Prolonged Permian–Triassic Ecological Crisis Recorded by Molluscan Dominance in Late Permian Offshore Assemblages

Prolonged Permian–Triassic Ecological Crisis Recorded by Molluscan Dominance in Late Permian Offshore Assemblages

Prolonged Permian–Triassic ecological crisis recorded by molluscan dominance in Late Permian offshore assemblages Matthew E. Clapham* and David J. Bottjer Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 Communicated by Steven M. Stanley, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, June 6, 2007 (received for review November 28, 2006) The end-Permian mass extinction was the largest biotic crisis in the been possible because of a lack of quantitative paleoecological history of animal life, eliminating as many as 95% of all species and studies from Late Permian marine fossil assemblages. dramatically altering the ecological structure of marine communi- ties. Although the causes of this pronounced ecosystem shift have Results and Discussion been widely debated, the broad consensus based on inferences Our quantitative counts of silicified Middle and Late Permian from global taxonomic diversity patterns suggests that the shift fossil assemblages [Fig. 1; see also supporting information (SI) from abundant brachiopods to dominant molluscs was abrupt and and ref. 12] provide direct evidence to demonstrate that, in largely driven by the catastrophic effects of the end-Permian mass contrast to the Permo–Triassic taxonomic transition and con- extinction. Here we analyze relative abundance counts of >33,000 trary to previous assumptions (2), the shift in relative abundance fossil individuals from 24 silicified Middle and Late Permian paleo- between rhynchonelliform brachiopods and molluscs occurred communities, documenting a substantial ecological shift to numer- during the Guadalupian–Lopingian interval in offshore tropical ical dominance by molluscs in the Late Permian, before the major carbonates. For comparison purposes, relative abundance data taxonomic shift at the end-Permian mass extinction. This ecological for all assemblages were normalized to include only rhynchonel- change was coincident with the development of fluctuating anoxic liform brachiopods, bivalves, and gastropods because of the conditions in deep marine basins, suggesting that numerical dom- fluctuating abundance of accessory faunal components (most inance by more tolerant molluscs may have been driven by variably commonly crinoid ossicles and stenolaemate bryozoan frag- stressful environmental conditions. Recognition of substantial eco- ments) and the inherent taphonomic problems involved in logical deterioration in the Late Permian also implies that the end-Permian extinction was the climax of a protracted environ- counting those groups. When normalized, rhynchonelliform mental crisis. Although the Late Permian shift to molluscan dom- brachiopods have a mean abundance of 99.2% (range 97.8– inance was a pronounced ecological change, quantitative counts of 100%), whereas bivalves only comprise 0.6% (range 0–2.1%) 847 Carboniferous–Cretaceous collections from the Paleobiology and gastropods 0.2% (range 0–1.9%) of the average Middle Database indicate that it was only the first stage in a stepwise Permian assemblage (Fig. 2A). In contrast, Late Permian fossil transition that culminated with the final shift to molluscan dom- assemblages, collected from similar carbonate lithologies depos- inance in the Late Jurassic. Therefore, the ecological transition from ited in similar offshore environments below storm wave base, brachiopods to bivalves was more protracted and complex than contain a mixed brachiopod–mollusc fauna markedly different their simple Permian–Triassic switch in diversity. from that found in Middle Permian samples (Fig. 2A). Gastro- pods are the most abundant component in the samples (mean end-Guadalupian extinction ͉ modern fauna ͉ paleoecology ͉ 48.4%, range 13.2–88.6%), whereas rhynchonelliform brachio- GEOLOGY Paleozoic fauna pods comprise only 34.6% of the individuals (range 1.2–84.1%), and bivalves account for 17.0% (range 0.6–34.7%) in an average he Permian–Triassic mass extinction was one of the most assemblage. This dramatic shift in numerical dominance also was Tdramatic faunal transitions in the evolution of marine animal accompanied by a pronounced change in the ecological structure life (1–3), altering the composition of benthic communities and of benthic communities, from extreme dominance by sessile, ultimately paving the way for present-day marine ecosystems. pedically attached (56.2%), and reclining (36.8%) epifaunal Compilations of marine animal diversity have shown that the suspension-feeding individuals in the Middle Permian to an phyletic transition from diverse rhynchonelliform brachiopods to abundance of motile herbivores/detritivores (47.4%) in the Late diverse molluscs occurred at the Permian–Triassic