BOOK OF AUTHORITIES FOR SUBMISSIONS OF THE POWER WORKERS’ UNION ON THE DRAFT REGULATORY DOCUMENT 2.2.4 TO THE CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION VOLUME 2 REGARDING REGULATORY DOCUMENT, REGDOC-2.2.4, Fitness for Duty March 7, 2016 Chris Dassios Emily Lawrence General Counsel External Counsel Power Workers' Union Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP 244 Eglinton Ave. East 155 Wellington Street West, 35th fl. Toronto ON M4P 1K2 Toronto, ON M5V 3H1 T: 416-322-2444 T: 416-646-7475 F: 416-322-2436 F: 416-646-4301 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Richard Stephenson External Counsel Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP 155 Wellington Street West, 35th fl. Toronto, ON M5V 3H1 T: 416-646-4325 F: 416-646-4301 E: [email protected] Index Volume 1 Tab 1. IrvingPulp& Pa perL tdv C EP,Loca l 30,2013SC C 34 2. C a nadianN a tional R a ilwa y C o.a ndC A W -C a nada (Re )(2000),95L A C (4th) 341(Picher) 3. G rea terTorontoA irportsA uthorityv P.S.A .C.,Loca l 0004,[2007]L VI 3734-2, 90C L A S 177(De vlin) 4. C a nadianC ivilL ibe rties A ssn.v. TorontoD ominionB a nk (1998),163 D L R (4th)193(Fe d C A ) 5. Esso Pe trole um C a nada a ndC .E.P. L oc 614 (Re )(1994)56L A C (4th)440 (M cA lpine) 6. Trima c TransportationSe rvice s-B ulk System s v TC U (1999),[2000]L VI 3090- 2,88L A C (4th)237(Ca nA rb) 7. SuncorEnergy Inca ndC EP,Loca l 707(Woods),Re ,2008C a rswe llA lta 2503, [2008]A G A A N o11 8. B omba rdier Transportationv Te a m sters C a nada R a ilC onference – D ivision 660,2014C a nLII 5318(CA L A ) 9. R e Provincial-A m e rica nTruck Transporters a ndTe a m sters U nion,Loca l 880 (1991),18L .A .C.(4th)412(O nt.) 10. R v D ym e nt,[1988]2SC R 417 11. R v D ion,[1986]R JQ 2196(QSJ) 12. Ja ck sonv Joyce ville Pe nitentiary,[1990]3FC 55(TD ) 13. B le ncoe v B ritishC olum bia ,(2002)2SC R 307 Volume 2 Tab 14. R v C ollins,[1987]1SC R 265 15. R v G rant,2009SC C 32 16. R v O a k e s,[1986]1SC R 103 17. C hiassonv Ke llogg B rown& R oot(Ca nada )Co,2006A B Q B 302 18. C a nada (House ofC omm ons)v Va id,2005SC C 30 19. B ritish C olum bia (Publicse rvice Employe e R e lationsC omm ission)v B ritish C olum biaG ove rnme nta ndSe rvice Employe e s' U nion(B.C.G .S.E.U.),[1999] 3SC R 3 20. B ritish C olum bia (Superintende ntof M otor Ve hicle s) v B ritish C olum bia (CouncilofH um a nRights),[1999]3SC R 868 21. Entropv Im perial O ilL td,2000C a rswe llO nt2525,[2000]O J N o2689 22. W e ye rhae use rC o.v.C EP,Loca l 447 (2006),154L .A .C.(4th)3(Sims) 23. R e naud v C e ntral O k a naga nSchool D istrictN o.23,1992C a rswe llB C 257, [1992]2SC R 970 24. C a nadianPa cificL imited v U TU (1987)31L A C (3d)179 25. M e chanica l C ontractors A ssociation Sa rnia v U nited A ssociation of Journeym e na ndA pprentice s O f The Plum bing& PipefittingIndustry ofthe U nited States a ndC a nada ,Loca l 663,2013C a nLII 54951(ArbSurdyk owsk i) 26. R e G raym ountW e sternC a nada Inc. a nd C e m e nt,L ime G ypsum & A llied W orke rs,Loca l D 575 (2002),114L A C (4th)269 27. H a m iltonH e a lthScience s a ndO .N .A .(Re )(2007),167L A C (4th) Volume 3 Tab 28. B a rb B utle r a ndA ssociates,R e ce ntA lcohol a ndD rug W orkplace Policies in C a nada : C onside rations for the N ucle a r Industry (2012),prepared for C a nadian N ucle a r Sa fety C omm issino,a va ilable online: N ucle a r Sa fety < http://nucle a rsa fety.gc.ca /pubs_ca talogue /uploads/M a rch-2012-IN FO -0831- R e ce nt-A lcohol-a nd-D rug-W orkplace -Policies-in-C a nada _C onside rations-for- the-N ucle a r-Industry_e .pdf> 29. O ntarioL a w R e form C omm ission,R e portonA lcohola ndD rug Te stinginthe W orkplace ,(Toronto:O ntarioL a w R e form C om m ission,1992),online:Internet A rchive, O sgoode H a ll L a w L ibrary < http://ia700708.us.archive .org/32/item s/reportondruga lco00onta/reportondruga lco00onta.pdf> 30. B a rb B utle r & A ssociates,“Em ploye e a ssistance program s”(2006),online: B