If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. / THE AMERICAN" UNIVERSITY WASHINGTON DC r. , , • +-~ 7 ¸~ lI. (D School of Public Affairs g Justice Program s office f AMERICAN UNIVERSITY W A S H I N G T O N , D C I JUSTICE PROGRAMSOFFICE i I :1 Drug Court Planning and Implementation: I Selected Operational Materials I I December 1995 I I I I I I I I .I I 4400 MASSACHUSETTSAVENUE, NW WASHINGTON,DC 20016-8159 202-885-2875 FAX:202-885-2885 i I I. i Table of Contents I Foreword I Part I: Summary of Operational Characteristics of Seventeen Drug Court Programs as of June 1994 I Part If: Comparative Information Regarding Urinalysis Costs and Procedures in I Seventeen Jurisdictions I Part HI Listing of Sample Operational Materials by Category Maintained in the I Drug Court Clearinghouse Reference Collection : I Part IV: Sample Operational Materials Developed by Drug Court Programs • Program Descriptions I Court Pleadings/Orders/Rules Relevant To Drug Case Program Operations I Program Procedures Participant Information I Participant Contracts/Agreements Certificates of Participant Completion'of Treatment Program I Forms Relating To Internal Case Intake/Management/Monitoring and Release of Information I Management Information/Data Collection Materials/Sample Computer Screens I I I I I I I Part I: Summary of Operational Characteristics of I Seventeen Drug Court Programs as of June 1994 I I Programs Included: Municipal Court; Bakersfield, California I Superior Court; Los Angeles, California Municipal Court; Oakland, California I District Court; Denver, Colorado i -a Superior Court; Wilmington, Delaware Circuit Court; Cook County (Chicago), Illinois Circuit Court; Broward County (Ft. Lauderdale), Florida First Judicial District Court; Pensacola, Florida I Second Judicial Circuit Court; Tallahassee, Florida Circuit and District Court; Baltimore, Maryland Ninth Judicial Circuit Court; Kalamazoo, Michigan I Second Judicial Circuit Court; St. Joseph, Michigan Sixteenth Judicial Circuit Court; Kansas City, Missouri I District Court; Clark County, Las Vegas, Nevada Circuit Court; Mulmomah County (Portland), Oregon District Court; Jefferson County (Beaumont), Texas I District Court; Travis County (Austin), Texas I I I ! I I i 4, Part II: Comparative Information Regarding Urinalysis Costs and Procedures in Seventeen Jurisdictions as of June 1994z; I Part III: Listing of Sample Operational Materials by Category I Maintained in the Drug Court Clearinghouse Reference Collection3; and I t Part IV: Sample Operational Materials Developed by Drug Court I Programs. I While the documents included in this report represent a very small portion of the resources maintained in the OJP Drug Court Clearinghouse Collection and the additional documents that have i been developed by the operating drug court programs, we hope that they will provide guidance to I judicial system and treatment professionals embarked on the development of drug court programs. Users of this report are encouraged to contact the drug court program officials noted or to I call The Justice Programs Office at American University for further information and assistance. I I Caroline S. Cooper, Director I OJP Drug Courts Clearinghouse The American University I December 1995 I I This information will be updated in Drug Courts: An Overview of Operational Characterstics and Inwlementation Issues: Volume 1I, which will be published by The American UniversityDrug I Court Clearinghouse shortly. This listing is currentlybeing updated and will be available shortly. I i I I AMERICAN UNIVERSITY W A S H I N G T O N , D C I JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE I Foreword I i i The materials which follow are excerpted from Drug Case Management and Treatment Intervention Strategies in the State and Local Courts (Volume II), which was prepared I by The American University under the auspices of the Drug Case Management and Technical Assistance Project, sponsored jointly by the State Justice Institute and the Bureau of Justice I Assistance during 1992 - 1994. The documents referenced formed the nucleus of the BJA Drag Court Resource Center which has since been significantly expanded and is now part of the Reference I Collection of the American University Drug Court Clearinghouse maintained for the Office of Justice I Programs oftheU.S. Department of Justice. The materials included in this publication have been assembled to provide an overview of a I variety of issues relevant to the development and operation of drug court programs and examples of I how various judicial systems have addressed them. I This excerpt is organized in four sections: I * Part I: Summary of Operational Characteristics of Seventeen Drug Court Programs as of June 1994; 1 I I Additional and more current