Grassland Communities of Traditional Orchards in the Western Carpathians (Slovakia)

Grassland Communities of Traditional Orchards in the Western Carpathians (Slovakia)

Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae DOI: 10.5586/asbp.3552 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Publication history Received: 2016-11-15 Accepted: 2017-06-12 Grassland communities of traditional Published: 2017-06-30 orchards in the Western Carpathians Handling editor Łukasz Łuczaj, Institute of Applied Biotechnology and (Slovakia) Basic Sciences, University of Rzeszów, Poland Hubert Žarnovičan1*, Jozef Kollár2, Iveta Škodová3 Authors’ contributions 1 HŽ: feld research; JK, IŠ, Department of Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská HŽ: writing the manuscript, dolina, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia 2 syntaxonomic classifcation, Department of Ecosystem Analyses, Institute of Landscape Ecology, Štefánikova 3, P.O. Box 254, numerical classifcation 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia 3 Department of Geobotany, Plant Science and Biodiversity Center, Institute of Botany SAS, Funding Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 23 Bratislava, Slovakia This contribution was supported * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] by Vega grants 2/0040/17 and 2/0016/15. Competing interests Abstract No competing interests have Traditional orchards are a valuable feature of the rural landscape and they are specifc been declared. for regions with scattered settlement such as the Myjava hilly land and White Car- Copyright notice pathians. Here, the permanent species-rich grasslands beneath trees were regularly © The Author(s) 2017. This is an managed in the traditional manner until some were replaced in the 1970’s and 80’s Open Access article distributed by intensively managed orchards, some of which were abandoned in the early 1990’s. under the terms of the Creative Our 2011–2015 phytosociological research followed the standard Braun-Blanquet Commons Attribution License, which permits redistribution, approach. We classifed 178 phytosociological relevés recorded in orchard meadows commercial and non- (156 relevés), former intensively managed orchards (16 relevés), and two relevés commercial, provided that the from a semi-intensively grazed orchard. Traditionally managed orchard meadows article is properly cited. were classifed in the following fve units: (i) Pastinaco sativae-Arrhenatheretum Citation elatioris – thermophilous variant, (ii) Pastinaco sativae-Arrhenatheretum elatioris Žarnovičan H, Kollár J, Škodová – transitional variant to Alchemillo-Arrhenatheretum elatioris, (iii) Ranunculo I. Grassland communities bulbosi-Arrhenatheretum elatioris, (iv) Onobrychido viciifoliae-Brometum erecti, and of traditional orchards in (v) Brachypodio pinnati-Molinietum arundinaceae. Formerly intensively managed the Western Carpathians (Slovakia). Acta Soc Bot Pol. large-scale orchards were classifed as Pastinaco sativae-Arrhenatheretum elatioris 2017;86(2):3552. https://doi. association and the semi-intensively grazed orchard as Lolio perennis-Cynosuretum org/10.5586/asbp.3552 cristati association. Te species composition varies considerably due to tree-shading and diferent management treatments applied in the orchards, so the relevés of the Digital signature delimited syntaxonomic units are not typical and have transitional character. Moisture, This PDF has been certifed using digital signature with a trusted timestamp to soil nutrients, and soil reaction were identifed as the main environmental gradients assure its origin and integrity. A verifcation trust dialog appears on the PDF document infuencing species composition. We tested four management treatments in direct when it is opened in a compatible PDF gradient analysis and found that abandonment has the strongest efect on species reader. Certifcate properties provide further details such as certifcation time composition. Comparison of grassland vegetation in the studied traditional orchards and a signing reason in case any alterations made to the fnal content. If the certifcate with that described in Germany reveals diferences in species composition. Moreover, is missing or invalid it is recommended to species richness of the compared Arrhenatherion elatioris and Bromion erecti alli- verify the article on the journal website. ances in Slovakian orchard meadows was higher than in the German orchards. Keywords orchard meadows; vegetation; scattered settlements; management; syntaxonomy; diversity; Myjava hilly land; White Carpathians Introduction Traditional old orchards are one of the most valuable and endangered habitats of the European cultural landscape [1]. Te fruit tree and grassland undergrowth subsystems combine conditions of both forest and non-forest habitats and they are known for their high biodiversity [2–5]. Tey are important in maintaining old local fruit tree