Natural Environment – Cost

Natural Environment – Cost

Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment Study Public Open House #2 Transportation Services Department December 7, 2017 Agenda • Review study progress • Confirm the Preferred Corridor • Design Alternatives • Light Maintenance and Storage Facility • Preliminary Recommended Plan • Next Steps 1 Context for the Study • Confederation Line nearing completion (2018) • Stage 2 Extension of Confederation Line West to Moodie and Baseline Stations is proceeding (2023) • Strategic opportunity to review possibility of Stage 3 to extend service further west 2 Study Goals • Determine the Preferred Corridor; • Determine the Recommended Plan for LRT alignment and stations; and • Determine project staging and implementation based on future ridership and affordability. 3 Study Schedule Pre-Planning Phase Spring 2017: Existing Conditions & Corridor Selection *Consultation Group Meetings* *Public Open House 1* EA Phase Summer/Fall 2017: Spring 2018: Evaluation of Designs Commence Transit Project *Meet with Stakeholders and Assessment Process Consultation Groups* Fall/Winter 2017: Recommended Plan *Consultation Group Meetings* *Public Open House 2* *Present to Committee and Council* 4 Study Process • Environmental Assessment requirements addressed through Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) • Documented in Environmental Project Report (EPR) 5 What We Heard • Expressed support for Corridor 8 • Do not support Corridor 13 • Consider how to provide a supporting transit network to better serve Kanata & Stittsville • Extend corridor 8 beyond Canadian Tire Centre, towards Hazeldean • How to cross Highway 417 • Connectivity to stations • Transit-Oriented Development potential • Future ridership numbers 6 Confirm the Preferred Corridor 7 Additional Corridor Evaluation • Further assessment of Corridors 1, 5, 8, 13 was undertaken – Terminus modified in each corridor • Evaluated new scenarios against same criteria used in initial evaluation • Used ridership projections from City Transportation model • All scenarios provide increased transit ridership versus the Transportation Master Plan Base Scenario (2031 Affordable Network) 8 Preferred Corridor - 8A • Provides rapid transit spine, supports approved transit corridors, development patterns • Good connection to Kanata North should be provided to enhance network • Extension to Hazeldean further increases ridership, improves network connectivity and provides additional transit-oriented development opportunities Ridership Potential TOD & City Natural Social Capital & & Network Building Environment Environment Complexity Operational Costs Connectivity Opportunities Impacts Impact ●+ ●+ ● ● ● ▲9 Alternative Design Evaluation 10 Alternative Designs • Generally, the LRT will follow the same alignment as previously approved Transitway EA’s • Alternative designs have been developed and evaluated for: – March/Eagleson Station – Terry Fox Station to Palladium segment 11 Alternative Designs 12 March/Eagleson Station • LRT will follow previously studied and approved BRT alignment • Main considerations in developing a preferred design at this location include: • Station connectivity • Transit/traffic operations • Land use compatibility • Cost 13 March/Eagleson Station– Alternative 1 • Limited impact to Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) facility • Bus terminal / Passenger pick-up and drop-off adjacent to station • Supports good station connectivity and access • Impact to BRT connection 14 March/Eagleson Station– Alternative 2 • Maintains BRT connection • Requires relocation of OPP facility • Bus terminal is complex, and removed from LRT platforms 15 March/Eagleson Station– Alternative 3 • Impact to BRT connection • Impacts OPP facility but may not require relocation • Bus terminal further away from LRT platforms 16 March/Eagleson Station Preferred: Alternative 1 • Minimizes impact on the OPP facility, Watt’s Creek and adjacent lands • Provides for a bus • terminal immediately adjacent to the station • Supports good station connectivity and access 17 March/Eagleson Station Preferred Alternative – Next Steps Additional work will be undertaken as part of station planning to consider: • Station connectivity • Traffic analysis / intersection design • The location and design of a new pedestrian/ cycling bridge over Highway 417 to the existing Park and Ride. 18 Terry Fox to Palladium • 6 Alternatives identified based on stakeholder feedback • Considers changes to Campeau Road and Feedmill Creek • Opportunities to address impacts on land development / property • Integration with future road network 19 Terry Fox to Palladium • Alternatives evaluated based on multiple criteria within the following categories – Transportation System Compatibility – Maximize Ridership Potential – Compatibility with Planned/Existing Communities – Social Environment – Natural Environment – Cost 20 Terry Fox to Palladium – Alternative 1 • Station location provides good coverage of existing/ proposed land uses • Best opportunity for city building and station integration with public realm • Good alignment geometry, with larger radius horizontal curves • Proximity to adjacent residential community across Campeau an issue due to elevated guideway and station • Blocks development frontage along Campeau Transportation Maximize Compatibility with Social Natural System Ridership Planned/Existing Cost Environment Environment Compatibility Potential Communities ● ● ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲21 Terry Fox to Palladium – Alternative 2 • Station location provides good coverage of existing/ proposed land uses • Good opportunity for city building and station integration with public realm • Good alignment geometry, with larger radius horizontal curves • Guideway further away from adjacent residential community • Allows for development frontage along Campeau Transportation Maximize Compatibility with Social Natural System Ridership Planned/Existing Cost Environment Environment Compatibility Potential Communities ● ● ● ● ▲ ▲22 Terry Fox to Palladium – Alternative 3 • Impact to development on adjacent lands as alignment bisects property • Station on east side of Canadian Tire Centre more difficult to integrate with existing and future development opportunities • Guideway further away from adjacent residential community • Alters previously identified and approved Carp River crossing Transportation Maximize Compatibility with Social Natural System Ridership Planned/Existing Cost Environment Environment Compatibility Potential Communities ▲ ▲ ▲ ● ▲ ▲23 Terry Fox to Palladium – Alternative 4 • Significant impact to development and access on adjacent lands • Station would be challenging to connect into future road network • Guideway further away from adjacent residential community • Alters previously identified and approved Carp River crossing Transportation Maximize Compatibility with Social Natural System Ridership Planned/Existing Cost Environment Environment Compatibility Potential Communities ▲ ▲ ▲ ● ▲ ▲24 Terry Fox to Palladium – Alternative 5 • Minimizes impact to development lands by placing alignment along south edge of property, adjacent to Highway 417 • Station would be challenging to connect into future road network • Reduced catchment area of station with Highway 417 barrier • Minimal natural environment impacts • Skewed crossing of Highway 417 will be challenging Transportation Maximize Compatibility with Social Natural System Ridership Planned/Existing Cost Environment Environment Compatibility Potential Communities ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ● ▲25 Terry Fox to Palladium – Alternative 6 • No station north of Highway 417 • Does not serve development lands or existing communities • Station on east side of Canadian Tire Centre more difficult to integrate with existing and future development opportunities. • Minimal natural environment impacts Transportation Maximize Compatibility with Social Natural System Ridership Planned/Existing Cost Environment Environment Compatibility Potential Communities ■ ■ ■ ▲ ● 26● Terry Fox to Palladium – Summary Options 1 2 3 4 5 6 Transportation System Compatibility ● ● ▲ ▲ ▲ ■ Maximize Ridership Potential ● ● ▲ ▲ ▲ ■ Compatibility with Planned/Existing ▲ ● ▲ ▲ ▲ ■ Communities Social Environment ▲ ● ● ● ▲ ▲ Natural Environment ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ● ● Costs ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ● 27 SUMMARY ▲ ● ▲ ▲ ▲ ■ Terry Fox to Palladium Preferred: Alternative 2 • Makes best use of the previously approved rapid transit corridor and lands; • Places Campeau Station far enough north to serve the area effectively; • Provides for good access and visibility of rapid transit to the surrounding community; • Can be integrated along south edge of planned development; • Provides for a tangent/ 90 degree crossing of Highway 417. 28 Light Maintenance and Storage Facility 29 LMSF Activities • Heavy maintenance activities will be concentrated at Belfast MSF • LMSF activities include: – Interior/exterior cleaning – Minor repairs (seats, windows, doors) – Daily inspection and servicing – Operator hand-off/hand-over – Overnight storage of trains 30 Light Maintenance and Storage Facility • Extension of LRT to Kanata requires additional analysis of LMSF options – Expansion of Moodie LMSF – Additional LMSF further west – Additional storage further west 31 LMSF Site Evaluation • 9 potential sites identified • Potential sites must be: – Close to mainline (<500-750 m ideal) – Large (12-16 ha), regular-shaped site ideal – A continuous parcel (not assembled group of parcels) • Process similar to previous evaluation for Belfast, Woodroffe, Moodie 32 Moodie LMSF 33 Additional LMSF Potential Sites 34 LMSF

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    45 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us