State Court School Desegregation Cases: the New Frontier

State Court School Desegregation Cases: the New Frontier

State Court School Desegregation Cases: The New Frontier 2020 Edition LawPracticeCLE Unlimited All Courses. All Formats. All Year. ABOUT US LawPracticeCLE is a national continuing legal education company designed to provide education on current, trending issues in the legal world to judges, attorneys, paralegals, and other interested business professionals. New to the playing eld, LawPracticeCLE is a major contender with its oerings of Live Webinars, On-Demand Videos, and In-per- son Seminars. LawPracticeCLE believes in quality education, exceptional customer service, long-lasting relationships, and networking beyond the classroom. We cater to the needs of three divisions within the legal realm: pre-law and law students, paralegals and other support sta, and attorneys. WHY WORK WITH US? At LawPracticeCLE, we partner with experienced attorneys and legal professionals from all over the country to bring hot topics and current content that are relevant in legal practice. We are always looking to welcome dynamic and accomplished lawyers to share their knowledge! As a LawPracticeCLE speaker, you receive a variety of benets. In addition to CLE teaching credit attorneys earn for presenting, our presenters also receive complimentary tuition on LawPracticeCLE’s entire library of webinars and self-study courses. LawPracticeCLE also aords expert professors unparalleled exposure on a national stage in addition to being featured in our Speakers catalog with your name, headshot, biography, and link back to your personal website. Many of our courses accrue thousands of views, giving our speakers the chance to network with attorneys across the country. We also oer a host of ways for our team of speakers to promote their programs, including highlight clips, emails, and much more! If you are interested in teaching for LawPracticeCLE, we want to hear from you! Please email our Directior of Operations at [email protected] with your information. Be advised when speaking for LawPracticeCLE, we require you to provide the bellow items related to your course: 1. A Course Description 2. 3-4 Learning Objectives or Key Topics 3. A Detailed Agenda 4. A Comprehensive PowerPoint Presentation CONTACT US 11161 E State Road 70 #110-213 941-584-9833 www.lawpracticecle.com Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202 LAWPRACTICECLE UNLIMITED LawPracticeCLE Unlimited is an elite program allowing attorneys and legal professionals unlimited access to all Law- PracticeCLE live and on-demand courses for an entire year. LawPracticeCLE provides twenty new continuing legal education courses each month that will not only appeal to your liking, but it will also meet your State Bar requirement. Top attorneys and judges from all over the country partner with us to provide a wide variety of course topics from basic to advanced. Whether you are a paralegal or an experienced attorney, you can expect to grow from the wealth of knowledge our speakers provide. COURSE CATEGORIES A View From The Bench Estate Planning Paralegal Studies Animal Law Ethics, Bias, and Professionalism Personal Injury Law Bankruptcy Law Family Law Practice Management & Trial Prep Business Law Federal Law Real Estate Law Cannabis Law Food and Beverage Law Religious Law Construction Law Gun Law Social Security Law Criminal Law Health Law Specialized Topics Cybersecurity Law Immigration Law Tax Law Education Law Intellectual Property Law Technology Law Employment Law Insurance Law Transportation Law Entertainment Law Nonprot Law Tribal Law More Coming Soon ... ACCREDITATION LawPracticeCLE will seek approval of any CLE program where the registering attorney is primarily licensed and a single alternate state. The application is submitted at the time an attorney registers for a course, therefore approval may not be received at the time of broadcasting. In the event a course is denied credit, a full refund or credit for another Law- PracticeCLE course will be provided. LawPracticeCLE does not seek approval in Illinois or Virginia, however the necessary documentation to seek CLE credit in such states will be provided to the registrant upon request. ADVERTISING WITH LAWPRACTICECLE At LawPracticeCLE, we not only believe in quality education, but providing as many tools as possible to increase success. LawPracticeCLE has several advertising options to meet your needs. For advertising and co-sponsorship information, please contact the Director of Operations, Jennifer L. Hamm, [email protected]. CHECK US OUT ON SOCIAL MEDIA Facebook: www.facebook.com/LawPracticeCLE lnstagram: www.instagram.com/lawpracticecle Linkedln: www.linkedin.com/company/lawpracticecle Twitter: www.twitter.com/LawPracticeCLE STATE COURT DESEGREGATION: THE NEW FRONTIER Daniel R. Shulman Minneapolis, Minnesota WHAT HAPPENED TO BROWN? • What Brown said: separate is not equal; “all deliberate speed” • Brown worked, achievement gap halved—Rucker Johnson, Sean Ritter • De jure v. de facto • Is there a difference—”The Color of Law,” Richard Rothstein • Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974) • How do you prove intent? • From Reagan to Trump: the federal judiciary, Is separate now equal? 