Do Plate Readers Agree? Understanding Performance Differences between Different Plate Reader Makes/Models Tanya R. Knaide, John Thomas Bradshaw, Richard H. Curtis, Geary Ritter, Rachel Parshley Abstract Introduction Materials Method Microplate readers are used for numerous Multiple plate readers are often used throughout a facility to measure •Single-channel Test Plate Readers A, B, D, E Discussion: Procedure: laboratory applications to measure results the response in microplates for different assay types. However, QC of •8-channel Test Plate Reader C of chemical assays in microplates. plate readers is often considered sufficient when PM service is A reference plate reader was established for this 520 nm. Using these solutions provided a range • Using the calibrated syringe*, or a gravimetric run through the reader pool concurrently (e.g. •Single-channel Reference Plate Reader Readers may be used to collect one or performed or measurement of reader-specific calibration plates is protocol (procedure not discussed). This plate of absorbance values at 520 nm which were large volume dilution procedure**, the dilutions plate one/reader one, plate one/reader two and several types of measurements including completed for each individual reader. The performance of multiple •Interference filters for 520 nm (where appropriate) reader complied with the following guidelines: measured by each plate reader under test. described in Table 1 were prepared in amber plate two/reader one, etc.) absorbance, or optical density. However, plate readers, regardless of make or model, is often not directly •Calibrated syringes (or another transfer standard) the lowest number of individual measurement bottles using the appropriate MVS Sample and like any type of laboratory equipment, not compared even if those readers are performing the same task(s) for •Calibrated 1 mL or higher pipette with tips channels was considered to return measurements All test readers and solutions were allowed to Diluent Solutions. The appropriate volume of *Calibrated syringe dilution procedure: all plate readers are created equal and the same assay(s). Unknown performance differences between plate as close to the “true” value as possible. equilibrate in the testing environment for 1 hour MVS Diluent was transferred to the bottle. Using a. Transfer desired volume of diluent to bottle •MVS Baseline Solution each lends different amounts of readers introduces an additional source of error to assays at perhaps prior to testing to minimize thermal influence on the syringe, the appropriate Sample Solution using a reliable transfer method (gravimetric, uncertainty to measurements collected, the most critical step. •MVS Range A, B and E This experiment compared average absorbance the measurements. volume was aspirated and dispensed into the pipette, etc.) and therefore the overall results of the •MVS Diluent measurements at 520 nm between multiple plate Diluent-filled amber bottle. Each bottle was b. Using calibrated syringe and proper technique, assays conducted. Characterization of In this presentation, a method of measuring plate reader performance •96-well Artel Verification Plates readers. The absorbance measurements from Plate reader settings including number of flashes gently inverted at least 10 times to achieve transfer the required volume of sample solution plate reader performance enables users using Artel MVS dye solutions is described using six different plate each reader were compared to those from the and pause time between reads were tested and complete mixing. to the diluent filled bottle. •384-well Artel Verification Plates to harmonize groups of instruments, reader types from different manufacturers. Using this method, groups reference reader to determine the off-set from the selected in a separate experiment. The settings c. Mix at least 10 times by inversion. making results agree regardless of the of plate readers may be assessed and standardized, thereby •MVS Calibrator Plate “true” absorbance at a specified absorbance used for the plate readers in this experiment are • Using a calibrated multichannel pipette, 200 µL plate reader employed, as well as to minimizing the uncertainty contributed to assay results from plate •Multichannel pipette or automated liquid handler range. described in Table 2. of the prepared dilution was dispensed into each **Gravimetric large volume dilution procedure: understand how the uncertainty of the reader measurements. •Amber bottles well of a 96-well Verification Plate, or 55 µL into a. Place bottle with cap on 5-place balance and plate reader measurements translates to Various dilutions were made containing different As with any QC procedure, materials and