N2 Gateway, Zanemvula and Khutshong Priority Projects

N2 Gateway, Zanemvula and Khutshong Priority Projects

ADD NAME/TITLE HERE Presentation on N2 GATEWAY, ZANEMVULA AND KHUTSHONG PRIORITY PROJECTS to SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES OCTOBER 2009 Purpose • The purpose of this presentation is to provide: – Information on the determination of and categorization of national priority projects; – a briefing on the following priority projects • N2 Gateway • Zanemvula • Khutson g Background • 2005 - N2 Gateway Project prioritized • 2006 - PHDs name “provincial pilot projects” • 2006 - Zanemvula Project (NMBMM ) and Khutsong Project (Gauteng) identified as prioritised projects Determination of Priority Projects i. pronouncement by the State President, Cabinet or the Minister of Human Settlements or a decision by Minmec or the DG of Human Settlements; ii. may have initially been determined as a provincial pilot project; iii. capability to achieve identified national priorities; iv. fulfill the intent of the Comprehensive Plan - roll out an integrated sustainable human settlement; v. cooperative management in terms of inter-governmental protocols by the different spheres of government as Determination of Priority Projects v. more than likely to be a mega project - deliver around 2 000 housing units or more or a number approved by the relevant MEC of the Province; vii. have a positive and visible impact on the lives of the affected communities; viii. is enrolled with the NHBRC and meets all the minimum national norms and standards; ix. has completed the P1 and P2 phases; and x. encapsulates all the relevant information in a Project Business Plan and submits Categorisation of Priority Projects i. ranking of the project outcomes in the national apex of priorities; ii. level of oversight and management input provided by the NDOH; iii. manner in which the project is funded; and iv. project’s state of readiness to deliver – inter alia, EIA, geotech investigations, land-legal, township establishment, Business Plans, etc. A1 Priority Projects – fullest facilitation and management input, oversight and monitoring by the NDOHS; – managed by three spheres of Government (cooperative and implementation agreements) – Allocated with ring-fenced funds, specifically for these priority projects; – Required to provide the NDOHS with monthly reports of progress; and – Reports to the meetings of Minmec. Project Project Location N2 Gateway Cape Town (Western Cape) Zanemvula Nelson Mandela Metro Municipality (Eastern Cape) Khutsong Merafong City (Gauteng) A2 Priority Projects – Managed by the three spheres of Government – Provided with oversight and management at a more strategic level by the NDOHS; – Funded by the provincial grant allocations; and – Required to provide the NDOHS with monthly reports of Projectprogress. Project Location Grasslands Manguang Local Mun, Free State Lerato Park Sol Plaatjies Mun, N Cape Emnambithi Urban Renewal Emnambithi/Ladysmith Mun, KZN Mokopane Ext 20 Mokopane Local Mun, Limpopo Duncan Village Redev. Initiative Buffalo City Mun, E Cape Klarinet Emalahleni Mun, Mpumalanga Ouboks Umsobomvu Local Mun, N Cape Chief Albert Luthuli Ext 6 Ekurhuleni Metro Mun, Gauteng A3 Category Priority Projects - New categorization (based on request to be accommodated within the 20% allocation of the total housing grant) Province Project Location Free State Phakisa Estate Mtjabeng (Welkom), Bloemside Informal Settlement Upgrading Gauteng Hostel eradication upgrading programme (4 Regions) KwaZulu-Natal Ethekwini-Cato Crest Upgrading, Amoatana, Empheleni Mpumalanga Ehlanzeni-Verulam (Umjindi), Gert Sibande (Rooikoppen-Lekwa) Northern Cape Khara Hais-Upington (various areas) Western Cape Kosovo-Phillipi, B M Section (Khayelitsha), Enkanini (Khayelitsha) N2 Gateway Project - located in Cape Town in the W Cape - conceptualised to address poverty and vulnerability of residents living along the N2 between the airport and the city - number of units planned around 22 000 units - planned as a pilot and to test the capacity of national, provincial and local government to execute settlement upgrading at scale overall layout plan includes socio N2 GATEWAY LOCALITY PLAN JOE SLOVO PHASE I OBJECTIVE: Rental units NO OF UNITS: 705 STATUS: • All units completed and occupied • Payment of Rental - 5% payment rate - Rental agreements in place - Identification of beneficiaries based on response to advert - Structural condition approved by engineers WAY FORWARD - Property management of rental units currently with Thubelisha - Turnaround strategy is being discussed by the different spheres of Government JOE SLOVO PHASE II OBJECTIVE: Bonded housing (FNB) NO OF UNITS: 43 STATUS: • All units completed and handed over to beneficiaries WAY FORWARD - Transfer of properties JOE SLOVO PHASE III OBJECTIVE: BNG houses Show Village NO OF UNITS: 49 STATUS: • All services installed & top-structures completed • Beneficiary