information is provided in Drug Courts: An Overview of Operational Characterstics and Implementation Issues I I I 4400 MASSACHUSETTSAvENuE, NW WASHINGTON,DC 20016-8159 202-885-2875 FAX:202-885-2885 I I 1. Program Descriptions Maricopa County, (Phoenix), Arizona First Time Drug Offender I Program Drug Court: Program Description I Alameda County, California Probation Department Drug Abuse Control Center (DACC): Program Description I FIRST Program: Summary of the FIRST Drug Diversion Program: Program Description I Bakersfield, California Municipal Court Substance Abuse Court Program Description I Denver, Colorado Drug Court Denver Drug Court Briefing Book I Denver Drug Court Description, May 11, 1994 New Castle County (Wilmington), Delaware Drug Court I Delaware Drug Court: Overview (February 1, 1994) SuperiogJCourt of the District of Columbia Drug Case Intervention I Program Drug Intervention Program Description I Broward County (Fort Lauderdale), Florida Drug Court Broward County Outpatient Drug Court Program I Dade County (Miami), Florida Drug Court Bennett H. Brummer and Hugh Rodham. "Miami's Drug Court: Leading the Way." article published in the National I Legal Aid and Defender Association (NLADA) Newsletter, Spring 1993. [authors are public defender and assistant public I defender, respectively, in Dade County) Cook County (Chicago), Illinois Fast Track Program for Adult Drug Case Defendants I Judge Michael Getty. "Preliminary Program Description: Fast Track Case Processing of Adult Drug Offenders". August 1989. I copy of all listed material is in the American University reference collection I ** excerpt included in Section IV I ! The American University Justice Programs Office: SectionIII I Berrien County (St. Joseph), Michigan Drug Court Michael G. Cianfarano. "Berrien County's Drug Court". i Michigan Judicial Institute. October 1992. Detroit, Michigan Recorder's Court Criminal Differentiated Case I Management Program George Gish. "Managing Drug Cases and Monitoring the Jail Population" (includes program description, summary of I procedures, case processing impact, and cost/benefit analysis) ! Kalamazoo County, Michigan Prison Diversion Program for Female Offenders Michael G. Cianfarano. "Kalamazoo County's Diversion Program for Female Offenders." Michigan Judicial Institute. I Ramsey County (St. Paul), Minnesota Fast Track Calendar for Drug Cases Guidelines for Diversion I Project Remand: Conditional Release Fast Track Drug Plan Summary of Operational Plan for Fast Track Drug Cases I Clark County (Las Vegas), Nevada Controlled Substance Court: Controlled Substance Court: Program Information I Milwaukee County, WisconsinFelony Drug:Court: Milwaukee County Speedy; Trial Courts: Summary Description. I 2. COURT PLEADINGS/ORDERS/RULESRELEVANT To I DRUG CASE PROGRAMOPERATIONS Superior Court of the District of Columbia Drug Case Intervention I Program Release Order (including graduated sanction schedule) I Escambia and Okaloosa Counties, Florida Drug Courts Administrative Order No.: 93-62: In Re: Creation of a Drug Court Division Within the Criminal Division (Escambia County) I Administrative Order No.: 93-115 :in Re: Creation of a Drug Court Division Within the Criminal Division (0kaloosa County) Pretrial Release Order: I Escambia County Okaloosa County I Stipulated Order of Referral to Drug Court (0kaloosa County) I 2. COURT PLEADINGS/ORDERS/RULESRELEVANT TO I The American UniversiO,Justice Programs Office: SectionIII I I I DRUG CASE PROGRAM OPERATIONS (cont.) Cook County (Chicago), Illinois "Fast Track" Caiendar for Adult Drug Case Defendants I Order for Referral to "Fast Track" Program :g* Berrien County (St. Joseph), Michigan Drug Court Division and Enhanced I Treatment Program Case Scheduling Order I Wayne County (Detroit), Michigan Recorder's Court Criminal Differentiated Case Management Program Recorder's Court Order Granting Discovery I Final Pre-Trial Conference Summary Joint Administrative Order Establishing Revised Fee Schedule for Indigent Defense Counsel I Certification of Jail Visit by Indigent Defense Counsel Structured Sentence Agreement I Petition and order for Court Appointed Attorney Clark County (Las Vegas), Nevada Controlled Substance Court i Petition for Admission to the Drug Court Program Order Granting/Denying Petition for Drug Court Program I Entry Multnomah County (Portland), Oregon Deferred Prosecution (STOP) and Expedited Drug Case Management Programs I Defendant's Petition for Diversion Court Order in Response to Defendant's Petition to Enter STOP I Temporary Sentencing Order Final Judgment and Sentence I Jefferson County (Beaumont), Texas Drug Intervention Court Motion and Agreement for Pre-Trial Intervention I Pierce County (Tacoma), Washington Criminal Differentiated Case Management