Composition and Provenance of the Rudite and Arenite Facies in Aforeland Basin, Northern Marchean Apennines, Italy

Composition and Provenance of the Rudite and Arenite Facies in Aforeland Basin, Northern Marchean Apennines, Italy

Composition and provenance of the rudite and arenite facies in aforeland basin, northern Marchean Apennines, Italy N. (2APLANO Istituto di Ceologia Applicata, Universitá di Urbino. ViaMuzio Odd¡, 14. 61029 Urbino, Italy. ABSTRACT Ibe Montecalvo in Foglia basin (Northern Marche, Italy) is infilíed by rudite and arenite deposits. The rudite facies (conglomerates) are mainly represented by carbonate, chert, and sandstone clasts while the arenite facies is characterized by a quartzolithic or fedspadiic litharenite petrofacies (mean values: Q 47, F,8, L35). This is characterized by a large number of lidiic fragments reflecting a local provenance from the sedimentary cover of the Marchean Apennines. Morphometric and compositional aualyses suggest diat the rudites, mostly made up of pebble-to-cobble-sized clasts, derived from the erosion of the «Ligurid» sequences to the northwest of the basin. They were elaborated in fluvio-torrential systems under temperate-warm climate conditions. Afterwards, during relative sealevel lowstauds, diese were eroded, cannibalized and resedimented into fasis or aprons confined to the narrow sub-basins of the Adriatic Foredeep. Textural data of the arenites shaw a premature diagenesis, characterized by a rapid formation of carbonate cement, which inhibited the mechanical compaction of sediments. Key words: Northem Marchean Apennines, Pliocene basin, cannibalized fandelta deposits. rudite and arenite composition, provenance. paleogeography. Cuadernosde Geología Ibérica N.’> 15, 185-207. Madrid, 1991. Edit. Universidad Complutense. 186 N. Capuano RESUMEN El relleno de la cuenca pliocena de Montecalvo in Foglia (Marche septentrional, Italia) se realizó por depósitos rudíticos y areníticos. Las facies rudíticas (conglomerados) están formadas por clastos calcáreos, pedernalinos (cuarcitícos), y de areniscas mientras que las facies areniticas (areniscas) están constituidas por una sola petrofacies: cuarzolítica o litareniscas feldespáticas (Q 47, F1~, L35). El estudio morfométrico y el análisis de la composición del sedimento revela que la génesis de estos depósitos está relacionada con el desmantelamiento de las áreas madres del Apenino marchigiano por sistemas fluvio-torrenciales bajo los efectos de un clima cálido templado y que posteriormente, fueron erosionados y canibalizados en los estadios de bajada relativa del nivel del mare incorporados a la cuenca sedimentaria marina. Por otro lado, el análisis sedimentológico realizado al microscopio revela la existencia de una diagénesis temprana que inhibió los efectos de la compactación del sedimento. Palabras clave: Apenino, Marche septentrional, cuenca Pliocena, depósitos de fan delta canibalizados, composición de ruditas y arenitas, procedencia, paleogeografía. INTRODUCTION The Montecalvo in Foglia basin (MCF) belongs to a forelaud basin system or foredeep. It is located on the Apennine margin (Marche region, Italy) and shows an asymmetric structure due to piggyback thrusting; Fig. 1). It is ouiginated aud evolved duiing the compressive tectonie phases from Late Miocene to Early Pliocene (Synorogenic molasse stage of Ricci Lucchi, 1986). It is filled widi allochthonous chaotic units (Liguride Complex) and Pliocene marine sediments. In this basin die upper stratigraphic sequence, 142 m thick, is characterized by eight coarse-grained bodies; Figs. 2 and 3). interbedded with hemipelagic mudstones (Capuano a al., 1989). The interpretation of the depositional processes asid environment could have implication for the gravitative transpon mechanism of the Ligurid thrust-pile. In fact, the northern pan of die basin is occupied by allochthonous units of the Ligurids, consisting of Jurassic to Miocene sediments (Capuano, Tonelli & Veneri, 1987; Capuano, 1990a). The purpose of this paper is to outline, through morphometric aud modal analyses of arenite aud rudite facies, the relationships between composition, provenance and paleogeography. Composition ant! provenance oftite rudite... 187 Hg. 1.—Location of the investigated area which shows piggyback thrust basinof Montecalvo in Foglia (MCF). Fig. 1 .~ Situación del área investigada que muestra la cuenca a cuestasde Montecalvoen Foglia (MCE). GRAIN SIZE, MOR.PHOMETRY AND LITHOLOGY OF THE RUDITES Rudite facies in the MCF basin are represented by mainly massive disorga-nized clast-supported conglomerates with au arenitic matrix (Fig. 4). Some-times, inverse-to-normal grading occurs within the basal parts of the rudite beds; the arenite portions may display vague horizontal laminations (Fig. 5). These rudites facies are intercalated within bodies 2, 4, 5 aud 6, outcropping at the western basin-margin (proximal area; Fig. 3). Most coarse material accumulated at entry point located near Mount Osteriaccia 188 N. Capuano ‘.5, << , — 5.5• * < • >~4s5 <5!. 