Adjunct Therapies for Refractory Status Asthmaticus in Children

Adjunct Therapies for Refractory Status Asthmaticus in Children

Adjunct Therapies for Refractory Status Asthmaticus in Children Kyle J Rehder MD Introduction Dosing of Standard Therapies Anticholinergics Intravenous ␤ Agonists Methylxanthines Magnesium Antibiotics Ketamine Heliox Noninvasive Ventilation Inhaled Anesthetics Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Discussion Summary Asthma exacerbation is a common reason for children to present to the emergency department. If primary therapies fail to halt the progression of an asthma flare, status asthmaticus often leads to hospital, and potentially ICU, admission. Following the initial administration of inhaled ␤ agonists and systemic corticosteroids, a wide array of adjunct medical therapies may be used to treat status asthmaticus. Unfortunately, the data supporting the use of these adjunct therapies are often un- clear, conflicting, or absent. This review will present the physiologic basis and summarize the sup- porting data for a host of adjunct therapies, including ipratropium, intravenous ␤ agonists, methylx- anthines, intravenous and inhaled magnesium, heliox (helium-oxygen mixture), ketamine, antibiotics, noninvasive ventilation, inhaled anesthetics, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Finally, we present a suggested care map for escalating to these therapies in children with refractory status asth- maticus. Key words: pediatric; asthma; critical care; methylxanthines; heliox; ketamine; magnesium; inhaled anesthetics. [Respir Care 2017;62(6):849–865. © 2017 Daedalus Enterprises] Introduction ity immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic response, causing mast cell degranulation, histamine release, and activation Asthma is an immune-mediated process in which an of pro-inflammatory cytokines.1 The classic triad of asthma environmental or infectious agent triggers a hypersensitiv- is the clinical manifestation of this cascade and involves airway reactivity and bronchospasm, mucosal swelling, and mucus production. The combination of concentric air- Dr Rehder is affiliated with the Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Duke Children’s Hospital, Durham, North Carolina. Dr Rehder has disclosed no conflicts of interest. Correspondence: Kyle J Rehder MD, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Dr Rehder presented a version of this paper at the 55th RESPIRATORY DUMC Box 3046, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail: [email protected]. CARE Journal Conference, “Pediatric Respiratory Care,” held June 10-11, 2016, in St Petersburg, Florida. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.05174 RESPIRATORY CARE • JUNE 2017 VOL 62 NO 6 849 ADJUNCT THERAPIES FOR REFRACTORY STATUS ASTHMATICUS IN CHILDREN exacerbations.1 For patients who fail to demonstrate im- provement with initial management of ␤ agonists and ste- roids, a host of other adjunct therapies may be utilized.6 This paper will review many of these adjunct therapies, including the basic mechanisms of action and the evidence supporting their use. Fig. 1. Schematic demonstrating asthma pathophysiology. Note Dosing of Standard Therapies the change in the cross-sectional airway from a normal airway (A) to an asthma bronchiole (B), with smooth muscle bronchocon- striction, mucosal edema, and mucus clinging to airway walls. If patients with status asthmaticus fail to respond to initial treatments, many providers will first escalate the dosage of these first-line therapies above the recommended way swelling and smooth-muscle constriction dramatically dosage prescribed in the NIH asthma guidelines. Contin- increases resistance in the lower airways, resulting in an uous delivery of a ␤ agonist has become common in the obstructive process (Fig. 1). Mucus production in the air- treatment of severe asthma flares. In children, this contin- ways adds to the obstructive process, both from potential uous delivery appears to be more effective than intermit- narrowing of airways with mucus clinging to airway walls tent delivery7,8 and also provides a more efficient use of and from worsening of air trapping through blockage of 9 airways in a ball-valve mechanism. respiratory therapist and nursing resources. The NIH ␤ asthma guidelines1 recommend a continuous inhaled albu- The mainstays of acute asthma therapy are inhaled 2 agonists and systemic steroids, and often this combination terol dosage of 0.5 mg/kg/h up to a maximum 15 mg/h; ␤ however, 20 mg/h of continuous albuterol is commonly is adequate to break the asthma flare. The 2 agonist (typ- ically inhaled albuterol, but it may also include levalbu- utilized by providers for children of all ages. A few studies terol or salbutamol) is the primary acute treatment, causing have evaluated the use of high-dose continuous albuterol, an immediate reduction in small airways