allocation completed WAY FORWARD - Transfer to beneficiaries to be undertaken - Energy efficiency pilot with Danish funding in terms of Government to Government agreement for solar panel heating units on roofs JOE SLOVO PHASE III (A,B,C) OBJECTIVE: Planned for High density. NO OF UNITS: currently 1500 STATUS: • Subject of Constitutional Court judgment • Current planning to densify – Dependent on the results of the socio-economic study and the conditions stipulated in the Constitutional Court decision – Draft layout design • Community consultation engagement with Joe Slovo Task Team at community level WAY FORWARD - Continuous engagement with Joe Slovo Task Team on type of units, allocation, etc. NEW OBJECTIVE: in-situ upgrade (712 contractorREST built + 443 PHP) NO OF UNITS: 1155 units STATUS: • 572 units complete • competition between PHP associations for beneficiaries WAY FORWARD • Services installation need to be concluded and some people need to be relocated DELFT 7 - 9 OBJECTIVE: Greenfields component to accommodate backyarders and households decanted from Joe Slovo NO OF UNITS: 3912 UNITS STATUS: • 2752 units complete • 98% of roads and internal services installed • Conversion from rental to BNG - will increase numbers • TRAs on 4 and 4.1on serviced land where houses have to be built WAY FORWARD • Need to resolve non-qualifiers Ct tii DELFT OBJECTIVE: BNG (originally rentalSYMPHONY + BNG) NO OF UNITS: 4227 STATUS: • 2733 in precincts 4 & 6 units complete • Contractor left the site due to, inter alia : – contractual disagreements with Thubelisha in Precincts 1 & 2 – quality and counter-claim disputes to be resolved WAY FORWARD • Resolution of contractual issues, quality and counter- claims • Completion of houses TRAs • Intersite : Langa • Tygerberg : Hospital U2 Building • Delft : TRA 4 + 4.1 • Delft TRA 1,2, 3 Tsunami • Delft : TRA Blikkiesdorp • TRA 5 : to be erected • Phillipi TRA • Blue Downs TRA N2 GATEWAY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE • IN THE TARGETED AREAS, 97% HOUSEHOLDS LIVE IN INFORMAL DWELLINGS • UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IS 57% • 85% OF HOUSEHOLDS EARN INCOMES OF LESS THAN R1 600 PER MONTH • 82% OF RESIDENTS DO NOT HAVE MATRIC • 27% OF HOUSEHOLDS HAVE ACCESS TO ELECTRICITY • LESS THAN 3% HOUSEHOLDS HAVE ACCESS TO ADEQUATE SANITATION (FLUSH AND CHEMICAL) • LESS THAN 3% HOUSEHOLDS HAVE ACCESS TO DRINKABLE WATER (ON SITE OR IN DWELLINGS) N2 TOWN PLANNING GATEWAY TOWNSHIP PRECINCT EIA APPROVAL ESTABLISHMENT JOE SLOVO PHASE 1 COMPLETE IN PROGRESS JOE SLOVO PHASE 2 COMPLETE IN PROGRESS JOE SLOVO PHASE 3 COMPLETE IN PROGRESS DELFT TOWNS 7 TO 9 COMPLETE COMPLETE DELFT SYMPHONY COMPLETE COMPLETE NEW REST COMPLETE IN PROGRESS APPLICATION IN BOYSTOWN IN PROGRESS PROGRESS DISTRICT 6 COMPLETE COMPLETE N2 CURRENT STATUS: PHASE 1 SERVICES ( AS GATEWAYAT 11 SEPT 2009) PROJECT NO. OF LAND PROJECT SERVICES COMMENTS TYPE SITES REHAB Includes FNB bonded DELFT SYMPHONY units. 2 018 BNG sites BNG 6 244 100% 100% (All precincts) were converted to 1 333 bonded sites Roads on precinct 2 are DELFT 7-9 BNG 3 912 100% 95% 70% complete DELFT 7-9 BNG 616 N/A 0% Social unit conversion EXTENSION NEW REST BNG 619 N/A 90% JOE SLOVO PHASE 1 RENTAL 705 100% 100% FNB JOE SLOVO PHASE 2 43 100% 100% BONDED JOE SLOVO SHOW BNG 49 100% 100% VILLAGE JOE SLOVO PHASE 3 BNG 100% 0% Re-design: High density BOYSTOWN BNG 1 308 0% 0% N2 GATEWAY CURRENT STATUS: PHASE 1 TOP STRUCTURES ( AS AT 11 SEPT 2009) UNITS UNITS NO. OF FOUNDA- WALL ROOF HANDE PROJECT COMPLET UNITS TIONS PLATE LEVEL D E OVER DELFT SYMPHONY 5 560 4 314 2 944 2 867 2 733 2 377 (All precincts) DELFT 7-9 4 528 3 055 3 049 2 979 2 752 2 710 NEW REST 1 155 602 595 579 539 514 JOE SLOVO (Excl. 797 92 92 92 92 49 re-design BOYSTOWN 1 308 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 13 348 8 063 6 680 6 517 6 116 5 650 MISMATCH BET SERVICED SITES AND NO. OF UNITS PREDOMINENTLY DUE TO LOSS OF PREC 3&5 BNG SITES TO 1 333 UNITS AND NEW REST SITES OF WHICH 536 WAS PREVIOUSLY SERVICED BY CoCT N2 CURRENT STATUS: PHASE 1 FINANCES TOTAL COST ESTIMATE = R4 527 055 000 GATEWAY EXPENDITURE AS AT 31 JULY 2009 PAYMENTS PAYMENTS TO PROJECT RECEIVED VARIANCE CONTRACTORS (Province/CoCT) DELF SYMPHONY 338 680 283 338 295 430 -384 852 DELF 7-9 291 440 942 325 235 336 33 794 393 JOE SLOVO PRECINCT 1 39 566 308 42 582 000 3 015 691 JOE SLOVO PRECINCT 2 9 945 105 9 945 105 - JOE SLOVO PRECINCT 3 5 032 635 7 794 130 2 761 495 NEW REST 38 431 611 39 651 885 1 220 273 MIG 119 453 575 72 966 424 -46 487 150 PHILLIPI TRA 1 972 705 1 500 000 -472 705 BOYSTOWN 19 743 - -19 743 PROFESSIONAL FEES - 32 361 949 32 361 949 LEGAL 5 274 532 - -5 274 532 OTHER EXPENSES 383 246 9 841 653 9 458 407 TOTAL 902 621 611 934 237 853 31 616 242 Challenge • shifting dynamics within the Province sinces 2004; • Inadequate

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    38 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us