FY 2015–2019 CIP Project – Arlington WPCP Biosolids Project Re-approp. Request______ New__X_ Ongoing__ Department/Division: Public Works Description/Justification: The City of Falls Church is a wholesale customer of the Arlington Pollution Control Plant, along with Fairfax County. As an Inter-Jurisdictional partner, the City contributes to Capital Improvements on a cost-share basis according to the City's Reserve capacity at the Plant (0.80 MGD). The Biosolids project will replace various pieces of equipment at the Plant which were installed anywhere from the 1950s to the 1990s, and are beyond their useful life. They require significant amounts of maintenance to keep operable, and could fail permanently at any time. It is necessary for them to be fully-operational to meet the Plant’s Class 1 reliability requirement in the permit. Project Cost Estimate: (Provide breakdown of Project Management, Design and Engineering, Construction; for on-going projects, include funds appropriated in prior years; include source of cost estimates) Staffing (in-house): $0 Project Management (outsourced): $0 Engineering and Design: $45,000 Construction: $255,000 Total Project Cost (all years): $300,000 Cost Estimate explanation: Project Cost Estimate and expenditure schedule provided by Arlington County staff. Pre-FY12 FY13 FY14 Total Adjusted Prior Appropriations: $0 $0 $0 $0 Unexpended Balance**: $0 $0 $0 $0 **confirm with Finance ***if no activity per City Charter (Section 6.19 ) in 3 years note in FY2014 for reappropriation action 10-1 Future Funding Needs: Available Funding FY2014*** FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 Total Funding Source: SS Debt $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $83,000 $0 $253,000 Funding Source: Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source: Local $0 $0 $47,000 $0 $0 $0 $47,000 Match: Cash Total: $0 $0 $47,000 $170,000 $83,000 $0 $0 $300,000 Overall Match requirement: Cash:____ In-kind:_____ Ratio:_______ Description: Project Schedule: Dates: Procurement: Engineering and Design: 2015 Construction: 2016-2017 Impact on Operating Costs (highlight increases or decreases for on-going operations and include equipment, supplies, personnel impacts; specify if a companion initiative will be submitted): The sewer rates have been increased to cover the debt required to finance this project. Conformity with Comprehensive Plan and Council Strategic Plan (include reference to additional adopted planning/policy documents): The upgrade of the Arlington Water Pollution Control Plant meets goals of the Comprehensive Plan’s “Community Facilities, Public Utilities and Government Services” chapter such as: • Ensure that a sufficient level of public facilities utilities services are available to meet the needs of the community • Identify and prioritize facilities that require upgrading • Ensure the most efficient and effective management of sanitary sewer systems • Explore new technology to update and operate the City’s utilities system 10-2 FY 2015–2019 CIP Project – Arlington WPCP Secondary Clarifiers Upgrade Re-approp. Request______ New__X_ Ongoing__ Department/Division: Public Works Description/Justification: The City of Falls Church is a wholesale customer of the Arlington Pollution Control Plant, along with Fairfax County. As an Inter-Jurisdictional partner, the City contributes to Capital Improvements on a cost-share basis according to the City's Reserve capacity at the Plant (0.80 MGD). The Secondary Clarifiers project will replace 3 clarifiers at the Plant which were constructed in the mid-1960s and rehabilitated in 2001. These units have inefficient solids collection with limited control over the final solids concentration, and cannot be brought on-line quickly in emergency situations. It is necessary for them to be fully-operational to meet the Plant’s Class 1 reliability requirement in the permit. Project Cost Estimate: (Provide breakdown of Project Management, Design and Engineering, Construction; for on-going projects, include funds appropriated in prior years; include source of cost estimates) Staffing (in-house): $0 Project Management (outsourced): $0 Engineering and Design: $64,500 Construction: $365,500 Total Project Cost (all years): $430,000 Cost Estimate explanation: Project Cost Estimate and expenditure schedule provided by Arlington County staff. Pre-FY12 FY13 FY14 Total Adjusted Prior Appropriations: $0 $0 $0 $0 Unexpended Balance**: $0 $0 $0 $0 **confirm with Finance ***if no activity per City Charter (Section 6.19 ) in 3 years note in FY2014 for reappropriation action 10-3 Future Funding Needs: Available Funding FY2014*** FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 Total Funding Source: SS Debt $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 $65,000 $0 $365,000 Funding Source: Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source: Local $0 $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 Match: Cash Total: $0 $0 $65,000 $150,000 $150,000 $65,000 $0 $430,000 Overall Match requirement: Cash:____ In-kind:_____ Ratio:_______ Description: Project Schedule: Dates: Procurement: Engineering and Design: 2015 Construction: 2016-2018 Impact on Operating Costs (highlight increases or decreases for on-going operations and include equipment, supplies, personnel impacts; specify if a companion initiative will be submitted): The sewer rates have been increased to cover the debt required to finance this project. Conformity with Comprehensive Plan and Council Strategic Plan (include reference to additional adopted planning/policy documents): The upgrade of the Arlington Water Pollution Control Plant meets goals of the Comprehensive Plan’s “Community Facilities, Public Utilities and Government Services” chapter such as: • Ensure that a sufficient level of public facilities utilities services are available to meet the needs of the community • Identify and prioritize facilities that require upgrading • Ensure the most efficient and effective management of sanitary sewer systems • Explore new technology to update and operate the City’s utilities system 10-4 FY 2015–2019 CIP Project – Fairfax Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades Phase Re-approp. Request______ New____ Ongoing_X_ Department/Division: Public Works Description/Justification: The City of Falls Church is a wholesale customer of the Alexandria Wastewater Treatment Plant, along with Fairfax County. Alexandria’s operating permit issued by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) expired in 2009. New capital projects, which will continue until 2022, have resulted from lower effluent limits. The City's share of the estimated costs of these improvements is approximately $6,400,000. A VRA loan in FY11 of $1,650,000 was issued to pay for expenditures through FY13. Actual expected project expenditures are shown. Project Cost Estimate: (Provide breakdown of Project Management, Design and Engineering, Construction; for on-going projects, include funds appropriated in prior years; include source of cost estimates) Staffing (in-house): $0 Project Management (outsourced): $0 Engineering and Design: $0 Construction: $6,400,000 Total Project Cost (all years): $0 Cost Estimate explanation: Project Cost Estimate and expenditure schedule provided by Fairfax County staff. Pre-FY13 FY13 FY14 Total Adjusted Prior Appropriations: $1,404,425 $359,000 $1,025,463 $2,788,888 Unexpended Balance**: $0 $0 $729,000 $729,000 **confirm with Finance ***if no activity per City Charter (Section 6.19 ) in 3 years note in FY2014 for reappropriation action 10-5 Future Funding Needs: Available Funding FY2014*** FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 Total Funding Source: SS Debt $729,000 $0 $797,284 $653,519 $653,519 $313,549 $313,549 $3,460,420 Funding Source: Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source: Local $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Match: Cash Total: $729,000 $0 $797,284 $653,519 $653,519 $313,549 $313,549 $3,460,420 Overall Match requirement: Cash:____ In-kind:_____ Ratio:_______ Description: Project Schedule: Dates: Procurement: Engineering and Design: 2009-2012 Construction: 2012-2022 Impact on Operating Costs (highlight increases or decreases for on-going operations and include equipment, supplies, personnel impacts; specify if a companion initiative will be submitted): The sewer rates have been increased to cover the debt required to finance this project. Conformity with Comprehensive Plan and Council Strategic Plan (include reference to additional adopted planning/policy documents): The upgrade of the Alexandria Wastewater Plant meets goals of the Comprehensive Plan’s “Community Facilities, Public Utilities and Government Services” chapter such as: • Ensure that a sufficient level of public facilities utilities services are available to meet the needs of the community • Identify and prioritize facilities that require upgrading • Ensure the most efficient and effective management of sanitary sewer systems • Explore new technology to update and operate the City’s utilities system 10-6 FY 2015–2019 CIP Project – Fairfax Wastewater Treatment Plant Capacity Re-approp. Request______ New____ Ongoing_X_ Department/Division: Public Works Description/Justification: The City currently has 1.0 MGD sanitary sewer treatment capacity from Fairfax County. The projected flows from future development within the City will exceed the current capacity. Based on the future flows, an additional 0.4 MGD capacity will be required. This project will purchase the additional capacity. Project Cost Estimate: (Provide breakdown of Project Management, Design and Engineering, Construction; for on-going projects, include funds appropriated in prior years; include source of cost estimates) Staffing