14.125: Market Design

14.125: Market Design

14.125: Market Design Last updated: 2/3/14 This is an advanced topics course on market and mechanism design. We will study existing or new market institutions, understand their properties, and think about whether they can be re-engineered or improved. This course assumes knowledge of the first year economics PhD sequence, especially microeconomic theory (14.121-4). Game theory (14.126) and courses from the industrial organization sequence are helpful, but not essential as background. Instructor: Parag Pathak, E17-240, [email protected] OH: Wednesday 1-2pm, or by appt TA: Yusuke Narita, [email protected], OH: TBD Course requirements: There will be three problem sets and one final paper. Depending on final course enrollment, we may ask students to do a class presentation on their final paper. Details will be distributed later in the semester. Recommended Textbooks: Milgrom, Paul (2004): Putting Auction Theory to Work. Churchill Lectures, Cambridge University Press. Roth, Alvin E. and Marilda Sotomayor (1990): Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game- Theoretic Modelling and Analysis. Econometric Society Monograph Series, Cambridge University Press. These other books may be of interest: Krishna, Vijay (2002): Auction Theory. Academic Press. Klemperer, Paul (2004): Auctions: Theory and Practice. Toulouse Lectures, Princeton University Press. Moulin, Herv´e(1991): Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making. Econometric Society Monograph Series, Cambridge University Press. Shiller, Robert (1998): Macro Markets: Creating Institutions for Managing Society's Largest Economic Risks. Clarendon Lectures, Oxford University Press. Outline and References: 1. Introduction • Roth, Alvin E. (2002): \The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimen- tation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics." Econometrica, 70(4), 1341-1378. 1 • Klemperer, Paul (2002): \What Really Matters in Auction Design?" Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1): 169-189. • Hahn, Robert W. (1984): \Market Power and Transferable Property Rights." Quar- terly Journal of Economics, 99(4): 753-765. • Joskow, Paul, Richard Schmalensee, and Elizabeth Bailey (1998): \The Market for Sulfur Dioxide Emissions." American Economic Review, 88(4), 669-685. • Weitzman, Martin (1977): \Is the Price System or Rationing More Effective in Get- ting a Commodity to Those Who Need it Most?" The Bell Journal of Economics, 8, 517-524. • Sah, Raj (1987): \Queues, Rations, and Market: Comparisons of Outcomes for the Poor and the Rich." American Economic Review, 77, 69-77. • Che, Y., I. Gale, and J. Kim (2013): \Allocating Resources to Budget-Constrained Agents." Review of Economic Studies, 80, 73-107. • Leslie, Phil and Alan Sorenson (2013): \Resale and Rent-Seeking: An Application to Ticket Markets." Review of Economic Studies, forthcoming • Bleakly, Hoyt and Joe Ferrie (2013): \Land Openings on the Georgia Frontier and the Coase Theorem in the Short- and Long-Run." Working paper, University of Chicago. • Coase, Ronald (1959): \The Federal Communications Commission." Journal of Law and Economics, 2, 1-41. • Coase, Ronald (1960): \The Problem of Social Cost." Journal of Law and Eco- nomics, 3, 1-44. 2. Basic Mechanism Design and Strategy-Proofness • Gibbard, Alan (1973): \Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result." Econo- metrica , 41(4): 587-601. • Sattherwaite, Mark (1975): \Strategy-proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions." Journal of Economic Theory, 10: 187-217. • Reny, Phil (2002): \Arrow's Theorem and the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem: A Unified Approach." Economics Letters, 70(1): 99-105. • Gibbard, Alan (1977): \Manipulation of Schemes that Mix Voting with Chance." Econometrica, 45: 665-681. • McLennan, Andy (2010): \Manipulation in Elections with Uncertain Preferences." Unpublished mimeo, University of Queensland. • Holmstr¨om,Bengt (1979): \Groves Schemes on Restricted Domains." Econometrica, 47(5): 1137-1144. • Green, Jerry R. and Jean-Jacques Laffont (1977): \Characterization of Satisfactory Mechanisms for the Revelation of Preferences for Public Goods." Econometrica, 45(2): 427-438. • Milgrom, P. and I. Segal (2002): \The Envelope Theorem for Arbitrary Choice Sets," Econometrica, 70(2): 583-601. 2 • Bikchandani, S., S. Chatterji, R. Lavi, A. Mualem, N. Nisan, and A. Sen (2006): \Weak Monotonocity Characterizes Deterministic Dominant Strategy Implementa- tion." Econometrica, 74(4): 1109-1132. • Wilson, Robert (1989): “Efficient and Competitive Rationing." Econometrica, 57, 1-40. • Sprumont, Yves (1991): \The Division Problem with Single-Peaked Preferences: A Characterization of the Uniform Allocation Rule." Econometrica, 59, 509-519. • Moulin, Herv´e(2000): \Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods." Econometrica, 68(3): 643-684. 