Restoring MLL Reactivates Latent Tumor Suppression-Mediated Vulnerability to Proteasome Inhibitors

Restoring MLL Reactivates Latent Tumor Suppression-Mediated Vulnerability to Proteasome Inhibitors

Oncogene (2020) 39:5888–5901 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01408-7 ARTICLE Restoring MLL reactivates latent tumor suppression-mediated vulnerability to proteasome inhibitors 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 Maolin Ge ● Dan Li ● Zhi Qiao ● Yan Sun ● Ting Kang ● Shouhai Zhu ● Shifen Wang ● Hua Xiao ● 1 5 4 1 Chunjun Zhao ● Shuhong Shen ● Zhenshu Xu ● Han Liu Received: 12 March 2020 / Revised: 16 July 2020 / Accepted: 23 July 2020 / Published online: 30 July 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access Abstract MLL undergoes multiple distinct chromosomal translocations to yield aggressive leukemia with dismal outcomes. Besides their well-established role in leukemogenesis, MLL fusions also possess latent tumor-suppressive activity, which can be exploited as effective cancer treatment strategies using pharmacological means such as proteasome inhibitors (PIs). Here, using MLL-rearranged xenografts and MLL leukemic cells as models, we show that wild-type MLL is indispensable for the latent tumor-suppressive activity of MLL fusions. MLL dysfunction, shown as loss of the chromatin accumulation and subsequent degradation of MLL, compromises the latent tumor suppression of MLL-AF4 and is instrumental for the 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: acquired PI resistance. Mechanistically, MLL dysfunction is caused by chronic PI treatment-induced epigenetic reprogramming through the H2Bub-ASH2L-MLL axis and can be specifically restored by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, which induce histone acetylation and recruits MLL on chromatin to promote cell cycle gene expression. Our findings not only demonstrate the mechanism underlying the inevitable acquisition of PI resistance in MLL leukemic cells, but also illustrate that preventing the emergence of PI-resistant cells constitutes a novel rationale for combination therapy with PIs and HDAC inhibitors in MLL leukemias. Introduction (H3K4) methylation [1]. MLL orchestrates several essential cellular processes by positively regulating its target genes, The mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) gene encodes a histone especially the Hox gene family and cell cycle genes [2, 3]. methyltransferase governing histone H3 lysine residue 4 MLL precursor polypeptide is site-specifically cleaved by the Taspase1 protease and functions as heterodimeric complexes composed of its amino (MLLN320) and carboxy C180 MLL These authors contributed equally: Maolin Ge, Dan Li, Zhi Qiao, (MLL ) terminal subunits [4, 5]. The gene under- Yan Sun goes many distinct chromosomal rearrangements to yield aggressive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute Supplementary information The online version of this article (https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01408-7) contains supplementary myeloid leukemia (AML). Leukemogenic MLL transloca- material, which is available to authorized users. tions fuse the N-terminal l~1400 amino acids of MLL in * Shuhong Shen Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, [email protected] 200240 Shanghai, China * Zhenshu Xu 3 Department of Oncology, Xin Hua Hospital, School of Medicine, [email protected] Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200092 Shanghai, China * Han Liu 4 Fujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory [email protected] of Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 350001 Fuzhou, China 1 Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of 5 Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Ministry Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational of Health, Department of Hematology & Oncology, Pediatric fi Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital af liated to Shanghai Jiao Translational Medicine Institute, Shanghai Children’s Medical Tong University School of Medicine, 200025 Shanghai, China Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2 State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, School of Life 200127 Shanghai, China Restoring MLL reactivates latent tumor suppression-mediated vulnerability to proteasome inhibitors 5889 frame with more than 94 translocation partner genes, which endogenous MLL-fusion proteins at the p27 locus through are present at high frequency in infants and at lower fre- PAX5 is decisive to the specific cytotoxicity caused by quencies in children and adults [5, 6]. proteasome inhibition in lymphoid, but not myeloid, MLL In contrast to the rearranged allele, the other MLL allele leukemias. usually remains intact and expressed. The contribution of We previously reported that PI bortezomib single-agent this wild-type MLL allele to leukemogenesis in MLL- therapy showed effectiveness in mouse models and patients rearranged leukemias has been the