Do Rewardless Orchids Show a Positive Relationship Between Phenotypic Diversity and Reproductive Success?

Do Rewardless Orchids Show a Positive Relationship Between Phenotypic Diversity and Reproductive Success?

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Serveur académique lausannois Ecology, 88(2), 2007, pp. 434–442 Ó 2007 by the Ecological Society of America DO REWARDLESS ORCHIDS SHOW A POSITIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHENOTYPIC DIVERSITY AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS? 1,3 2 1 2 ANN SMITHSON, NICOLAS JUILLET, MARK R. MACNAIR, AND LUC D. B. GIGORD 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK 2Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biology Building, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland Abstract. Among rewardless orchids, pollinator sampling behavior has been suggested to drive a positive relationship between population phenotypic variability and absolute reproductive success, and hence population fitness. We tested this hypothesis by constructing experimental arrays using the rewardless orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina, which is dimorphic for corolla color. We found no evidence that polymorphic arrays had higher mean reproductive success than monomorphic arrays for pollinia removal, pollen deposition, or fruit set. For pollinia removal, monomorphic yellow arrays had significantly greater reproductive success, and monomorphic red the least. A tendency for yellow arrays to have higher pollen deposition was also found. We argue that differential population fitness was most likely to reflect differential numbers of pollinators attracted to arrays, through preferential long-distance attraction to arrays with yellow inflorescences. Correlative studies of absolute reproductive success in 52 populations of D. sambucina supported our experimental results. To our knowledge this is the first study to suggest that attraction of a greater number of pollinators to rewardless orchids may be of greater functional importance to population fitness, and thus ecology and conservation, than are the behavioral sequences of individual pollinators. Key words: conservation; corolla color; Dactylorhiza sambucina; Orchidaceae; phenotypic diversity; pollination; population fitness. INTRODUCTION (Heinrich 1975, Dafni 1984, Ackerman 1986, Nilsson Population diversity, both genetic and phenotypic, is 1992). Rewardlessness is rare generally across all plant considered beneficial to population fitness and species families, but more common in orchids (one third of persistence, as it provides the raw material for adapta- species; van der Pijl and Dodson 1966). Rewardless tion to a changing environment (Frankham et al. 2002). orchids have notably high within-population phenotypic Much effort has been invested in quantifying neutral diversity, especially for corolla color (Heinrich 1975, genetic diversity within and between populations, Nilsson 1980, Dafni 1984, Slater and Calder 1988, despite the fact that neutral and adaptive genetic Cropper and Calder 1990, Ackerman and Galarza-Pe´rez diversity are seldom strongly correlated (Reed and 1991), consistent with the hypothesis that phenotypic Frankham 2001). In some cases phenotypic diversity is diversity is positively related to population fitness. expected to be directly and positively correlated with Pollinators’ avoidance-learning behavior while sam- population fitness. For example, the number of alleles pling rewardless orchids is suggested to drive a positive controlling self-incompatibility in plants is positively relationship between the phenotypic variability of a related to population reproductive success and persis- population of a rewardless species and the total number tence, since allelic diversity increases the number of of pollinator visits a population receives, and thus total potential mates (Young et al. 2000). Experiments reproductive success and population fitness (Heinrich studying such direct relationships are rare, however. 1975, Ferdy et al. 1998). It has been predicted that Rewardless orchids provide a particularly interesting pollinators take more flower visits to learn to avoid a case study for studying direct positive relationships rewardless species in a population where phenotypic between population phenotypic diversity and population diversity is high, so that the cumulative number of visits fitness. While most animal-pollinated plants provide received, and reproductive success accrued, should nectar or pollen reward to entice pollinators into increase with increasing population phenotypic variabil- visitation, rewardless orchids rely on deception of ity (Heinrich 1975, Nilsson 1980, Dafni 1984, Cropper pollinators without mimicry to achieve pollen transfer and Calder 1990, Ackerman and Galarza-Pe´rez 1991). It is therefore expected that the population fitness of a rewardless species should reach a maximum