Geometry of Manifolds, Lecture 3 M

Geometry of Manifolds, Lecture 3 M

Geometry of manifolds, lecture 3 M. Verbitsky Geometry of manifolds lecture 3: partition of unity Misha Verbitsky Math in Moscow and HSE February 18, 2013 1 Geometry of manifolds, lecture 3 M. Verbitsky Sheaves of functions (reminder) DEFINITION: An open cover of a topological space X is a family of open S sets fUig such that i Ui = X. DEFINITION: A presheaf of functions on a topological space M is a collection of subrings F(U) ⊂ C(U) in the ring C(U) of all functions on U, for each open subset U ⊂ M, such that the restriction of every γ 2 F(U) to an open subset U1 ⊂ U belongs to F(U1). DEFINITION: A presheaf of functions F is called a sheaf of functions if these subrings satisfy the following condition. Let fUig be a cover of an open subset U ⊂ M (possibly infinite) and fi 2 F(Ui) a family of functions defined on the open sets of the cover and compatible on the pairwise intersections: = fijUi\Uj fjjUi\Uj for every pair of members of the cover. Then there exists f 2 F(U) such that fi is the restriction of f to Ui for all i. REMARK: A presheaf of functions is a collection of subrings of functions on open subsets, compatible with restrictions. A sheaf of fuctions is a presheaf allowing \gluing" a function on a bigger open set if its restrictions to smaller open sets are compatible. 2 Geometry of manifolds, lecture 3 M. Verbitsky Ringed spaces (reminder) A ringed space (M; F) is a topological space equipped with a sheaf of func- Ψ tions. A morphism (M; F) −! (N; F0) of ringed spaces is a continuous map Ψ M −! N such that, for every open subset U ⊂ N and every function f 2 F0(U), the function ∗f := f ◦ Ψ belongs to the ring F Ψ−1(U) . An isomorphism of ringed spaces is a homeomorphism Ψ such that Ψ and Ψ−1 are morphisms of ringed spaces. DEFINITION: Let (M; F) be a topological manifold equipped with a sheaf of functions. It is said to be a smooth manifold of class C1 or Ci if every point in (M; F) has an open neighborhood isomorphic to the ringed space n 0 n n 0 (B ; F ), where B ⊂ R is an open ball and F is a ring of functions on an n open ball B of this class. DEFINITION: Diffeomorphism of smooth manifolds is a homeomorphism ' which induces an isomorphims of ringed spaces, that is, ' and '−1 map (locally defined) smooth functions to smooth functions. Assume from now on that all manifolds are Hausdorff and of class C1. 3 Geometry of manifolds, lecture 3 M. Verbitsky Charts and coordinates (reminder) DEFINITION: Coordinate system on a manifold M is an open subset V ⊂ 1 ∼ n 1 n M equipped with an isomorphism of ringed spaces (V; C V ) = (B ;C B ) per definition of a manifold. DEFINITION: A chart on a smooth manifold (M; C1M) is an open subset n U ⊂ M together with an embedding : U −! R given by smooth func- 1 tions '1; :::; 'n 2 C M inducing a diffeomorphism on any open subset V ⊂ U 1 ∼ n 1 n equipped with a coordinate system (V; C V ) = (B ;C B ). n DEFINITION: Transition map between two charts 1 : U1 −! R and n 2 : U2 −! R is a map Ψij : 1(U1 \ U2) −! 2(U1 \ U2) defined as Ψij(x) = −1 2( 1 (x)). CLAIM: Transition maps are smooth. Proof: In local coordinates all functions '1; :::; 'n used in the definition of the transition map are smooth. 4 Geometry of manifolds, lecture 3 M. Verbitsky Atlases on manifolds (reminder) DEFINITION: An atlas on a smooth manifold is a collection of charts n S fUi; i : Ui −! R g satisfying Ui = M together with their transition maps. REMARK: In such a situation, the charts Ui are usually identified with n their images (Ui) ⊂ R . REMARK: The sheaf C1M can be reconstructed from an atlas as follows: a function f on U ⊂ M is smooth if and only if its restrictions to U \ Ui are smooth on all charts. 