A Review of Wireless Communication Using High-Altitude Platforms for Extended Coverage and Capacity

A Review of Wireless Communication Using High-Altitude Platforms for Extended Coverage and Capacity

This is a repository copy of A review of wireless communication using high-altitude platforms for extended coverage and capacity. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/159534/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Arum, Steve orcid.org/0000-0001-6199-3024, Grace, David orcid.org/0000-0003-4493- 7498 and Mitchell, Paul Daniel orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-2581 (2020) A review of wireless communication using high-altitude platforms for extended coverage and capacity. Computer Communications. pp. 232-256. ISSN 0140-3664 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.04.020 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 A Review of Wireless Communication using High-Altitude Platforms for Extended Coverage and Capacity Steve Chukwuebuka Arum, David Grace and Paul Daniel Mitchell Abstract—This paper provides an up-to-date review of wireless telecommunications coverage in Nigeria so far is heavily communications service provisioning in rural or remote areas concentrated in the urban and suburban areas. It was estimated from High-Altitude Platforms (HAPs) exploiting cellular radio that a minimum of 60,000 base stations were required to cover spectrum. With the recent International Telecommunication Union (ITU) report showing that as much as 74% of the over 36 million people all living in rural areas who are either population in Africa, most of which are living in rural areas, do grossly underserved or unserved [2]. According to a 2014 not have access to broadband, this paper focuses on the potential estimation, an additional 33,000 base stations are needed by of using HAPs as an alternative to terrestrial systems for 2018 [3] in Nigeria. Unfortunately, the prohibitive cost of wireless communication in rural communities. Considering the deployment, frequent vandalism and low user densities render typically low user densities in rural areas and the importance of HAP coverage maximization while ensuring harmless coexistence terrestrial communication systems commercially unattractive with terrestrial systems in rural areas, this paper explores in rural areas. Even in technologically advanced countries like extending the achievable wireless coverage from a HAP. This the UK, only 70% of the landmass has broadband coverage. takes into consideration the coexistence of a HAP with terrestrial Although unlike in Nigeria, 98% of the UK population systems using intelligent techniques to dynamically manage radio have broadband access, some areas and population still lack resources and mitigate interference. Studies have shown that efficient intelligent radio resource and topology management access to wireless telecommunication services due to reasons can minimize inter-system interference and ensure coexistence including restrictions as a result of planning or local regulations with improved system performance. Potential techniques for [2]. It is clear that wireless coverage problems persist in coverage extension such as exploiting the spatial characteristics rural areas. In these cases, the use of HAPs to deliver of array antennas, radio environment maps (REMs) and device- telecommunication services presents a commercially viable to-device (D2D) communications are discussed. Generally, this paper presents a comprehensive review of significant HAP alternative. In [4], it is highlighted that typical benefits of related studies and their outcomes. broadband coverage in developing countries are dominated by improved education and health service delivery, community Index Terms—Artificial Intelligence, High-Altitude Platform, Coverage Extension, Radio Environment Map, Device-to-Device, development and an increase in small businesses, rural-urban Resource Management. migration mitigation etc. Similarly, a UK broadband report [5] highlights increased access to and use of e-government services, a positive change in civic participation, ease of I. INTRODUCTION learning for pupils/students, quality of web browsing and ORE than half of the world’s population do not have time saving from faster browsing as some of the impacts M access to mobile broadband as of 2017 according to the of broadband in advanced societies like the UK. Therefore, latest International Telecommunication Union (ITU) report [1]. increased broadband access presents different propositions in The report suggests that close to 74% and 14% of Africans different areas. and Europeans respectively are without broadband access, with The work in this paper is based on wireless telecommunica- the majority living in rural and remote areas. On the one hand, tion service provisioning using HAPs. The focus is on coverage this percentage for Africa represents an absence of coverage extension and coexistence of HAP and terrestrial systems with over significantly large areas. On the other hand, the European minimal intra-system and inter-system interference. Since a scenario which is dominated by islands of coverage, presents a macrocell can potentially transmit up to a distance of 32km different coverage problem. Delivering broadband in rural areas [6], it is highly likely that some terrestrial infrastructure will will significantly increase broadband connectivity. The lack exist within the service area of a HAP. Hence, it is important of broadband access in rural areas does not necessarily mean to ensure coexistence between these systems. Considering the insufficient data capacity in the region of interest. For instance, seemingly commercial unviability of terrestrial communica- despite more than 9 Terabits/s of data capacity being available tions in rural areas due to the low return on investments to Nigeria through submarine cable landings, progressive (ROI) resulting from low user density, HAPs present a distribution to rural areas still remains an issue [2]. Wireless compelling alternative. HAPs are aeronautic platforms which 2 are manned or unmanned, located conventionally between [24]. These characteristics encapsulate the requirements of a 17-22km altitude and used for wireless applications [7]. The rural wireless communication system as captured in [4], thus advantages of HAPs over terrestrial wireless and satellite making HAPs a suitable solution for wireless communication systems in addressing some wireless communication issues in rural areas. HAPs also allow for contiguous coverage with are highlighted in [8], [9]. HAPs offer some advantages over less frequent handovers over a regional service area, potential terrestrial systems due to their elevated look-angle and better capacity improvements and reduced roundtrip time, increased propagation performance. The increasing optimism in HAPs throughput, lower latency and improved link budget compared is partly due to the possibility of the use of one platform to satellites. for multiple applications and also due to their potential for HAPs for communication service delivery can range from low cost, high availability wireless communications service having just remote radio heads (RRHs) elevated to the provision over an extended area. stratospheric altitude to complete base stations [17]. Whether Due to the characteristically low user density in rural areas, it is better to have just a RRH or a complete base station optimal coverage is important for the balance between the is dependent on the trade-off between HAP payload weight, cost of deployment and ROI. The majority of the previous and power consumption, and allowable service delay. Having a current HAP projects like the Japanese Stratospheric Platform full base station on a HAP can potentially reduce signal round- (SPF) project [10], HeliNet [11], CAPANINA [12], Loon trip time (RTT) thereby reducing delay as signals are fully [13], [14] and other studies [15], [16] consider a service processed in the HAP while in RRHs, data is relayed to area radius of approximately 30km. Therefore, this paper a processing station thereby increasing the RTT and hence focuses on coverage extension from HAPs in a heterogeneous delay. Additionally, the capability of the platform in terms of network (HetNet) specifically to deal with wide area coverage available payload allowance and power can influence the choice beyond the 30km radius, especially in rural areas. The design between a full base station and RRH. The increased coverage and deployment of wireless communication systems in rural advantage of HAPs over terrestrial systems arises from their areas must address the need for large coverage, operation in significantly higher elevation angle. Conclusive qualitative varying geographic terrain, robustness, and ease of installation studies have been carried out in some projects notably HeliNet, [4]. In order to satisfy the large coverage requirement using CAPANINA and ABSOLUTE covering only about 60km terrestrial systems, extremely tall base station masts are diameter service area with a HAP at 20km altitude. This ◦ needed with signals transmitted at significantly high

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    32 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us