AHistory of Bolshevism: From Marx to the First Five-Year Plan Rosenberg,Arthur 1932 Published in German in 1932 and English in 1934, this text was written by a figure on the very left of the German Communist Party (KPD). This basis for this edition of the text comes from https://www.marxists.org/archive/rosenberg/history-bolshe- vism/index.htm. Preface to the English Translation This translation of the original German edition of my Geschichte des Bolschewismus (published in 1932) is an exact rendering and does not contain any alteration of any kind whatsoever.Events that have occurred since the appearance of the German edi- tion fully confirm the views expressed in these pages.The collapse of the KPD with- out any show of resistance proved that the Communism of the Third International could no longer be looked upon as a living revolutionary force.The ruin of the KPD sealed the fate of the Third International, whichhas ceased, together with its affilia- tions in Czechoslovakia, France,etc,tobeafactor in international politics.Moreover, the attitude displayed by the Soviet government towards Hitlerite Germany shows that Stalin is no longer interested in the so-called world revolution. The Soviet gov- ernment did not in its negotiations with Nazi Germany allow itself to be actuated by any other consideration than that of self-interest, and displayed no regard whatever for the German Communists or the Communist International. Stalin thus indirectly proclaimed the dissolution of the Third International as an independent and active labour movement. In Soviet Russia the course followed by events has been that indi- cated in the original German edition. At the same time the Soviet government has revealed itself powerless to resolve the glaring contradictions in its governmental system. Arthur Rosenberg Zürich, August 1933 Preface An immense literature exists on the subject of Soviet Russia and the Russian Revolu- tion – documented and journalistic,scientific and sentimental, condemnatory and adulatory.This book does not attempt to compete with what has already been writ- ten and instead seeks to fill a definite gap.Uptothe present there has not been available any history of the evolution of Bolshevism from its roots in Karl Marx through the individual stages traversed by Lenin, down to the theories and tactics of Stalin in 1932. It has thus come about that false notions are common in the widest circles on the subject of Bolshevism. It is either underestimated or overestimated -2- and never appreciated for what it really is. Ideas are the products of actual conditions and not of a vacuum. It is therefore necessary here to take note of the factors in the development both of Russia and the world in so far as they are essential for a proper understanding of Bolshevism. It would have been beyond the scope of this book to have attempted to describe fully any one event in the Russian Revolution or – for example – to analyse the Five-Year Plan in detail. The problem whichIhaveattempted to solve in this book is scientific and not a problem of party politics.Atthe time of the split in the Independent Social-Democrat Party in Germany in 1920 I joined the Communist Party in common with the major- ity of the USPD.Iwasfor years a member of the Berlin Committee,the Central Committee of the KPD,and the Executive of the Third International. Iwas forced to resign from the Communist International in 1927, as so many Communists of all countries have been forced to do before and since.Since then I have not belonged to any political party nor to any of the small groups comprising the Communist Opposi- tion. I have not written this book to please any party or group,and I am not con- scious of any desire to make ‘revelations’ or to ‘settle accounts’. Those who hope to find in this book anecdotes about Stalin and the ‘torture chambers’ of the GPU will be bitterly disappointed. It is obviously necessary for scientific and political reasons to remove the prob- lem of Bolshevik Russia from the atmosphere of petty strife and political debate.It will be shown that important issues depend upon our judgement of Bolshevik Russia, suchasGerman-Russian relations,proletarian unity,and the relations between Rus- sia and the international proletariat. It must be clearly understood that despite everything that has happened, Soviet Russia is progressing and the Third Interna- tional is irretrievably heading towards destruction. This book seeks to explain how this unique twofold situation has arisen. As far as possible I have used Bolshevik sources.Atthe same time I have not hesitated to state my own opinions.Ihave throughout avoided giving this book an autobiographical character whichwould have been unsuitable for the task I had in