5 Geometry of manifolds, lecture 3 M. Verbitsky Locally finite covers (reminder) DEFINITION: An open cover fUαg of a topological space M is called locally finite if every point in M has a neighborhood intersecting only a finite number of Uα. CLAIM: Let fUαg be a locally finite atlas on a manifold M. Then there exists a refinement fVβg of fUαg such that a closure of each Vβ is compact in M. THEOREM: Let fUαg be a countable locally finite cover of a Hausdorff topological space, such that a closure of each Uα is compact. Then there exists another cover fVαg indexed by the same set, such that Vα b Uα. n REMARK: If all Uα are diffeomorphic to R , all Vα can be chosen diffeo- morphic to an open ball. Indeed, any compact set is contained in an open ball. COROLLARY: Let M be a manifold admitting a locally finite countable n cover fVαg, with 'α : Vα −! R diffeomorphisms. Then there exists another 0 n 0 atlas fUα;'α : Uα −! R g, such that 'α(B) is also a cover of M, and n B ⊂ R a unit ball. 6 Geometry of manifolds, lecture 3 M. Verbitsky Construction of a partition of unity n CLAIM: There exists a smooth function ν : R −! [0; 1] which vanishes n outside of a unit ball B ⊂ R and is positive on B. Proof. Step 1: There exists a smooth function a : R −! R which is >0 0 −x−2 >0 0 positive on R and 0 on R6 . Take a = e on R and a = 0 on R6 . Step 2: There exists a smooth function b : R −! R vanishing outside of [0; 1] and positive on the open interval ]0; 1[. Take b(x) = a(x)a(1 − x). Step 3: There exists a smooth function c : R −! R equal to 0 on ]1; 1[ −1 R x and equal to 1 on ] − 1; 0[. Take c(x) = 1 − λ −∞ b(x)dx, where λ := R 1 −∞ b(x)dx. 2 Step 4: Now, let ν(z) := c(jzj ). This function is smooth, vanishes on jzj > 1, and positive on jzj < 1. 0 νi REMARK: In assumptions of Corollary, let να(z) := ν('α), and µi := P . α να Then µα : M −! [0; 1] are smooth functions with support in Uα satisfying P α µα = 1. Such a set of functions is called a partition of unity. 7 Geometry of manifolds, lecture 3 M. Verbitsky Partition of unity: a formal definition DEFINITION: Let M be a smooth manifold and let fUαg a locally finite cover of M.A partition of unity subordinate to the cover fUαg is a family of smooth functions fi : M ! [0; 1] with compact support indexed by the same indices as the Ui's and satisfying the following conditions. (a) Every function fi vanishes outside Ui P (b) i fi = 1 The argument of previous page proves the following theorem. THEOREM: Let fUαg be a countable, locally finite cover of a manifold M, n with all Uα diffeomorphic to R . Then there exists a partition of unity subordinate to fUαg. 8 Geometry of manifolds, lecture 3 M. Verbitsky Whitney's theorem for compact manifolds THEOREM: Let M be a compact smooth manifold. Then M admits a N closed smooth embedding to R . n Proof. Step 1: Choose a finite atlas fVi;'i : Vi −! R ; i = 1; 2; :::; mg, and subordinate partution of unity µi : M −! [0; 1]. Let α : [0; 1] −! [0; 1] be a smooth, monotonous function mapping 0 to 0 and [1=2m; 1] to 1, and νi := α(µi). Step 2: Denote by Wi the set of interior points of W i := fz j νi(z) = 1g = 1 Pm fz j µi(z) > 2mg: Since i=1 µi = 1, the set fWig is a cover of M. (νi'i(z);1−νi(z)) Step 3: For each i, the map Φi(z) := is smooth and induces j(νi'i(z);1−νi(z))j n n+1 a diffeomorphism of Wi and an open subset of S ⊂ R . Step 4: The product map m Y n n n Ψ := :Φi : M −! S × S × ::: × S | {z } i=1 m times is an injective, continuous map from a compact, hence it is a homeomor- phism to its image. It is a smooth embedding, because its differential is injective. 9 Geometry of manifolds, lecture 3 M. Verbitsky 1 Embedding to R QUESTION: What if M is non-compact? I DEFINITION: Define Rf as a direct sum of several copies of R indexed by a set I, that is, the set of points in a product where only finitely meny of I coordinates can be non-zero. The set Rf has metric q 2 2 d((x1; :::; xn; :::); (y1; :::; yn; :::)) := jx1 − y1j + jx2 − y2j + ::: + jxn − ynj + :::: It is well-defined, because only finitely many of xi; yi are non-zero. n THEOREM: Let M be a compact smooth manifold, fVi;'i : Vi −! R ; i 2 Ig be a locally finite atlas, and µi : M −! [0; 1] a subordinate partition of unity. Define νi := α(µi) and Φi as above, and let Y n n n n+1 I Ψ := :Φi : M −! S × S × ::: × S ⊂ (R ) | {z } I I times be the corresponding product map. ThenΨ is a homeomorphism to its image. 10 Geometry of manifolds, lecture 3 M. Verbitsky 1 Embedding to R (cont.) n THEOREM: Let M be a compact smooth manifold, fVi;'i : Vi −! R ; i 2 Ig be a locally finite atlas, and µi : M −! [0; 1] a subordinate partition of unity.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    18 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us