Examination of the Oxidation of Iron by Oxygen Using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and QUASESTM

Examination of the Oxidation of Iron by Oxygen Using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and QUASESTM

Surface Science 565 (2004) 151–162 www.elsevier.com/locate/susc Examination of the oxidation of iron by oxygen using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and QUASESTM A.P. Grosvenor a,b,*, B.A. Kobe a, N.S. McIntyre a,b a Surface Science Western, Room G-1, Western Science Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ont., Canada N6A 5B7 b Department of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ont., Canada N6A5B7 Received 22 March 2004; accepted for publication 21 June 2004 Available online 21 July 2004 Abstract TM Oxidation of iron (Fe) by oxygen (O2) at low pressures was investigated using XP spectra and QUASES Analyze and Generate software programs. The results indicated that the oxide films produced after short oxygen exposure times contained a mixture of magnetite (Fe3O4) and maghemite (c-Fe2O3) without distinct interfaces between the two being seen. Further investigation suggested that a reaction mechanism involving cationic diffusion was mostly responsible for the formation of Fe3O4, while a mechanism involving anionic diffusion was responsible for c-Fe2O3 growth. The kinet- ics of the overall reaction were also investigated and found to follow a direct logarithmic relationship with increasing time. The rates of oxide growth were calculated for different pressures studied at the same temperature and found to be the same. This observation was used to conclude that the rate-limiting step was the formation of a thin oxide film by place-exchange and not anionic or cationic diffusion. Ó 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; Iron; Oxidation; Tunneling 1. Introduction the past [1–9]. Exposure of iron to low pressures of dry oxygen gas at room temperature results in The near surface structures produced during an oxide that has been reported to consist qualita- oxidation of iron have received great attention in tively of a layer of Fe3O4 covered by a second layer of c-Fe2O3 [4–6]. Other researchers examining the oxidation of single crystal Fe(100) have suggested * Corresponding author. Surface Science Western, Room G- that a mixture of oxides rather than distinct oxide 1, Western Science Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ont., Canada N6A 5B7. Tel.: +1 519 661 2173/2111; layers are found [7]. Kinetic studies performed by fax: +1 519 661 3709. Graham et al. [9] using a manometric method to E-mail address: [email protected] (A.P. Grosvenor). measure oxygen uptake at temperatures between 0039-6028/$ - see front matter Ó 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.susc.2004.06.210 152 A.P. Grosvenor et al. / Surface Science 565 (2004) 151–162 25 and 300 °C found that the oxide formation fol- length and the energy loss function (inelastic elec- lowed a logarithmic function with increasing time. tron scattering cross-section) used. The initial oxi- The oxide in this study was assumed to be uniquely dation study of Fe using several pressures of O2 Fe3O4 and the amount of oxide formed was found [18] showed that the oxide layer did, in fact, con- to increase as the surfaces were changed from sin- tain a layered mixture of the oxides Fe3O4 and c- gle crystal to polycrystalline [9]. These kinetic re- Fe2O3. sults have been confirmed at temperatures below This paper reports a comprehensive study of the 200 °C using XPS [10]. Above 200 °C, however, effect of time, temperature and pressure on the plots of oxide thickness versus oxygen exposure growth of surface oxides during exposure of poly- have shown a greatly increased slope indicating a crystalline Fe to O2. The initiation of metal oxida- probable change in mechanism [10]. Oxidation tion at low temperature has been suggested to studies of Fe carried out in O2 at pressures of less result from field induced electron transport/tunnel- than 1 · 105 Pa and temperatures ranging from ling under constant potential from the metal 800 to 1000 °C have indicated that the oxidation through an existing thin oxide film to adsorbed kinetics obeyed a parabolic law [11]. oxygen [8]. The oxide initially grows quickly, with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) has the rate flattening out when the potential across been used heavily to determine surface oxide com- the layer starts to become significantly low [2]. position and to measure changes in oxide thickness From this model, an inverse logarithmic growth [10,12–14]. In the past, XPS has had limited capac- versus time relationship has been derived: ity to probe compositions and structures beneath W qaE dx Àð À Þ the outermost oxide and to provide a well defined ¼ NXme kT ð1Þ measure of the interfaces that are known or ex- dt