NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY Procurement & Contract Administration Section 28 MauueArea, G^9/1,Islamq.bqd A 051-9032727,E 051-9260419 z No.6(a33)/cM (P&cA)/NHA/ 17 19ll 12 May,2OI7 Director General Public Procurement Regulatory Authority 1.t Floor FBC Building near State Bank, SectorG-512, Islamabad. Subject: ANNoUCNEMENT oF EVALUATIoN REPORT (PPRA Rule-351: CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND DETAITED DESIGN FOR METALLED ROAD FROM MOTORWAY INTERCHANGE KATHA LILLA UPTO MIANWALI VIA NALI. KUND. JABBI. WARCHA. GOLEWALI. CHHIDRU AND MUSAKHEL. Reference: PPRARule-3 5 Kindly find attached the duly filled and signed Evaluation Report along with Bid Evaluation Criteria (Annex-I) pertaining to the procurement of subject services in view of above referred PPRA Rule-35 for uploading on PPRA website at the earliest, please. , lru ,4 (Muhamiirad Azamf Director (P&CA) Encl: Evaluation Report along with Annex-I Copy for kind information to: - Member (Planning), NHA - Member (Engineering-Coord),NHA - General Manager (P&CA),NHA - S.O (Tech.)to Chairman, NHA EVALUATIONREPORT (As Per Rule35 of PP Rules.2004) 1 Nameof ProcurinqAqency: NationalHiohwav Authoritv 2. Methodof Procurement: SinoleStaqe Two Envelop Procedure J. Titleof Procurement: ConsultancyServices for FeasibilityStudy and Detailed Designfor MetalledRoad from MotorwayInterchange KathaLilla upto Mianwali via Nali,Kund, Jabbi, Warcha, Golewali.Chhidru and Musakhel. 4. TenderInquiry No.: 6(433) PPRA Ref. No. (TSE): TS307057E o. Date& Timeof BidClosinq: 21"'March, 2017 at 1130 hours local time 7. Date & Time of Bid Openinq: 21"'March,2017 at 1200hours local time R Noof BidsReceived: Seven(7) Proposals were received Criteriafor BidEvaluation: Criteriaof BidEvaluation is attachedat Annex-l 10. Detailsof Bid(s)Evaluation: As below Marks Rule/Regulation/SBD*/Poli Nameof Bidder Evaluated cy/ Basis for Rejection/ Technical Financial Gost Acceptanceas per Rule35 (if (if (PKR) of PP Rules,2004. applicable) applicable) 1) M/sPrime Engineering andTesting Consultants Topscoring firm in combined (Pvt.)Ltd. in JV with M/s ozo 200 16,826,546 evaluation(PPRA Rule 36(b) FiniteEngineering (Pvt.) (ix)) Ltd.+M/s REC(Pvt.) Ltd. 2) M/sABM Engineers - 615 168 20,007,820 2no Karachi 3) M/sEgineering General ConsultantsEGC (Pvt.)Ltd in JV with M/sAssociated 598 too 20,276,080 3to ConsultingEngineers - ACE(Pvt.) Ltd. 4) M/sNational EngineeringServices 578 171 19,714,661 4tn PakistanNESPAK (Pvt.) Ltd. M/sEA Consulting (Pvt.) 5) 629 80 42,098,956 Ltd. 6) M/sAsif Ali Associates (Pvt.)Ltd in JV M/sAA 567 lJo 24,688,462 Associatesand M/s ECSP (Pvt.)Ltd. Ltd. 7) M/sAssociated ConsultancyCenter ACC 569 113 29,908,110 7'n (Pvt.)Ltd. &,*n Top Ranked Bidderl M/sPrime Engineering and Testing Consultants (Pvt.) Ltd. in JV with M/sFinite Engineering (Pvt.) Ltd.+ M/s REC(Pvt.) Ltd. 11. Any other additional/ supportinginformation, the procuringagency may like to share: The Procurementwas carriedout in linewith PPRARules & Regulations.The sisnature: .....:/,ffi/s/:"tz OfficialStamp: .,'.,,:;,:::..:::it,til.. *Standard Bidding Drocumentsr#, " I i;j.j r,T- ,, '. ' ". ,:. : i.: .., .r: ..: ' ' t' "-.-----.-.. .'.'' ::'... !'.1 !-..., .-:.,";, ' -..'-\:f.:<.' .::::. :: NationalHighway Authority tBi[Ho': rriSr.a'AYs Annex-I Criteria EOK Bid Evaluation ConsultancyServices for Feasibility Study and DetailedDesign for Metalled Road from Motorway InterchangeKatha Lilla upto Mianwali via Nali, Kund, Jabbi, Warcha, GolewalioChhidru and Musakhel. Muy,2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY Procurement & Contract Administration Section 28-Mauve Area, G-9/ l,Islamabad Tel: 9032727 , Fax: 9260419 Ref:6(433)/ GM (P&cA)/NHA/ 17I 43o 1Sft March.2OlT All Prospective Consultants Subject: Minutes of Pre-Proposal Meeting and Addendum No.l for: Consultancy Seryices for Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for M from Motonvav In Katha Lilla u Musakhel Reference: Request for Proposal Notice for subjee,,I.:'"!Se'r:tiicesappeared in daily newspaperson 23'a February, 2017 "+., '''l'ilrl.;:.il i,.. The Minutes of Pre-Proposal Meetjng,ffid'Addendum No.1 for subject Services being integral part of the Request foriiProposal, are enclosed herewith, for necessary action, please. />)r-ft \\ - %e(DAWOOD KHANI Deputy Director (P&CA) Enclosure: - Minutes of Pre-ProposalMeeting (03 Pages), - Addendum No.1 (04 pageS). Member (Planni@), NHA, Islamabad; Member (Engineeting Coordination), NHA, Islamabad; General Mana$er (P&CA), NHA, Islamabad; office 6-opp'"' MINUTES OF PRE-PROPOSAL o MEETING HELD ON 22"dFebruarv 2017 ConsultancvServices fol FeasibilitvStudv and DetailedDesisn for Metalled Road from Motorwgy InterchaneeKatha Lilla upto Mianwali via Nali. Kund. Jabbi. Warcha. Golewali.Chhidru and Musakhel A