Technical Support Document for the 2008 Final Effluent Guidelines Plan

Technical Support Document for the 2008 Final Effluent Guidelines Plan

Technical Support Document for the 2008 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan © 2008 The Omaha World-Herald. August 2008 EPA-821-R-08-015 Photograph of pills in a box, center top, is reprinted with permission from The Omaha World-Herald, copyright 2008. CONTENTS Page PART I: INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................I 1.0 BACKGROUND...................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 EPA’s Clean Water Act Program ........................................................................1-1 1.2 Background on the Effluent Guidelines Program................................................1-1 1.3 What Are Effluent Guidelines and Pretreatment Standards?...............................1-2 1.3.1 Best Practicable Control Technology Currently Available (BPT) — CWA Sections 301(b)(1)(A) and 304(b)(1).............................................1-3 1.3.2 Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology (BCT) — CWA Sections 301(b)(2)(E) and 304(b)(4) .......................................................1-4 1.3.3 Best Available Technology Economically Achievable (BAT) — CWA Sections 301(b)(2)(A) and 304(b)(2).......................................................1-4 1.3.4 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) — CWA Section 306 .......1-4 1.3.5 Pretreatment Standards for Existing Sources (PSES) — CWA Section 307(b).......................................................................................................1-4 1.3.6 Pretreatment Standards for New Sources (PSNS) — CWA Section 307(c) .......................................................................................................1-5 1.4 Success of EPA’s Effluent Guidelines Program..................................................1-5 1.5 What Are EPA’s Effluent Guidelines Planning and Review Requirements?......1-5 1.6 Background References .......................................................................................1-6 2.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE FINAL EFFLUENT GUIDELINES PROGRAM PLAN FOR 2006 AND PRELIMINARY EFFLUENT GUIDELINES PROGRAM PLAN FOR 2008 ............................2-1 3.0 THE EFFLUENT GUIDELINES PLANNING PROCESS .............................................................3-1 3.1 Goals of the ELG Planning Process.....................................................................3-1 3.2 Annual Review of Existing Effluent Guidelines and Pretreatment Standards ....3-1 3.2.1 Factors Considered in Review of Existing Effluent Guidelines and Pretreatment Standards ............................................................................3-1 3.2.2 Overview: Review of Existing Point Source Categories .........................3-5 3.3 Identification of New Categories of Direct Dischargers for Possible Effluent Guidelines Development......................................................................................3-7 3.4 Identification of New Categories of Indirect Dischargers for Possible Effluent Guidelines Development......................................................................................3-8 3.5 Stakeholder Involvement and Schedule...............................................................3-8 3.6 The Effluent Guidelines Planning Process References........................................3-9 4.0 METHODOLOGY, DATA SOURCES, AND LIMITATIONS .......................................................4-1 4.1 Data Sources and Limitations ..............................................................................4-1 4.1.1 SIC Codes ................................................................................................4-2 4.1.2 Toxic Weighting Factors..........................................................................4-3 4.1.3 Calculation of TWPE...............................................................................4-4 4.1.4 Data from TRI..........................................................................................4-4 4.1.5 Data from PCS .........................................................................................4-6 i CONTENTS (Continued) Page 4.2 Methodology Corrections Affecting Both Screening-Level Review Databases .4-9 4.3 Corrections to the TRIReleases2004 Database ....................................................4-9 4.4 Corrections to the PCSLoads2004 Database .......................................................4-9 4.5 Corrections to the TRIReleases2005 Database ....................................................4-9 4.5.1 TRIReleases2005: Categorization of Discharges ....................................4-9 4.5.2 TRIReleases2005: Pollutant Corrections...............................................4-11 4.5.3 TRIReleases2005: Data Quality Review ...............................................4-12 4.5.4 TRIReleases2005: Facility Reviews......................................................4-13 4.6 TRIReleases2004 and TRIReleases2005 Rankings and PCSLoads2004 Rankings ............................................................................................................4-13 4.7 Methodology, Data Sources, and Limitations References.................................4-17 PART II: RESULTS OF THE 2008 ANNUAL REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL CATEGORIES WITH EXISTING ELGS ...................................................................................................................................II 5.0 2008 ANNUAL REVIEW OF EXISTING EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS AND RANKING OF POINT SOURCE CATEGORIES ............................................5-1 5.1 Summary of the Results from the 2007 Annual Review .....................................5-1 5.2 Results of the 2008 Screening-Level Review......................................................5-1 5.2.1 Facilities for Which EPA Is Currently Developing or Revising ELGs ...5-2 5.2.2 Categories for Which EPA Recently Promulgated or Revised ELGs .....5-2 5.2.3 Categories with One Facility Dominating the TWPE..............................5-3 5.2.4 Results of the 2008 Screening-Level Review..........................................5-5 5.3 Prioritization of Categories for the 2008 Annual Review ...................................5-5 5.3.1 Detailed Study of Existing ELGs...........................................................5-11 5.3.2 Preliminary Review ...............................................................................5-11 5.4 2008 Annual Review of Existing Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards and Ranking of Point Source Categories References........................5-13 6.0 CENTRALIZED WASTE TREATMENT (40 CFR PART 437) ..................................................6-1 6.1 CWT Category Background ................................................................................6-1 6.1.1 CWT Industry Profile ..............................................................................6-1 6.1.2 40 CFR Part 437.......................................................................................6-2 6.2 CWT Category 2004 Through 2008 Screening-Level Reviews..........................6-3 6.3 CWT Category 2004 through 2008 Pollutants of Concern..................................6-4 6.4 CWT Category Pesticide Discharges...................................................................6-4 6.4.1 Pesticide Discharges for Vopak Logistics Services — Deer Park, TX ...6-8 6.4.2 Pesticides Discharges for DuPont Chambers Works — Deepwater, NJ .6-8 6.5 CWT Category Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds Discharges..........................6-10 6.6 CWT Category Conclusions ..............................................................................6-11 6.7 CWT Category References ................................................................................6-12 ii CONTENTS (Continued) Page 7.0 ORGANIC CHEMICALS PLASTICS AND SYNTHETIC FIBERS (40 CFR PART 414).................7-1 7.1 OCPSF Category Background .............................................................................7-1 7.1.1 OCPSF Industry Profile ...........................................................................7-1 7.1.2 40 CFR Part 414.......................................................................................7-4 7.2 OCPSF Category 2004 Through 2008 Screening-Level Reviews.......................7-5 7.3 OCPSF Category 2004 Through 2008 Pollutants of Concern.............................7-5 7.4 OCPSF Category Dioxin and Dioxin-Like Discharges in TRI............................7-8 7.5 OCPSF Category Hexachlorobenzene Discharges in TRI and PCS..................7-12 7.6 OCPSF Category Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds Discharges in TRI...........7-14 7.7 OCPSF Category Aluminum Discharges in PCS ..............................................7-15 7.8 OCPSF Category Benzidine Discharges in PCS ...............................................7-16 7.9 OCPSF Category Conclusions...........................................................................7-17 7.10 OCPSF Category References.............................................................................7-18 8.0 ORE MINING AND DRESSING (40 CFR PART 440).............................................................8-1 8.1 Ore Mining Category Background.......................................................................8-1 8.1.1 Ore Mining Industry Profile.....................................................................8-1 8.1.2 40 CFR Part 440.......................................................................................8-4 8.2 Ore Mining Category

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    396 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us