subject of intense with pro-B MLL leukemia; however, the inevitable emer- research. Several lines of investigation support that endo- gence of PI resistance imposes limits on bortezomib’s genous MLL maintains the H3K4me status and facilitates clinical application [18]. Therefore, identification of the MLL-fusion protein-mediated leukemogenesis [7–9]. mechanism underlying PI resistance and the design of novel Meanwhile, the loss of endogenous MLL alone can have combination strategies are essential to overcome resistance significant impacts on several AML subtypes, including and facilitate the application of PIs to MLL leukemias. those initiated by MN1 and NUP98 fusion proteins [10, 11]. Intriguingly, we found that the wild-type MLL protein was However, other studies have demonstrated that endogenous less abundant and was insensitive to PI treatment in resistant MLL is dispensable for MLL-rearranged AML and that MLL leukemia cells, compromised the latent tumor sup- MLL deletion alone had no major impact on the survival of pression of MLL fusions. Therefore, we reasoned that dis- MLL leukemic cells [12, 13]. Nevertheless, these dis- ruption of the balance between wild-type MLL and MLL crepancies occur mainly in AML models, while the con- chimeras plays a critical role in PI resistance, and that tar- tribution of the wild-type allele of MLL to MLL-rearranged geting MLL dysfunction and restoring MLL may be a ALL remains elusive. promising strategy for treating the aggressive resistance in The improved molecular understanding of MLL and MLL leukemia. MLL fusions has led to the identification of several poten- tial mechanism-based therapeutic targets. While the neces- sity of the wild-type allele of MLL for leukemogenesis is Results debatable, it has nonetheless become an attractive ther- apeutic target in MLL leukemia. Given the findings that the PI resistance is associated with the failure of MLL remaining wild-type MLL protein is generally much less and p27 induction abundant than the MLL fusions in MLL leukemia cells, several candidate therapeutic strategies are emerging that We previously observed that pro-B MLL leukemia dis- stabilize wild-type MLL protein to displace MLL chimeras played selective sensitivity to the PI bortezomib, but the from chromatin and therefore evade the oncogenic addiction disease did eventually develop in xenograft mice [18]. To of these cells to MLL chimeras [14, 15]. For example, the understand mechanisms by which pro-B MLL leukemic inhibition of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinases cells overcome proteasome inhibition, we modeled (IRAKs) impedes UBE2O-mediated MLL degradation and bortezomib-resistant SEM and RS4;11 cells by con- stabilizes wild-type MLL protein. Casein kinase II (CKII) tinuously treated parental cells with a sublethal dose of inhibition, on the other hand, blocks the phosphorylation of bortezomib (5 nM) for over 4 weeks (Figs. 1a and S1A). the taspase1 cleavage site on MLL and inhibits taspase1- Cells were passaged and the inhibitor was replenished every dependent MLL processing, thus increasing MLL stability. 3 days. The half-maximal dosage effect (IC50) values were Analogously, IRAK and CKII inhibition induce wild-type measured intermittently until the drug resistance was MLL to outcompete the oncogenic MLL chimeras through acquired. In PI-sensitive MLL leukemic cells, bortezomib additional chromatin-binding modules, such as PHD fingers induces the accumulation of MLL-AF4 and latent tumor and a bromodomain. These domains are not retained in suppression programs, triggering cell cycle arrest involving MLL fusions but exist exclusively in wild-type MLL [16]. the activation of the p27 gene (CDKN1B)[18]. Like the Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have also been original PI-sensitive parental cells, the abundance of MLL- reported to activate wild-type MLL [17], but the underlying AF4 in resistant cells exhibited a remarkable increase under mechanisms are not fully understood. bortezomib treatment, while the abundance of wild-type Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are newly reported clinical MLL and p27 did not increase significantly (Fig. 1b), regimens for MLL therapy, specifically MLL-r B-ALL indicating that PI resistance in MLL leukemic cells is cells, but not AML [18, 19]. Mechanistically, proteasome associated with the failure of MLL and p27 induction. inhibition induces the intrinsic tumor-suppressive activity Interestingly, while the activation of p27 is essential for cell of MLL fusions by triggering apoptosis and cell cycle cycle deregulation caused by acute PI treatment, it was not arrest involving cleavage of BID by caspase-8 and upre- significantly activated in chronically induced PI-resistant gulation of p27, respectively [18, 20]. The accumulation of cells (Fig. 1b), suggesting that the cell cycle deregulation in 5890 M. Ge et al. Fig. 1 PI resistance is associated with the failure of MLL

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us