a rbB utle r& A ssociates http://www.butle rconsultants.com/bb_be nefits.html 31. R . Eva ns,Chair,D rug Te stinginthe W orkplace :R e portofthe Inde pende nt Inquiry intoD rug Te stinginthe W orkplace ,(N e w York: Jose ph R owntree Founda tion, 2004), online: Jose ph R owntree Founda tion < http://www.uk cia.org/rese a rch/DrugTe stingInWorkplace .pdf> 32. Privacy C om m issionerofC a nada ,D rug Te stinga ndPriva cy,(O ttawa :M inister of Supply a nd Se rvice s C a nada ,1990),online: O ffice of the Privacy C omm issionerofC a nada http://www.priv.gc.ca /inform a tion/02_05_12_e .pdf 33. C a nada ’s N ucle a r R e gulator,Fitness forD uty:Proposa ls forStrengthening A lcohola ndD rug Policy,Program s a ndTe sting,D iscussionPa per D IS-12-03 (O ttawa ,O N :A pril2012) 34. D e bra R . C ome r,“A C a se a ga inst W orkplace D rug Te sting”,(M a y 1994) O rga niza tionScience ,5(2):259a t260. Tab 14 R. v. Collins, 1987 CarswellBC 94 „„:„„ 1987 CarswelIBC 94, 1987 CarswelIBC 699,[1987] 1 S.C.R. 265,[1987] 3 W.W.H. 699... 1987 CarswellBC 94 pa ra 46 Supreme Court of Canada R. v. Collins 1987 CarswellBC 699, 1987 CarswellBC 94,[1987] 1 S.C.R. 265,[1987] 3 W.W.R. 699,[1987] S.C.J. No. 15, 13 B.C.L.R.(2d) 1, 28 C.R.R. 122, 33 C.C.C.(3d) 1, 38 D.L.R.(4th) 508, 56 C.R.(3d) 193, 74 N.R. 276, J.E. 87-516, EYB 1987-66975 COLLINS v. R. 5 Dickson C.J.C., McIntyre, Chouinard , Lamer, Wilson, Le Dain and La Forest JJ. Heard: May 27, 1986 Judgment: April 9, 1987 Docket: No. 17937 Chouinard J. took no part in the judgment Counsel: G.A. Goyer, for appellant. S.D. Frankel and D.J. Avison, for respondent. Subject: Criminal; Constitutional; Public Headnote Criminal Law --- Constitutional issues in criminal law — Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Charter remedies — Exclusion of evidence Criminal Law --- Search and seizure — Unreasonable search and seizure Statutes --- Interpretation — Role of court — Bilingual legislation Civil liberties and human rights — Enforcement under the Charter ofRights and Freedoms — Remedies — Exclusion of evidence — Police officer grabbing accused by throat in process of searching for drugs — Evidence as to grounds for officer's belief under s. 10(1) of Narcotic Control Act improperly excluded at trial — In absence of evidence as to grounds of officer's belief, search unreasonable and admission of evidence bringing administration ofjustice into disrepute. i".1)A Copyright Thomson Reuters Canada Limited or its licensors (excluding individual court documents). All rights reserved. F C Lj6. 1987 u61 welLU 699,[19Bij H. 263,[1987] 3 W.W.R. 699... Civil liberties and human rights Legal rights — Unreasonable search or seizure — Police officer grabbing accused by throat in process ofsearching for drugs — Evidence as to grounds for officer's belief under s. 10(1) of Narcotic Control Act improperly excluded at trial — In absence of evidence as to grounds of officer's belief, search unreasonable and admission of evidence bringing administration ofjustice into disrepute. Criminal law — Drug offices Possession for purposes oftrafficking — Evidence Police officer grabbing accused by throat in process ofsearching for drugs — Evidence as to grounds for officer's belief under s. 10(1) of Narcotic Control Act improperly excluded at trial — In absence of evidence as to grounds of officer's belief, search unreasonable and admission of evidence bringing administration ofjustice into disrepute. Criminal law — Search and seizure — Warrantless searches — Police officer grabbing accused by throat in process of searching for drugs — Evidence as to grounds for officer's belief under s. 10(1) of Narcotic Control Act improperly excluded at trial — In absence of evidence as to grounds of officer's belief, search unreasonable and admission of evidence bringing administration ofjustice into disrepute. Members of the R.C.M.P. drug squad, who were conducting a surveillance of the accused and her husband, observed the accused in a pub.