NASA MOONED AMERICA ! By Ralph Rene APPROPRIATE SAYINGS People always overdo the matter when they attempt deception. C.D. Warner Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth. F.D. Roosevelt A clean glove often hides a dirty hand. English Proverb The great masses of the people will more easily fall victims to a big lie than a small one. A. Hitler The trouble with lying is that your lie changes slightly with each telling. Rene There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance — that principle is contempt prior to investigation. Herbert Spencer There's a sucker born every minute. RT. Barnum - a - INTRODUCTION Our space shuttles routinely blast off to orbit the Earth. There is not a single doubt that man is in space! However, there is much doubt that any man has ever gone beyond the radiation shield provided by the Van Allen belts. As you will eventually learn from the chapter titled Sunstroke, once beyond that shield space is riven with deadly radiation from the Sun. The Table of Contents should be on this page. However, since NASA MOONED AMERICA! is a unique book it required a different format. The old adage, "A picture is worth 10,000 words." still holds true. We shall immediately present four pages of NASA- derived photos that will absolutely prove that NASA began to doctor photos three years before the Apollo missions allegedly landed men on the Moon. - b - THE ZERO G AIRPLANE This photo in Carrying The Fire, a book written by Apollo Astronaut Michael Collins, was snapped by a professional NASA photographer as the plane flew an outside loop to temporarily eliminate gravity. The cabin is padded to protect the occupants from the inevi- table fall the instant the loop is terminated. Here, Collins, as he practices space walking, is holding the propulsion rod in his right hand. Note the similarity between this picture and the one on the adjoining page. Note also that the suit's wrinkles deny that it is inflated. - c - The GEMINI 10 SPACE WALK This picture was also extracted from Carrying The Fire and was allegedly taken during a space walk on the Gemini 10 mission exactly three years before his Apollo 11 mission to the Moon. NASA claims to have landed the first men on the Moon during this mission. He is shown holding a jet reaction propulsion rod with his left hand. On page 124 of Heroes In Space by Peter Bond, published in 1987, I discovered that Collins allegedly lost his camera on this space walk. That was a contrived excuse by NASA so they could turn a zero-g picture into one of a spacewalk so no one would ask why he wasn't carrying his camera. On page 660 of Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do written by Peter Mc Williams we find "the film of Russia's first space walk was later proven to be shot in a studio." -d- THE SPACEY TWINS # 1 Following an obvious hunch I had negatives made of both previous pictures. Then I had another negative made of the first photo reduced in size and flopped over. Collins is now practicing with his left hand, the same hand he used in his alleged space walk. I then had the "Gemini 10" picture blown up until the figure of Collins was the same size as this one. THE SPACEY TWINS # 2 I then rotated the blown-up photo clockwise until the propulsion rod made the same angle across the page on both pictures. Even the expression of his face is the same. Collins would have us believe that this picture was taken by a different person many months later. However, the negative of either picture placed over the print of the other produces a point to point coincidence until the binding line at the knee is reached. The missing area was re- moved when the photo was bound in his book. If I do the same to the original NASA picture #66-40127 (which took over 18 months to get from NASA), the point to point coincidence continues to the soles of his boots. Why did NASA feel it necessary to fake pictures and lie to us as early as July 1966? -f - AUTHOR'S NOTES This book is niether a thesis nor an academic dissertation, nor is it written by an academic expert. It provides a strong body of proof that we never landed men on the Moon. I first reached this conclusion by examination of the photos you have just seen and others, and by dissecting direct quotations from the books of the astronauts involved in the Apollo missions and those of government scientists and engineers. The subject matter caused most publishers to reject this book out of hand without bothering to read it. Some rejected it because I lack proper academic credentials. In this somewhat Orwellian world many people with formal educations delude themselves into thinking that college degrees are a prerequisite for thought. That's simply not so! I have very credible credentials for what I do. I am an ex-member of Mensa with an IQ in the top one- half % of the population; I am an inventor who was granted, without corporate help, two basic patents. I am a self-taught engineer who has successfully designed beams, trusses, a mobile crane, boats, homes, factories, machinery, etc. I know they are successful because I built them with my own hands. For over 20-years I was the only disciple of Pete Ross who had one of the finest technical minds on the planet. He was a hands-on person who could devise simple experiments to test almost any hypothesis with the same ease with which he could design and build a machine. He claimed I was one of the smarter monkeys, and he vowed to open my mind. He presented me with logic and examples that many times negated some small part of our accepted scientific beliefs. Frequently, when I left, I had severe headaches from the process. The only people with the proper credentials to write about the moon hoax are the very ones who participated in it. Michael Collins, Frank Borman, and Buzz Aldrin all wrote books about the Apollo 11 mission- which was a mistake, because those books contain many revealing discrepancies. This book was originally written because in 1990 NASA intended to take us to Mars the same way they allegedly took us to the Moon. The week before I finished this new edition NASA bravely announced that Martian life was found on a rock they found in the Antarctic. WOW! According to their professionals this rock had smashed into Antarctica 13,000 years ago after being blasted off Mars 17-million years ago by a meteorite. Therefore, since Antartica accretes ice at the rate of 2 feet per year they must have found it at the 26,000 foot level- which is rather difficult to do, because there is only 10,000 feet of ice there. To put the icing on the NASA fruitcake, about a week later some lady astronomer announced that she had located the Martian crater from which it was blasted. This means that although the rock was in space with an unstable orbit for 16,987,000 years (it hit us didn't it?) she was able to calculate backwards from the landing site of that rock. For starters she had to know the exact time, direction, and velocity of the landing. Sure she does! I cite only secondary sources for information. Whistle blowers are never popular, and in the last few decades many of them have worked in either atomic energy or space. Not having a suicidal urge, I refrained from blandly traipsing in the government archives suspiciously searching for information. That would be foolish. Instead, I chose to dissect the work of other serious writers on space and various other NASA programs, plus the astronauts who wrote about their trips to the Moon . -i - I found no fault with the research of these professional writers because it was mostly well written. I feel their only flaw was in their conclusions, where they neglected to exercise their critical facilities. However, it is easy for sincere, honest men to fall prey to professional and unscrupulous con men especially when the con artists have wrapped themselves in red, white, and blue. I myself was an absolute believer for over 20-years. On the title page of this book the copyright notice reads, "All rights reserved," etc. The first part is a familiar message appearing in most books. Did all the authors have to get permis- sion to print the same message from one another? How do they know who to get permission from? So far as I know there is no service that keeps track of the users and issues a listing of a hundred thousand previous users. It's very perplexing. However, I took the precaution of add- ing to the standard notice a statement giving other authors blanket permission to use direct quotes from this book. Trying to get permission from various publishers is an excercise in futility. I sent certified letters. After five or six weeks had passed, two out of a dozen or so responded. They used the SASH I provided to forward me a questionnaire asking simplistic questions. They wanted to know how much the book would cost, how many copies would be sold, where it would be for sale, etc.