Pre-ProposalMeeting was held in NHA Auditorium at 1100 hours on 27tt'February, 2017 to discussthe Requestfor Proposal(RFP) for subjectServices. Following NHA officers and representativesof prospectiveconsultants attended the meeting: . NationalHighway Authority =ti]::,: ''tl;,.: ;:= Mr. ArbabAli GeneralManager (Planning) Mr. Asim Amin GeneralManager (Design) Mr. Muhammad Azam Directgr(P&CA) - III J] Mr. DawoodKhan Deput31,'lpii'.'eOtor(P&CA) - II Consultants ,,,==t,,u* Mr. HarisAqil Consulting(Pvt,) Ltd, ;:'1,"i',\,{,1$A Ms. AyeshaNawaz l,,M/s EA Consulting(Pvr.) Ltd. Mr. Niaz Ahmad M/s ABM EngineeringKarachi Mr. NaeemMahmood Khan M/s EGC (Pvt.)Ltd. 2. The qureriessr.rbmified during the above m,enti.Onedpre-proposal meeting and their clarificationsl repliesare summarized below for informationof all proSpectivebidders: Sr. No. Queries Reply I Reference clause 6.1 EIA of TOR: It is ReferFinancial Proposal Forms, Form A-16, in the mentionedthat Consultantsshall'',darry out EIA table at Sr. No.9 under "Direct (Non-Salary) study for the subject'project but input of Costs", Rs,500,000 are allocated for Environmental Exper.t is;,nof provided in the EnvironmentalImpact Assessment. RFP. ; 2. ReferenceClause +3.1 GIS for Corridor of Agreed,please refer Addendum No.1 TOR: lt is mentionedthat Consultantsshall developa detailedGIS databasefor 500 meter corridorfor wAol€:ralignrnent.But input of GIS Expertisnbrp-roVided in the RFP. a l Reference,clause 18.1 Tender Documentsof Since Pakistan Engineering Council's standard TORI It is mentionedthat Consultantsshall bidding documentswill be used; thereforewe prepare Tender Documents but the input of don't envisageexpenditure in this regard. ContractSpecialist is not provided in the TOR. 4 ReferenceChecklist provided in the RFP for Not agreed, the Consultants must provide the documents:It is mentionedthat Integrity Pact completed Integrity Pact document as per the Documentsduly filled in the blank spaceswith Checklistreferred. requisiteinformation and signed/stampedmust be provided.Consultants understand that this information will be provided later stage at the time of ContractAsreement. Minutes ofPre-proposal Meeting for ConsultancyServices for FeasibilityStudy and DetailedDesign for Metalled Road from Motoruay InterchangeKatha Lilla upto Mianwalivia Nali,Kund, Jabbi, Warcha, Golewali, Chhidru and Musakhel ffiPage1 'sub-clause Data SheetClause 1.7 at page 9 Not accededto, proceedas per RFP, please. (iii) added' states that "The Consultantmay pleasenote not to suggestnames of Key Staff already proposedin other Proposalswith the Client or awarded recently. This will affect adversely marking of these professionals in evaluationof TechnicalProposal. Their secured points are liable to be reducedby 50o/oif their namesappear in more than 1 previous Proposal in whichthey areranked No. 1. Also the existing load of work with a firm shall be consideredas one of the factor for the considerationin the awardof the work. This is not realisticin view of seriesof Proposals being invited by NHA and proposing scparate stafffor everyProposal is not possiblefor almost any consultingfirm in the country.Moreover, assignment under discussion is limited to FeasibilityStudy and DetailedDesign i.e. entire work, excluding survey and investigations,is desktopbased, to be carriedout at DesignOffice where an expert can simultaneouslywork on more than one assignment/ project, As such,,€his conditionmay please be waived. Data SheetClause 3.L.4 at Page11 to 13 (The. Since there are two options given separatedwith minimum required experienceof proposed "OR"; any personnel fulfilling the experience key staff): This statesas "Minimum B.Sc, OR criteriaof the eitherwill receivesame marks. The M.Sc. with varied experiencein respectivemarksagainst academic qualification however, will disciplines.If staff proposedwith B.Sc.(Civil be allocatedin accordancewith footnotesunder the Engineering) qualification and required tablefor PersonnelEvaluation Sheet on page-19of experience,will thesebe givenrfull.marks? RFP. Data SheetClause Sla i;itPage12& l3 (The Refer page-74 ''expbrience of RFP where in a table there is no minimum required of proposed Chief Surveyor mentioned,For QS there are two key staff): Similarly, if tllQjrQS,Chief Surveyor options given separatedwith "OR" (refer pagel2- and Surveyor afQ, proposed with DAE 13 of RFP); the proposed QS tulfilling the qualification*i1[ 1-e@ed experience,will these experiencecriteria of the either will receive same begiven lull marks? marks. The marks against academicqualification however, will be allocatedin accordancewith footnotesunder the table for Persomel Evaluation Sheeton page-l9 of RFP. Refer page-74 again Surveyors are mentioned under "Non-Key Personnel"and hence these will not be evaluated, S. No. 13 of ChecklistPage