Scintigraphic Evaluation of Liver Masses: Cavernous Hepatic Hemangioma Guest Editor: Abass Alavi Case Presentation and Discussion: Raymond A. Rubin and Gary R. Lichtenstein Gastrointestinal Section, Hospital ofthe University ofPennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania tive, consistent with the diagnoses of pernicious anemia J NucIMed1993;34:849—852 and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy demonstrated achlo rhydria and several hyperplastic gastric polyps. Biopsy of CASE PRESENTATION thickened folds within the gastric fundus revealed a mod A 54-yr-old female was referred for evaluation of a erately dense infiltrate of small, slightly irregular mature mass in the right lobe of the liver noted on abdominal lymphocytesinvolvingthemucosaandextendingthrough ultrasound. She had been in her usual state of health until the muscularis. Although immunohistochemistry and 1 wk prior to admission to this institution when she noted gene rearrangement studies were not diagnostic, these episodic cramping right flank pain. She denied jaundice, findings raised the concern for a possible low-grade non pruritus, constitutional symptoms or change in bowel Hodgkin's lymphoma. Lymph node and thyroid biopsies habits. Microhematuria was noted on urinalysis. An in demonstrated nonspecific inflammation. travenous pyelogram demonstrated a nonobstructmg ure The initial differential diagnosis for the hepatic mass teral stone. While the kidneys appeared normal on ab included primary hepatic neoplasm, metastatic disease or dominal ultrasound, a large complex echogenic mass of cavernous hemangioma. Magnetic resonance imaging the right lobe of the liver was detected. (MRI) with intravenous gadolinium-DTPA demonstrated The patient's medical history was notable only for a an 8-cm lesion in the posterior segment of the right lobe total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oo of the liver, which was dark on Ti and bright on T2 phorectomy performed for uterine leiomyomata. She images (Fig. 1). The borders of the mass were slightly took no medications. She neither drank alcohol nor used irregular. The first postcontrast image was not obtained intravenous drugs. There was no family history of liver until 4 mm aftergadoliniumwas injected.The massdid disease. Physical examination revealed a healthy appear not enhance peripherally. The enhancement pattern de ing black female without stigmata of chronic liver dis creased on the more delayed images. Whereas this was ease. There were numerous rubbery cervical and sub interpreted to be consistent with hemangioma, adenoma mandibular lymph nodes as well as a 5—6-cmor focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatocellular carcinoma or multinodular goiter. By percussion, the liver span was 10 hypervascular endocrine tumor were not ruled out. cm in the mid-clavicular line. No tenderness, hepatic or Images of the liver were obtained following the intra abdominal masses, splenomegaly or ascites were noted. venous administration of 20 mCi of @Tc-labeled red The remainder of the examination was within normal blood cells (RBCs). Sequential images revealed a rela limits. tively photopenic area in the inferoposterior aspect of the Laboratory values revealed normocytic anemia with right lobe of the liver (Fig. 2). Delayed images subse hyperlobulated polymorphonuclear leukocytes on pe quently demonstrated increased activity within the le ripheral blood smear. Liver function tests, electrolytes, sion.SPEC].'imagingconfirmedthe presenceof a focal coagulation studies, a-fetoprotein and the remainder of area of increased activity (Fig. 3). These findings were the complete blood count were within normal limits. Se believed to be diagnostic of hepatic cavernous hemangi rum gastrin was 262 pg/mI (nl 0—100),cyanocobalamin oma (HCH). level was < 100 ngfliter (nl 200—1200)and anti-parietal cell anti-thyroid microsomal antibodies were markedly posi DISCUSSION Hepatic cavernous hemangioma is the most common benign neoplasm of the liver (1). Focal lesions suggestive ReceivedAug.26, 1992;revisionacceptedSept.15,1992. of HCH are often incidentally discovered on sonography, Forcorrespondenceorreprintscontact:GaryA. Uchtenstein,MD,Hospital of the Universityof Pennsylvania,GastrointestinalSection,3rd Floor,Dulles Cr or radionuclidescintigraphy.DistinguishingHCH Building,3400SpruceSt.,Philadelphia,PA19104-4283. from other hepatic masses, especially primary or meta Cavernous Hepatic Hemangioma •Rubin and Uchtenstein 849 @ 4' @ ) .4' t@7 @, ; @t 4 ‘@ 1@ FIGURE 3. CoronalSPECT imagesof the liver demonstrate intense concentrationof activity in the inferoposterioraspect of the right lobe of the liver. With SPECT imaging,the lesion (be tween arrows) is clearly distinguishedfrom the adjacent normal