December 2016 POLICY BRIEF Using & restoring the Miombo woodlands: needs for an integrated and holistic approach in ecosystem management for long term sustainability Policy decisions made now about how to Socio-ecological relationships in Miombo develop the Miombo region of Africa will woodlands have far-reaching consequences for the Miombo Woodlands are the people living in this region and for the Julbernardia/Brachystegia dominated globe. There are currently conflicting woodlands that span 2.7 million km2 across viewpoints about the best way to ensure eight countries in southern and eastern development goals and human livelihoods Africa: Democratic Republic of Congo, in the region, while also fulfilling Angola, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Malawi, conservation ideals and sequestering Tanzania, Mozambique and partly South carbon. These decisions need to be Africa (Figure 1). They are characterized by grounded on solid understanding of the highly variable woody canopy cover –from socio-ecology of the system, sound scientific 40-80% (Frost 1996). The ecosystem has information on the rates and causes of land high plant species diversity and endemism, cover change, and they need to include key- and a rich avifauna, containing several players at all levels of governance - from global hotspots of biodiversity: the local, to national, to global. grassland/woodlands mosaics NW and NE The Miombo Network (MN) is an alliance of Zambia (Mwinilunga, Mporokoso) are just a scientists that aims to achieve effective and few. appropriate management policies and 76% of the energy used in the region is practices by providing science-based derived from the woodlands (Ryan et al., information through the use of field-based 2016); timber products are exported; food approaches, remote sensing and other from bushmeat (Fa, 2015), caterpillars geospatial information technology, as well (Chama, 2016), honey (Ribeiro et al., 2016), as the valorization of traditional-knowledge roots, and leaves are a key source of systems and new biotechnologies. This nutrition and income – especially during the policy brief is the outcome of a meeting held dry season and also in times of crop failure. in July 2016, in Maputo under the theme Forest products are used and traded “Restoring socio-ecological and socio- extensively for medicine, curios and economic relationships in the Miombo ornaments (Brigham et al., 1996). More woodlands”. recently the carbon storage potential has Here we analyse how socio-ecological become a likely source of income and an relationships are affected by the current opportunity to restore over-utilised state of Miombo ecosystem as well as woodlands with the initiation of REDD+. options for restoration. 1 increasing, and in order to fulfill Africa’s agricultural development goals this will have to accelerate. Concurrently, the intact natural Miombo woodlands are under increasing pressure to provide all the resources mentioned above – not only to the rural population, but also to the ever- increasing urban population via trade and businesses. This may result in degradation of the woodlands and deforestation, which in turn reduces the resources that may be extracted. We estimate that between 250,000 and 300,000 ha/year of Miombo are degraded and/or lost (Miombo Network Meeting, July 2016). Figure 1. Map of African Vegetation, Fact Figures about Miombo resources showing Miombo woodlands in dark green (Source: White, 1983). • Timber industry in Mozambique was worth $330.3 million in 2011 (UT- REDD, 2016). Fire is a cultural management tool, which 14.8 million m3 wood used in has been (and is being) used by most rural • Mozambique for biomass energy (Sitoe communities in the Miombo region. It is et al., 2010). also a key ecological factor in maintaining Miombo ecology. However, changes in fire • Medicinal or therapeutic plants and regimes derived from among others, human products in Southern Africa are population growth and climate changes, estimated to yield US$ 150 million/year may impact on the ecology of Miombo and although some of the harvesting thus, the resources provided by the methods are unsustainable ecosystem. The dimension of these changes (Syampugani et al., 2009). is still less known in the region. • Provisioning services (including NTFPs) At the global level, Miombo represents an contribute $9±2 billion/year to rural important carbon repository and a potential livelihoods (Ryan et al., 2016). source of both renewable energy (via sustainable charcoal industry) and carbon • 76% of energy used in the region is storage (through increasing above-ground derived from the woodlands (Ryan et biomass). Up to 80% of the population in al., 2016). the region – both rural and urban - benefit • Traded woodfuels have an annual