New Fossil Decapod Crustaceans from the Remy Collection, Muséum National D’Histoire Naturelle, Paris

New Fossil Decapod Crustaceans from the Remy Collection, Muséum National D’Histoire Naturelle, Paris

New fossil decapod crustaceans from the Remy Collection, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris Carrie E. SCHWEITZER Kent State University Stark Campus, Department of Geology, 6000 Frank Ave. NW, North Canton, 44720 Ohio (USA) [email protected] Rodney M. FELDMANN Kent State University, Department of Geology, Kent, 44242 Ohio (USA) [email protected] Schweitzer C. E. & Feldmann R. M. 2010. — New fossil decapod crustaceans from the Remy Collection, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. Geodiversitas 32 (3): 399-415. ABSTRACT Unpublished material originally identifi ed by J.-M. Remy, as well as evaluation of his type material deposited in the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, has KEY WORDS resulted in two new genera, Remyranina n. gen. and Planobranchia n. gen.; two new Crustacea, species, Liocarcinus heintzi n. sp. and Szaboa lamarei n. sp., and fi ve new combina- Decapoda, Brachyura, tions, Remyranina ornata n. comb., Calappilia? gorodiskii n. comb., Mursia simplex n. Cretaceous, comb., Planobranchia simplex n. comb., and Planobranchia laevis n. comb. ese taxa Eocene, Oligocene, include the fi rst Oligocene record for the Matutidae, and the extinct genus Szaboa France, is re-diagnosed. e Remy collection, comprised primarily of fossils from France Africa, and equatorial Africa, consists of numerous Calappidae and Carpilioidea, especially new species, new genera, abundant today in tropical environments, suggesting that at least for some taxa in new combinations. these groups, environmental tolerances have changed little since the Eocene. RÉSUMÉ Nouveaux crustacés décapodes fossiles de la Collection Remy, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. L’étude du matériel non publié et la révision du matériel type de J.-M. Remy déposé au Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, a permis de proposer deux genres nouveaux, Remyranina n. gen. et Planobranchia n. gen., deux espèces nouvelles, MOTS CLÉS Liocarcinus heintzi n. sp. et Szaboa lamarei n. sp., et cinq combinaisons nouvelles, Crustacea, Remyranina ornata n. comb., Calappilia? gorodiskii n. comb., Mursia simplex n. Decapoda, Brachyura, comb., Planobranchia simplex n. comb., et Planobranchia laevis n. comb. Un Matu- Crétacé, tidae de l’Oligocène est identifi é pour la première fois et une nouvelle diagnose du Éocène, Oligocène, genre éteint Szaboa est proposée. La collection Remy, principalement constituée de France, fossiles de France et d’Afrique équatoriale, regroupe de nombreux Calappidae et Afrique, Carpilioidea. Ces crustacés, particulièrement abondants dans les environnements espèces nouvelles, genres nouveaux, tropicaux actuels, suggèrent que les tolérances environnementales de certaines combinaisons nouvelles. espèces de ces groupes ont peu changé depuis l’Éocène. GEODIVERSITAS • 2010 • 32 (3) © Publications Scientifi ques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. www.geodiversitas.com 399 Schweitzer C. E. & Feldmann R. M. INTRODUCTION the matrix of the specimen of Liocarcinus heintzi n. sp. contains what appears to be miliolids. e e Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris calcilutite and calcirudite both have been reported houses a collection of decapod specimens de- to contain abundant terrigenous input (Puech- scribed or preliminarily identifi ed by Jean-Marcel maille & Vigneaux 1966), seen in the matrix of Remy during the mid-twentieth century. Our the specimen of Szaboa lamarei n. sp. us, the work and that of others over the past decade label information corresponds well with the actual has already revised and illustrated some of the lithology of the rock surrounding the specimens, taxa described in Remy’s works, bringing them so we can only assume it to be correct. up-to-date with the most recent classifi cations (see Collins & Morris 1975; Schweitzer 2003, DAX (LANDES, FRANCE) 2005; Feldmann & Portell 2007; Ahyong 2008; Remy reported that the specimen collected from Karasawa et al. 2008). Herein we evaluate the this locality, simply noted as Dax (Landes) was of remainder of the taxa described or preliminarily Eocene age, and an old label noted it as having been identifi ed by Remy, resulting in several new taxa part of the Nummulitique de Dax, collection of and combinations. A. Milne-Edwards. e Eocene age was probably Remy’s work has been particularly important derived from the association with a nummulitic for decapod studies because it includes some of rock unit. Indeed, Eocene rocks are well known the few decapod crustaceans known from the from that region of France, the southwestern re- continent of Africa (Remy 1960; Remy & Tessier gion of Aquitaine (Sztràkos et al. 1997, 1998). 