Bureau of Justice Statistics Arrest-Related Deaths Program Review Washington, D.C. May 13, 2010 AGENDA Thursday, May 13 8:30 Continental Breakfast 9:00 Welcome and Introductions 9:15 Purpose of the Arrest-Related Deaths Program History Future Objectives Relevance of Theory and Policy Implications Data Analysis and Reporting 10:30 Break 10:45 Capabilities and Constraints Data Providers Additional Sources of Information Sharing Across Agencies 12:00 Working Lunch: “What Should a BJS Program on Use of Force Look Like?” Moderator: Dave Klinger 1:00 Discussion of the Data Collection Instrument Defining an “Arrest-Related” Scope of the Collection Utility of the Data Collected Evaluation of Individual Items and Overall Structure Validity and Reliability of Responses Modifications to the Instrument Instructions to Respondents 2:30 Review of the Meeting Next Steps Final Comments 3:00 Adjourn Transcript of a Meeting held Thursday May 13, 2010 in Washington, D.C. about the Data Collection Instrument for the ARREST-RELATED DEATHS PROGRAM * Note: This transcript has not been edited for spelling, grammar or accuracy. Points of view expressed here are those of the participants and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Office of Justice Programs, or the U.S. Department of Justice. Inquiries about this meeting should be directed to: Andrea Burch, ARD Program Manager, 202-305-0765, [email protected]. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS + + + + + ARREST-RELATED DEATHS DATA PROGRAM REVIEW + + + + + THURSDAY MAY 13, 2010 + + + + + The meeting convened at the Justice Research & Statistics Association in Suite 801 of 777 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., at 9:00 a.m., Joel Garner, Chief, Law Enforcement Statistics Unit, Bureau of Justice Statistics, presiding. PARTICIPANTS: JOEL GARNER, Chief, Law Enforcement Statistics Unit, BJS ANDREA BURCH, Program Manager, Arrest-Related Deaths, BJS KENNETH ADAMS, Professor, College of Health and Public Affairs, University of Central Florida JESSICA BLAIR, Program Associate, Justice Research & Statistics Association SUSAN BURTON, Administrator, Department of Law Enforcement, Florida Statistical Analysis Center MARK J. CALLAHAN, Homicide Section, Baltimore City Police Department CONSTANCE DiANGELO, Virginia Office of the Chief Medical Examiner ANNA FRANCIS, IT Specialist, Policy & Planning, DC Office of the Chief Medical Examiner 2 PARTICIPANTS: (cont.) HARRY HILL, Office of the Assistant Chief of Police, DC Metropolitan Police Department ROBERT KAMINSKI, Associate Professor, Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, University of South Carolina DAVE KLINGER, Senior Research Scientist, Police Foundation ROBERT LANGWORTHY, Chair, Department of Criminal Justice & Legal Studies, University of Central Florida COLIN LOFTIN, Professor, School of Criminal Justice, University at Albany, SUNY GUY R. X. MIDDLETON, Force Branch Investigations, DC Metropolitan Police Department STAN ORCHOWSKY, Director of Research, Justice Research & Statistics Association ANTHONY RUSSO, Office of Management Analysis & Planning, New York Police Department JOAN SMITH, Criminal Justice Information Support Manager, Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs PAMELA SOUTHALL, Maryland Office of the Chief Medical Examiner GEORGE THORPE, Health Statistician, Maryland Violent Death Reporting System, Family Health Administration BRIAN WIERSEMA, Violence Research Group, Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, University of Maryland 3 4 P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S: 8:56 a.m. MR. GARNER: I am Joel Garner, I'm Chief of the Law Enforcement Statistics Unit at the Bureau of Justice Statistics and I would like to welcome you to Washington, D.C. This is an unusual season for us. It's called spring. It usually lasts about two days and it's lasted maybe a week or two now. But I am sure summer will be here quite soon. What I would like to do is welcome you all on behalf of BJS and the law enforcement unit. We are really excited about this meeting and this program. It's something that many of you have been working on, it's a topic many of you have been working on for years, in some cases decades. BJS has only been involved in the last several years but we have put some additional resources and are trying to put some additional focus on this program and related programs. We are really hoping that you can help us with that and we really appreciate that. This is the sort of expert, national expert meeting that BJS uses in many of its programs, I think most of its programs. And helping us guide the program, help design it, what are people interested in, how should this program be structured, it's really an essential part of the BJS way of operation. I thought I was hired a year ago figuring they just wanted me to come and design 5 programs and I would just implement them and I have been led to believe and actually like the idea that it's really the national people, operationally, in operational agencies and research agencies, who actually might know more about it than I do, have a great deal of say and influence in how we operate our programs. And it's really an essential thing for our effort and we really do appreciate that and that you've taken your time to come and help with this. I wanted to plant the emphasis for today's meeting, it's actually a very narrow emphasis but it's a crucial emphasis, it is this form that we have used, has been used for seven years for this program. So we'll talk a little bit -- there's a history of this program with Congressional legislation mandating it and that mandate has gone away. There were directions on what the program would look like. There's been a form that's been used for several years which is, we think, an essential part of this effort and we would really like to work on that and have you help us with that for an effort for the next two years. We are hoping to have a more major revision of this program that we cannot really do now but we can do maybe three or four years from now. But we can address, and what we can do, is see where there are improvements, enhancements, revision to this form, and how we collect this data and we'd really appreciate that. Currently BJS's interest is in arrest-related deaths, it's a lethal force program. We hope, at BJS, to be able to expand that in the future to other, non-lethal, use of force programs and statistical efforts. That is something for the future that we think is appropriate 6 for our unit, something that would complement this effort. Again, that's something that's more into the future. We have asked Dave Klinger, sort of at lunch to just sort of talk with us about that a little bit. It's really not part of the agenda for today but it's something we're interested in and it sort of complements well, what are we doing here, what else might we do on other types of police use of force, other kinds of injuries, assaults, weapon use. I wanted to mention to you that today's meeting is going to be recorded. We are going to provide in about a week a transcript of this meeting. We will put that up on our webpage. Part of our operation is that while we invite people to meetings with us, there is no way really to publicly announce these. This is not a public meeting. But we would like this discussion to be available for the entire research, policing, medical, criminal justice community, to understand what were the kinds of issues we were concerned with and where, what we are thinking about on this form. We hope to work on this form and this program today but after this meeting if you have other ideas or if you have talked to people, we are going to promote this among the field generally. If people have ideas that aren't expressed here today and you are interested in, you or they should send that to Andrea or to myself and this is not just a one-meeting concern. We hope to be making revisions so that we can use this form beginning in October but we really need to work on this and then we have to go through a process where the Office of Management and Budget reviews our proposed form so we have to do that some 7 time in the next several months. But it's a continuing effort to improve that and if there's other folks that couldn't make it today or that or you've talked with or something comes up, we would like to hear about that. We are really trying to make this as open a process as we can but also have a concentrated discussion with experts like yourself. I would like, I guess, to finish up, just again thanking you on behalf of BJS. This is what makes our programs work. We, I have, I spent many years at the National Institute of Justice, a sister agency and have been surprised to learn the differences in the way agencies operate. And BJS is one that is very emphatic about what we do has to work, has to be feasible. We do studies where we get 90, 95 percent response rates. It really has to be something that the community wants, the data providers are interested in that that is really a focus not just that will be interesting and something we would do one time, but something we are going to do for a long time.