varieties Published by Polish Botanical Society 1 of 16 Žarnovičan et al. / Grassland communities of orchards in Western Carpathians (Slovakia) [6]. Te grassland undergrowth protects the soil against erosion and positively afects its physical and chemical properties [7–9]. Tis provides an excellent example of tradi- tional European agroforestry systems as well as olive orchards, wood pastures, dehesa and montado (cf. [10]), which were and are still used in Europe [11]. Nowadays, their importance is increasing in order to maintain biodiversity in the cultural landscape [10]. Orchard meadows form part of the landscape in most countries in Western, Central, and Eastern Europe. Although traditional orchards are ofen under-utilized compared to the past, they still thrive in Germany, Spain, France, England, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovenia, and Ukraine [6,12,13]. Tese persist despite the dramatic loss of traditional orchard meadow area during the second half of the twentieth century recorded in southwestern, southern, and eastern Germany [13–15], Switzerland [6], Austria [16,17], France [18], and Slovenia [19,20]. Here in Slovakia, Špulerová et al. [21] report that 70.25% of traditional orchard landscape is threatened by abandon- ment of traditional farming and this has now become one of the greatest threats to traditional orchards. Biodiversity in the European agricultural landscape has also been severely afected by agricultural intensifcation with ensuing landscape simplifcation and biodiversity loss [22–24]. Agricultural collectivization also played an essential role in former socialist countries, where small felds were merged into large blocks under uniform management. Tis had negative impact on orchards in the study area [1,25] where part of traditional orchards disappeared and some intensively managed large- scale apple and plum orchards were established in the 1970’s. Te fall of socialism in Eastern and Central Europe then caused decreased management intensity, and even its cessation in some areas [26]. Te Slovak orchard meadows have a specifc type of land use typical for regions with scattered settlement called “kopanice”, which are present throughout the Myjava hilly land and White Carpathians. Tis settlement type expanded from the second half of the sixteenth century in poorly accessible forested areas [27]. While the main function of traditional orchards was fruit production in the past, today it is their nature that is highly valued rather than economic importance because they serve as biodiversity hotspots and contribute significantly to cultural landscape diversity [12,28]. The small-scale orchards with 0.5-hectare average area produced mostly plums and apples with fewer pears, cherries, common walnuts, and rarely, even true service trees. Te undergrowth was used for grazing and producing hay and some orchards were used to grow vegetables and grain. Traditional management usually included biannual mow- ing and 1–3 head of cattle, sheep, or goat grazing per orchard. Tree litter was removed annually, usually in spring, and although orchards were fertilized with manure and slurry, chemical spraying of trees was rare [29]. Te frequency and intensity of traditional orchard management has decreased in Slovakia over the last 25 years [21,29] as in other European countries [6,12,30]. Tis trend threatens not only their functions but their very existence. Management of intensive orchards has also changed in the study area, and while most have been gradually abandoned following the 1989 sociopolitical changes, some are still in use. Because grassland diversity depends on long-term regular management [31–33], it is therefore necessary to maintain orchard meadow biological values by ensuring traditional management continuity and traditional ecological knowledge. Tis entails combining elements of theoretical knowledge and the practical experience and beliefs [34] which are eroding today. Maintaining traditional ecological knowledge is obliga- tory to protect countryside landscape efectively [35]. Te study of orchard meadow plant communities helps us understand the impact of various management regimes on their species composition. While phytosociological research of orchard meadows in Europe was mainly per- formed in Germany [36–39], some information on the occurrence of this habitat is also reported from other Central European countries [6,10–12] but phytosociological data is lacking or poorly accessible. In Slovakia, foristic and vegetation research of orchard meadows has only been partly carried out and historical data is relatively missing. Te most important papers focused directly on the study area orchard meadows were published by Ružičková [40] (50 relevés) and Labuda and Žarnovičan [1] (13 relevés). Te detailed research of subxerophilous and mesophilous grasslands of the White Carpathians dealt partly

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us