Econometrics of Panel Data

Econometrics of Panel Data

Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 4 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 4 1 / 26 Outline 1 Two-way Error Component Model Fixed effects model Random effects model 2 Hausman-Taylor estimator Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 2 / 26 Two-way Error Component Model Two-way Error Component Model 0 yit = α + Xitβ + uit i ∈ {1,..., N }, t ∈ {1,..., T}, (1) the composite error component: ui,t = µi + λt + εi,t, (2) where: I µi – the unobservable individual-specific effect; I λt – the unobservable time-specific effect; I ui,t – the remainder disturbance. Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 3 / 26 Fixed effects model Two-way fixed effects model: yit = αi + λt + β1x1it + ... + βkxkit + uit, (3) where I αi - the individual-specific intercept; I λi - the period-specific intercept; 2 I uit ∼ N 0, σu . As in the case of the one-way fixed effect model, independent variables x1, ..., xk cannot be time invariant (for a given unit). The estimation: 1 the least squares dummy variable estimator (LSDV); 2 the within estimator; 3 combination of the above methods. Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 4 / 26 The LSDV estimator can be obtained by estimating the following model: N N X X yit = αjDjit + λτ Bτit + β1x1it + ... + βkxkit + ui,t. (6) j=1 τ=1 2 where ui,t ∼ N 0, σu . The parameters in equation (7) can be estimated with the OLS. The LSDV estimator In the analogous fashion to the one-way fixed effect model, we define the following dummy variables: I for the j-th unit: ( 1 i = j D = , (4) jit 0 otherwise I for the τ-th period: ( 1 t = τ B = . (5) τit 0 otherwise Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 5 / 26 The LSDV estimator In the analogous fashion to the one-way fixed effect model, we define the following dummy variables: I for the j-th unit: ( 1 i = j D = , (4) jit 0 otherwise I for the τ-th period: ( 1 t = τ B = . (5) τit 0 otherwise The LSDV estimator can be obtained by estimating the following model: N N X X yit = αjDjit + λτ Bτit + β1x1it + ... + βkxkit + ui,t. (6) j=1 τ=1 2 where ui,t ∼ N 0, σu . The parameters in equation (7) can be estimated with the OLS. Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 5 / 26 One might test only individual or period effects: H0 : α1 = ... = αk , (10) H0 : λ1 = ... = λk . (11) The construction of test for poolability is the same but we use different degrees of freedom. The LSDV estimator: test for poolability The LSDV estimator: N N X X yit = αj Djit + λτ Bτit + β1x1it + ... + βk xkit + ui,t , (7) j=1 τ=1 2 where ui,t ∼ N 0, σu . We can test whether the individual-specific and period-specific effects are significantly different: H0 : α1 = ... = αk ∧ λ1 = ... = λT = 0. (8) To verify the null described by (8) we compare the sum of squared errors from the pooled model with (with restrictions, SSER) with the sum of squared errors from the LSDV model (without restrictions, SSER). The test statistics F: (SSE − SSE )/(N − T − 1) F = R U (9) SSEU /(NT − K − T) if null is emph then F ∼ F(N−T−1,NT−K−T). Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 6 / 26 The LSDV estimator: test for poolability The LSDV estimator: N N X X yit = αj Djit + λτ Bτit + β1x1it + ... + βk xkit + ui,t , (7) j=1 τ=1 2 where ui,t ∼ N 0, σu . We can test whether the individual-specific and period-specific effects are significantly different: H0 : α1 = ... = αk ∧ λ1 = ... = λT = 0. (8) To verify the null described by (8) we compare the sum of squared errors from the pooled model with (with restrictions, SSER) with the sum of squared errors from the LSDV model (without restrictions, SSER). The test statistics F: (SSE − SSE )/(N − T − 1) F = R U (9) SSEU /(NT − K − T) if null is emph then F ∼ F(N−T−1,NT−K−T). One might test only individual or period effects: H0 : α1 = ... = αk , (10) H0 : λ1 = ... = λk . (11) The construction of test for poolability is the same but we use different degrees of freedom. Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 6 / 26 Given the above transformations we can eliminate both the individual- and period specific effects: 0 (yit − y¯i − y¯t +y ¯it) = β (xit − x¯i − x¯t +x ¯it) + (uit − u¯i − u¯t +u ¯it) . (12) The within estimator Consider the following transformations: I averaging over time (for each unit i):y ¯i , I averaging over unit (for each period t):y ¯t , I averaging over time and unit:y ¯, for the dependent variable yit: T N T N 1 X 1 X 1 X X y¯ = y , y¯ = y , y¯ = y . i T it t N it NT it t i t i Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 7 / 26 The within estimator Consider the following transformations: I averaging over time (for each unit i):y ¯i , I averaging over unit (for each period t):y ¯t , I averaging over time and unit:y ¯, for the dependent variable yit: T N T N 1 X 1 X 1 X X y¯ = y , y¯ = y , y¯ = y . i T it t N it NT it t i t i Given the above transformations we can eliminate both the individual- and period specific effects: 0 (yit − y¯i − y¯t +y ¯it) = β (xit − x¯i − x¯t +x ¯it) + (uit − u¯i − u¯t +u ¯it) . (12) Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 7 / 26 The within estimator The within estimator: y˜it = β1x˜1it + ... + βkx˜kit +u ˜it (13) where y˜it = yit − y¯i − y¯t +y ¯it x˜1it = x1it − x¯1i − x¯1t +x ¯1it . x˜kit = xkit − x¯ki − x¯kt +x ¯kit u˜it = uit − u¯i − u¯t +u ¯it . The parameters β1, ..., βk can be estimated by the OLS. The independent variables, i.e., x1it, ..., xkit, cannot be time (unit) invariant. Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 8 / 26 The independent variables can be time invariant. Individual-specific and period-specific effects are independent: E (µi, µj) = 0 if i 6= j, E (λs, λt) = 0 if s 6= t E (µi, λt) = 0 Estimation method: GLS (generalized least squares). Random effects model Two-way random effects model: yit = α + β1x1it + ... + βkxkit + uit, (14) where the error component is as follows: uit = µi + λt + εit, (15) where 2 I µi is the individual-specific error component and µi ∼ N 0, σµ ; 2 I λt is the period-specific error component and λt ∼ N 0, σλ ; 2 I εit is the idiosyncratic error component and εit ∼ N 0, σε . Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 9 / 26 Random effects model Two-way random effects model: yit = α + β1x1it + ... + βkxkit + uit, (14) where the error component is as follows: uit = µi + λt + εit, (15) where 2 I µi is the individual-specific error component and µi ∼ N 0, σµ ; 2 I λt is the period-specific error component and λt ∼ N 0, σλ ; 2 I εit is the idiosyncratic error component and εit ∼ N 0, σε . The independent variables can be time invariant. Individual-specific and period-specific effects are independent: E (µi, µj) = 0 if i 6= j, E (λs, λt) = 0 if s 6= t E (µi, λt) = 0 Estimation method: GLS (generalized least squares). Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 9 / 26 The two-way RE model - the variance-covariance matrix of error termI It is assumed that the error term in the two-way RE model can be described as follow: uit = µi + λt + εit, (16) 2 2 2 where µi ∼ N 0, σµ , λt ∼ N 0, σλ and εit ∼ N 0, σε . The variance-covariance matrix of the error term is not diagonal!. The diagonal elements of the variance covariance matrix of the error term: 2 2 E uit = E (µi + λt + εit ) 2 2 2 = E µi + E λt + E εit + 2cov (µi , λt ) + 2cov (µi , εit ) + 2cov (λt , εit ) | {z } | {z } | {z } | {z } | {z } | {z } =σ2 =σ2 =σ2 =0 =0 =0 µ λ ε 2 2 2 = σµ + σλ + σε . Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Two-way Error Component Model Meeting # 4 10 / 26 The two-way RE model - the variance-covariance matrix of error termII For a given unit, non-diagonal elements of the variance covariance matrix of the error term (t 6= s): cov (uit , uis) = E [(µi + λt + εit )(µi + λs + εis)] , 2 = E µi + E (λt λs) + E (εit εis) + COV1 | {z } | {z } | {z } | {z } 2 =0 =0 =0 =σµ 2 = σµ, where COV1 = cov(λt, µi)+cov(λs, µi)+cov(λt, εit)+cov(λs, εit)+2cov(µi, εit). Similarly, for a a given period, non-diagonal elements of the variance covari- ance matrix of the error term (i 6= j): cov (uit , ujt ) = E [(µi + λt + εit )(µj + λt + εjt )] , 2 = E (µi µj ) + E λt + E (εit εjt ) + COV2 | {z } | {z } | {z } | {z } =0 =0 =σ2 =0 λ 2 = σλ.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    30 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us