boundary Permian (Fig. 2B). Infaunal individuals (primarily shallow sus- (2–4), coincident with the end-Permian mass extinction event. pension-feeding bivalves) were absent from most Middle Per- That concurrence has been used to argue that the mass extinction mian assemblages (mean abundance Ͻ 0.01%) but increased was the primary cause of the ecological change by eliminating dramatically to 7.2% in the Late Permian samples. Motile forms previously dominant brachiopods and allowing molluscs to rise (some infaunal bivalves and most gastropods) increased in to dominance (2). However, because ecological changes are not abundance from 0.06% in the Middle Permian to comprise a necessarily synchronous with taxonomic changes (5, 6), the tacit majority in the Late Permian assemblages (54.6%). assumption that the shift to abundant molluscs paralleled the well known shift to diverse molluscs may not be accurate. Similar Author contributions: M.E.C. and D.J.B. designed research; M.E.C. performed research; taxonomic richness data have been used to argue that the M.E.C. and D.J.B. analyzed data; and M.E.C. and D.J.B. wrote the paper. end-Permian mass extinction was a catastrophic and abrupt The authors declare no conflict of interest. event confined to the immediate boundary interval (7, 8), Ͻ *To whom correspondence should be sent at the present address: Department of Geolog- occurring in 1 million years (9). Although an earlier extinction ical Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6. E-mail: clapham@ has been recognized at the end of the Middle Permian (the geol.queensu.ca. end-Guadalupian extinction), it was a separate event, distinct This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/ from the end-Permian crisis (10, 11). However, recognition of 0705280104/DC1. ecological deterioration before the mass extinction event has not © 2007 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.0705280104 PNAS ͉ August 7, 2007 ͉ vol. 104 ͉ no. 32 ͉ 12971–12975 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 252.6 End-Permian Extinction MIDDLE LATE PERMIAN PERMIAN 253.8 CH A 100 100 FM. (%) 80 80 FM. TE PERMIAN) Gastropods (LA 60 60 Bivalves EPISKOPI HESHAN Abundance 40 40 Rhynchonelliform WUCHIAPINGIAN Brachiopods LOPINGIAN 20 20 260.4 End-Guadalupian Crisis Relative 0 0 FM. 100 100 Motile PERMIAN) B Herbivore AGE (Myr ago) Infaunal (%) CAPITANIAN 80 80 e Deposit-Feeding Infaunal 265.8 GERSTER (MIDDLE 60 60 Suspension-Feeding . Epifaunal GP Byssate I 40 40 Epifaunal 268 WORD FM. Cemented BUR 20 20 Epifaunal Reclining Relative Abundanc RAT ROAD WORD GUADALUPIAN Epifaunal 270.6 0 0 Pedically-Attached Fig. 1. Permian timescale showing age of sampled formations, approxi- Fig. 2. Ecological changes in silicified Middle and Late Permian fossil sam- mate age of silicified fossil assemblages (filled circles) used in this study, ples. (A) Normalized mean abundance of rhynchonelliform brachiopods, bi- and timing of the end-Guadalupian biotic crisis and end-Permian mass valves, and gastropods from silicified field samples. (B) Mean proportional extinction. Absolute ages are based on ref. 37. Road, Roadian; Word, abundance of ecological guilds in Middle and Late Permian silicified assem- Wordian; Ch, Changhsingian. blages. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Taphonomic and Biogeographic Biases. Although these results from Capitanian fossiliferous carbonates from Guangxi Province geographically distinct Middle and Late Permian localities imply (China) record abundant brachiopods and no molluscs (15), that the transition was a real, global phenomenon, the observed strikingly similar to Middle Permian North American samples changes may not reflect a true ecological shift if taphonomic and significantly different from Late Permian samples also from biases during silicification greatly decreased the abundance of China. Brachiopods were also numerically dominant in temper- aragonitic genera (especially gastropods) in Middle Permian ate siliciclastic deposits from the Bowen basin (Queensland, assemblages. Given that aragonite preservation is enhanced by Australia), comprising 79.5% of seven quantitative samples from early diagenetic silicification (13), it seems unlikely that the the Wordian and Capitanian (16). These data strongly imply that Middle Permian assemblages from the Gerster Formation in biogeographic differences in community ecology between Te- Nevada, which underwent silicification before or early during thys and eastern Panthalassa were minor and that the ecological sediment compaction and record fine details such as brachiopod shift from Middle Permian to Late Permian tropical carbonate punctae, would have all suffered from extensive aragonite assemblages was a widespread phenomenon. dissolution, whereas similarly silicified Late Permian samples

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us