Download the Report Drugs & Conflict in Burma

Download the Report Drugs & Conflict in Burma

DEBATE PAPERS DECEMBER 2003 no 9 Drugs and Conflict in T Burma (Myanmar) N Dilemmas for Policy Responses I Drugs and Democracy Programme TRANSNATIONAL TNI BRIEFING SERIES NO 2003/7 CONTENTS EDITORS: Martin Jelsma G Editorial 3 Tom Kramer Pietje Vervest G Drawing to a Close? The Opium Economy and the Pending Ban 4 TEXT EDITING: N Imre Szucs Box: Best Guesstimates 5 N Map: Shan State 6 DESIGN: Jan Abrahim Vos N Box:The Ya Ba Market 8 Zlatan Peric, MEDIO N Logo Drugs & Conflict: Major events in recent Burmese history 11 Elisabeth Hoogland N Box: Burma in the Global Opiates Market 12 PRINTING: G Kingpins or Scapegoats? Drukkerij Raddraaier, Civil War and the Drugs Trade in Burma 14 Amsterdam N Box:The KMT and the Opium trade 15 FINANCIAL SUPPORT: N Box:‘Kings of Opium’ 16 GTZ (Germany),Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs N Box: Ya ba and the Wei brothers 19 T N Map: Burma (Myanmar) 21 CONTACT: Transnational Institute G A Politicised Debate N Paulus Potterstraat 20 Sanctions, Humanitarian Aid and Drug Control 23 1071 DA Amsterdam N I The Netherlands Box: Drugs & HIV/AIDS 29 Tel: -31-20-6626608 G Fax: -31-20-6757176 Abbreviations 30 [email protected] G References and useful websites 21 www.tni.org/drugs Europe and Plan Colombia Debate Paper No. 1,April 2001 Contents of this booklet may Fumigation and Conflict in Colombia. In the Heat of the be quoted or reproduced, pro- Debate - Debate Paper No. 2, September 2001 vided that the source of infor- Afghanistan, Drugs and Terrorism. Merging Wars mation is acknowledged.TNI Debate Paper No. 3, December 2001 would like to receive a copy of Alternative Development and Eradication.A Failed the document in which this Balance - Debate Paper No. 4, March 2002 booklet is used or quoted. Polarisation & Paralysis in UN Drug Control. Breaking the impasse - Debate Paper No. 5, July 2002 You may stay informed of TNI An Agenda for Vienna. Change of Course publications and activities by Debate Paper No. 6, March 2003 subscribing to TNI’s bi-weekly Alternative Development and Conflict in Colombia. Cross e-mail newsletter. Send your Purposes - Debate Paper No. 7, June 2003 request to [email protected] or Forward Operating Locations in Latin America.Transcending register at www.tni.org Drug Control - Debate Paper No. 8, September 2003 All editions of the series are available online in English Amsterdam, December 2003 and Spanish at: www.tni.org/reports/drugs/debate.htm EDITORIAL Sword of Damocles is hanging over the In December 2003, we will convene an international Shan State in Burma (Myanmar)1, the conference in Amsterdam in cooperation with the area where by far the majority of the Burma Centre Netherlands to discuss the dilemmas for country’s opium is produced. In the drug policy responses in this context. We intend to Kokang region, an opium ban was improve the terms of the debate on peace and democ- enforced last year, and by mid-2005 no more poppy ratisation based on a better understanding of what is growing will be allowed in the Wa region.The enforce- happening on the ground in the ceasefire regions and ment of these bans will directly threaten the livelihoods within the opium-growing communities. of some 250,000 families in the Shan State who depend on the opium economy.They add another chapter to A gradual and sustainable decrease of the illicit drugs the long and dramatic history of drugs, conflict and economy could have positive impacts on the HIV/Aids human suffering in the country. crisis in Burma, which is largely related to intravenous drug use. It may also reduce the concerns related to In this issue of Drugs & Conflict we present the key find- drug trafficking in the region, such as the epidemic of ings from a TNI research mission to Thailand and Burma ya ba (methamphetamines) in Thailand,serviced main- which aimed to assess the extent of the unfolding ly from production facilities in Burma. It could diminish drama and talk openly to all sides involved.2 Our con- the levels of corruption and the distortion of power clusions and our doubts are based on the discussions relations that result from the revenues earned by armed we had, and on the expertise we have gathered over groups - those under ceasefire agreements and those the years in the fields of drugs and conflict and the sit- still in armed opposition,or by the military government. T uation in Burma.The complex nature of the issues poses History has shown that few of the parties to the con- many dilemmas and requires carefully designed drug pol- flict can claim innocence insofar as deriving income from icy responses –both at the local level as well as inter- the illicit economy goes. Demonising one specific play- N nationally- to enable the country to move towards er in the field,as often occurs,usually has stronger roots development, national