Chemical Burns of the Eye: Causes and Management

Chemical Burns of the Eye: Causes and Management

Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.71.11.854 on 1 November 1987. Downloaded from British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1987, 71, 854-857 Chemical burns of the eye: causes and management STEPHEN J MORGAN From the Croydon Eye Unit SUMMARY For the 14 months 1 January 1985 to 28 February 1986 all cases of chemical eye injury presenting to the Croydon Eye Unit were analysed. Of the 180 cases 19 were caused by assaults and 14 were admitted for treatment. The wide range of injurious substances is emphasised, and the circumstances of injury are listed. A discussion of the management of chemical eye injury is included. Chemical injuries of the eye form a small but Nineteen cases (10-6%) were the result of assaults. significant fraction of ocular trauma. Three recent The injurious agent was ammonia in nine (possibly studies'-3 put the incidence at 7, 8-7, and 9-9% of all 10) and an antipersonnel gas in nine. Two of the ocular trauma, respectively. While many of these assaulted persons had other injuries: both had cuts injuries are trivial, with no lasting adverse effects, and bruises and one a fractured mandible. Circum- others, notably those involving strong alkalis and to a stances and apparent motives for the assaults are less extent acids and other noxious substances, are detailed in Table 2. copyright. potentially blinding. This study was prompted by a One hundred and sixty-one cases (89.4%) were the recent rise in the incidence of chemical trauma due to result of accidents. Some details of the history were assault seen at Croydon Eye Unit, and set out to lacking in 28; of the remainder 84 (63%) had determine what substances are involved, which occurred at work, 44 (33%) at home, 4 (3%) at people are at risk, and the frequency of assault cases. school, and one in a public house. In one case deliberate self injury was suspected. The occupations Patients and methods of those injured at work are listed in Table 3. The Croydon Eye Unit serves a largely residential http://bjo.bmj.com/ area, population 300 000, with total attendances 33 000 and new attendances 11000 per annum, based on 501- 1984 figures. No. of Data were extracted from the case histories of all patients 180 cases ofchemical eye injury presenting during the (n) 40k study period. on September 27, 2021 by guest. Protected Results 30 p Of 180 cases 136 were male and 44 female. Forty-one patients (23%) suffered bilateral injuries. The age 20- distribution (Fig. 1) shows a marked preponderance of people of young working age, especially ages 16 to 25. 10 The range of implicated substances (Table 1) is very large, there being at least 33 and probably many L MWIMMM (D 0 L0O0 (0 0 L 0 ( 0 0 0 (0 0 + more chemical compounds. Three categories, alkalis M "C O -f " | t> W _ 0D- W- CO |q- '- (D|W - ( (26%), acids (14%), and solvent based products _ " C MMs fl(0V, (13%), together accounted for over half the cases. Age of patients Correspondence to Dr S J Morgan, Newcastle General Hospital, Fig. 1 Age distribution in 178 cases ofchemical eye injury Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 6BE. (age not recorded in twopatients). 854 Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.71.11.854 on 1 November 1987. Downloaded from Chemical burns ofthe eye: causes and management 855 Table 1 Injurious agent in 180 cases ofchemical eye injury Table 2 Breakdown ofcircumstances of19 cases of chemical burn sustained as a result ofmalicious attacks Agent Number Subgroups No Occupation ofvictim Alkalis 47 Plaster 14 Sales assistant 2 Ammonia 10 Security officer Oven cleaner/NaOH 8 Van driver Wet cement 8 British Rail steward Dry cement 6 Petrol attendant Truck wash* 1 Not at work when attacked 13 Acids 25 Car battery 15 Total 19 Miscellaneous 8 Place ofattack Gastric aspirate 1 Street 10 Boron trifluoride 1 Shop 2 Solvents/paints 24 Train in motion Detergents 15 Outside bank Antipersonnel sprays 9 Petrol station Adhesives 9 Public house Bleach 7 Night club Aerosols 6 Unclear 2 Surgical scrub 5 Total 19 Creosote 5 Motivefor attack Antifreeze 3 Robbery 67 Brake fluid 3 Street fight 193 Petrol 3 Petty quarrel 1 Perfumes 3 None apparent Copper sulphate 2 Total Disinfectants 2 Topical drugs 2 Chilli Powder 1 Contact lens cleaner 1 Table 3 Occupations of84patients who sustained chemical Dispel (air freshener) 1 copyright. Fire lighter fluid 1 eye injuries at work Gas canister It Insecticide 1 Builders and labourers 18 Methyl diphenyl isocyanate I Electricians 12 Mouthwash I Engineers 9 Phenytoin solution 1 Nurses 7 Tattooing fluid 1 Cleaners 6 Machine operators 6 *See text. Hotel and catering 4 tExact nature unclear. Plating and printing 4 Drivers 3 http://bjo.bmj.com/ Painters 2 Plumbers 2 ADMITTED CASES Storemen 2 Carpenter Fourteen cases (six assaults and eight