a 384-well Verification Plate, respectively, as tare. •5-place balance their assay results. Herein, a specific It should be noted that this procedure may be employed using mixtures of MVS Sample Solutions and Diluent. instruments used for this experiment were tested indicated in Table 1. b. Remove the cap and dispense the appropriate procedure for the measurement of the different dyes at other wavelengths. In the example described, MVS The dilutions were dispensed into 96-well and to ensure proper performance before beginning volume of diluent into the bottle. variability between plate readers will be Sample Solutions were used because they represent the wavelength 384-well Artel Verification Plates as defined in and technician skill level was adequate for the • Each sample plate was measured in the reader c. Replace the cap and record the weight. discussed. of interest and are reliably manufactured. When repeating this Table 1. MVS Sample Solutions are procedure. pool according to Table 3. To ensure that the d. Remove the cap again and dispense the procedure in an effort to standardize plate readers used for specific manufactured with a high degree of reproducibility baseline reading was not drifting due to thermal appropriate volume of sample solution to the assays, appropriate dye solutions should be employed. at six different concentrations that absorb light at fluctuations of the readers, the two 96-well bottle. sample plates were read in close e. Replace on the cap and record the weight. succession. To do this, both plates were f. Mix at least 10 times by inversion. Method (continued) Nominal Standard Plate Reader Settings Results of Experiment Reader Absorbance Deviation %CV 8-channel Plate Reader C vs. Reference 8-channel Plate Reader C vs. Median A 0.15 0.00027 0.16% 3.00% 1.00% Reader Type Plate Type # Flashes Read Mode Pause Time (ms) Ch1 The plate readers described in Figure 1 were used to Ch1 Plate # Target Abs. Sample Sample Diluent Plate Portion of A 0.25 0.00027 0.11% 2.50% Ch2 0.50% Ch2 Ch3 Solution Volume (µL) Volume Type plate measure the absorbance of each well in the sample- Ch3 A 0.5 0.00038 0.08% 2.00% Ch4 (µL) Reader A 96 10 n/a 20 0.00% Ch4 filled microplates. Measurements collected during the Ch5 1.50% Ch5 A 1.2 0.00067 0.06% Ch6 Ch6 1 0.15 Range E 20 60000 96 Columns Reader B 96 10 n/a 20 experiment are summarized in the Figures 2-4. In Ch7 -0.50% 1.00% Ch7 1-4 A 2.4 0.0020 0.09% Ch8 Figure 2, all single-channel plate reader measurements from Ref % Difference Ch8 Median -1.00% Reader C 96 n/a n/a n/a B 0.15 0.00072 0.46% 0.50% Median 1 0.25 Range E 30 60000 96 Columns are compared to the respective measurements from the Reference from Median % Difference 5-8 Reader D 96 n/a 6 (10 ms) 50 B 0.25 0.00078 0.34% 0.00% -1.50% reference reader at each absorbance level. Figures 3a 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1 0.475 Range B 3000 57000 96 Columns Absorbance and 4a compare the absorbance measured by each B 0.5 0.00094 0.21% Absorbance 9-12 B 1.2 0.0019 0.17% Figure 3a. Figure 3b. Reader A 384 5 n/a 20 channel of 8-channel plate readers to the single 2 1.133 Range B 7500 52500 96 Columns channel of the reference plate reader. Figures 3b and 4 B 2.4 0.0059 0.26% 8-channel Plate Reader F vs. Reference 8-channel Plate Reader F vs. Median 1-4 Reader B 384 5 n/a 20 compare the absorbance measurement from each of C 0.15 0.00027 0.162% 4.00% 2 2.265 Range A Neat 0 96 Columns 2.50% Reader C 384 n/a n/a n/a 5-8 the 8 channels to the median of all absorbance C 0.25 0.00027 0.112% Ch1 3.00% Ch1 Ch2 Reader D 384 n/a 7 (16.7 ms) 50 measurements collected by the 8-channel plate 1.50% Ch2 2 0 Baseline Neat 0 96 Columns C 0.5 0.00038 0.082% Ch3 Ch3 9-12 readers. 2.00% Ch4 Ch4 Table 2. Plate reader settings employed C 1.2 0.00067 0.057% Ch5 0.50% Ch5 Ch6 1.00% Ch6 In this experiment, single-channel and multichannel C 2.4 0.0020 0.088% Ch7 Ch7 Reference Ch8 % Difference from Ref % Difference -0.50% Table 4. Photometric noise measurement at key absorbance levels 0.00% 1 0.15 Range E 20 60000 384 Columns plate readers similarly exhibited the largest deviation Median from Difference % Median 1-4 Reference Plate Reader: Single-channel, interference filter-based from the reference reader at absorbance levels below -1.00% -1.50% 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1 0.25 Range E 30 60000 384 Columns Plate Reader A: Single-channel, monochromator-based Single-channel Plate Readers vs. Reference 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 5-8 0.5 OD, while the best agreement between channels Absorbance Absorbance Plate Reader B: Single-channel, interference-filter based and between readers occurred near 1.0 OD.