Page 1 of 65 RST Bibliography from the RST

Page 1 of 65 RST Bibliography from the RST

RST Bibliography from the RST web site (http://www.sfu.ca/rst) Last updated: August 22, 2017 Abelen, Eric, Gisela Redeker & Sandra A. Thompson. 1993. The rhetorical structure of US-American and Dutch fund-raising letters. Text 13(3). 323-350. Abrahamson, Jennie A. & Victoria Rubin. 2012. Discourse structure differences in lay and professional health communication. Journal of Documentation 68(6). 826-851. Abrahamson, Jennie A. & Victoria Rubin. 2015. Differences over discourse structure differences: A reply to Urquhart and Urquhart. Journal of Documentation 71(2). Afantenos, Stergos D. 2007. Some reflections on the task of content determination in the context of multi-document summarization of evolving events. In Galia Angelova, Kalina Bontcheva, Ruslan Mitkov, Nicolas Nicolov & Nikolai Nikolov (eds.), Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2007) (pp. 12-16). Borovets, Bulgaria: INCOMA. Afantenos, Stergos D & Nicholas Asher. 2014. Counter-argumentation and discourse: A case study. Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers and Connections between Argumentation Theory and Natural Language Processing. Forlì-Cesena, Italy. Afantenos, Stergos D., Pascal Denis, Philippe Muller & Laurence Danlos. 2010, 3578-3584. Learning recursive segments for discourse parsing. International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Malta. Afantenos, Stergos D., Irene Doura, Eleni Kapellou & Vangelis Karkaletsis. 2004. Exploiting cross-document relations for multi-document evolving summarization. In G. A Vouros & T. Panayiotopoulos (eds.), Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of 3rd Hellenic Conference on AI, SETN 2004 (pp. 410-419). Berlin: Springer. Afantenos, Stergos D. & Nicolas Hernandez. 2009. What's in a message? Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Acquisition. (pp. 18-25). Athens, Greece. Afantenos, Stergos D., Vangelis Karkaletsis & Panagiotis Stamatopoulos. 2005. Summarization from medical documents: a survey. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 33(2). 157-177. Afantenos, Stergos D., Vangelis Karkaletsis, Panagiotis Stamatopoulos & Constantin Halatsis. 2008. Using synchronic and diachronic relations for summarizing multiple documents describing evolving events. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 30(3). 183-226. Ahmed, Nabeel, Sharifulah Khan, Khalid Latif & Asad Masood. 2008. Extracting semantic annotations and their correlation with document components. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET). (pp. 32-37). Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Aker, Ahmet. 2014. Entity Type Modeling for Multi-Document Summarization: Generating Descriptive Summaries of Geo-Located Entities. University of SheffieldThesis Type. Alami, Nabil, Mohammed Meknassi & Noureddine Rais. 2015. Automatic texts summarization: Current state of the art. Journal of Asian Scientific Research 5(1). 1-15. Albacete, Patricia L., Pamela Jordan & Sandra Katz. 2015. Is a dialogue-based tutoring system that emulates helpful co-constructured relations during human tutoring effective? Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Madrid, Spain. Albertini, John A., Marc Marschark & Pamela J. Kincheloe. 2015. Deaf students' reading and writing in college: Fluency, coherence, and comprehension. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. in press. Aldogan, Deniz & Yusuf Yaslan. 2015. A comparison study on ensemble strategies and feature sets for sentiment analysis. In Omer H. Abdelrahman, Erol Gelenbe, Gokce Gorbil & Ricardo Lent (eds.), Information Sciences and Systems 2015: Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences (ISCIS) (pp. 359-370). Berlin: Springer. Alexandris, Christina, Mario Nottas & George Cambourakis. 2015. Interactive evaluation of pragmatic features in spoken journalistic texts. In Masaaki Kurosu (ed.), Human-Computer Interaction: Users and Contexts. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Part III (pp. 259-268). Berlin: Springer. Alexandropoulos, George. 2013. Stylistic approach of Julian the Emperor and Gregory Nazianzean. The Buckingham Page 1 of 65 Journal of Language and Linguistics 6. 1-13. Alexandropoulos, George. 2014. Rhetorical approach of Flavius Claudius Julian's letters. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics 7. 1-14. Alexandropoulos, George. 2015. Caesars and Misopogon: A linguistic approach of Flavius Claudius Julianus' political satires. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics 8. 107-120. Alexandropoulos, Georgios. 2015. A corpus-stylistic approach of the treatises of Great Athanasius about idolatry. In Jan Zizka & Frantisek Darena (eds.), Modern Computational Models of Semantic Discovery in Natural Language (pp. 273-299): IGI Global. Alexandropoulos, Georgios. 