Comparative Study Between Percolation and Ultrasonication for the Extraction of Hibiscus and Jasmine Flowers Utilizing Antibacterial Bioassay

Comparative Study Between Percolation and Ultrasonication for the Extraction of Hibiscus and Jasmine Flowers Utilizing Antibacterial Bioassay

Available online on www.ijppr.com International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research 2014; 6(3): 472-476 ISSN: 0975-4873 Research Article Comparative Study between Percolation and Ultrasonication for the Extraction of Hibiscus and Jasmine Flowers Utilizing Antibacterial Bioassay *Rasha Saad1, Gayathiry Murugiah2, Junainah Abdulhamid1, Eddy Yusuf1, Mohd Fadli1 1School of Pharmacy, Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia 2Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Available Online: 1st September 2014 ABSTRACT Different extraction techniques can produce extracts of divergent active compounds from plants. Percolation with soxhlet and ultrasonication were used with ethanol solvent to extract hibiscus and jasmine flowers. These extracts were tested for antibacterial effect on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus with susceptibility test. The study was conducted by extracting the flowers with soxhlet and ultrasonic apparatus using ethanol as solvent. The extracts were separated from the solvent by evaporating the solvent with rotary evaporator. Discs of 6 mm were prepared from filter paper and were impregnated with the extracts. Sub-cultured test organisms, E. coli and S. aureus were swabbed on Mueller Hinton (MH) agars for susceptibility testing. The prepared discs were placed on the swabbed MH agar plates. Commercially prepared jasmine oil and hibiscus tea extracts’ discs were used as standards. Gentamicin discs were used as positive control and ethanol impregnated discs were used as negative control. Observations were recorded after 24 hours of incubation at 37 ⁰C. Soxhlet and ultrasonic extracts of hibiscus flower showed antibacterial effect on E. coli and S. aureus. The hibiscus standard did not produce any effect on both E. coli and S. aureus. Soxhlet and ultrasonic extracts of jasmine flower showed no effect E. coli. Soxhlet and ultrasonic extracts of jasmine flower showed antibacterial effect on S. aureus. The jasmine standard showed antibacterial effect on both E. coli and S. aureus. Based on the results, it can be concluded that different extraction techniques administered on plants will yield different extracts. These extracts will display varying effects on bacteria like E. coli and S. aureus. Key words: Percolation, Ultrasonication, Hibiscus and Jasmine Flowers, Antibacterial Bioassay, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. INTRODUCTION addition, the leaves and flowers have been found to be aid Extraction is used in medical field to separate medically in the healing of ulcers.[18] active portion of a plant by using selective solvent in Parts of jasmine plant such as leaf, stem, bark and roots are standard extraction procedures. Soxhlet apparatus is also very useful and important in pharmaceutical designed to extract compound that has limited solubility industries. All the parts of this plant contain manitol.[6] in a solvent and the impurities are insoluble in that The plant is extensively used in manufacturing incenses, solvent.[1] Ultrasonic extraction uses ultrasonic waves to room fresheners and soaps. Juices from the leaves of extract active compounds of a plant. The ultrasonic field jasmine plants are applied to treat ulcers, remove corns, enables generation, locally of microcavitations in the effecting in expelling worms, regulating menstrual flow, to liquid surrounding the plant material.[2] clean kidney waste, inflamed and blood shot eyes.[7] Escherichia coli and Staphlococcus aureus are naturally Therefore this study was conducted to determine if extracts occurring commensal in the human body.[9,11] Both of hibiscus and jasmine from different extraction bacteria can cause a variety of diseases that are difficult to techniques have antibacterial effects on E. coli and S. treat due to the increased drug resistance.[10,12,13] There is a aureus. need to search for new drugs to overcome this and Malaysian flowers like hibiscus and jasmine has shown MATERIALS AND METHOD antibacterial effect on E. coli and S. aureus. Previous Plant Material: The plant materials of hibiscus and jasmine studies have showed that hibiscus possesses many were collected from a nursery located in Klang, Selangor. biological activities, such as antipyretic, analgesic and Plant Extraction: The plant flowers were collected, anti- inflammatory activities. It has also been reported that washed, the petals were removed from its stem and stamen the plant’s flower possesses antispermatogenic, and shadow dried. The flowers were then pulverised to androgenic, antitumor and anticonvulsant properties in coarse powder with an electric blender. The coarse *Author for correspondence: E-mail: [email protected] Rasha Saad et al. / Comparative Study between… Fig. 1: Effects of hibiscus extracts (A) and hibiscus standard (B) on Escherichia coli Fig. 2: Effects of hibiscus extracts (A) and hibiscus standard (B) on Staphylococcus aureus Table 1: Effects of hibiscus extracts Zone of Inhibition (mm) Bacteria Control Standard Hibiscus Extracts Gentamicin (+ve) Ethanol (-ve) Hibiscus Tea Soxhlet Ultrasonic Escherichia coli 17.