liver. FIGURE 1. T2-weighted transverse magnetic resonance im age of the abdomen demonstrates an 8-cm high intensity mass (triangle)intheposterioraspectoftherightlobeoftheliver. Pathologically, HCH consists of large, thin-walled, blood-filled vascular spaces lined by flattened epithelium and separated by fibrous septae (1). In giant hemangio static malignancy, is a relatively common clinical chal mas, the increased endothelial surface may sequester lenge. As this particular case illustrates, specific imaging platelets, resulting in a thrombocytopenic coagulopathy studiesmay be diagnosticof HCH. The appropriateuti known as the Kassabach-Meritt syndrome (5). lization of available radiologic techniques may expedite Imaging of Hemanglomas establishingthe specificdiagnosisof HCH andavertex Radionucide Scintigraphy. The routine @Tc-sulfur pensive and potentially harmful testing. colloid liver scan offers little help in differentiating HCH As demonstrated by this case, HCH is generally de from other space-occupying lesions of the liver (3). On tected incidentally during radiologic studies, laparotomy the liver-spleen scan, HCH typically appears as a non or autopsy. It is found in all age groups and 60%—80%are specific cold defect in an otherwise normal liver (4). seen in females (2), in whom estrogens may contribute to Serial planar blood-pool scintigraphy with [@Tc]per the growth of these lesions (1). Similar to hepatic adeno technetate labeled RBCs is very specific, if not diagnos mas, the majority of HCHs are located in the right lobe of tic, for the noninvasive diagnosis of hemangioma. Slug the liver (3,4). Lesions are typically solitary, although gish blood flow through the tortuous vascular pathways li%—33% of the time they are multiple. The majority of produces a “perfusion/blood-pool mismatch― of initial patientswith HCH havenormalliver functiontestsand hypoperfusion with gradually increasing RBC accumula are asymptomatic. Patients with “giant―HCH (exceed tion on serial delayed imaging, which peaks within 30 to ing 4 cm in size) more commonly describe abdominal 50 mm after injection (3,6, 7). fullness, belching, weight loss and pain. Morbidity may Isolated cases of HCH have been reported in which be attributed to bleeding, infarction, necrosis and, rarely, increased arterial blood supply demonstrated not only red rupture (Table i). cell accumulation in the delayed images, but also on early perfusion and blood-pool images (8). Alternatively, some hemangiomas will be largely fibrotic and will not show the expected increased blood pool (6). .@ The specificity and positive predictive value of labeled RBC scanning approaches 100% (9,10). No lesions other than HCHs have been described as showing red cell TABLE 1 Clinicopathologic Classification of Cavernous Hemangioma 1. Solitaryor multiplewithoutsymptoms 2. Solitaryor multiplewith symptoms FIGURE 2. Anterior (Left)and posterior(Right)planarblood 3. Gianthemangiomas pool images demonstrate intense concentration (arrows) of @‘Tc-labeIedRBCsin the inferoposterioraspectof the right 4. Hemangiomatosis, exclusive of hepatic involvement 5. Hemangiomatosis, hepatic and extrahepatic involvement lobe of the liver. 850 The Journal of Nuclear Medicine •Vol. 34 •No. 5 •May 1993 accumulationon delayedimages,except for three re Magnetic Resonance Imaging. MRI has emerged as an ported cases of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), a re accurate and safe, though expensive, method for diagnos ported case of an angiosarcoma and possibly hypervas ing hemangiomas (23). HCH usually appears as a smooth, cular metastases (7,11). homogenous mass of high signal intensity on T2-weighted While planar studies may not demonstrate small (<3 images (24). Other features, such as a lobulated contour cm) hemangiomas, smaller lesions may be detected with and peripheral location may be helpful in the MR diag the use of SPEC!' (12—15).SPECT is also superior to nosis of HCH (25). HCHs larger than 4 cm may demon planar imaging for detecting hemangiomas adjacent to the strate atypical features, such as an irregular outline or spleen and kidney (16). Since labeled RBC activity per inhomogenous internal architecture (26). MRI has greater sistsin the heartandmajorintrahepaticbloodvesselson sensitivity than labeled RBC SPEC].' scanning in detect delayed SPEC].' blood-pool images, it may be difficult to ing small (<2—2.5cm) HCHs. It is also superior in iden identify small hemangiomas when they are adjacent to tifying lesions adjacent to the heart and major intrahe these structures (9). Large (>4 cm) cavernous hemangi patic vessels (9). omas have been missed by both planar and SPECT The ability of MRI to distinguish HCH from metastases @“Tc-RBCimaging (14). False-negative labeled RBC is dependent in part on the histology