Configurations of Lines on Del Pezzo Surfaces

Configurations of Lines on Del Pezzo Surfaces

Configurations of lines on del Pezzo surfaces Rosa Winter Universiteit Leiden Konstanz Women in Mathematics Lecture Series June 26th, 2018 I Master ALGANT (see next talk) in Leiden and Padova. I Traineeship 'Eerst de Klas', obtaining a teaching degree and working for a company. I Since 2016: PhD in Leiden under the supervision of Ronald van Luijk and Martin Bright Today: talk about a project that started as my master thesis. A little bit about myself I Bachelor degree from Leiden University I Traineeship 'Eerst de Klas', obtaining a teaching degree and working for a company. I Since 2016: PhD in Leiden under the supervision of Ronald van Luijk and Martin Bright Today: talk about a project that started as my master thesis. A little bit about myself I Bachelor degree from Leiden University I Master ALGANT (see next talk) in Leiden and Padova. I Since 2016: PhD in Leiden under the supervision of Ronald van Luijk and Martin Bright Today: talk about a project that started as my master thesis. A little bit about myself I Bachelor degree from Leiden University I Master ALGANT (see next talk) in Leiden and Padova. I Traineeship 'Eerst de Klas', obtaining a teaching degree and working for a company. Today: talk about a project that started as my master thesis. A little bit about myself I Bachelor degree from Leiden University I Master ALGANT (see next talk) in Leiden and Padova. I Traineeship 'Eerst de Klas', obtaining a teaching degree and working for a company. I Since 2016: PhD in Leiden under the supervision of Ronald van Luijk and Martin Bright A little bit about myself I Bachelor degree from Leiden University I Master ALGANT (see next talk) in Leiden and Padova. I Traineeship 'Eerst de Klas', obtaining a teaching degree and working for a company. I Since 2016: PhD in Leiden under the supervision of Ronald van Luijk and Martin Bright Today: talk about a project that started as my master thesis. Example Cubic surfaces 3 Let's look at smooth cubic surfaces in P over an algebraically closed field. Cubic surfaces 3 Let's look at smooth cubic surfaces in P over an algebraically closed field. Example x3 + y 3 + z3 + 1 = (x + y + z + 1)3 (Clebsch surface) Cubic surfaces 3 Let's look at smooth cubic surfaces in P over an algebraically closed field. Example x3 + y 3 + z3 = 1 (Fermat cubic) Clebsch surface Cubic surfaces Theorem (Cayley-Salmon, 1849) I Such a surface contains exactly 27 lines. I Any point on the surface is contained in at most three of those lines. Cubic surfaces Theorem (Cayley-Salmon, 1849) I Such a surface contains exactly 27 lines. I Any point on the surface is contained in at most three of those lines. Clebsch surface Example The Clebsch surface has 10 Eckardt points; the Fermat cubic has 18 Eckardt points. Cubic surfaces 3 A point on a smooth cubic surface in P that is contained in three lines is called an Eckardt point. Lemma (Hirschfeld, 1967) There are at most 45 Eckardt points on a cubic surface. Cubic surfaces 3 A point on a smooth cubic surface in P that is contained in three lines is called an Eckardt point. Lemma (Hirschfeld, 1967) There are at most 45 Eckardt points on a cubic surface. Example The Clebsch surface has 10 Eckardt points; the Fermat cubic has 18 Eckardt points. Definition A del Pezzo surface X is a 'nice' surface over a field k that has an n embedding in some Pk , such that −aKX is linearly equivalent to a hyperplane section for some a. The degree is the self intersection 2 (−KX ) of the anticanonical divisor. d For degree d ≥ 3, we can embed X as a surface of degree d in P . Question: What do we know about lines on del Pezzo surfaces of other degrees? Generalizations of Eckardt points? More general: del Pezzo surfaces A smooth cubic surface is a surface given by an equation of degree 3 in 3-dimensional space. This is an example of a del Pezzo surface. d For degree d ≥ 3, we can embed X as a surface of degree d in P . Question: What do we know about lines on del Pezzo surfaces of other degrees? Generalizations of Eckardt points? More general: del Pezzo surfaces A smooth cubic surface is a surface given by an equation of degree 3 in 3-dimensional space. This is an example of a del Pezzo surface. Definition A del Pezzo surface X is a 'nice' surface over a field k that has an n embedding in some