accidents) were Car valet admitted for treatment. All were males and their ages Computer operator ranged from 14 to 53. Eight were bilateral cases. Fireman Indications for admission were (1) severity of the Glazier Manager l on September 27, 2021 by guest. Protected injury, (2) presence of severe pain and blepharo- Physiotherapist 84 spasm, or (3) presence of other injuries. Receptionist All six assault cases were caused by ammonia; the Student other implicated substances were cement (4), and Total plaster, brake fluid, truck wash (a detergent/alkali mixture), and a gas canister (type unknown) one case each. foreign bodies were found in six eyes. Minor lid burns Corneal injury ranged from severe punctate were seen in three ammonia cases. keratopathy to 95% epithelial loss. In the two most Treatment involved immediate and repeated severely injured eyes there were persistent stromal lavage of the conjunctival sac with sterile saline until scars, albeit with normal visual acuity. the pH approached neutral. Particles of foreign Conjunctival injury consisted of patchy or con- material were removed after double eversion of the fluent areas of epithelial loss, with small ischaemic lids. Topical steroids were given in all cases, and in 17 areas in a minority of cases and significant limbal cases an intensive regimen (1/2 hourly to 2 hourly ischaemia (up to 25%) in four. Persistent subtarsal dexamethasone) was instituted. Topical vitamin C Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.71.11.854 on 1 November 1987. Downloaded from 856 StephenJMorgan was applied in two cases and oral given in one. involves three factors: damage to the lids and Mydriatics, analgesia, and padding were used as adnexae, degree of limbal ischaemic necrosis (more required. than one-third affected equals severe), and the The duration of stay in hospital ranged from one to degree of acute corneal stromal opacification (not 11 days determined by corneal re-epithelialisation seen in the present study). The visual results of one of and degree of discomfort. The total duration of these series6 emphasise this difference: of 63 cases treatment ranged from two days to 3½/2 months, 40% had a final acuity of less than 6/60 and 18% of no tailing off according to clinical resolution. light perception; only 29% achieved an acuity better Six patients defaulted from follow-up, and five had than 6/12. Two thirds of the cases in this series were no sequelae and were discharged. One patient assault victims, but the association with violent followed up elsewhere developed suspected func- crime, alcoholism, and revenge attacks on unfaithful tional visual loss in his fellow eye. Two patients had spouses contrasts with the motives of theft, petty persistent corneal opacities but with normal visual quarrels, and gratuitous attacks seen in the present acuities; one of these also had scarring of the upper study. tarsal plate without symblepharon. Apart from motive, another factor influencing the outcome might be the nature or concentration of the NON-ADMITTED CASES noxious agent used. Of these 166 cases 110 (66.3%) were seen once only, In the management of chemical eye injury, first aid 44 (26.5%) were followed up for up to one week, 11 is of paramount importance. Immediate and copious (6-6%) for up to two weeks and only one for more irrigation with bland sterile solutions and removal of than two weeks. In 92 cases (55-4%) topical steroids all solid particles should always precede a full history were used, often as a single dose of ointment plus an and examination. Testing the pH of the conjunctival eye pad. In no case was any permanent injury sac or washings should indicate the presence of alkali, observed. and, if it is present, irrigation should be prolonged. This gradually leaches alkali out of the tissues, where ASSAULT VERSUS ACCIDENTAL CASES it would otherwise persist and cause further damage copyright. Assault cases were over six times as likely to be long after the pH of the external eye has returned to admitted as accidental (31 6% versus 4-97% respec- normal.4 tively). Alkalis were involved in 52-6% of assault In the early clinical assessment of assault cases a cases and 23-0% of accidental cases. most important differential diagnosis exists between ammonia and antipersonnel agents such as CS gas. Discussion The picture is often confused by the assumption by victims and witnesses that any pungent smelling This study indicates the range and severity of ocular substance thrown at the face is ammonia. The chemical injuries which may be encountered in a following observations from personal experience http://bjo.bmj.com/ district general hospital. It underlines the enormous may be helpful. variety of chemicals which may be implicated and the Antipersonnel agents are usually carried in an potentially serious nature of injuries due to assault.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us