5* <ni ~ 5-5 , 5,, ,s;’<.t Fig. 2—General view of tbe northeastem flank of the MCE basin. Morphological steps of sedimentary bodies No. 1 - 5 are shown. Fig. 2.—Vista general del flanco noreste de la cuenca MCF Se han ,ndicado los escalones morfológicos de los cuernos sedimentarios n’ 1 a 5. (Fig. 3). Sampling of largegravel populations has been carried out toestablish its grain-size parameters and form-evolution. In each gravel body pebble-to- cobble-sized clasts are identified. In this area the rudites are distributed aud statistically divided into five grain-size classes: 4-8 (1.4 %), 8-16 (16.2 %), 16-32 (46.9 %), 32-64 (32.7 %), 64-128 (2.8 %) mm. Iheir degree of roundness and form evolution have been determined by using the Cailleux & Tricart (1963) scheme. Morphometric parameters (flatness, bluntness, dissymmetry, spbe- ricity, roundness and oblate-prolate indexes) have been used following procedures proposed by Cailleux (1945; 1947) aud Dobkins & Follc (1970). In the parameter evaluation only the classes 8-16, 16-32, 32-64, 64-128 mm have been consi-dered because of the intrinsie difficulties in precise measurements on small-sized clasts. In order to obtain a maximum accuracy, data has only been gathered for the prevaling carbonate clasts. Texture and shape are also interpreted accordind to Potter (1978), Folk (1980), Mazzullo & Ehrlich (1983) and Ineson (1989). Analytical resulís and discuss¡on Lithologically speaking,theruditeshaveavariablecomposition,withclastic elements consisting mainly of carbonaterocks (64%), chertfragments (30.4%), asid lithic arenites (5.6 %). The carbonate rock clasts, consisting of micrites, biomicrites, marístones aud calcarenites, are mainly derived from te Alberese Composition ant! provenance oftite rudite... 189 Fig. 3.—Sketch geological map of MCpbasin with generalised stratigraphy 1), Terraced alluvial sediments (Holocene); 2), conglomerates asid sandstones (Early Pliocene); 3), pelites and thin sandstones(EarlyPliocene); 4), Marís (EarlyPliocene); 5), Messiniandeposits; 6), allochthonous Montefeltrosheet (Ligurids); 7), contactbetweenUmbro-Marcheansequences mid allochthonous Montefeltro sheet; 8), thnst; 9), backthrust; 10), faults. Fig. 3~—Mapa geológico esquemático de la cuenca MCF con la estratigrafía general. (1), terrazas aluviales (Holoceno); (2), conglomerados y areniscas (Plioceno Inferior); (3), lutitas y areniscasdelgadas (Plioceno Inferior); (4), margas(Plioceno Inferior);(5),depósitos messinienses; (6), manto alóctono de Montefeltro (Ligurides); (7), contacto entre las secuencias Umbro- Marcheanas y el manto alóctono de Montefeltro; (8), cabalgamiento; (9), retrocabalgamiento; (10), fallas. aud S.Marino Fomiations (Ligurids). The chertgranules were derived bothfrom ophiolite olistolidis (Ligurids) and from Que Bisciaro Formation (Miocene umbro-marchean sequence). The lidiic arenites, mostly greywacke lithic clasts, were derived both ftom te Marnoso-Arenacea Formation (miocenic ten- genous turbiditic sequence) asid te Pietraforte Fonnation (Ligurids). The clastic composition of Que arenites (matrix component) and of die rudites is comparable, with minor differences caused by grain size variations. 190 N. Capuano Hg. 4.—Rudite facies interbedded with massive arenite facies (A); note the well-rounded pebbles supported by arenitic matrix with ostreids (B). II Castellaccio near MOsteriaccia. Hg. 4.—Facies de ruditas interestratificadas con facies de arenitas masivas (A); obsérvese los cantos bien redondeados sostenidos por la matriz arenosa con ostreidos (E). 11 Castellaccio, cerca de M. Osteriaccia. Composition and provenance of tite rudite... 191 Fig. 5.—Clast-supported rudite composed of well-rounded carbonatepebbles. Note inverse-to- normal grading. II Castellaccio near MOsteriaccia. Fig. 5 —Rudita soportada por los clastos constituida por clastos de carbonato redondeados y bien seleccionados. Nótese la granoselección inversa a normal. II Castellaccio cerca de M. Osteriaccia. 60 ¡ Oisoo¡daI ‘¡‘“gateo Olaje, • body= badyd U beoy> U bodyg Fig. 6.—Histogram showing the clast-shape distribution in percentage (after Zingg, 1935 modified). The different clast-shape populations reflect specific transpon and environmen- tconditions: at first a fluvial environment, later with residence time in a shallow-marine j.c. shelf-type fmi delta), ínter on turbulent flow mechanisms in submarine fans (cf see figure 12). Fig. 6.—Histogramaque muestra la distribución porcentual de morfologías de clastos (según Zingg, 1935 modificado). Lasdistintaspoblacionesreflejan condicionesespecíficas ambientales y de transporte: al principio, un ambiente fluvial, luego un tiempo de residencia en ambiente marino somero (es decir, un fmi delta de tipo

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    23 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us