XXXVII, 50, Sarajevo 2017. XXXVII, 50, Sarajevo 2017. Izdavači Speleološko društvo “Bosansko-hercegovački krš”, Sarajevo Centar za krš i speleologiju, Sarajevo Branilaca Sarajeva 30, 71000 Sarajevo Redakcija – Editorial board Mirnes Hasanspahić, Simone Milanolo, Jasminko Mulaomerović, Ferid Skopljak, Amila Zukanović Urednik – Editor Jasminko Mulaomerović Korice – Cover Detalj nastarijeg popisa pećina Bosne i Hrecegovine iz 1885. Detail of the oldest cave list of Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1885 DTP & print TDP Sarajevo Izdavanje časopisa Naš krš pomoglo je Federalno ministarstvo obrazovanja i nauke. Bilten Naš krš upisan je u evidenciju javnih glasila pod brojem 132 od 10. 3. 1991. godine. 3 SADRŽAJ Ivo Lučić KARSTOLOGY AND PETAR MILANOVIĆ'S KARST RESEARCH CONCEPT . 5 INTERVIEW WITH PETAR MILANOVIĆ ON THE OCCASION OF HIS 80TH YEAR OF LIFE: I WAS LUCKY TO FIND MYSELF IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME......... 19 PETAR T. MILANOVIĆ CV........................................................ 27 Admir Bajraktarević, Ivica Piljić, Ramajana Zahirović, Sabahudin Huskić, Senad Huskić REZULTATI SPELEOLOŠKIH ISTRAŽIVANJA PLANINE KONJUH – ZONA KRABANJSKOG KRŠA THE RESULTS OF SPELEOLOGICAL RESEARCH ON MT KONJUH, KRABANJA KARST REGION................................................ 40 Miralem Husanović ZNAČAJ TURISTIČKOG UREĐENJA PEĆINE STUDEŠNICE NA KONJUHU THE SIGNIFICANCE OF TURISTIC ARRANGEMENT OF STUDEŠNICA CAVE ON MOUNTAIN KONJUH ......................................................... 59 Jasminko Mulaomerović, Ersan Tiganj DVIJE METATARZALNE KOSTI IZ MRAČNE PEĆINE U KANJONU PRAČE TWO METATARSAL BONES FROM MRAČNA PEĆINA CAVE IN THE PRAČA CANYON .. 66 Peter Glöer, Jasminko Mulaomerović PRVI NALAZ ANCYLUS RECURVUS MARTENS, 1873 I NOVI PODACI O VRSTI ISLAMIA VALVATAEFORMIS (MÖLLENDORFF, 1873) U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI THE FIRST RECORDS OF ANCYLUS RECURVUS MARTENS, 1873 AND NEW DATA OF ISLAMIA VALVATAEFORMIS (MÖLLENDORFF, 1873) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA............................................................. 69 Giulio Gardini, Jasminko Mulaomerović DRUGI NALAZ PSEUDOŠKORPIJE NEOBISIUM (N.) MACRODACTYLUM (DADAY, 1888) U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI THE SECOND FINDING OF PSEUDOSCORPION NEOBISIUM (N.) MACRODACTYLUM (DADAY, 1888) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA................. 75 Jasminko Mulaomerović NOVI PODACI O PEĆINSKIM PAUCIMA IZ BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE NEW DATA ON CAVE SPIDERS FROM BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA.................. 78 Jasminko Mulaomerović SREDINA JESENI U SARAJEVU: NOĆNI ŠIŠMIŠ I DVOBOJNI ŠIŠMIŠ MIDDLE OF THE FALL SARAJEVO: COMMON NOCTULE AND PARTI-COLORED BAT .. 82 4 Jasminko Mulaomerović DVOBOJNI ŠIŠMIŠ (VESPERTILIO MURINUS) NA IGMANU PARTI-COLOURED BAT (VESPERTILIO MURINUS) ON THE MOUNTAIN IGMAN ...... 85 Miralem Husanović PORODILJSKA KOLONIJA MALOG POTKOVASTOG ŠIŠMIŠA (RHINOLOPHUS HIPPOSIDEROS) U PEĆINI KOZARA MATERNITY COLONY OF LESSER HORSESHOE BATS (RHINOLOPHUS HIPPOSIDEROS) IN THE KOZARA CAVE........................................................... 87 Jasminko Mulaomerović, Miralem Husanović VELIKI POTKOVASTI ŠIŠMIŠ – NOVA VRSTA U PEĆINI PONIKVA KOD VAREŠA GREAT HORSESHOE BAT – NEW SPECIES IN THE PONIKVA CAVE NEAR TOWN VAREŠ 90 Jasminko Mulaomerović TRAGOM JEDNE FOTOGRAFIJE: MALI MIŠOUHI ŠIŠMIŠ (MYOTIS BLYTHII OXYGNATUS) U PEĆINI MEGARI NA BJELAŠNICI ON THE TRACE OF THE ONE PHOTOGRAPHY: LESSER MOUSE-EARED BAT (MYOTIS BLYTHII OXYGNATUS) IN THE MAGARA CAVE ON BJELAŠNICA MOUNTAIN...... 92 Miralem Husanović REZULTATI ISTRAŽIVANA FAUNE ŠIŠMIŠA SJEVEROISTOČNE BOSNE RESULTS OF BAT FAUNA RESEARCH IN NORTHEASTERN BOSNIA................... 97 PRIKAZI DNEVNIK SPELEOBIOLOGA / EGON PRETNER. ................................... 104 DIVLJA VINOVA LOZA........................................................... 128 KAMENSKI LEDARI ............................................................. 129 SKUPOVI SASTANAK SAVJETODAVNOG KOMITETA SPORAZUMA O ZAŠTITI ŠIŠMIŠA EUROBATS, BEOGRAD 27.-29. 3. 2017.............................................. 