view.Among German literature on Bolshevism I am specially indebted to the works of Karl Korsch. Arthur Rosenberg Berlin-Zehlendorf,June 1932 Table of Contents Chapter 01: Marx to Lenin, 1843-1893 Chapter 02: Revolution in Russia, 1893-1914 Chapter 03: The World War,August 1914 to February 1917 Chapter 04: The Third International, August 1914 to February 1917 Chapter 05: MarchtoOctober 1917 Chapter 06: The Bolshevik Revolution and Wartime Communism, 1917-1921 Chapter 07: The Third International at the Height of its Revolutionary Power,1919-1921 Chapter 08: The Great Change: NEP and the Third World Congress,1921 Chapter 09: Lenin’sTestament, 1922-1924 Chapter 10: Stalin Versus Trotsky,1924-1927 Chapter 11: ‘Socialism in a Single Land’, 1927-1932 Bibliography Chapter 01: Marx to Lenin, 1843-1893 While on a journey in Holland in March1843, the twenty-five-year-old Dr Karl Marx wrote to his friend Ruge a letter in whichhedescribed the follies of Frederick William IV of Prussia. He added: -3- The state is too serious a concern to be turned into a harlequinade.Itispossible that a ship manned by idiots might run before the storm for a time.Its fate would nevertheless overtake it if for no other reason than that the idiots would not realise it. In our case this doom is the revolution that is at our doors. This trumpet-blast was answered by Ruge in a mood of deep pessimism: Although it is a hard saying,Imust write it because it is the truth. Icannot imagine any nation that is so disunited as the German nation. Yousee workmen –and not men; thinkers – and not men; masters and servants,young people and those who are already settled in life,but not men. Is that not a battlefield where arms and legs and mutilated bodies lie heaped on one another while the life- blood runs out upon the ground? Hölderlin in Hyperion. That describes my mood; and unfortunately it is not a new one.The same cleavage works at differ- ent ages in the same manner in all humanity.Your letter is filled with illusory ideas.Your courage only serves to intensify my lackofspirit. You saythat we – the contemporaries of these Germans – are going to experience a political revolu- tion? Your wish is father to your thought, my friend. Oh, I have lived through it all! Hope is sweet and disappointment bitter,very bitter.Ittakes more courage to despair than to hope.Nevertheless,itisthe courage of common sense,and we have reached the point at whichwedare not let ourselves be disappointed any longer. Ruge went on to add: In so far as one can speak of a German spirit, it is contemptible,and it gives me no qualms of conscience to declare that it is owing to its contemptible nature that it appears as it does. He concluded his letter with the words: Our nation has no future.What does our reputation matter? Marx refused to be discouraged. He agreed indeed with Ruge that a Germany of shopkeepers and fools could not be the scene of a revolution like the FrenchorEng- lish revolutions.But in the eyes of Marx that only meant that a revolution in Ger- many must take on a special character; it must be no revolution of half-measures but must revolutionise the entire structure of society in a single effort. And Marx formu- lated his theory as to the nature of the coming revolution in Germany in his cele- brated ‘Criticism of Hegel’sPhilosophy of Law’ whichappeared in 1844 in the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher.This review bore on its title-page the names of its two editors – Arnold Ruge and Karl Marx. Hence Marx’sarticle was also a tirade against the pessimism of his co-editor. In this article Marx asked the question: Can Germany accomplish a revolution that will not only raise it to the level of a modern nation but also to the pinnacle that will be attained in the immediate future by the other nations? Marx went on to declare that the German middle class would certainly never be capable of carrying out this revolution, since it was nothing more than the type of the commonplace mediocrity that characterised all the other classes in the old Germany. But a new class was coming into existence in Germany whichwas no longer a part of the middle-class order of society,whichwas completely outside society,and which could only achieve its own freedom by overthrowing the entire existing world-order. This class was the industrial proletariat. In the course of its struggle the proletariat would attract to itself all the poor classes in society,inthe country as well as in the -4- towns,and by so doing would accomplish the truly great revolution – the German Revolution. The emancipation of Germany from medievalism [wrote Marx] is only possible in the form of a simultaneous emancipation from the effects of an incomplete libera- tion from medievalism.