value from goods and services from Miombo of $780 M (Ryan et al., 2016). woodlands (Malimbwi et al., 2010). • Woodlands store 18-24 PgC carbon “Resource use of Miombo woodlands has (Ryan et al., 2016). not enabled the rural masses to come out of poverty.” Restoration options in the Miombo woodlands Causes of forest degradation and deforestation Introducing measures to conserve Miombo vegetation will clearly impact the current This region is also highlighted as a potential economic growth trajectories of the region, area for expansion of agriculture in the next but it is also clear that well-managed century. Conversion of Miombo for Miombo vegetation provides more goods agriculture, forestry, and mining is and services to the people than over- 2 utilized landscapes. The main tree species decisions are being made without a proper in Miombo are clonal - which means they appreciation of the contribution of Miombo use root suckers to spread. This makes woodlands to national treasury. Miombo vegetation very resilient to above- ground disturbances like fire and wood harvesting (Syampungani et al., 2015, Gumbo, 2016), but very sensitive to land clearing activities like large-scale cultivation, because the trees do not mainly regenerate from seed. Miombo requires cyclic cutting of mature stands, silvicultural thinning and pruning in stand development stages towards maturity, through regular Figure 2. Cyclic clearing-cropping-fallow- use of resources by rural society and others, regrowth maintains diversity & to maintain plant diversity and productivity productivity of Miombo (Source: of the system. Growth rates in mature Geldenhuys, 2016). Miombo can be slow - 0.24cm/year (Amade et al., 2016)- but when disturbed through harvesting/wind-throw the resprouting “Conserving Miombo does not require stumps can have high regrowth rates - up to stopping human activities – just 1.4cm per year when properly managed managing them.” (Syampungani, 2010). This implies that sustainable utilisation of Miombo is Local, national, regional, and global possible (e.g. Figure 2; Geldenhuys, 2016) if interests in Miombo woodlands are not various utilization aspects are incorporated always aligned (see examples below), and in Miombo woodlands management. this is exacerbated by lack of inter-sector coordination in the Miombo woodlands “Fires are an important ecological management. Sector policies across the determinant of Miombo, but need to be region collectively aim to address the plight correctly managed.” of the Miombo but sustainable approaches Fire has been considered as negative factor need to be well understood and applied at for the Miombo ecology. Frequent fires can country level. There is need to harmonize impose important changes to Miombo policy frameworks across the region to vegetation affecting its capacity to provide ensure collaborative effort towards the goods and services to rural and urban management of the Miombo. communities in the region. Appropriate fire Long-term scenario planning suggests that regimes are contested, and depend on the urban population of Africa will double particular management goals. But in general by 2030 (Campbel, 2014). This is not likely fire frequency of every 3-4 years and of low to reduce the pressure on woodland intensity are key to maintain the woodlands resources, but it does provide flexibility in (Ribeiro et al., 2013). terms of land use planning. Research demonstrates that it is possible to design development plans in Miombo, which Governance issues optimize agricultural production, carbon The economic contributions of Miombo storage and conservation objectives (Estes woodlands are not adequately accounted in 2016), but this requires good research- national GDP's, which means that they are policy relationships, and solid governance not appropriately valued in development structures. plans. For example the 14.8 million m3 of “The cost of large-scale agricultural wood used as biomass energy annually in expansion to communities who have Mozambique (Sitoe et al., 2010), does not economies intimately linked to the intact appear in its national asset valuation. vegetation need to be quantified and Consequently national planning and policy considered in development plans.” 3 Balancing carbon storage, biodiversity Brigham, T., A. Chihongo, and E. Chidumayo conservation, food security and human 1996. Trade in woodland products from livelihoods Miombo region. In: Campbell, Bruce Morgan, ed. The Miombo in transition: woodlands and Carbon storage: Reducing wood harvesting welfare in Africa. CIFOR, in Miombo will increase above-ground Campbel K. 2014 Cities and Biodiversity biomass, but will increase demand for Outlook: Action and Policy. Montreal, Canada: alternative (fossil-fuel based) energy, and Secretariat of the