resistance through with doses as high as 75–150 mg/h,10-12 with no clear bronchial smooth-muscle relaxation and resultant bron- evidence of benefit over standard dosing. The limiting chodilation. Corticosteroids, most commonly oral predni- factor in continuing to increase the dose of albuterol is sone or prednisolone or intravenous methylprednisone, typically dose-dependent tachycardia. Diastolic hypoten- have 2 distinct mechanisms of action. In the first few hours sion and mild hypokalemia may be seen with increasing after administration, glucocorticoids cause upregulation of doses of continuous inhaled albuterol12,13; however, the ␤-receptors on bronchial smooth-muscle cells, allowing clinical importance of these findings is undetermined. for increased efficacy of ␤-agonist therapy to reduce bron- The dosing equivalent of 1–2 mg/kg/d of prednisone choconstriction.2 Following this early effect, the glucocor- (maximum 60 mg) is the recommended steroid dosing ticoid anti-inflammatory actions lead to decreases in in- regimen for asthma exacerbation in the NIH asthma guide- flammatory cytokines and cause reduced swelling of the lines1; however, it is also common for many providers to airways. In many ways, the anti-inflammatory effect of the exceed this dose during a severe exacerbation.14 Although steroid reverses the underlying asthma process, whereas some evidence in adults may suggest benefit from early other therapies, including ␤ agonists, simply treat symp- high-dose steroid in the emergency department setting,1 toms and “buy time” for the steroids to work. data on systemic steroids remain inconclusive. A 2016 Unfortunately, some patients continue have severe bron- Cochrane review examined 18 pediatric and adult studies chospasm and respiratory distress despite initial treatment using a variety of dosing regimens for systemic steroids with ␤ agonists and steroids. Status asthmaticus and acute and found no clear advantage to any specific regimen.15 It severe asthma are common terms used for severe or life- threatening asthma exacerbations in which bronchospasm has, however, been demonstrated that early administration and respiratory distress persist despite treatment with ste- of systemic steroids in the emergency department is asso- 16 roids and multiple doses of a ␤ agonist. Status asthmaticus ciated with decreased hospital admission rate. occurs in approximately 20% of asthma hospitalizations, Despite the common practice of escalating the dosing of but the number of children requiring pediatric ICU admis- standard therapies in the setting of status asthmaticus, lim- sion appears to be increasing over time.3-5 ited data support inhaled continuous albuterol dosing Ͼ 15– Expert guidelines from the National Institutes of Health 20 mg/h or steroid dosing Ͼ 2 mg/kg/d of prednisone (NIH) recommend inhaled ␤-agonist systemic corticoste- equivalent. Providers should carefully consider and mon- roid therapy for all asthma flares requiring emergent treat- itor adverse effects of these medicines if they choose to ment, with the addition of inhaled ipratropium for severe exceed standard dosing regimens. 850 RESPIRATORY CARE • JUNE 2017 VOL 62 NO 6 ADJUNCT THERAPIES FOR REFRACTORY STATUS ASTHMATICUS IN CHILDREN Anticholinergics peated the trial in 2002 with earlier randomization and similar results.24 An additional 2007 randomized trial of Ipratropium is an anticholinergic agent that causes bron- intravenous terbutaline versus saline added to nebulized chodilation through its action as an acetylcholine receptor albuterol for children presenting to the emergency depart- antagonist.17 A 2005 systematic review of 32 randomized ment with status asthmaticus demonstrated a statistically studies of ipratropium provided in the initial management nonsignificant improvement in clinical asthma scores, time of status asthmaticus in the emergency department dem- to weaning of nebulized therapy, and time to ICU dis- onstrated a clear benefit in both children and adults for charge.25 However, 4 subjects demonstrated some cardiac improving pulmonary function parameters and preventing toxicity of terbutaline, with one displaying cardiac dys- hospital admissions18; this was confirmed in a 2013 Co- rhythmias and 3 cases of elevated troponin levels. Despite chrane review.19 However, once a child is admitted to the the marginal success of these early trials, Cochrane re- hospital, the potential benefit of continued ipratropium views in 2001 and 2012 including children and adults therapy is less clear. A randomized trial of 210 children found no significant benefit with the addition of intrave- (ipratropium vs control) found an advantage in the ipra- nous ␤ agonists to inhaled ␤ agonists.22 tropium group for symptom improvement and reduced More recently, the increased use of long-acting ␤ ago- length of hospital stay; however,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us