US General Services Administration - USACE Access Control Point (ACP); Market Research Report 1 Please note this version of the market report differs than the report provided to the client as we have removed industry partner responses who did not authorize sharing on the Acquisition Gateway. The summary totals are accurate. This market research report summarizes the results of a request for information (RFI) issued to Schedule 03FAC SIN 811 002 to understand their capabilities in regards to the Army Access Control Point (ACP) requirements. The RFI was issued by the US General Services Administration (GSA) on behalf of the US Army Engineering and Support Center (HNC), Huntsville, AL on June 19, 2018. Responses were due by August 31, 2018. The report does not draw technical conclusions in regards to the Army ACP requirement and the industry response. While GSA does not draw technical conclusions, we are confident the Army will receive adequate competition under GSA Schedule 03FAC. Additionally, the results of the research also demonstrate the possibility of a small business under Schedule 03FAC. However, GSA is unable to make this statement definitively as we have not reviewed the technical capabilities as the Army is the technical expert in relation to this requirement. A summary of the total responses is below. Overall, the RFI yielded 23 responses and demonstrates the best in class nature of GSA Contracts. Please note, that while 23 responses were received, 21 were interested in responding if an RFQ would be posted and 19 allowed GSA to publish their info on the Gateway. GSA believes the Army can be confident it will achieve its mission goals, competition goals and socio-economic goals under Schedule 03FAC. Additionally, GSA is confident the data collected will help the Army better understand the technical environment as well as steps they are able to take in order to improve their overall acquisition strategy. GSA thanks the US Army for allowing us to partner on this market research and stands by to support in whatever way is needed as the Army moves forward through the acquisition lifecycle. US General Services Administration - USACE Access Control Point (ACP); Market Research Report 2 Business Size Standard Will your firm submit an offer if an RFP is 18 issued against GSA 03FAC Schedule? 21 15 20 15 10 8 8 7 6 10 5 5 5 4 3 5 2 0 0 Yes s h o w wo ew v dv d 8a Count Count Are you able to self-perform at least 50% of the Prime 22 services described? Subcontractor 8 22 20 GSA Schedule ... 4 10 Not Interested ... 1 1 0 0 5 10 15 20 No Yes Count Count US General Services Administration - USACE Access Control Point (ACP); Market Research Report 3 Interested Parties Q3_1 - Company Name Company Name Contact Name (POC) POC Email Integrated Security Solutions, Inc. Marquis L. Laude [email protected] M.C. Dean, Inc. Rose Montgomery [email protected] DynCorp International, LLC John Ayers [email protected] Leininger Enterprises, LLC Lisa K Leininger [email protected] Security Solutions & Management LLC Michael D Gardner [email protected] THEBENADEGROUP, INC. EBENEZER ADEWUNMI [email protected] Infotec Systems Corporation Roddy Traxler [email protected] Diversitech Inc NA NA Matlock and Associates John Matlock [email protected] South Dade Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Inc. Patti McMilion [email protected] dba SDAC CMB SERVICES, INC n/a [email protected] Ms. Alix King, VP of Business Development & RELYANT Global, LLC [email protected] Contracts US General Services Administration - USACE Access Control Point (ACP); Market Research Report 4 Low Voltage Wiring, dba LVW Electronics Sander Wilson [email protected] Sloan Security Group Rusty Sloan [email protected] J&J Maintenance, Inc. dba J&J Worldwide Services Heather Saia [email protected] (J&J) Arbor Corporation, Inc. Nidhi Puri [email protected] I. Star Enterprises, Inc Jill ColemN [email protected] Management Engineering Associates, LLC Bill Ward [email protected] Yukon Fire Protection Services, Inc. (DBA Yukon David Sawczuk (EVP) [email protected] Industrial) US General Services Administration - USACE Access Control Point (ACP); Market Research Report 5 Technical Questions: Company’s total capacity to perform the tasks stated in the PWS, what is the maximum number of sites your Company Name company could simultaneously perform at? Please provide for CONUS and OCONUS. What would your strategy be if awarded multiple sites? To meet the requirements of this undertaking, ISS would enlist the aid of our strategic partners around the country and the world, with which we have successfully performed many USACE projects in the past. We estimate that for work of this nature, we could comfortably engage in 30to 35 projects simultaneously. Our Integrated