2 SEGREGATION IN MINNESOTA • Highly segregated—huge gaps between Blacks and Whites • 11th largest educational achievement gap • 9th largest earning disparities • Sixth largest employment disparities • Second largest poverty & home ownership gaps https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/03/opinion/george-floyd-minneapolis- segregation.html?searchResultPosition=1 3 NEW YORK TIMES JUNE 3, 2020 • “Today, Minnesota has some of the largest black-white welfare gaps in the nation, in education, income and employment. The state has America’s 11th-largest educational achievement gap, ninth largest earning disparities, sixth largest employment disparities and the second largest gaps in poverty and homeownership.” • “Segregated cities are more likely to produce racism not just within the police force but throughout any political or civic institution with power.” https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/03/opinion/george-floyd-minneapolis- segregation.html?searchResultPosition=1 4 WASHINGTON POST 6-5-20 • The Twin Cities’ numbers tell the story. The black poverty rate is five times higher than for white residents. A quarter of black residents own their homes compared with three- quarters of whites. Only 57 percent of black students in Minneapolis and 70 percent of black students in St. Paul complete high school in four years, compared with around 85 percent of their white peers. Black youth represent 11 percent of the under-18 population but more than 30 percent of those detained in the juvenile justice system. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/06/04/its-hard-hear-minnesota-nice- without-undertones-irony- despair/?utm_campaign=wp_todays_headlines&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newslet ter&wpisrc=nl_headlines 5 FAILURE TO ACHIEVE RACIAL PROGRESS • 2016 WalletHub Report on States’ Racial Progress: Minnesota rankings: overall 51; gap in median annual income, 50; gap in home ownership rate, 50; gap in poverty rate, 49; gap in residents with at least H.S. diploma, 51; racial progress, 50 • 2020 WalletHub States with the Most Racial Progress: Minnesota rankings: racial integration, 45; median annual income gap, 49; home ownership gap, 48; poverty rate gap, 48; high school diploma gap, 50; racial progress, 45 • https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-the-most-and-least-racial-progress/18428/ 6 BOOKER V. SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 • Booker v. SPECIAL SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, MINNEAPOLIS, MINN., 351 F. S u p p. 799 (D. Minn. 1972) • Filed 1971, claiming deliberate segregation Minneapolis public schools • “The record clearly indicates that the defendant has been aware of the existence of residential segregation, and the discrimination which underlies it.” • As result of the actions of the defendant set out above and the wide-spread racial segregation in housing within the District, the public school students of Special School District # 1 have been segregated on account of race • Busing within city ordered to desegregate 7 THE SUCCESS OF BOOKER • https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/03/opinion/george-floyd-minneapolis- segregation.html?searchResultPosition=1 • Severe segregation in the Twin Cities region is a relatively recent phenomenon. In the 1960s and 1970s, the Minneapolis region was one of the most racially integrated in the nation. • “carefully designed ‘fair share’ program that required all municipalities within the region to develop affordable housing within their borders, preventing suburbs from effectively barring low-income residents…” • “Minneapolis also operated an aggressive school desegregation plan.” • 1978: MDE deseg. rule: State can regulate de facto segregation • By early 1980’s, no racially identifiable schools 8 MINNEAPOLIS RESEGREGATES I • Based on State Bd of Ed assurance, Court dissolves Booker injunction—6/8/83 • Minneapolis demographics shift; 1988, 45% students of color, rising • April ‘89: Legislature creates Deseg Policy Forum; DPF task force urges inter-district deseg to remedy de facto segregation—creates & proposes new deseg rule in ’94 • New proposed rule gets legislative OK to go to formal rule-making • PROCESS HIJACKED BY THE RIGHT—more to come 9 MINNEAPOLIS RESEGREGATES II • But beginning in the 1990s, Minneapolis and St. Paul began abandoning the integration model under pressure from parents and political groups that argued that there was “no compelling government interest in K-12 education absent intentional discrimination.” Instead, the schools moved to a system based on open

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    31 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us