2016. Stylistic devices of Christians expressing contradiction against the Gentiles, Current Trends in Historical Sociolinguistics. Alharbi, Ghada, Raymond W. M. Ng & Thomas Hain. 2015. Annotating meta-discourse in academic lectures from different disciplines. Proceedings of SLaTE 2015, Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education. Leipzig, Germany. Al-Khawaldeh, Fatima T. & Venus W. Samawi. 2015. Lexical cohesion and entailment based segmentation for Arabic text Summarization. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal 5(3). 51-60. Allaymoun, Mohammad Hamad. 2015. Rhetorical structure analysis for assessing collaborative processes in CSCL. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC). (pp. 123-127). Cheile Gradistei, Romania. Allaymoun, Mohammad Hamad & Stefan Trausan-Matu. 2016. Analysis of collaboration in CSCL chat using rhetorical schemas. Proceedings of 2016 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS). (pp. 39-44). Irbid, Jordan. Allen, Robert B. & Yoonmi Chu. 2015. Architectures for complex semantic models. Proceedings of the Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing. Jeju Island, Korea. Allen, R. B., Y. J. Wu & J. Luo. 2005. Interactive causal schematics for qualitative scientific explanations. In Digital Libraries: Implementing Strategies and Sharing Experiences, Proceedings (Vol. 3815, pp. 411-415). Almany, Ibrahim, Naomie Salim, Yogan Jaya Kumar & Ameer Tawfik. 2014. Discussion summarization based on cross-document relation using model selection technique. Advances in Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems and Artificial Intelligence. (pp. 218-225). Alonso i Alemany, Laura & Maria Fuentes Fort. 2003. Integrating cohesion and coherence for automatic summarization. Proceedings of EACL'03 Student Research Workshop. (pp. 1-8). Budapest, Hungary. Alós, Julieta. 2015. Discourse relation recognition in translation: A relevance-theoretic perspective. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology. in press. Al-Saleh, Asma Bader & Mohamed El Bachir Menai. 2016. Automatic Arabic text summarization: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review in press. Al-Sanie, W., Ameur A. Touir & Hassan I. Mathkour. 2006. Towards a rhetorical parsing of Arabic text. Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC'06). Altshuler, Daniel. 2014. Discourse transparency and the meaning of temporal locating adverbs. Natural Language Semantics. 58-88. Aluíso, Sandra M., Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo & MS Duran. 2014. New corpora for "new" challenges in Portuguese processing. In Tony Berber Sardinha & Telma de Lurdes São Bento Ferreira (eds.), Working with Portuguese Corpora. London: Bloomsbury. Alves, Fabio & José Luiz Gonçalves. 2013. Investigating the conceptual-procedural distinction in the translation process. Target - International Journal of Translation Studies 25(1). 107-124. Alves, Fabio & José Luiz Gonçalves. 2015. Investigating the conceptual-procedural distinction in the translation process. In Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Susanne Göpferich & Sharon O'Brien (eds.), Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research (pp. 109-126). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Alwesabi, Khaled & Weihua Gui. 2017. A novel method based on hybrid summarization system for Arabic documents. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 14(1). 835-846. Al-Zahrani, Ahmed M., Hassan Mathkour & Hassan Abdalla. 2015. PSO-based feature selection for Arabic text summarization. Journal of Universal Computer Science 21(11). 1454-1469. Andersson, Marta. 2016. The Architecture of Result Relations: Corpus and experimental approaches to Result coherence relations in English. Stockholm: Stockholm UniversityThesis Type. Page 2 of 65 Andersson, Marta & Jennifer Spenader. 2014. Result and purpose relations with and without 'so'. Lingua. in press. André, Elisabeth & Thomas Rist. 1996. Coping with temporal constraints in multimedia presentation planning. Proceedings of Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (pp. 142-147). Portland, Oregon. Andriessen, Jerry, Koenraad de Smedt & Michael Zock. 1996. Discourse Planning: Experimental and modeling approaches. In Ton Dijkstra & Koenraad de Smedt (eds.), Computational Psycholinguistics: Symbolic and Network Models of Language Processing (pp. 247-278). London: Taylor and Francis. Androutsopoulos, Ion, Gerasimos Lampouras & Dimitrios Galanis. 2013. Generating natural language descriptions from OWL ontologies: The NaturalOWL System.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    65 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us