Security approach to this geographically separated collection of facilities would likely be to schedule sites for Solutions, Inc. maintenance per logistical analysis and regionally coordinate resources for a systematic response. This is an approach we have successfully taken in meeting the requirements of work on hundreds of ARNG and USARC facilities throughout CONUS, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. We can perform at 50+ sites at a time. Our approach to successfully manage multiple construction projects with concurrent periods of performance relies on the following major components by applying fundamental project management framework. This framework takes into account production capabilities to minimize impact to the critical path, personnel trained in infrastructure tools such as Primavera P6, and standardized procedures M.C. Dean, Inc. compliant with project schedule requirements. When managing multiple task orders we maintain an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) that is resource loaded by each individual task work breakdown structure. Each task order has key milestones associated with award date, kick off, submittals, CDRLs, design phases, procurement, execution, testing, commissioning and close out. We believe short interval production scheduling (SIPS) coupled with pull planning based on task order issuance is the most predictable and productive method. DynCorp DI has vast experience managing numerous sites simultaneously CONUS and OCONUS. International, LLC US General Services Administration - USACE Access Control Point (ACP); Market Research Report 6 Leininger Interested in the locations listed in the LRD region Enterprises, LLC SSM can comfortably self-perform in the south east regions. For CONUS and OCONUS sites, we would rely on Security Solutions our existing network of qualified subcontractors, plus expand that network to cover locations where we do not & Management LLC have a reliable subcontractor. Building out the network will be relatively easy, as there typically are few qualified providers at most military bases. CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN A successful management of multiple tasks at more than one location requires an organization and management approach uniquely oriented to the efficient and timely completion of a large number of small and medium‑size projects in an environment where highs and lows occur in the work load. By necessity, this leads to a project organization built around a dedicated groups of staff of highly diverse and THEBENADEGROUP, experienced personnel whose collective background span a variety of construction disciplines. This permits them INC. to accommodate and oversee substantial participation by small business subcontractors. In addition to responsiveness, another important requirement is the ability to simultaneous coordinate multiple delivery orders and subcontractors. The Benade Group’s ability to coordinate multiple delivery orders and subcontractors has been proven through actions rather than words. Assumptions Per the requirements of this Project (assumptions), we understand Infotec has the capacity to maintain 20 sites (mix of CONUS and OCONUS) currently utilizing a mix of Infotec and regional subcontractors. This number can easily be increased to 50 to 100 sites by adding personnel and Infotec Systems subcontractors. Infotec has maintained 2 large Regions within the ACP program as well as individual ACPs Corporation outside the ACP Program. Infotec has access to additional personnel and subcontractors through the ongoing and previous ACP design build and maintenance and services contracts. Diversitech is capable of supporting the LRD and SAD sites. Our organization strategy would be to combine work Diversitech Inc sites into optimized central management office that will managed decentralized work at each work site located in each region. US General Services Administration - USACE Access Control Point (ACP); Market Research Report 7 Matlock and Full scope support Associates South Dade Air SDAC currently performs more than 50 simultaneous Federal Government contracts throughout the U.S. and, Conditioning and with a $1 million LOC and $20 million bonding capacity we are able to ramp up and down to support contracts of Refrigeration Inc. any size, in virtually any location. dba SDAC CMB SERVICES, Our firm has the capacity to perform in the SAD and NAD areas. We would deploy managers to each region to INC develop and vett our sub-contractor base to help support our efforts. RELYANT offers a solution uniquely catered to support contingency programs through our extensive and successful logistical, operations & maintenance (O&M), construction, labor augmentation, and related support