Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, Vol. 11, No.1, pp. 51‐58 Copyright © 2011 MAA Printed in Greece. All rights reserved. GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION AT TELL EL‐DABAA ʺAVA RISʺ ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE A.I. Taha,1, G. El‐Qady1, M.A. Metwaly1,2, U. Massoud1 1National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG), 11722, Helwan, Cairo, Egypt 2King Saud University, Saudi Arabia Received: 06/04/2010 Accepted: 24/04/2010 Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Tell El –Dabaa is one of the important archaeological sites in the Eastern part of the Nile Delta. It is located at about 7 km north of Faqous city, Sharqiya governorate, Egypt. The ancient name of El‐ Dabaa area was Avaris, which had been considered as the main capital of Hyksos (Dynasty XV) from 1650 to 1542 B.C. The whole area was covered by the deltaic deposits during the successive flood events along Nile Delta. Geomagnetic and geoelectric surveys have been carried out in order to outline the subsurface archaeological remains in this area. The target area, which is about 10000 m2, was surveyed in grid pattern each of 20x 10 m for magnetic survey and 20 × 20 m for geoelectri‐ cal resistance survey. Integrated results of the magnetic and geoelectric data analysis have suc‐ ceeded in delineating a clear subsurface picture of archaeological remains. The results show many linear anomalies, which may represent buried walls, as well as some small archaeological remains detached from the main walls. Also, we could notice some rectangular features with different sizes, which might be described as remains of different archaeological buildings. Besides, some circular structures with small size obtained and could be interpreted as columns foundations. KEYWORDS: Tell El‐Dabaa (Avaris), magnetic, resistivity, geophysical, archaeology, Hyksos, Egypt 52 A.I. TAHA A.I. th HISTORICAL BACKGROUND military roles. During the XVIII Dynasty, the area was known by the name Peru‐nefer (Bietak Tell El‐Dabaa is one of the famous and im‐ 1979 and 1996). In the XIXth Dynasty, it became portant archeological sites in the eastern part of a part of Piramesse the northern residence of the Nile Delta, Egypt. It is located at about 7 km Ramsses II (EAIS, 2005). north of Faqous city, Sharqiya Governorate Excavations at Tell El‐Dabaa have been con‐ (Fig.1). MEDITERRANEAN SEA ducted by the Austrian Archaeological Institute Manzala lake in Cairo and the Institute of Egyptology, Uni‐ NILE Mansoura DELTA study area Faqous versity of Vienna from 1966 to 1969 and from SUEZ CANAL SUEZ Benha 1975 to the present (Bietak 1991). The results of Giza Cairo the excavations were published in many reports (A) and papers (e.g. Bietak 1975; 1986 and 1996; Bi‐ Temple etak et al., 1994; El‐Qady et al., 2003). Precinct E. RUSHDI The majority of Egyptologists however fol‐ EL NIMR E. ATIWA lowed the theory of Pierre Monter, which states E. YASERGI Settlement E. HAWA NK 2 E. SILMY that Avaris and Piramesse were located at Tanis E. RUSHDI Settlement CENTRE OF TOWN EL KEBIRA NK ? DURING 19th DYN (Monter, 1957). It is the overwhelming evidence Lat Period and from many seasons of excavations that has fi‐ Roman Settlement Settlement NK ? E. YANINI Settlement 15 th nally changed the general opinion of scholars. DYN and NK E. MACHALI E. HELMI Today Avaris and Piramesse are identified as E. SHARQAWI E. ZIZ Tell El‐Dabaa and Qantir respectively. Together they cover an area of approximately 12 sq. km TEMPLE OF SUTECHE TELL EL- DABAA from Qantir in the north to Ezbet Gayel and Ez‐ KHATANA MAGHUBIA bet Gezirat El‐Baghl in the south (Bietak, 1996). Ez Gayel Today a mound, with approximately 500 m Ez. GEZIRAT diameter represents the remains of this vast E. DORMAN EL-BAGHL E. FED town‐site. At the end of the last century the site was spread out more than 1Km westward, as Tell areas and River courses and 0 500 1000 m ancient landscape inundated areas far as the village of Khata’na and Ezbet Helmy Excavation areas VILLAGES.HAMLETS CANALS on the eastern bank of Bahr Faqous, which follows the bed of the old Pelusiac branch of the (B) L A 250 N A River Nile (Fig. 1‐A) (Bietak, 1996). The current C 200 study is one step forward to discover and complete the overview subsurface pictures of 150 the Tell El Dabaa area. To achieve this target, 100 Study area geophysical surveys using magnetic gradient 50 and resistance measurements have been 0100200m. 