September 25, 2020 VIA EMAIL U.S. Department of State Office of Information Programs and Services 2201 C Street NW, Suite B266 Washington, D.C. 20520-0000 [email protected] Re: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear FOIA Officer: Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the implementing regulations of your agency, American Oversight makes the following request for records. Media reports indicate that well-connected external coalitions have been advocating for the Open Technology Fund to redirect funding toward projects specifically targeting China’s digital censorship.1 American Oversight seeks records with the potential to shed light on whether and to what extent external entities have influenced agency actions. Requested Records American Oversight requests that the U.S. Department of State produce the following records within twenty business days: 1. All email communications (including emails, email attachments, complete email chains, and calendar invitations) between any of the State officials listed in Column A and any of the external individuals and entities listed in Column B: Column A: Agency Officials Column B: External Entities Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights i. Michael Horowitz and Labor: ii. Steve Bannon i. Robert Destro, Assistant iii. Michael Pack Secretary iv. Katrina Lantos Swett 1 Russell Brandom, A New Trump Appointee Has Put Internet Freedom Projects in Crisis Mode, The Verge (June 23, 2020, 11:55 AM), https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/23/21300424/open-technology-fund-usagm- circumvention-tools-china-censorship-michael-pack. 1030 15th Street NW, Suite B255, Washington, DC 20005 | AmericanOversight.org ii. Anyone serving as Chief of Staff Anyone communicating on behalf of any to the Assistant Secretary, of the following organizations: Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor v. Lantos Foundation iii. Scott Busby, Deputy Assistant (@lantosfoundation.org) Secretary vi. 21Wilberforce iv. Patricia Davis, Director of Global (@21wilberforce.org) Programs vii. China Aid Association v. Michael Kozak, Acting Assistant (@chinaaid.org) Secretary for Western viii. Church of Scientology National Hemisphere Affairs & former Affairs Office Senior Bureau Official for (@churchofscientology.net) Democracy, Human Rights and ix. Citizen Power Initiatives for Labor China (@initiativesforchina.org) x. Falun Dafa Association of Bureau of International Organizations: Washington D.C. i. Acting Assistant Secretary Pam xi. Epoch Times (@epochtimes.com Pryor, including in her former or @theepochtimes.com) capacity as Senior Advisor in the xii. Jubilee Campaign Office of the Under Secretary for (@jubileecampaign.org) Civilian Security, Democracy and xiii. The Church of Almighty God Human Rights (almightygod.church) xiv. Uyghur Human Rights Project Office of International Religious (uhrp.org) Freedom: xv. Victims of Communism i. Sam Brownback, Ambassador at Memorial Foundation Large for International Religious (victimsofcommunism.org) Freedom ii. Daniel Nadel, Director iii. Riley Barnes, Senior Advisor Please note that American Oversight does not seek, and that this request specifically excludes, the initial mailing of news clips or other mass-distribution emails. However, subsequent communications forwarding or responding to such emails are responsive to this request. In other words, for example, if Assistant Secretary Destro received a mass-distribution email from the Lantos Foundation, that initial email would not be responsive to this request. However, if Assistant Secretary Destro forwarded that email to another individual with his own commentary, that subsequent message would be responsive to this request and should be produced. Please provide all responsive records from January 1, 2019, through the date the search is conducted. 2. All email communications (including emails, email attachments, complete email chains, and calendar invitations) sent by any of the Department of State officials listed in Column A (above) containing any of the listed key terms: - 2 - STATE-20-2385 Key Terms (Item 2 Only): • UltraSurf • Psiphon • UltraReach • “Michael Horowitz” • Freenet • “Michael Pack” • FreeGate • Bannon • Lantern • Lantos • Swett In an effort to accommodate your agency and reduce the number of potentially responsive records to be processed and produced, American Oversight has limited item 2 of its request to emails sent by agency officials. To be clear, however, American Oversight still requests that complete email chains be produced, displaying both sent and received messages. Please provide all responsive records from January 1, 2019, through the date the search is conducted. Fee Waiver Request In accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(iii) and your agency’s regulations, American Oversight requests a