PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick

PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick

09/26/21 PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick PH214: Philosophy of Science View Online 1. Hempel, C.G., Oppenheim, P.: Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of science. 15, 135–175 (1948). 2. Wesley C. Salmon: Why Ask, ‘Why?’? An Inquiry concerning Scientific Explanation. Proceedings and addresses of the American Philosophical Association (Online). 51, 683–705 (1978). 3. Cartwright, N.: Causal Laws and Effective Strategies. Noûs. 13, 419–437 (1979). 4. Gillies, D.: Varieties of Propensity. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 51, 807–835 (2000). 5. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/. 6. Hitchcock, C.: Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. , Blackwell Publishers, 2004. 1/12 09/26/21 PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick 7. Callender, C.: The Oxford handbook of philosophy of time. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011). 8. Callender, C.: The Oxford handbook of philosophy of time. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011). 9. Macbeath, M.: Who was Dr Who’s Father? Synthese. 51, 397–430 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485262. 10. Alexander Bird: Philosophy of science. UCL Press, London (1998). 11. Christopher Hitchcock, Woodward, J.: Explanatory Generalizations, Part II: Plumbing Explanatory Depth. Noûs. 37, 181–199 (2003). 12. Hitchcock, C., Woodward, J.: Explanatory Generalizations, Part II: Plumbing Explanatory Depth. Nou ̂ s. 37, 181–199 (2003). 13. Woodward, J.: Scientific Explanation (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-explanation/. 2/12 09/26/21 PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick 14. James Woodward, Hitchcock, C.: Explanatory Generalizations, Part I: A Counterfactual Account. Noûs. 37, 1–24 (2003). 15. Woodward, J., Hitchcock, C.: Explanatory Generalizations, Part I: A Counterfactual Account. Nou ̂ s. 37, 1–24 (2003). 16. Wesley C. Salmon: Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques. Philosophy of Science. 64, 461–477 (1997). 17. Salmon, W.C.: Causality and explanation: A reply to two Critiques. Philosophy of science. 64, 461–477 (1997). 18. Feigl, H., Maxwell, G.: Scientific explanation, space, and time. Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1962). 19. James Ladyman: Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge, London (2002). 20. James Ladyman: Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge, London (2002). 21. Alexander Bird: Philosophy of science. UCL Press, London (1998). 3/12 09/26/21 PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick 22. David K. Lewis: Counterfactuals. Blackwell, Oxford (1973). 23. David K. Lewis: Philosophical papers: Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, New York (1986). 24. David K. Lewis: Philosophical papers: Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, New York (1986). 25. D. M. Armstrong: What is a law of nature? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983). 26. Carroll, J..: Laws of Nature (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/laws-of-nature/. 27. Loewer, B.: Humean Supervenience. Philosophical topics. 24, 101–126 (1996). 28. Cartwright, N.: How the laws of physics lie. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1983). 29. Fred I. Dretske: Laws of Nature. Philosophy of Science. 44, 248–268 (1977). 4/12 09/26/21 PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick 30. Dretske, F.I.: Laws of Nature. Philosophy of science. 44, 248–268 (1977). 31. Mumford, S., Tugby, M.: Metaphysics and science. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013). 32. Mumford, S., Tugby, M.: Metaphysics and science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2013). 33. G. E. M. Anscombe: Causality and determination: an inaugural lecture. Cambridge University Press, London (1971). 34. Ernest Sosa, Michael Tooley: Causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993). 35. Dowe, P.: Causal Processes (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-process/. 36. Michael J. Loux, Dean W. Zimmerman: The Oxford handbook of metaphysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005). 37. Michael J. Loux, Dean W. Zimmerman: The Oxford handbook of metaphysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003). 5/12 09/26/21 PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick 38. John David Collins, Edward J. Hall, L. A. Paul: Causation and counterfactuals. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2004). 39. Christopher Hitchcock: Causal Processes and Interactions: What are they and what are they good for? Philosophy of Science. 71, 932–941 (2004). 40. Hitchcock, C.: Causal Processes and Interactions: What Are They and What Are They Good For? Philosophy of science. 71, 932–941 (2004). 