Optimizing Transportation Infrastructure Through Effective Land Use Opportunities for Transit Supportive Development in the Greater Rochester Area 2008 Front cover, from left to right: Titus Avenue in the Town of Irondequoit (J. Haremza), signage along Mt. Hope Avenue in the City of Rochester (J. Bovenzi), pedestrian crossing signage on Main Street in the City of Canandaigua (J. Bovenzi). Optimizing Transportation Infrastructure Through Effective Land Use Opportunities for Transit Supportive Development in the Greater Rochester Area 2008 Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 50 West Main Street • Suite 8107 Rochester, NY 14614 (585) 454-0190 http://www.gflrpc.org [email protected] Mission Statement The Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council (G/FLRPC) will identify, define, and inform its member counties of issues and opportunities critical to the physical, economic, and social health of the region. G/FLRPC provides forums for discussion, debate, and consensus building, and develops and implements a focused action plan with clearly defined outcomes, which include programs, personnel, and funding. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council David S. Zorn, Executive Director Contributors Joseph Bovenzi Jayme Breschard Daniel Burton Margaret DelPlato Jason Haremza, AICP Christopher Tortora David S. Zorn Interns Andrew Stuart, SUNY Geneseo This report, along with other relevant project information, is available online at the following web address: http://www.gflrpc.org/Optimizing.htm Optimizing Transportation Infrastructure Through Effective Land Use Opportunities for Transit Supportive Development in the Greater Rochester Area TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………….v 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………..…..……………………………..1-1 Section 1.1: Introduction………………………………………………………………1-1 Section 1.2: Project Background…………………………………………………….1-2 Section 1.3: Corridor Selection Methodology……………………………………..1-3 2. TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE DEVELOPMENT (TSD): AN OVERVIEW ..……………..……2-1 Section 2.1: The Land Use/Transportation Connection ………………………….2-1 Section 2.2: Infrastructure and the Support of Pedestrian and Transit Use…...2-2 Section 2.3: Benefits of Pedestrian and Transit Supportive Development …...2-3 Section 2.4: The Market for Transit Supportive Design in the Greater Rochester Area………………………………………………..2-3 Section 2.5: Obstacles………………………………………………………………….2-4 3. TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES………………………………..3-1 Section 3.1: Introduction…………………………...................………………………3-1 Section 3.2: Municipal Comprehensive Plans ...................………………………3-1 Section 3.3: Zoning Regulations ......…………………………………………………3-3 Section 3.4: Design Standards/Guidelines…………...………………………........3-5 4. CORRIDOR A NODAL POINTS: DESCRIPTIONS, ASSESSMENTS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS….………………..4-1 Section 4.1: Introduction……………………………………………………………….4-1 Section 4.2: Nodal Point A-1: Irondequoit Town Center……………………………. 4-3 Section 4.3: Nodal Point A-2: La Marketa………………………………………………..4-10 Section 4.4: Nodal Point A-3: Amtrak Station……………………………………………4-14 Section 4.5: Nodal Point A-4: Main/Clinton……………………………………………...4-18 Section 4.6: Nodal Point A-5: Intercity Bus Station……………………………………..4-21 Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council iii Optimizing Transportation Infrastructure Through Effective Land Use Opportunities for Transit Supportive Development in the Greater Rochester Area Section 4.7: Nodal Point A-6: Monroe Village…………………………………………..4-22 Section 4.8: Nodal Point A-7: Twelve Corners…………………………………………..4-27 Section 4.9: Nodal Point A-8: Pittsford Plaza…………………………………………….4-33 Section 4.10: Nodal Point A-9: Pittsford Village…………………………………………4-38 5. CORRIDOR B NODAL POINTS: DESCRIPTIONS, ASSESSMENTS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS….………………..5-1 Section 5.1: Introduction………………………………………………………………5-1 Section 5.2: Nodal Point B-1: Nodal Point B-1: University of Rochester/ Strong Memorial Hospital………………………………..5-3 Section 5.3: Nodal Point B-2: Monroe Community College (MCC)………………….5-7 Section 5.4: Nodal Point B-3: Marketplace Mall………………………………………..5-10 Section 5.5: Nodal Point B-4: Erie Station Village……………………………………….5-13 Section 5.6: Nodal Point B-5: Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT)………………5-16 6. CORRIDOR C NODAL POINTS: DESCRIPTIONS, ASSESSMENTS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS….………………..6-1 Section 6.1: Introduction……………………………………………………………….6-1 Section 6.2: Nodal Point C-1: Bushnell’s Basin……………………………………………6-3 Section 6.3: Nodal Point C-2: Eastview Mall………………………………………………6-6 Section 6.4: Nodal Point C-3: Victor Village……………………………………………..6-10 Section 6.5: Nodal Point C-4: Farmington (junction of Rts. 332 and 96)……………6-15 Section 6.6: Nodal Point C-5: North Canandaigua…………………………………….6-19 Section 6.7: Nodal Point C-6: Downtown Canandaigua……………………………...6-23 Section 6.8: Nodal Point C-7: Canandaigua Lakefront………………………………..6-28 APPENDICES: Appendix A: Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Members………..