Optimising New Mobility Services

Optimising New Mobility Services

A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Yanocha, Dana Working Paper Optimising new mobility services International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, No. 2018-25 Provided in Cooperation with: International Transport Forum (ITF), OECD Suggested Citation: Yanocha, Dana (2018) : Optimising new mobility services, International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, No. 2018-25, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), International Transport Forum, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/432b8f34-en This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/224173 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu CPB Corporate Partnership Board Optimising New Mobility Services Discussion Paper 175 Roundtable Dana Yanocha Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, New York City Optimising New Mobility Services Discussion Paper 175 Roundtable Dana Yanocha Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, New York City The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 59 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States. International Transport Forum 2 rue André Pascal F-75775 Paris Cedex 16 [email protected] www.itf-oecd.org ITF Discussion Papers ITF Discussion Papers make economic research, commissioned or carried out in-house at ITF, available to researchers and practitioners. They describe preliminary results or research in progress by the author(s) and are published to stimulate discussion on a broad range of issues on which the ITF works. Any findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Transport Forum or the OECD. Neither the OECD, ITF nor the authors guarantee the accuracy of any data or other information contained in this publication and accept no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Comments on Discussion Papers are welcome. Cite this work as: Yanocha, D. (2018), “Optimising New Mobility Services”, International Transport Forum Discussion Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris. Acknowledgements The expertise and experience captured in this paper was contributed by the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) field office staff from around the world. The author would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China and the International Transport Forum for hosting the roundtable for which this paper was prepared. OPTIMISING NEW MOBILITY SERVICES | DISCUSSION PAPER | ITF ROUNDTABLE 175 Table of contents Background: Dockless bike share from Shanghai to Seattle ................................................................ 5 Why regulate? ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Market failures ................................................................................................................................ 5 Regulation enables system-building ................................................................................................ 6 Policy framework for maximising benefits of dockless bike share ....................................................... 7 Outcome-oriented system planning ................................................................................................ 8 Addressing operational shortfalls .................................................................................................... 8 Real-time monitoring and enforcement ........................................................................................ 13 Long-term policy evaluation and adjustment ................................................................................ 14 Lessons for regulating new mobility modes ....................................................................................... 15 Design and pilot regulations informed by city goals ...................................................................... 15 Understand costs .......................................................................................................................... 16 Evaluate system performance ....................................................................................................... 17 Develop new mobility ecosystems ................................................................................................ 18 4 © OECD/ITF 2018 OPTIMISING NEW MOBILITY SERVICES | DISCUSSION PAPER | ITF ROUNDTABLE 175 Background: Dockless bike share from Shanghai to Seattle Over the past decade, emerging technologies and innovative business models have turned the transportation sector on its head. New mobility options are constantly coming online; presenting more choices to travelers as city transportation departments evaluate how best to integrate these modes into existing networks. One of these new mobility offerings, dockless bike share, has increased the visibility and ubiquity of urban cycling in cities around the world. The concept of bike share without stations is not new. Operators like nextbike, Social Bicycles, and OV Fiets have been offering hub-centric, stationless bike share options for years. However, dockless bike share in its current form - GPS-enabled bikes that allow users to lock and unlock them anywhere using smartphones - has been operating in China since 2014, and was largely unregulated during its infancy. Market imperfections quickly emerged as cities were inundated with millions of dockless bikes and the challenges that came with them, including piles of discarded bikes blocking rights of way and vandalism. A response from the government was all but inevitable and, in April 2017, Chinese cities were given express permission to begin exploring options for regulating the supply of bikes and better managing public space and parking (Perkowski, 2017). Soon after, dockless bike share began to emerge in the United States and other western markets. In July 2017, Seattle, Washington released the first ever comprehensive permit structure as part of a pilot to manage dockless bike share operations before companies dropped bikes on city streets. Since then, more and more cities have launched pilot programs to test regulatory approaches on the ground prior to more formal implementation. As cities began to proactively consider regulating dockless bike share, it became clear that a delicate balance must be maintained. Operators consistently call for flexibility to innovate, compete, and improve their service delivery, technology, and business

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    24 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us