The Contest for the Tall Forests of South-Western Australia and the Discourses of Advocates

The Contest for the Tall Forests of South-Western Australia and the Discourses of Advocates

SPECIAL ISSUE CSIRO PUBLISHING Pacific Conservation Biology, 2019, 25, 50–71 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18058 The contest for the tall forests of south-western Australia and the discourses of advocates Grant Wardell-Johnson A,H, Angela Wardell-Johnson B, Beth SchultzC, Joe DortchD, Todd RobinsonE, Len CollardF and Michael CalverG AARC Centre for Mine Site Restoration and School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. BCentre for Human Rights Education, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. CPO Box 203, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia. DCentre for Rock Art Research and Management, University of Western Australia, M257, Perth, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. ESchool of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. FSchool of Indigenous Studies, The University of Western Australia, M303, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. GEnvironment and Conservation Cluster, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia. HCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. After over 50 000 years of interaction between Aboriginal people and changing climates, south-western Australia’s tall forests were first logged less than 200 years ago, initiating persistent conflict. Recent conservation advocacy has resulted in the protection of 49% of these tall forests in statutory reserves, providing an opportunity to implement and benefit from a growing moral consensus on the valuing of these globally significant, tall forest ecosystems. We analysed a cross-section of literature (63 papers, 118 statements) published on these forests over 187 years to identify values framing advocacy. We differentiated four resource-oriented discourses and three discourses giving primacy to social and environmental values over seven eras. Invasion sparked initial uncontrolled exploitation, with the Forests Act 1918 managing competing agricultural and timber advocacy. Following the Colonial and Country Life eras, industrial- scale exploitation of the karri forest region resulted in reaction by increasingly broad sectors of society. Warming and drying in the 21st Century emphasises the importance of intact tall forest and the Indigenous Renaissance discourse. Vesting for a more comprehensive set of values would acknowledge a new moral consensus. Additional keywords: conservation policy, culture, environmental management, environmental sustainability, forestry, human impact, natural resource management, world heritage area Received 28 June 2018, accepted 30 October 2018, published online 6 December 2018 Introduction protectionism or exclusion of production. Rather, he advocated Nearly a century ago, Charles Lane Poole, Western Australia’s regulation and orderly management, with retention of aesthetic Conservator of Forests, advocated: values. He recognised that a transition to ‘cultivated’ forest would result in significant change: y when the people develop a forest conscienceness [sic] y and they themselves will see to it that the forest policy is When the State’s forests have become cultivated, trees will be maintained and the forests are used for the benefit of the cut when they reach maturity. Sentiment may dictate the community as a whole, forever, and not for the benefit of the preservation of a few for a period far beyond that of maturity, few sawmillers, timber hewers, and timber merchants of as reminders of the giants of former days, but whole forests of to-day [sic] (Lane Poole 1920a, p. 34) giant trees will no longer be seen. (Lane Poole 1920b, p. 130) Lane Poole’s plea to move beyond narrow exploitation in the Since these remarks, formal management of State-owned forests forests of south-western Australia (SWA) was not for has been put into practice in the two major forest types of Journal compilation Ó CSIRO 2019 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pcb Discourses and tall forest advocacy Pacific Conservation Biology 51 SWA: jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) and karri (Eucalyptus numerical taxonomic approaches with explicit attention to the diversicolor). Lane Poole’s prescience of a loss of ‘giants’ (but discourses, conflicts, capitals and knowledge systems embed- not ‘cultivation’) has occurred in the jarrah forests (Wardell- ded within the statements. We then include selected statements Johnson et al. 2015). However, in the karri (or tall eucalypt) within eras to provide a historical context for advocacy under forests, advocacy for the ‘giants of former days’ has resulted in three management rationales: Deep Time, Resources and Con- substantial areas of forest being protected with national park servation. Finally, we discuss