A Simple Microtiter Plate Screening Assay for Bacterial Invasion Or Adherence

A Simple Microtiter Plate Screening Assay for Bacterial Invasion Or Adherence

Methods in Cell Science 20: 107–111 (1998) 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. A simple microtiter plate screening assay for bacterial invasion or adherence Victor Nizet1, Arnold L. Smith2, Paul M. Sullam3 & Craig E. Rubens4 1 Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA; 2 Department of Molecular Microbiology & Immunology, University of Missouri-Columbia Medical School, Columbia, Missouri, USA; 3 Department of Medicine, Veteran Affairs Medical Center and University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; 4 Division of Infectious Diseases, Children’s Hospital & Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Abstract. Many bacteriologic studies, including cumbersome and severely limit the number of cellular invasion and adherence assays, require organisms or conditions which can be tested. As a enumeration of viable organisms or colony forming potential alternative, we describe a simple, rapid units. When attempting to screen large numbers of and inexpensive soft agar-based technique for semi- clinical or environmental isolates or laboratory- quantitative determination of bacterial colony counts derived mutants for differences in invasion or adher- directly within the wells of a 96-well microtiter ence phenotype, standard plating methods can be plate. Key words: Bacterial adherence, Bacterial invasion, Bacteriological techniques, Invasion assay, Microbial colony count, Soft agar 1. Introduction esis indicates that standard labor-intensive plating techniques are widely used, even when great numbers Many bacteriologic studies, including cellular inva- of isolates or laboratory-derived mutants are being sion and adherence assays, depend at some point on screened. Therefore, we offer a brief description of data derived from enumeration of viable organisms our screening invasion and adherence assays, in hope or colony forming units. When screening large that others may find a useful application for the soft numbers of clinical or environmental isolates or agar technique in their own experiments. laboratory-derived mutants in such quantitative The screening cellular invasion assay is adapted assays, standard plating methods can be time-con- from the antibiotic protection procedure first suming and limit the number of organisms or condi- described by Devenish and Schiemann [2]. Certain tions which can be tested. Alternative methods to antibiotics (e.g., gentamicin) will effectively kill agar plating for bacterial quantification include: extracellular or surface-adherent bacteria, but ineffi- direct microscopic enumeration in counting chambers ciently penetrate eukaryotic cells so as not to reach [6], epifluorescence microscopy using acridine microbicidal levels in the intracellular compartment. orange or other fluorochromes [3, 4], flow cytometry The differential antibiotic killing can be exploited [8], impedance bacteriometry [5], tetrazolium dye to quantify the degree of invasion of viable bacteria reduction [7], measurement of adenosine triphosphate into the host cell. Previously, we had quantified the bioluminescence [10], and enzyme-labeled, rRNA- number of internalized bacteria by plating small targeted oligonucleotide probes [1]. None of these aliquots of an epithelial cell lysate onto standard agar methods, however, allows the investigator to assay petri dishes containing the appropriate growth media. bacterial viability, antibiotic susceptibility and meta- When screening large numbers of transposon mutants bolic phenotype simultaneously, as can be done with for modifications of invasion phenotype, however, growth on specialized agar media. we found plating samples from each individual well In the course of our studies of cellular invasion to be quite tedious. A single person could screen and adherence by group B streptococci (GBS) and comfortably no more than 100 mutants in a single other bacterial pathogens, we have employed a work day. Moreover, the inherent time delay between simple, rapid and cost-saving soft agar technique for plating of the first and last samples introduced an the semi-quantitative determination of bacterial undesired variable into determination of viable colony counts directly within the wells of 96-well counts, and replicate samples often demonstrated dif- microtiter plates. Although we hesitate to claim that ferences attributable to sampling or plating error. For a similar technique has never been described, the screening purposes, semi-quantitative discrimination current literature in the field of bacterial pathogen- of colony forming units would suffice. We therefore 108 modified our protocol to eliminate the labor-inten- cases, a replica plate with 200 µl of fresh sive plating steps, and employed soft agar to enu- media per well may be inoculated with 10 µl merate the bacteria directly within wells of a 96- of the overnight cultures and growth monitored well microtiter plate. We subsequently adapted by optical density measurement using a this methodology to develop a screening assay for microplate reader. streptococcal adherence to human platelets. 