1954; Gorodiski & Remy 1959). Some other works Fossil crabs have previously been reported from have described taxa from Egypt (Noetling 1885; the region (A. Milne-Edwards 1862-1865; Burger Lőrenthey 1909; Anderson & Feldmann 1995) et al. 1945; Daguin 1948; Boulanger et al. 1967; and other areas, but relatively few decapods are Sztràkos et al. 1998; Odin 2005). We herein sim- known from the continent. ply refer to the age of the specimen as Paleogene until more material with more precise locality data is collected. LOCALITIES AND GEOLOGIC SETTING Discussed here are the localities for the previously ABBREVIATIONS unpublished specimens described herein. Remy’s BSP Bayerische Staatsammlung für Paläontolo- published work contains localities for the specimens gie und historische Geologie München, from Africa and Israel. Munich; IMDASlf.Nr. Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, MONSÉGUR (GIRONDE, FRANCE) Stuttgart; Two decapod specimens were collected from Mon- KSU decapod collections, Kent State Univer- sity, Kent, Ohio; ségur, Liocarcinus heintzi n. sp. and Szaboa lamarei MR Természettudományi Múzeum, Föld-és n. sp. is locality belongs to the Calcaire à Astéries Ősléntár, Stéfania ut 14, Budapest (Hun- Formation (Rupelian). is formation is composed garian National Museum, Paleontological of carbonates in the northern region of Aquitaine and Geological Collection); (France), including calcilutites, calcarenites, and MNHN collections de Paléontologie du Muséum calcirudites, in that stratigraphic order (Puech- national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. maille & Vigneaux 1966; Maillet & Puechmaille 1967). Magne (1947) confi rmed the Oligocene SYSTEMATICS age based upon various fossils. e calcarenite has been noted to contain abundant miliolid foramini- Order DECAPODA Latreille, 1802 ferans (Maillet & Puechmaille 1967), and indeed, Infraorder BRACHYURA Linnaeus, 1758 400 GEODIVERSITAS • 2010 • 32 (3) New fossil decapod crustaceans from the Remy Collection Section EUBRACHYURA Remyranina ornata (Remy, 1960) n. comb. de Saint Laurent, 1980 (Fig. 1A) Subsection RANINOIDA De Haan, 1839 Superfamily RANINOIDEA De Haan, 1839 Raninella ornata Remy, 1960: 57, fi g. 2; fi gs 8, 9 of the unnumbered plate. Family RANINIDAE De Haan, 1839 Subfamily RANININAE De Haan, 1839 TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype (dorsal carapace) by monotypy (MNHN R03847, coll. Tessier). Genus Remyranina n. gen. TYPE LOCALITY. — From probable Eocene rocks on the seacliff below Kraïebouen hill, near Fresco, 5.03°N, TYPE SPECIES. — Raninella ornata Remy, 1960. 5.31°W, Ivory Coast, Africa (Remy 1960). ETYMOLOGY. — e generic name combines the name MEASUREMENTS. — Measurements (in mm) taken on of the author of the type species and prominent French the holotype of Remyranina ornata n. comb.: maximum paleontologist, Jean-Marcel Remy, and Ranina, the type carapace length, > 18.7; maximum carapace width, 14.3; genus of the family. frontal width, 21.0; fronto-orbital width, 10.0. OCCURRENCE. — e sole specimen was collected from probable Eocene rocks of Ivory Coast, Africa. EMENDED DESCRIPTION Carapace small for family, longer than wide, mod- DIAGNOSIS. — Small raninid with expanded, moderately erately vaulted transversely, weakly arched longitu- broad fronto-orbital margin; ovoid, slightly longer than wide, with carapace ornamentation granular in anterior dinally; regions not well defi ned; surface granular in half and strongly terraced in posterior half. anterior half and strongly terraced posteriorly. Front narrow, about 17% carapace width; fronto-orbital DESCRIPTION. — As for emended description of spe- margin moderately broad, about 68% carapace cies. width; maximum carapace width, measured at mi- DISCUSSION dlength, less than 80% maximum carapace length; Although the specimen referred to the new genus posterior margin broken, estimated to be about 54% clearly allies it with the Ranininae, the combina- maximum width. Front projected slightly in advance tion of characters is unique and readily justifi es of postorbital spines; rostrum sulcate, trifi d, with axial creation of the new taxon. e genus to which spine projected in advance of lateral spines; axis of it is most closely allied is Lophoranina Fabiani, rostrum with subtle granular ridge. Orbital margin 1910. ese two genera are the only ones in the not well preserved; apparently sinuous with at least Raninidae that are characterized by possession one orbital fi ssure at about midpoint; terminating of a trifi d rostrum and development of terraced laterally in prominent outer orbital spine. Lateral ornamentation. However, Lophoranina tends to margin of outer orbital spine convex, widest near be widest near the front or at the level of the tip and narrowing to tip and to intersection with last anterolateral spine, whereas Remyranina anterolateral margin. Anterolateral margin widen- n. gen. is broadest at the midlength, well pos- ing posteriorly; with two spines (broken)

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us