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 7.0 Staphylococcus aureus 17.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 11.0 Comparison of Soxhlet and Ultrasonic Extracts of Hibiscus on E. coli and S. aureus 20 Soxhlet 15 Ultrasonic 10 Control 17 17 (mm) 5 11 6 7 8 0 Zone of InhibitionZone E. coli S. aureus Fig. 3: Comparison of soxhlet and ultrasonic extracts of hibiscus on E. coli and S. aureus powders were used for extraction with ethanol using further use. soxhlet and ultrasonic apparatus. The extracts were Optical Density Measurement of Extracts: All collected 473 evaporated by rotary evaporator, labelled and stored for extracts’ optical density were measured using a Page IJPPR, Vol 6, Issue 3, September-November 2014, 472-476 Rasha Saad et al. / Comparative Study between… Table 2: Optical density of hibiscus samples Hibiscus Sample Optical density Standard Sample 0.000 Soxhlet Extract 0.913 Ultrasonic Extract 0.371 Fig. 4: Effects of jasmine extracts and jasmine standard on Escherichia coli Fig. 5: Effects of jasmine extracts and jasmine standard on Staphylococcus aureus Table 3: Effects of jasmine extracts Zone of Inhibition (mm) Bacteria Control Standard Jasmine Extracts Gentamicin (+ve) Ethanol (-ve) Jasmine Oil Soxhlet Ultrasonic Escherichia coli 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Staphylococcus aureus 18.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 9.0 spectrophotometer to determine their respective Discs Preparation: Filter paper was used to prepare 6 mm concentrations.[20] paper discs that were incubated with extracts and were air Test Microorganisms: Escherichia coli and dried.[20] The positive control used was gentamicin discs. Staphylococcus aureus were obtained from Faculty of The negative control was ethanol incubated discs. Health and Life Science of Management and Science Commercially prepared jasmine oil and hibiscus tea University (MSU), Malaysia. The cultures of the bacteria extracts were also incubated in paper discs and used as a were maintained in their appropriate agar plate at 4°C comparison. throughout the study and used as stock cultures.[19] Susceptibility Test: The nutrient broth inoculated with the Culture Preparation for Susceptibility Test: The test test organisms were swabbed on prepared Mueller Hinton microorganisms were sub cultured from their agar plates agar with sterile cotton swabs. Then the discs with extracts into nutrient broth. A single bacterial colony was removed impregnated were placed directly on the surface of the from the agar and incubated in nutrient broth for 24 hours swabbed Mueller Hinton agar plates and were incubated at 474 at 37°C.[20] 37°C for 24 hours.[20] The test was done in triplicates. The Page IJPPR, Vol 6, Issue 3, September-November 2014, 472-476 Rasha Saad et al. / Comparative Study between… Comparison of Soxhlet and Ultrasonic Extracts of Jasmine on E. coli and S. aureus 20 15 Soxhlet 10 18 18 Ultrasonic 5 8 9 Control 0 0 0 E. coli S. aureus Fig. 6: Comparison of Inhibition(mm) Zone of soxhlet and ultrasonic extracts of jasmine on E. coli and S. aureus Table 4: Optical density of jasmine samples Jasmine Sample Optical density Standard Sample 0.000 Soxhlet Extract 0.327 Ultrasonic Extract 0.615 plates were observed for the presence of zone of inhibition. and Figure 5). Soxhlet extract of jasmine flower did not produce any effect but ultrasonic extract of jasmine flower RESULTS AND DISCUSSION has produced 7 mm on E. coli. Whereas on S. aureus, Hibiscus Extracts: Hibiscus flowers extracted using soxhlet extract of jasmine has produced 8 mm of zone of soxhlet and ultrasonic extractions both have antibacterial inhibition and ultrasonic extract of hibiscus flower has effect on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus (See produced 9 mm (See Table 3). Standard sample of jasmine Figure 1 and Figure 2). Soxhlet extract of hibiscus flower exhibited antibacterial effect on E. coli and S. aureus. has produced 6 mm of zone of inhibition and ultrasonic These observations show that both extracts of jasmine extract of hibiscus flower has produced 7 mm on E. coli. flowers from soxhlet and ultrasonic has extracted the Whereas on S. aureus, soxhlet extract of hibiscus has active compounds that can inhibit the growth of S. aureus produced 8 mm of zone of inhibition and ultrasonic extract but not E. coli. of hibiscus flower has produced 11 mm (See Table 1). Optical density of the jasmine samples were measured at Standard sample of hibiscus did not exhibit any effect on 650 nm to determine the samples concentration. Based on E. coli and S. aureus. These observations show that both the measurements (See Table 4), ultrasonic extract was extracts of hibiscus flowers from soxhlet and ultrasonic has more concentrated compared to soxhlet extract. Hence extracted the active compounds that can inhibit the growth ultrasonic extract exhibited better antibacterial effect on S. of E. coli and S. aureus. aureus compared to soxhlet extract (See Figure 6). Optical density of the hibiscus samples were measured at Since soxhlet extract and ultrasonic extract did not show 800 nm to determine the samples concentration.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us