when many Manuscript received 14 September 2005; revised 16 May floral variants are present at equal frequencies in a 2006; accepted 30 May 2006; final version received 27 June 2006. Corresponding Editor: R. Mitchell. population (Ferdy et al. 1998). The hypothesis assumes 3 E-mail: [email protected] that reproductive success is strongly pollinator limited, 434 February 2007 DIVERSITY AND ORCHID REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS 435 which is common in rewardless species (Neiland and (Nilsson 1980, Smithson 2001, Gigord et al. 2002, Wilcock 1998, Tremblay et al. 2005). Since a positive Jersa´kova´et al. 2006). This species has been used relationship between diversity and population fitness previously in manipulative experiments, and most would result in the highest population seed production natural populations of the species are polymorphic in phenotypically diverse populations, testing the (mean morph frequency 53% yellow, n ¼ 174; Smithson hypothesis is important for understanding the persis- 2001, Gigord et al. 2001). tence and conservation ecology of populations of rewardless species, especially orchids (Ackerman 1986, MATERIALS AND METHODS Ferdy et al. 1998). To date, the only experimental test of Dactylorhiza sambucina (see Plate 1) is a locally this hypothesis, using captive pollinators foraging on abundant, European arctic–alpine rewardless orchid painted single flowers, found weak evidence for a that flowers in spring (roughly May) and is pollinated positive relationship (Dukas and Real 1993). by newly emerged bumble bee queens across the species Negative frequency-dependent selection is suggested range. It grows in open grassy meadows, with a to be the evolutionary force maintaining corolla color preference for neutral to alkaline soils (Nilsson 1980). polymorphisms within populations of rewardless or- Reproductive success is strongly pollinator-limited, and chids (Ackerman 1986, Smithson and Macnair 1997, plants are self-compatible (Nilsson 1980, Peter and Gigord et al. 2001, Smithson 2001). If a pollinator Johnson 2006). Each corm produces one inflorescence samples proportionately more inflorescences with rare per year with a mean (6SE) of 12.24 6 0.13 (yellow) corolla colors than expected by chance while searching a and 12.32 6 0.13 (red) flowers per inflorescence. Each patch for reward, this drives a negative relationship flower has two pollinia, which are removed whole either between color morph frequency and the reproductive singly or more commonly in pairs (L. D. B. Gigord, component of fitness (Ackerman 1986, Smithson and M. R. Macnair, and A. Smithson, unpublished manu- Macnair 1997, Gigord et al. 2001, Smithson 2001). script), but pollen is deposited gradually onto stigmas in However, while pollinator behavior may drive an clumps (massulae). Geitonogamy rates for this species individual fitness advantage for plants with rare colors, are unknown, although pollinarium bending occurs after this does not necessarily imply that individual pollina- removal by a pollinator, which is thought to be an tors sample more plants in diverse populations, since adaptation to reduce geitonogamy (Nilsson 1980). this depends on the avoidance learning mechanism Experiments with dyed pollinia suggest substantial adopted (Smithson and Macnair 1997). In previous between-morph pollen transfer, although pollinia dyeing experiments, captive pollinators sampled disassorta- reduced pollinia removal (R. Gala and A. Smithson, tively on color morphs of artificial flowers that were unpublished data). While flowers open from bottom to rewardless but switched to assortative visitation by color top sequentially as plants come into flower, if unpolli- morph on encountering a reward (Smithson and nated, all flowers on an inflorescence can be open Macnair 1997, Dukas and Real 1993). Such visitation simultaneously for the majority of the flowering period, caused negative frequency dependence but resulted in which can last for up to three weeks depending on the cumulative number of visits to rewardless color weather conditions (Nilsson 1980; A. Smithson, unpub- morphs in arrays not being positively correlated with lished data). their color diversity (Smithson and Macnair 1997, The manipulative experiment was centered on the Dukas and Real 1993). Causse Noir, France (448100 N38200 E) during 2004. Are we therefore justified in expecting a positive Populations of D. sambucina occur in the surrounding relationship between phenotypic diversity and popula- Ce´vennes National Park (mean morph frequency 6 SE tion fitness in the field? We carried out the first field ¼ 69% 6 3% yellow), but they are rare on the Causse. experimental test of this hypothesis, using populations We used a D. sambucina population in the periphery of a rewardless plant to quantify population fitness. We region of the National Park as a source, and translo-

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us