2. Inoculation of cell monolayers Immediately prior to the invasion assay, each plate is vortexed gently to resuspend settled 2. Materials bacteria. Optical density measurement can be obtained to identify any strains or mutants 01. 96 well tissue culture plates, flat bottom, sterile which grew poorly, such that any spuriously with lid (Costar #3598). low input inoculum can be considered in inter- 02. Todd Hewitt Broth (Difco #DF0492-17-6). pretation of final invasion assay results. Using 03. Bacteriologic grade agar (Difco DF0140-01-0). an 8- or 12-channel pipettor, 10 µl of each bac- 04. A549 human lung carcinoma cell line (ATCC terial culture is transferred as an inoculum to #CCL-185). a corresponding well in a 96-well plate con- 05. RPMI 1640 tissue culture media, with HEPES taining 200 µl antibiotic-free tissue culture (Sigma #R 6504). media and a confluent A549 cell monolayer. 06. Fetal calf serum, heat inactivated (Sigma Alternatively, the plates may be inoculated #F 4135). using a Boekel 99-pin stainless steel replicator 07. 12-channel pipettors (Labsystems #4510040 and which transfers a standard volume of the liquid 4510050). culture by capillary action. 08. Boekel 96-pin stainless steel replicator (Fisher 3. Antibiotic protection method for determination #05-450-9). of cellular invasion 09. Reagent reservoir (Sigma #R 1936). Following inoculation, the 96-well tissue 10. Bent stainless steel manifold (Drummond #3-00- culture plates are centrifuged at 800 ×g for 10 094). min to place GBS at the surface of the cell 11. Gentamicin sulfate (Sigma #G 1264). monolayer, then incubated for 2 h at 37 °C 12. Penicillin G (Sigma #P 7794). with 5% CO2 to allow cellular invasion by the 13. 0.25% Trypsin/EDTA solution (Sigma #T 4049). GBS. After the incubation, medium is removed 14. Triton X-100 (Sigma #X-100). from the monolayers by gentle aspiration of 15. Poly-L-Lysine (Sigma #P 4832). the wells using a bent-hub 8-channel stainless 16. Brain-Heart Infusion (BHI) Broth (Difco steel manifold attached to a vacuum source. DF0037-07-0). The subsequent wash and treatment steps 17. Tyrode’s salt solution (Sigma #T 2397). all involve liquids dispensed from a sterile reagent reservoir. Monolayers are washed ×3 by adding 200 µl of phosphate buffered saline 3. Procedures (PBS) via a multichannel pipettor, followed by gentle aspiration of the wash buffer with the A. Cellular Invasion Assay vacuum manifold. Alternatively, removal of 1. Preparation of bacteria and tissue culture cells medium or wash buffer can be accomplished A549 lung epithelial cells are seeded and by rapid inversion and brief shaking of the grown in tissue culture media (RPMI media + plate over a sink or disposal container. After 10% fetal calf serum) in 96-well tissue culture the primary wash steps, 200 µl of tissue culture plates until confluent monolayers are formed. medium containing 100 µg/ml gentamicin and The day before the screening assay, single 5 mg/ml penicillin G is added to each well, colonies of GBS mutants are picked with a and the plates incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with µ sterile toothpick and used to inoculate 200 l 5% CO2 to kill extracellular and surface- of Todd Hewitt broth (THB) in individual adherent bacteria. The monolayers are once wells of 96-well microtiter plates. Control again washed ×3 with PBS. Finally, 50 µl of wells on each plate are inoculated with either a 1:4 mixture of 0.25% trypsin/EDTA solution the wild-type GBS strain or a noninvasive bac- and 0.025% Triton X-100 is added to each terial isolate (e.g., Escherichia coli strain DH5 well, the plates incubated for 10 min at 37 °C or Streptococcus gordonii Challis). The plates in order to disrupt the epithelial cell mono- are incubated overnight at 37 °C to allow the layers and liberate intracellular bacteria. bacteria in each well to reach stationary 4. Semiquantitative determination of bacterial growth phase. Cellular invasion by certain colony counts using soft agar bacterial species may require factors expressed Todd Hewitt soft agar (THSA) medium is only during exponential growth phase. In such prepared in advance by using 0.7% Bacto 109 agar (Difco) rather than our standard 1.5%, forming units represent possible low-platelet- maintained in liquid form by incubation in a binding mutants, whose phenotype is subse- 45–50 °C water bath, and dispensed into a quently confirmed by a quantitative platelet

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us