reconciliation and democracy. in politics than in evidence. I With this publication, we want to stimulate and bring To achieve a sustainable decrease, alternative sources nuance to the currently very polarised debate on inter- of income for basic subsistence farmers have to be national engagement with Burma. Between political secured. Enforcement of the current tight deadlines pleas for strict sanctions aimed at pressuring for a does not allow alternatives to be in place in time,in spite democratic transition in Rangoon,and the efforts of the of genuine efforts undertaken by UNODC and other SPDC military government to hold onto power, little international agencies. A humanitarian crisis will occur, attention is being paid to developments at the local level jeopardising the fragile social stability in the poppy grow- in zones as remote as Kachin State and the Kokang and ing areas. Wa regions, in Shan State. Without adequate resources, the longer-term sustain- Rural communities risk being sacrificed in an effort to ability of ‘quick solutions’ is highly questionable. Since comply with international pressures about drug-free local authorities are eager to comply with promises deadlines and US drug control certification conditions, made, law enforcement repression is likely to increase, as well as drug-related security concerns from neigh- with human rights abuses and more displacement a bouring countries. In response to such pressures, offi- potential outcome.The only viable and humane option cials in Rangoon and local authorities are trying to curry lies in a simultaneous easing of drug control deadline favour with the international community by announc- pressures and increasing international humanitarian aid ing harsh measures against illicit crop production.Com- efforts. Both require stronger international engage- munity livelihoods face being crushed between the pin- ment of a different kind to that we have seen so far. cers of the opium ban and tightened sanctions. 1 In 1989, the military government changed the name of Burma to Myanmar. Using either ‘Burma’ or ‘Myanmar’ has since become a highly politicised issue.The UN system uses Myanmar, but for the sake of consistency we have chosen to use Burma, which is the way the country is referred to in the large majority of English language press and other publications. 2 In September,TNI undertook a mission to the Thai/Burmese border,to Rangoon and into the Wa hills in Shan State.We visited groups in armed opposition; met with civil society organisations; had extensive discussions with ceasefire groups; talked to drug control offi- cials of the military government in Rangoon; spoke with UNODC representatives in the capital and local staff of the Wa Alternative Development Project and visited villages dependent on poppy cultivation. Drugs and Conflict no 9 - December 2003 3 DRAWING TO A CLOSE? The Opium Economy and the Pending Ban “The real point about opium in the The Opium Economy Wa States and Kokang is that opium is the only thing produced which After Afghanistan, Burma is the world’s sec- will pay for transport to a market ond largest producer of opium,the raw mate- where it can be sold. To suppress rial from which heroin is produced. Accord- opium in Kokang and the Wa States ing to the latest opium survey of the United without replacing it by a crop Nations Office on Drugs and Crime relatively valuable to its bulk, (UNODC) for Burma in 2003, “the potential would be to reduce the people to the opium production was estimated to range level of mere subsistence on what between 560 and 1,060 tons,with a mean value they could produce for food and of 810 tons.This represented a decrease of 4% wear themselves or to force them to compared to last year.”3 Measured in hectares migrate.” [1937]1 cultivated, the survey claimed a decrease of 23%, from a mean estimate of 74,600 poppy hectares in 2002 to 57,200 this year. About ong ago,in the mountains of Loi Mu lived 90% of the opium poppy is grown in the Shan a beautiful woman named Ya Lem, also State,with the Wa and Kokang Special Regions known as Nang Hong Loi Mu (the Beau- alone accounting for about 40-50 per cent. ty of Loi Mu).Many eager young suitors T came to seek her hand in marriage. The US State Department, using other meth- However, she could only select one, which proved ods and reaching different figures, confirmed impossible,causing her great consternation.So she the pattern that “opium production declined in N killed herself.From the breast of her corpse sprout- Burma for the sixth straight year in 2002.The sur- ed tobacco, and from her groin came poppy.And vey found that the maximum potential yield for I so,since that time,the Wa people have raised tobac- opium in Burma in 2002 totalled 630 metric tons, co and poppy.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    32 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us