41. Hoefer, C.: Humean effective strategies. (2003). 42. David Lewis: Causation as Influence. The Journal of Philosophy. 97, 182–197 (2000). 43. Menzies, P.: Are Humean doubts about singular causation justified. Communication & Cognition. 31, 1–26 (1998). 44. Lewis, D.: Causation as Influence. Journal of philosophy. 97, 182–197 (2000). 45. Peter Menzies, Huw, P.: Causation as a Secondary Quality. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 44, 187–203 (1993). 6/12 09/26/21 PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick 46. Menzies, P., Price, H.: Causation as a Secondary Quality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 44, 187–203 (1993). 47. Price, H.: Agency and Causal Asymmetry. Mind. 101, 501–520 (1992). 48. Price, H.: Agency and Causal Asymmetry. Mind: a quarterly review of philosophy. 101, 501–520 (1992). 49. Wesley C. Salmon: An ‘At-At’ Theory of Causal Influence. Philosophy of Science. 44, 215–224 (1977). 50. Salmon, W.C.: An ‘At-At’ Theory of Causal Influence. Philosophy of science. 44, 215–224 (1977). 51. Salmon, W.C.: Causality: Production and Propagation. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1980, 49–69 (1980). 52. James Woodward: Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003). 53. 7/12 09/26/21 PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick James Woodward: Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2003). 54. Dupre, J.: Probabilistic Causality Emancipated. Midwest studies in philosophy. 9, 169–175 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1984.tb00058.x. 55. Ellery Eells: Probabilistic causality. , Cambridge University Press (2008). 56. Ellery Eells, James H. Fetzer: The place of probability in science. Springer, Dordrecht (2010). 57. Hitchcock, C.: The Mishap at Reichenbach Fall: Singular vs. General Causation. Philosophical Studies. 78, 257–291 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990114. 58. Hitchcock, C.: Probabilistic Causation (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-probabilistic/. 59. Charles R. Twardy, Korb, K.B.: A Criterion of Probabilistic Causation. Philosophy of Science. 71, 241–262 (2004). 60. Twardy, C.R., Korb, K.B.: A Criterion of Probabilistic Causation. Philosophy of science. 71, 241–262 (2004). 8/12 09/26/21 PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick 61. D. M. Armstrong: What is a law of nature? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983). 62. Patrick Suppes: Logic, methodology and philosophy of science: Proceedings. North-Holland Pub. Co, Amsterdam (1973). 63. Alan Hájek: "Mises redux” - Redux: Fifteen arguments against finite frequentism. Erkenntnis. 45, 209–227 (1996). 64. Hájek, A.: "Mises redux” - Redux: Fifteen arguments against finite frequentism. Erkenntnis: an international journal of analytic philosophy. 45, 209–227 (1996). 65. Hájek, A.: Fifteen Arguments Against Hypothetical Frequentism. Erkenntnis. 70, 211–235 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-009-9154-1. 66. Hájek, A.: Fifteen Arguments Against Hypothetical Frequentism. Erkenntnis: an international journal of analytic philosophy. 70, 211–235 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-009-9154-1. 67. Hájek, A.: Interpretations of Probability (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/probability-interpret/. 68. 9/12 09/26/21 PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick Hoefer, C.: The Third Way on Objective Probability: A Sceptic’s Guide to Objective Chance. Mind. 116, 549–596 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm549. 69. Callender, C.: Thermodynamic Asymmetry in Time (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time-thermo/. 70. Huw Price: Time’s arrow & Archimedes' point: new directions for the physics of time. Oxford University Press, New York (1997). 71. Huw Price: Time’s arrow & Archimedes' point: new directions for the physics of time. Oxford University Press, New York (1996). 72. Dummett, M.: Bringing About the Past. The Philosophical Review. 73, 338–359 (1964). 73. Dummett, A.E., Flew, A.: Symposium: Can an Effect Precede Its Cause? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes. 28, 27–44 (1954). 74. Horwich, Paul: Asymmetries in time: problems in the philosophy of science. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1987). 75. Faye, J.: Backward Causation (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-backwards/. 10/12 09/26/21 PH214: Philosophy of Science | University of Warwick 76. A Time Travel Website - Exploring the paradoxes of time travel, http://timetravelphilosophy.net/. 77. Lewis, D.: The Paradoxes of Time Travel. American philosophical quarterly. 13, 145–152 (1976). 78. Theodore Sider: A New Grandfather Paradox? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 57, 139–144 (1997). 79. Sider, T.: A New Grandfather Paradox? Philosophy and phenomenological research.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us