3. One-Sided Matching • Shapley, Lloyd and Herbert Scarf (1974): \On Cores and Indivisibility." Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1: 23-28. • Roth, Alvin E. and Andrew Postlewaite (1977): \Weak Versus Strong Domination in a Market with Indivisible Goods." Journal of Mathematical Economics, 4: 131-137. • Roth, Alvin E. (1982): \Incentive Compatibility in a Market with Indivisibilities." Economics Letters, 9: 127-132. • Hylland, Arnuand and Richard Zeckhauser (1977): \The efficient allocation of indi- viduals to positions." Journal of Political Economy, 87: 293-314. • Abdulkadiro˘glu,Atila and Tayfun S¨onmez(1999): \House Allocation with Existing Tenants." Journal of Economic Theory, 88: 233-260. • Roth, Alvin E., Tayfun S¨onmezand M. Utku Unver¨ (2003): \Kidney Exchange." Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 457-488. 4. Stochastic Matching Mechanisms • Abdulkadiro˘glu,Atila and Tayfun S¨onmez.(1998): \Random Serial Dictatorship and the Core from Random Endowments in House Allocation Problems." Econometrica, 66: 689-701. • S¨onmez,Tayfun and Utku Unver¨ (2005): \House Allocation with Existing Tenants: An Equivalence." Games and Economic Behavior, 52: 153-185. • Pathak, Parag and Jay Sethuraman (2011): \Lotteries in Student Assignment: An Equivalence Result." Theoretical Economics, 6(1): 1-18. • Bogomolnaia, Anna and Herve Moulin (2009): \A New Solution to the Random Assignment Problem." Journal of Economic Theory, 100: 295-328. • Kojima, Fuhito and Mihai Manea (2010): \Incentives in the Probabilistic Serial Mechanism." Journal of Economic Theory, 145: 106-123. • Kojima, Fuhito and Yeon-Koo Che (2010): \The Asymptotic Equivalence of Proba- bilistic Serial and Random Priority Mechanisms." Econometrica, 78: 1625-1672. • Liu, Qingming and Marek Pycia (2012): \Ordinal Efficiency, Fairness, and Incentives in Large Markets." Working paper, Columbia University. 3 • Hall, P. (1935): \On Representatives of Subsets." Journal of Mathematical Society, 19, 26-30. • Dutta, Bhaskar and Debray Ray (1989): \A Concept of Egalitarianism under Par- ticipation Constraints." Econometrica, 57, 615-35. • Bogolmanaia, Anna and Herve Moulin (2004): \Random Matching under Dichoto- mous Preferences." Econometrica, 72: 257-279. • Katta, Akshay-Kumar and Jay Sethuraman (2006): \A Solution to the Random Assignment Problem on the Full Preference Domain." Journal of Economic Theory, 131(1): 231-250. • Roth, Alvin E. , Tayfun S¨onmez, and M. Utku Unver (2005): \Pairwise Kidney Exchange." Journal of Economic Theory, 125(2): 151-188. • Roth, Alvin E., Tayfun S¨onmez,and Utku Unver¨ (2007): “Efficient Kidney Exchange: Coincidence of Wants in Markets with Compatibility-Based Preferences." American Economic Review, 97(3): 828-851. 5. Axiomatic Resource Allocation • Ma, Jipeng (1994): \Strategy-proofness and Strict Core in a Market with Indivisi- bilities." International Journal of Game Theory, 23: 75-83. • S¨onmez,Tayfun (1999): \Strategy-proofness and Essentially Single-valued Cores." Econometrica, 67(3): 677-689. • Svensson, Lars-Gunnar (1994): \Queue allocation of indivisible goods." Social Choice and Welfare 11, 323-330. • Svensson, Lars-Gunnar (1999): \Strategyproof Allocation of Indivisible Goods." So- cial Choice and Welfare 16, 557-567. • Papai, Szilvia (2000): \Strategyproof Assignment by Hierarchical Exchange", Econo- metrica, 68: 1403-1433. • S¨onmez,Tayfun and Utku Unver¨ (2010): \House Allocation with Existing Tenants: A Characterization." Games and Economic Behavior, 69(2): 425-445. • Pycia, Marek and Utku Unver¨ (2012): \Incentive Compatible Allocation and Ex- change of Discrete Resources." Working paper, UCLA. 6. Two-sided matching • Roth and Sotomayor, Chapters 2-5. • Gale, David and Lloyd Shapley (1962): \College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage." American Mathematical Monthly, 69: 9-15. • Roth, Alvin E. (1984): \The Evolution of the Labor Market for Medical Interns and Residents: A Case Study in Game Theory." Journal of Political Economy, 92: 991-1016. • Niederle, Muriel and Alvin E. Roth (2003): \Relationship Between Wages and Pres- ence of a Matching in Medical Fellowships." Journal of the American Medical Asso- ciations, 290(9): 1153-1154. 4 • Bulow, Jeremy and Levin, Jonathan (2006): \Matching and Price Competition." American Economic Review, 96(3): 652-668. • Roth, Alvin E. (1991): \A Natural Experiment in the Organization of Entry Level Labor Markets: Regional Markets for New Physicians and Surgeons in the U.K." American Economic Review, 81, 415-440. 7. Unraveling, timing, and congestion • Roth, Alvin E. and X. Xing (1994): \Jumping the Gun: Imperfections and Institu- tions Related to the Timing of Market Transactions." American Economic Review, 84, 992-1044. • Li, Hao and Sherwin

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us