waiver of fees associated with processing this request for records. The subject of this request concerns the operations of the federal government, and the disclosures will likely contribute to a better understanding of relevant government procedures by the general public in a significant way. Moreover, the request is primarily and fundamentally for non-commercial purposes. American Oversight requests a waiver of fees because disclosure of the requested information is “in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of operations or activities of the government.”2 The public has a significant interest in the United States’ involvement in international internet freedom efforts.3 Records with the potential to shed light on this matter would contribute significantly to public understanding of operations of the federal government, including whether and to what extent external activists have influenced official agency policy or funding decisions. American Oversight is committed to transparency and makes the responses agencies provide to FOIA requests publicly available, and the public’s understanding of the government’s activities would be enhanced through American Oversight’s analysis and publication of these records. 2 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(iii). 3 Spencer S. Hsu, Trump Administration is Crippling International Internet Freedom Effort by Withholding Funds, Officials Say (July 31, 2020, 4:28 PM), Wash. Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/trump-administration- withholds-20-million-crippling-international-internet-freedom-effort-officials- say/2020/07/31/eea0a9c0-d2a1-11ea-8d32-1ebf4e9d8e0d_story.html. - 3 - STATE-20-2385 This request is primarily and fundamentally for non-commercial purposes.4 As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, American Oversight does not have a commercial purpose and the release of the information requested is not in American Oversight’s financial interest. American Oversight’s mission is to promote transparency in government, to educate the public about government activities, and to ensure the accountability of government officials. American Oversight uses the information gathered, and its analysis of it, to educate the public through reports, press releases, or other media. American Oversight also makes materials it gathers available on its public website and promotes their availability on social media platforms, such as Facebook and Twitter.5 American Oversight has also demonstrated its commitment to the public disclosure of documents and creation of editorial content through regular substantive analyses posted to its website.6 Examples reflecting this commitment to the public disclosure of documents and the creation of editorial content include the posting of records related to the Trump Administration’s contacts with Ukraine and analyses of those contacts;7 posting records and editorial content about the federal government’s response to the Coronavirus pandemic;8 posting records received as part of American Oversight’s “Audit the Wall” project to gather and analyze information related to the administration’s proposed construction of a barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border, and analyses of what those records reveal;9 the posting of records related to an ethics waiver received by a senior Department of Justice attorney and an analysis of what those records demonstrated regarding the Department’s process for issuing such 4 See 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(iii). 5 American Oversight currently has approximately 15,600 page likes on Facebook and 104,600 followers on Twitter. American Oversight, Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/weareoversight/ (last visited Sep. 9, 2020); American Oversight (@weareoversight), Twitter, https://twitter.com/weareoversight (last visited Sep. 9, 2020). 6 See generally News, American Oversight, https://www.americanoversight.org/blog. 7 Trump Administration’s Contacts with Ukraine, American Oversight, https://www.americanoversight.org/investigation/the-trump-administrations- contacts-with-ukraine. 8 See generally The Trump Administration’s Response to Coronavirus, American Oversight, https://www.americanoversight.org/investigation/the-trump-administrations- response-to-coronavirus; see, e.g., CDC Calendars from 2018 and 2019: Pandemic-Related Briefings and Meetings, American Oversight, https://www.americanoversight.org/cdc- calendars-from-2018-and-2019-pandemic-related-briefings-and-meetings. 9 See generally Audit the Wall, American Oversight, https://www.americanoversight.org/investigation/audit-the-wall; see, e.g., Border Wall Investigation Report: No Plans, No Funding, No Timeline, No Wall, American Oversight, https://www.americanoversight.org/border-wall-investigation-report-no-plans-no- funding-no-timeline-no-wall.