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 conducted using “FM36 Gradiometer and RM15 Fig. (1): (A) Reconstruction of the historical landscape resistance meter” respectively. Results of the of Tell El‐Dabaa and Qantir (Modified after Bietak, geophysical survey will help for planning the 1996). (B) Location of the study area in cultivated land. future excavation activities in the area based on scientific research work. The earliest evidence of occupation in this area dates back to the first intermediate period, when royal estate was found in the region. Dur‐ GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION ing the middle kingdom, it was a flourishing Most of the ancient architectural features in settlement area known as Rawaty, “mouth of Egypt were made of mud bricks and granite. the two roads”. During the turbulent second Therefore, magnetic and electrical resistivity are intermediate period it was the capital city of the most effective archaeo‐geophysical tools for Hyksos (Dynasty XV), with both economic and detecting such structures and the associated GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION AT TELL EL‐DABAA ʺAVARISʺ ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE 53 fired remains, such as pottery, fire bricks and FM36 fluxgate gradiometer with sensitivity of kilns, (Breiner, 1973; Abdallatif et al., 2003, 0.1 nT (Geoscan Research, 1987). The gradiom‐ Bates et al., 2007, ). In this work, the study area eter emphasizes the near surface features and is surveyed using magnetic gradient and elec‐ tends to cancel response of deeper of longer trical resistance scanning techniques to confirm range features. the subsurface features. The area of investigation is 100 m × 100 m, and divided into 50 individual grids each of them was 20 x 10 m, as shown in Fig. (2‐A). The 1. Magnetic gradient survey area has been surveyed along lines using paral‐ The magnetic gradient survey has been lel traverse mode with a sampling rate of 0.5 m applied in this study as the gradient of the (2 samples/meter) and the line traverse spacing vertical components of the magnetic field or the is 0.5 m. The whole area is flat leveled and has difference between the readings of two sensors different kinds of cultivation activities without separated by specified short vertical distance any evidences about the subsurface features. was recorded. The survey was conducted using M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 (B) (A) M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 M13 M14 M15 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 M16 M17 M18 M19 M20 M21 M22 M23 M24 M25 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 M26 M27 M28 M29 M30 M31 M32 M33 M34 M35 R16 R17 R18 R19 R20 M36 M37 M38 M39 M40 M41 M42 M43 M44 M45 R21 R22 R23 R24 R25 M46 M47 M48 M49 M50 0 20 40 0 20 40 250 200 150 100 Study area 50 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 m. 0 100 200 Fig. (2): Surveyed area and the individual grids applied the FM36 gradiometer (A), RM 15 resistance meter (B). cavities due to the significant contrast between 2. Electrical Resistance Scanning resistance values of these structures and the Surface and subsurface electrical resistance host material (Aitken, 1974), Tsokas, and is largely dependent on water and ionic content Liritzis, (1990). Clay and soil may have resistivi‐ in the different subsurface rock materials such ties of 1‐10 Ohm.m and porous rocks may have as stone, clay, wet soil, dug soil, sand, etc. Bur‐ 100‐1000 Ohm.m., while non‐porous rocks have ied walls; building foundations; roads and values between 103 ‐106 Ohm.m. These differ‐ ditches can be shown up clearly with this tech‐ ences may be distinguished by measurements nique as well as tombs, bits and underground 54 A.I. TAHA A.I. of resistivity of the ground, enabling archaeo‐ 3‐ The data were clipped initially at ‐9/9nT to logical remains to be discovered and planned. remove the high frequencies resulting from any The study area has been surveyed through‐ expected surface iron spikes. Also, the despike out 25 grids each of them was 20 x 20 m, as function (K) is applied for more enhancement shown in Fig. (2‐B). The distance between the and good presentation. measuring points is 1 m along a line, and the Finally, the Gaussian Low‐Pass Filter (L) is traverses spacing was 1 m, while the mobile applied to remove the high frequencies as well electrodes spacing was 0.5 m. In the present as to smooth and enhance the weak anomalies study the Geoscan Resistance Meter (RM–15) of deep archaeological features. The Low‐Pass has been used, with the twin‐array of electrodes Filter parameters are set to X and Y radii = 2. configuration. The processed magnetic data is illustrated in The twin electrode array was especially de‐ figure (3). It is obvious that the scattering effects signed for near surface investigations and par‐ of local high magnetic anomalies in different ticularly for the archaeological Prospection sites are essential specially, whereas there are (Geoscan Research, 1993.). The system is quick, linear features. The relatively high magnetic where up to 6000 readings can be acquired per anomalies can be interpreted as ovens and/or day (Evan, 2003).