papers, but in the Catalogue of Palaearctic 2009c, 2012a. Coleoptera Vol. 6 (Löbl, Smetana 2010) many of those have been erroneously mentioned as 2. Z. frontalis SUFFRIAN, 1840 still belonging to Latvia. Telnov et al. 1997; Barševskis 2001, 2002; The aim of the current work is Telnov 2004; Bukejs 2009c, 2010d, 2012a. to summarize and analyze previous bibliographic data and to compile the 3. Z. scutellaris SUFFRIAN, 1840 catalogue of Latvian Chrysomelidae s. l. Šmits 1962; Pūtele 1980, 1981, 1981a, 1984; according to modern systematics. Barševskis 1993a, 2002; Bukejs 2009c, 2010d, 2012a, 2012b. Latvijas Entomologs 2013, 52: 3-57. 5 4. Z. subspinosa (FABRICIUS, 1781) 9. A. obtectus (SAY, 1831) Kawall 1866a; Seidlitz 1872-1875, 1887- Smarods, Liepa 1956; Trauberga 1957 1891; Rathlef 1905; Trauberga 1957; Pūtele (Bruchidius); Šmits, Spuris 1966; Spuris 1974, 1980, 1981, 1981a, 1984; Barševskis 1974; Barševskis 1993a; Telnov et al. 1997; 1988, 1993a, 2002; Telnov et al. 1997; Telnov Telnov 2004; Bukejs 2010e, 2010j, 2012a. 2004; Kalniņš et al. 2007; Bukejs, Telnov 2007; Bukejs 2009c, 2012a, 2012b. Genus Bruchidius SCHILSKY, 1905 5. Z. turneri POWER, 1863 10. B. marginalis (FABRICIUS, 1776) Seidlitz 1887-1891; Rathlef 1905; Pūtele Barševskis 1996, 2001, 2002; Telnov et al. 1980, 1981, 1981a, 1981b, 1984; Barševskis 1997 (Bruchus); Barševskis et al. 2004; 1993a, 2002; Telnov et al. 1997; Telnov Telnov 2004; Telnov et al. 2005; Bukejs 2004; Bukejs 2009c, 2010d, 2012a. 2010e, 2010j, 2012a. Family Orsodacnidae C.G. THOMSON, 1859 (-) B. unicolor (OLIVIER, 1795) Subfamily Orsodacninae C.G. THOMSON, Bukejs 2010d, 2010e, 2010j. 1859 Note: Only Ulanowski (1883) mentioned Genus Orsodacne LATREILLE, 1802 Bruchidius olivaceus GErmar, 1824 [as Bruchus] for Latvia. Previously, B. olivaceus 6. O. cerasi (LINNAEUS, 1758) was considered as synonym of B. unicolor Fleischer 1829; Seidlitz 1872-1875, 1887- (oLiviEr, 1795). According to Anton (2010) 1891; Heyden 1903; Rathlef 1905; Lindberg B. olivaceus is valid species and known 1932; Trauberga 1957; Stiprais 1977; from Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Barševskis 1988, 1993a, 2002; Rūtenberga Italy, Turkey and Algeria. Therefore its 1992; Telnov et al. 1997; Telnov 2004; occurrence in the Latvian fauna is unlikely Kalniņš et al. 2007; Bukejs 2009c, 2010d, and it is excluded from the list of Latvian 2012a, 2012b. Chrysomelidae. Family Chrysomelidae LATREILLE, 1802 11. B. villosus (FABRICIUS, 1792) Subfamily Bruchinae LATREILLE, 1802 = ater Marsham, 1802 Tribe Amblycerini BRIDWELL, 1932 Bukejs 2010d, 2010e, 2010j, 2012a. Genus Spermophagus SCHÖENHERR, 1833 Subtribe Bruchina LATREILLE, 1802 7. S. calystegiae (LUKJANOVITSH et TER- Genus Bruchus LINNAEUS, 1767 MINASSIAN, 1957) Bukejs 2010d, 2010e, 2012a. 12. B. affinis FRÖLICH, 1799 Barševskis 1993a, 2002; Telnov et al. 1997; 8. S. sericeus (GEOFFROY, 1785) Telnov 2004; Bukejs 2010e, 2010j, 2012a. Telnov 2004; Telnov et al. 2005; Bukejs 2010d, 2010e, 2010j, 2012a. 13. B. atomarius (LINNAEUS, 1760) = granarius LINNAEUS, 1767 Tribe Bruchini LATREILLE, 1802 Precht 1818 (granarius); Seidlitz 1872- Subtribe Acanthoscelidina BRIDWELL, 1946 1875 (granarius L.), 1887-1891 (granarius Genus Acanthoscelides SCHILSKY, 1905 L.); Rathlef 1905 (Mylabridae: Mylabris); Barševskis 1993a, 2002; Telnov et al. 1997; 6 Catalogue of Latvian leaf-beetles (Coleoptera: Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae ... Telnov 2004; Bukejs 2006, 2008g; Kalniņš et Šmits 1962; Stiprais 1977; Barševskis 1988, al. 2007; Bukejs 2010d, 2010e, 2010j, 2012a. 1993a, 2002; Telnov et al. 1997; Telnov 2004; Valainis et al. 2007; Kalniņš et al. 14. B. laticollis BOHEMAN, 1833 2007; Bukejs 2010d, 2010k, 2012a. Telnov 2004; Telnov et al. 2005; Bukejs 2010d, 2010e, 2010j, 2012a. 20. D. bicolora ZSCHACH, 1788 = sagittariae Fabricius, 1792 15. B. loti PAYKULL, 1800 Precht 1818 (sagittariae); Seidlitz 1872- Seidlitz 1872-1875, 1887-1891; Rathlef 1875 (sagittariae F.), 1887-1891; Rathlef 1905 (Mylabridae: Mylabris); Lackschewitz, 1905; Spuris 1953, 1974; Šmits, Spuris Mikutowicz 1939 (Mylabris); Spuris 1974; 1966; Stiprais 1977; Barševskis

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    55 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us