pected to be present following a reaction of metal where x = oxide thickness, t = time, N = potential and oxygen. However, the development of meth- number of mobile ions, X = oxide volume per mo- ods to analyze the extrinsic loss structure present bile ion, m = atomic vibration frequency, W = en- in all XP spectra [15,16] appears poised to increase ergy barrier to ion movement into the oxide, the density of information available on surface q = ionic charge (Ze), a = half the ion jump dis- structures. Specifically, such methods seem capa- tance, E = the electric field (V/x), k = BoltzmannÕs ble of providing much improved definition, both constant, and T = the temperature at which the to the identification of oxide structures as well as reaction occurs [2]. The integrated equation is usu- their thicknesses. ally represented as 1 ¼ kT ln t + constant [2]. Research in this laboratory using XPS and x qaV QUASESTM Generate and Analyze [17] software Direct logarithmic kinetics proposed by Eley programs has shown that the QUASESTM algo- and Wilkinson [19] also allows for an electron tun- rithms are suitable for studying the oxidation of nelling mechanism, but for film growth under con- Fe [18]. These algorithms are used to model the stant field conditions: extrinsic loss structures found in XP spectra, and dx 0:6 bx E 0:6 cx ¼ aP eÀ ¼ AeÀRT P eÀRT ð2Þ from this, determine the depth at which the loss sig- dt nals originate [15]. ‘‘Analyze’’ models the extrinsic background of a photoelectron peak, allowing one where A = the pre-exponential value, E = activa- to determine the range of depth at which the bulk tion energy, P = reaction pressure, T = tempera- structure originated. ‘‘Generate’’, on the other ture, x = thickness of the oxide at time t, and hand, allows the experimental spectra to be mod- c = increase in activation free energy with thick- elled using various combinations of reference spec- ness of the oxide film [19]. The inclusion of P in tra whose extrinsic backgrounds have been altered the equation indicates the importance of the oxy- based on the depth at which they are found within gen concentration to the reaction and is thus more the surface [17,18]. The accuracy of the thickness appropriate for a mechanism involving anion dif- determined is dependent upon the attenuation fusion [2]. A.P. Grosvenor et al. / Surface Science 565 (2004) 151–162 153 This paper describes the oxidation of Fe under [20]. The vacuum in the reaction chamber was con- low temperature ( 6 150 °C) and pressure condi- trolled using multiple turbo-molecular pumps. tions. Specific attention will be paid to the individ- ual reactions governing the growth of Fe3O4 and 2.2. Reactions c-Fe2O3. The kinetics of the reaction will be shown to be modelled best using a logarithmic equation. To oxidize the clean Fe surface, medical grade oxygen (Praxair) dried by passage through a silica gel column (6–8 mesh, EM Science) was used. The 2. Experimental polyvinyl tube used to carry the oxygen into the instrument from the gas cylinder was pumped 2.1. Sample preparation out under vacuum for 24 h prior to beginning the study to remove as much adsorbate contami- Pure polycrystalline iron rod (99.995%) from nation as possible. After introduction into the vac- Alfa-Aesar was cut into 3.4 mm disks using a dia- uum chamber where dosing was performed, the mond saw with one surface being polished to a samples were exposed to the reactant gas for 120 À2 2 mirror finish using 0.05 lm c-Al2O3. Samples were s at pressures of 1.3 · 10 , 1.3, and 1.3 · 10 Pa degreased in methanol using an ultrasonic cleaner measured using a Pirani gauge and temperatures and then loaded into a Kratos AXIS Ultra XPS of 27 ± 2 and 150 ± 1 °C. The total dose in Lang- for oxygen treatment and analysis. All samples muirs (L) was calculated by using the average pres- were cleaned again in the vacuum chamber of the sure of O2 that the surface experienced. The Kratos spectrometer first by sputter cleaning the reaction kinetics were also observed at oxygen dos- surface for 10 min using a 4 kV Ar+ ion beam, then ing pressures of 1.3 · 10À2 and 1.3 Pa. The expo- by annealing in vacuum at 600 °C for 30 min. sure times were 20, 200, and 2000 s with the After in vacuo cleaning, all samples were analyzed temperature held at 27 ± 1 °C. When oxidizing by XPS to confirm that all contaminate species (C, the samples, a certain amount of time was always Na, etc.) had been removed and that no oxides required to increase the O2 pressure to the wanted remained. value. Although the amount of O2 to which the After the surface was determined to be free of surface was exposed was very small, it cannot be oxides, it was transferred into another vacuum ruled out that some oxide did in fact form during chamber of the XPS where the dosing experiments this time period.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us