131 KARSTOLOGY AND PETAR MILANOVIĆ'S KARST RESEARCH CONCEPT Ivo Lučić1 The term karstology refers to a scientific endeavor that seeks to encompass the karst as a whole. The paradox is that in Dinaric Karst, the cradle of karstology, that expression is very rare, certainly less frequent than in some other prominent karstological zones. It was used only by several domestic researchers, mostly on the margins of their research. One of them is Petar Milanović, a geologist who spent most of his career exploring extremely demanding Trebišnjica karst basin. At that time, completely new scientific research was carried out, the results of which had a strong echo in the worldwide professional literature. In 2018 Milanović marks 80 years anniversary. On this occasion, we try to analyze how this controversial and symptomatic phenomenon was copied through his work. This paper will discuss biographical and social contexts of Milanović's use of karstology or karst research; then a regional scientific tradition related to this problem; it will also question terminology Milanović used in describing karst, a phenomenon that was usually researched in his work in a more comprehensive way than a single discipline. Although Milanović used the term “kar- stology” quite rare in his work, he often crossed the boundaries set by the definition of that concept. In doing so, he was faced with the limitations of his own scientific and professional environment and social circumstances. For all that he was able to preserve the need for a broader and more open view of karst. Key words: karstology, multidisciplinarity, Milanović, anniversaries 1. Milanović within the context of the history of karst sciences 1.1 Experiences of Dinaric Karst Since the establishing karstology as a science, 125 years has been passed. Then, Jovan Cvijić first time collected and presented the majority of the karst phenomena in his monograph Das Karstphomenomen (1893). It book has been published two years later in Belgrade under the name Karst (Cvijić 1895). The term karstology refers to a scientific endeavor that seeks to encompass the karst as a whole. Many works have been published in the meantime around the world within this scientific field, while karstology has been differently accepted, but it has never recognized as the karst dis- cipline number 1. So, it is some kind of the paradox, in Dinaric Karst, the one of the 1 Center for Karst and Speleology, Sarajevo, B&H, [email protected] 5 6 Ivo Lučić karstology cradle, that basic term is very rarely frequent, certainly less than at some important karstological zones. One of the most prominent 20th-century karstolo- gists in Dinaric Karst, Ivan Gams, said that "it term is of a newer date and is more frequently used in the world" (2004). Indeed, in Dinaric Karst, this term is rarely heard despite the long research history and the historical importance of the Dinaric Karst. There, several huge en- gineering projects have been launched over the last about 150 years, through which new methods have been developed, as well as new concepts have been set up and a huge fund of scientific data created. Ivan Gams, who used to use this term, defined karstology as a profession that unites many branches, among which the most pre- valent are physical speleology, including vulcanospeleology and glaciospeleology, speleotherapy, speleobiology, karst climatology and karst hydrology (2004). The tra- ditional professions such as karst geomorphology, geology, biology, and archeology, have been engaged in karst. Some others, like geophysics, chemistry, sedimentology, cave tourism, military karstology and cave ecology, joined them to a considerable extent (Gams 2004). Also, the term is occasionally used by Andrej Kranjc, a long-time geographer at the Postojna Karst Research Institute (IZRK), where also Gams has been engaged for some time. Kranjc (2003) sees karstology as an integral system of karst science, very similar to physical geography. Kranjc has analyzed the approaches and topics dealt with by karst researchers. With colleagues from IZRK, he launched and led a postgraduate study of karstology at the University of Nova Gorica in Slovenia, as we know, unique in the world. The term karstology has been used by hydrologist Ognjen Bonacci for the last ten years, the first time in occasion on invited lectures in Bratislava in Slovakia (Bonacci 1998a) and Slovenia in Postojna (Bonacci 1998b). He talked about new multidisciplinary approaches to karstology, which he saw as an opportunity for the integration of hydrological professions. In the articles that followed, Bonacci attempts to associate karst hydrology and ecology (Lučić 2009), after such linkage was established between ecology and ​​open streams hydrology (Bonacci 2003). The ecohydrological approach means an integral karst study within the general ecological, biological, hydrological, hydrogeological, geomorphological and geochemical contexts, which should give real theoretical and practical answers as well (Bonacci et al. 2008, Bonacci et al. 2009). Then Bonacci strived to link ecohydrology with the karstology directly. He de- fined karstology as a science that integrates hydrological, geomorphological, hydro- geological, ecological, ecological, biological, speleological, socio-economic, cultural, political and other processes at various spatial and temporal scales in certain karst areas (Bonacci 2009). Then he directly calls on definition karstology as an integrated scientific system composed of certain branches which undertake complex studies of karstic systems, as Panoš