discourses in relation to the future status. This protected forest, together with stands of ‘cultivated’ of these forests under the rapid warming and drying now trees within a matrix of regeneration in State forest provides an experienced in the region. We ask: what discourses enable insight into the consequences of advocacy in the global context. policy and management to best maintain the values inherent in Forests regulate planetary processes and are extraordinarily these tall forests? We conclude by advocating protection of a biodiverse (FAO 2016; Watson et al. 2018). They capture wider range of values under circumstances of changed social primeval imagination (Schama 1995), reflecting and inspiring values and climate. This is because, we argue, World Heritage a complex interconnectedness of feelings and attitudes, repre- listing better protects the values provided by intact tall forests senting symbolic and material values (Hay 2002). These values than any approach based on narrow sectoral interests. are derived through historical associations, contemporary use and future expectations, and coevolve and converge through Methods landscape connections (Wardell-Johnson 2011; Ernoul and Wardell-Johnson 2015). As these values are important to peo- Solutions to environmental issues involve evidence-based ple, they are often contested (Thirgood 1981; Gellman 2008). approaches drawing on transdisciplinary methods integrating High levels of contestation provide particular challenges for the biophysical, ecological and social sciences. These methods environmental management and governance (Rittel and Webber have clear standards and transparent processes to achieve 1973; Reed and Massie 2013; Kanowski 2017) and often technical and scientific credibility (Brennan 2004). This instigates advocacy. Advocacy is an expression of social values research is framed by conceptual frameworks that allow inte- that define political imperatives, manifesting as a range of gration of these disciplines (Mylopoulos 1992). These frame- behaviours and interactions in relation to the status quo. Advo- works should include underpinning assumptions, and serve in cacy plays a role, both in maintaining (e.g. Underwood et al. the interpretation of positions (Kung and Solvberg 1986). We 1991) and in challenging (e.g. South-West Forests Defence thus apply a discourse framework to analyse statements that Foundation Inc. 1986) the status quo. Advocacy galvanises reflect the inherent values of positions (Dryzek 1997; Wardell- moral and ethical positions to defend environmental manage- Johnson 2005; Ernoul and Wardell-Johnson 2015) in the history ment (Batavia and Nelson 2016) and generates waves of con- of management of the tall forests of SWA. sequences. The contested values in forest management (Thirgood 1981; Kanowski 2017) are evident in the tall forests Study area: SWAs tall eucalypt forests in context of SWA: The tall eucalypt forests of Australia include the world’s tallest angiosperms, with volume and mass of vegetation that are It is an intense, even violent debate, and one which has amongst the greatest in terrestrial ecosystems (Keith et al. become deeply political as proponents for one philosophy or 2009). Although they occupy only 0.75% of Australia’s land- the other seek the power to decide how the karri is to be cover (4.9 million ha: Wardell-Johnson et al. 2017a), their managed. This is the social context in which foresters are environmental, economic and cultural values represent signifi- attempting to produce responsible and workable manage- cance beyond their distributional area (Wardell-Johnson et al. ment plans for the karri forest. (Underwood et al. 1991, p. 22) 2017a). Tall eucalypt forests occur discontinuously in a zone of As values determine forms of advocacy (see Boon 2018) and are high rainfall (at least 1000 mm per year) from north-eastern inseparable from politics, they manifest themselves in a diver- Queensland to southern Tasmania, with an outlier over 2000 km sity of human positions (Maser 1994; O’Laughlin 1996; War- to the west in SWA (Wardell-Johnson et al. 2017a). These dell-Johnson et al. 2018). Advocacy reflects sectoral values, forests share globally significant structural features and also identified through types of conflict (Duane 1997), informed by provide habitat for unique biotic assemblages (Wardell-Johnson discrete knowledge systems (Wardell-Johnson and Selvaratnam et al. 2017a): 2011) that draw on different types of capital (Flora and Flora With their associated understorey, the giant Karris of south 1996), framing distinct discourses (Dryzek 1997; Wardell- Western Australia constitute a unique and ancient forest; one Johnson 2005). Thus discourses can be identified through of the great botanical associations of the world (CTRC

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    22 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us