Pk , such that −aKX is linearly equivalent to a hyperplane section for some a. The degree is the self intersection 2 (−KX ) of the anticanonical divisor. Question: What do we know about lines on del Pezzo surfaces of other degrees? Generalizations of Eckardt points? More general: del Pezzo surfaces A smooth cubic surface is a surface given by an equation of degree 3 in 3-dimensional space. This is an example of a del Pezzo surface. Definition A del Pezzo surface X is a 'nice' surface over a field k that has an n embedding in some Pk , such that −aKX is linearly equivalent to a hyperplane section for some a. The degree is the self intersection 2 (−KX ) of the anticanonical divisor. d For degree d ≥ 3, we can embed X as a surface of degree d in P . More general: del Pezzo surfaces A smooth cubic surface is a surface given by an equation of degree 3 in 3-dimensional space. This is an example of a del Pezzo surface. Definition A del Pezzo surface X is a 'nice' surface over a field k that has an n embedding in some Pk , such that −aKX is linearly equivalent to a hyperplane section for some a. The degree is the self intersection 2 (−KX ) of the anticanonical divisor. d For degree d ≥ 3, we can embed X as a surface of degree d in P . Question: What do we know about lines on del Pezzo surfaces of other degrees? Generalizations of Eckardt points? We often do this to resolve a singularity. Another way of defining del Pezzo surfaces Let P be a point in the plane. The construction blowing up replaces P by a line E, called the exceptional curve above P; each point on this line E is identified with a direction through P. Another way of defining del Pezzo surfaces Let P be a point in the plane. The construction blowing up replaces P by a line E, called the exceptional curve above P; each point on this line E is identified with a direction through P. We often do this to resolve a singularity. From: Robin Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry. I We say that X lies above the plane. I On X (so after blowing up), P is no longer a point, but a line. I Two lines that intersect in the plane in P do not intersect in X ! They both intersect the exceptional curve E, but in different points. I Outside P, everything stays the same. Some facts about blow-ups of points Let P be a point in the plane that we blow up, and let E be the exceptional curve above P. We call the resulting surface X . I On X (so after blowing up), P is no longer a point, but a line. I Two lines that intersect in the plane in P do not intersect in X ! They both intersect the exceptional curve E, but in different points. I Outside P, everything stays the same. Some facts about blow-ups of points Let P be a point in the plane that we blow up, and let E be the exceptional curve above P. We call the resulting surface X . I We say that X lies above the plane. I Two lines that intersect in the plane in P do not intersect in X ! They both intersect the exceptional curve E, but in different points. I Outside P, everything stays the same. Some facts about blow-ups of points Let P be a point in the plane that we blow up, and let E be the exceptional curve above P. We call the resulting surface X . I We say that X lies above the plane. I On X (so after blowing up), P is no longer a point, but a line. I Outside P, everything stays the same. Some facts about blow-ups of points Let P be a point in the plane that we blow up, and let E be the exceptional curve above P. We call the resulting surface X . I We say that X lies above the plane. I On X (so after blowing up), P is no longer a point, but a line. I Two lines that intersect in the plane in P do not intersect in X ! They both intersect the exceptional curve E, but in different points. Some facts about blow-ups of points Let P be a point in the plane that we blow up, and let E be the exceptional curve above P. We call the resulting surface X . I We say that X lies above the plane. I On X (so after blowing up), P is no longer a point, but a line. I Two lines that intersect in the plane in P do not intersect in X ! They both intersect the exceptional curve E, but in different points. I Outside P, everything stays the same. Theorem Let X be a del Pezzo surface of degree d over an algebraically closed field.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    97 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us