………A-1 Appendix B: Ridership Figures and Development Density……………..……….B-1 Appendix C: Municipal Outreach Presentations…………………………………C-1 Appendix D: Potential Funding Sources…………………………………….……...D-1 Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council iv Optimizing Transportation Infrastructure Through Effective Land Use Opportunities for Transit Supportive Development in the Greater Rochester Area EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, entitled Optimizing Transportation Infrastructure through Effective Land Use: Opportunities for Transit Supportive Development in the Greater Rochester Area, is a review and assessment of infrastructure conditions and municipal land use planning and regulatory documents along three regionally significant public transportation corridors in the Greater Rochester Area. This report provides recommendations for municipal boards and officials to draw upon in order to encourage transit-supportive development (TSD) along these corridors. TSD is a land use technique that calls for focusing public and private investment into clearly defined areas where several transportation options are readily available to the people who live, work and recreate within those areas. Typically, TSD projects consist of mixed-use (some combination of residential, commercial, institutional, and recreational land uses) developments that are designed to provide their inhabitants with a range of viable transportation options. In addition to offering local boards and officials a list of recommendations for encouraging TSD projects in their municipalities, this report includes site-specific analyses of twenty-one “Nodal Points,” or key locations, along the three public transportation corridors. These Nodal Points represent regionally and locally significant residential, commercial, educational, institutional, and recreational centers of activity. This report offers several planning recommendations for each Nodal Point that, if implemented, would improve the sustainability of TSD projects in these locations. The report is organized into six chapters, with appendices at the end. The individual chapters are laid out as follows: Chapter 1, Introduction, includes a brief introduction to this report and an explanation of its development and background. The introduction provides an overview of what this report aims to accomplish, namely the presentation of TSD planning concepts as a viable option for municipal officials and local developers. It also discusses the value of TSD concepts as a response to changing demographics and housing interests, and lastly provides an overview of the process by which the project’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) selected the three public transportation corridors and the Nodal Points examined in this report. Chapter 2, Transit Supportive Design (TSD): An Overview, provides a brief explanation of what Transit Supportive Design (TSD) is. It discusses the basic importance of the connection between land uses and transportation systems, the uses of built form to support pedestrian and transit use, ways in which transit can be used as an asset for communities, development/market issues and transit service, and obstacles to coordinated region-wide transit-supportive planning including automobile oriented land use patterns and municipal land use policies and regulations. This chapter is designed to provide the reader with basic background knowledge of what TSD is, what its benefits to a community are, and what some of the obstacles to implementing TSD projects may be. Chapter 3, Transit Supportive Development Guidelines, includes a detailed list of actions and recommendations that any municipality can use when revising and updating its land use plans and regulations. This chapter is organized into four sections, including a short introduction, which cover comprehensive plans, zoning codes, and design standards/guidelines. Each section consists of a list of potential revisions and considerations for local boards and officials to consider when revising and updating the local planning and regulatory documents. This chapter, the “heart” of this report, provides local boards and officials with an easy-to-use guide for TSD planning, zoning, and urban design concepts. It discusses the many ways in which TSD concepts can be integrated into comprehensive plans, and follows through with recommendations on how TSD concepts outlined in comprehensive plans can be Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council v Optimizing Transportation Infrastructure Through Effective Land Use Opportunities for Transit Supportive Development in the Greater Rochester Area implemented