Humans, Water, and the Colonization of Australia

Humans, Water, and the Colonization of Australia

Humans, water, and the colonization of Australia Michael I. Birda,b,1, Damien O’Gradyc,d, and Sean Ulmb,e aCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia; bCentre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia; cAstron Environmental Services, Perth, WA 6004, Australia; dCentre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia; and eCollege of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia Edited by Jim Allen, La Trobe University, Broulee, NSW, Australia, and approved August 30, 2016 (received for review June 9, 2016) The Pleistocene global dispersal of modern humans required the provided by stepping stones of small and variable water features, transit of arid and semiarid regions where the distribution of rather than to the resources themselves. All treatments of human potable water provided a primary constraint on dispersal pathways. dispersal in Pleistocene Sahul to date have lacked an explicit Here, we provide a spatially explicit continental-scale assessment of spatial dimension. What potential dispersal routes were available, the opportunities for Pleistocene human occupation of Australia, where, and under what circumstances? These questions relate the driest inhabited continent on Earth. We establish the location specifically to water in the landscape, because water is critical for and connectedness of persistent water in the landscape using the human survival (27–30), and three-quarters of Australia is semi- Australian Water Observations from Space dataset combined with arid or arid. In the absence of spatial information, discussion of the distribution of small permanent water bodies (springs, gnam- the patterns of human colonization in Australia usually have been mas, native wells, waterholes, and rockholes). Results demonstrate framed in general terms of aridity—the absence of water—although a high degree of directed landscape connectivity during wet periods it is well known that even the driest deserts in Australia are peri- and a high density of permanent water points widely but unevenly odically flooded (21, 31, 32). In the Western Desert, for example, distributed across the continental interior. A connected network Peterson (p. 65 in ref. 33) noted that “after substantial falls of rain representing the least-cost distance between water bodies and the population disperses widely to the most ephemeral sources graded according to terrain cost shows that 84% of archaeological far out on the plains. As the water supplies disappear the sites >30,000 y old are within 20 km of modern permanent water. people retreat back to the more permanent water supplies, We further show that multiple, well-watered routes into the semi- where they may become trapped for a period” (34). It is perhaps arid and arid continental interior were available throughout the for this reason that Gould (35) observed that indigenous Aus- ANTHROPOLOGY period of early human occupation. Depletion of high-ranked re- tralians prioritize foraging near satellite water holes before sources over time in these paleohydrological corridors potentially settling closer to the main water hole. In the Western Desert, drove a wave of dispersal farther along well-watered routes to Veth (36) notes a positive correlation between the number of patches with higher foraging returns. extractive artifacts and the permanency of water. Aridity in isolation therefore is not necessarily a barrier either to Sahul | Pleistocene colonization | radiocarbon | human dispersal | habitation or to transit. It is the duration of inundation, the con- SCIENCES paleohydrological corridor nectedness of water at times of inundation, and the location of permanent water in the landscape that dictates where, and for what ENVIRONMENTAL onsiderable debate has surrounded the timing, routes, and length of time, humans could reside in or transit through most of Cmechanisms of early human colonization of the continent of interior Australia. O’Connell and Allen note that “terrestrial patch Australia. Initial occupation from the north appears to have rank was determined primarily by the availability of freshwater, as begun before 47 kyBP (1–8) with relatively rapid movement measured by the volume and reliability of precipitation and/or local therafter; for example, the Willandra Lakes region in the south- stream flow” (pp.7–8inref.25). east of the continent may have been occupied within 1,000 y after The Water Observations from Space (WOfS) dataset (37) allows the arrival of humans (1, 9, 10). Birdsell (11) considered that an assessment of the spatial distribution and permanency of standing dispersal occurred rapidly and throughout the continent, whereas Bowdler (12) considered that early dispersal took place along the Significance coastlines, with limited initial occupation of the interior. Horton (13) and Tindale (14) added the postulates that, upon arrival in Australia is the driest inhabited continent on earth, but humans the northwest, or north, respectively, humans dispersed through dispersed rapidly through much of the arid continental interior the northern and eastern interior woodlands along riverine cor- after their arrival more than 47,000 y ago. The distribution and ridors and thence to the coast. These “end-member” dispersal connectedness of water across the continent, and particularly in scenarios (Fig. 1) subsequently have been reworked to include a its arid core, played a pivotal role in facilitating and focusing early more nuanced understanding of “the filling of the continent” human dispersal throughout the continent. We analyze the dis- (p. 453 in ref. 15) as variably dependent on a matrix of biogeo- tribution and connectedness of modern permanent water across graphic (16), ecological/climatic (17), and sociological/technological Australia. The modelled least-cost pathways between permanent (18, 19) facilitators of—or barriers to—dispersal from an initial water sources indicate that the observed rapid occupation of the point of entry in the north (20). The vast interior of the continent is continental interior was possible along multiple, well-watered now viewed as a mosaic of potential oases, corridors, and barriers, routes and likely was driven by the depletion of high-ranked with the viability of a specific region for occupation or transit also resources in each newly occupied area over time. depending on the trajectories of environmental change (21–24). O’Connell and Allen (1), building on previous work (25) and Author contributions: M.I.B., D.O., and S.U. designed research; D.O. and S.U. performed drawing on optimal foraging theory, propose a model of human research; M.I.B., D.O., and S.U. analyzed data; and M.I.B., D.O., and S.U. wrote the paper. dispersal throughout the continental interior driven by resource The authors declare no conflict of interest. availability/depletion, with the major interior rivers/river basins This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. representing the environments most attractive to human foragers; Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. these environments extended into other areas for short periods, at 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]. “ ” times of rain-related resource flushes. Smith (26) attributes This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. human dispersal through the desert to access to the food resources 1073/pnas.1608470113/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1608470113 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on October 2, 2021 Fig. 1. Proposed colonization models for the Australian continent. (A) Birdsell (11). (B) Tindale (14). (C) Horton (13). (D) Bowdler (12). water in the modern Australian landscape. Here we use this infor- distribution of permanent water were similar to the present day mation, coupled with the distribution of small natural permanent (39). Archaeological sites in Australia are frequently located and water bodies (springs, gnammas, native wells, waterholes, and investigated as a result of linear infrastructure surveys associated rockholes) compiled from the 1:250,000 topographic sheets with mining, road, and pipeline developments and as such are not (nationalmap.gov.au) to provide a spatially explicit assessment biased per se toward locations associated with water. Research- of the opportunities for Pleistocene human occupation of, and based probabilistic survey is extremely rare in Australia. The dispersal throughout, Australia. A connected network was pro- explicit comparison between archaeological sites is important duced representing the least-cost distance between water bodies because it further diminishes potential bias associated with site and graded according to terrain cost. selection, given that all sites were discovered by broadly the same array of archaeological survey techniques. Results and Discussion The distribution of sites from <30 ka is similar to the distribution The results of the spatial analysis of the 112,786 individual nat- of land area relative to modern permanent water (Fig. 3), with 65% ural water points (Dataset S1) demonstrate a high degree of of 1,049 sites <20 km and 20% of sites >40 km from modern directed landscape connectivity during wet periods and a high permanent water. This distribution suggests that more recent density of water points distributed widely but unevenly

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us