Vol. 26: 33–40, 2017 AQUATIC BIOLOGY Published February 21 doi: 10.3354/ab00669 Aquat Biol OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS In situ measurements of righting behavior in the common sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus: the importance of body size, substrate type, and covering material R. C. Challener1,*, J. B. McClintock2 1Bellarmine University, Department of Biology, Louisville, KY 40205, USA 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Biology, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA ABSTRACT: Righting behavior has been used extensively in laboratory studies of sea urchins as an in- dicator of stress under various environmental conditions. In situ measurements of the natural righting response of sea urchins would serve to place such laboratory measurements in an ecological context as well as potentially validate laboratory control conditions. We investigated the righting response of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus in seagrass and sand bottom habitats of Saint Joseph’s Bay, Florida. Field-measured righting times (other than the exception mentioned below) in L. variegatus were similar to those measured in laboratory studies. Moreover, as seen in multiple sea urchin species in laboratory studies, smaller individuals exhibited significantly shorter righting times than larger in- dividuals. Importantly, sea urchins lacking covering material (shell material, seagrass blades) that were placed on open sand patches took significantly longer to right than those with covering material placed on sand patches. Our field observations indicate the importance of sea urchin size, substrate type, and the presence or absence of covering materials when making righting measurements in the laboratory or the field. Our findings also suggest that higher water velocities facilitate righting, as at higher flows on sand patches, the presence/absence of covering material no longer significantly im- pacted righting time. These findings are ecologically important as they indicate that, under certain natural conditions (sand substrate, low availability of covering materials and low water velocities), L. variegatus that are displaced onto their aboral side are more vulnerable to predation. KEY WORDS: Righting response · Covering behavior · Soft bottom · Echinodermata · Echinoidea INTRODUCTION tal change (e.g. Kleitman 1941, Giese & Farmanfar- maian 1963, Percy 1973, Lawrence 1975, Lares & Echinoderms are widely known for their ability to McClintock 1991, Böttger et al. 2001, Challener & right themselves from an aboral position (Hyman McClintock 2013) or as a diagnosis of sea urchin 1955, Reese 1966). This righting behavior usually disease (e.g. Scheibling & Stephenson 1984). In in - involves the coordinated movements of tube feet and stances where righting responses are employed, sea spines (Lawrence 1976a) and is thought to be a sim- urchins or sea stars are collected and transported to ple neurological reflex (Reese 1966, Binyon 1972). the laboratory, where they are placed in aquaria or Historically, the righting response has been exploited seawater tables. Several days to weeks are usually in laboratory studies, particularly with asteroids and allowed for adjustment to laboratory conditions prior echinoids, as a measure of stress under environmen- to measuring righting responses, as a technique to © The authors 2017. Open Access under Creative Commons by *Corresponding author: [email protected] Attribution Licence. Use, distribution and reproduction are un - restricted. Authors and original publication must be credited. Publisher: Inter-Research · www.int-res.com 34 Aquat Biol 26: 33–40, 2017 evaluate exposure to a given stressor. Although feet facilitate the righting response in sea urchins adjustment to laboratory settings is necessary to (Lawrence 1976b), it is possible that the presence of ensure that animal well-being is optimal and to covering material interferes with the ability to right, minimize variation between individuals (Schapiro & yet to date it is unknown whether this is the case. Everitt 2006), laboratory conditions often do not The purpose of the present study was to conduct reflect the natural environment and therefore have the first analysis of righting behavior in a common the potential to produce experimental results that sea urchin in its natural benthic environment. For vary from those observed in the field. Assessing both small and large individuals, we measured the righting responses under natural conditions would time required to right on the same substrate (sea- permit comparisons with laboratory-based righting grass), each with and without covering material, to times. Thus, such knowledge has the potential to val- evaluate the potential effect of size and presence/ idate laboratory studies, as well as provide valuable absence of covering material on in situ righting times. information on ecologically relevant righting times. We then took large individuals (to eliminate size as a Yet, to our knowledge, righting behavior has never factor), with and without covering material, and been measured for any echinoid or asteroid under measured the time require to right on 2 natural sub- natural conditions in the field. strates (sand and seagrass), to evaluate the potential The common regular sea urchin Lytechinus varie- effect of substrate type and presence/absence of cov- gatus is distributed throughout the Caribbean and ering material on in situ righting times. Gulf of Mexico, occurs primarily in shallow seagrass habitats (see Watts et al. 2013 for review) and dis- plays righting behavior: when placed on its aboral MATERIALS AND METHODS side with its mouth facing upward, the sea urchin will reorient itself by rotating 180º until its oral surface is Field observations were carried out in May 2014 again on the substrate (Kleitman 1941). Smaller and 2015 during daylight hours in Eagle Harbor, a urchins are likely to right more rapidly than larger small bay located within Saint Joseph’s Bay State urchins as smaller body size in regular sea urchins Park, Florida (29° 46’ N, 85° 22’ W) where densities of has been associated with reduced righting time in Lytechinus variegatus as high as 35 m−2 have been laboratory studies (Percy 1973, Sonnenholzner et al. recorded (Beddingfield & McClintock 2000). All ex - 2010). Populations of L. variegatus are known to dis- periments were carried out during daylight in shal- play polymodal size distributions with discrete year low (<2 m depth) water where researchers were able classes present throughout the year (e.g. Bedding- to stand and/or kneel while handling and observ - field & McClintock 2000) and therefore righting re - ing sea urchins. Individual sea urchins were hand- sponses may be expected to vary with size in the field. collected and righting measurements were made Other factors that may influence the righting within the same seagrass beds from which urchins response in L. variegatus include substrate type and were collected or immediately adjacent to seagrass presence/absence of covering material. In Saint beds where urchins were collected for sand-patch Joseph’s Bay, Florida, densities of L. variegatus are treatments. Urchins were maintained under water at relatively higher in seagrass (Thalassia testudinum) all times in order to minimize air exposure, with the patches in comparison to sand patches, yet indi- exception of a period of less than 30 s such that digi- viduals have been observed on sand patches (e.g. 8 tal images could be taken (see below). In treatments individuals m−2), especially in winter months when where covering material was removed, this was care- less seagrass is present (Beddingfield & McClintock fully cleaned from the test under water by hand in an 2000). L. variegatus has greater clinging power (ad - effort to minimize any tube foot damage. Righting herence to an experimental substrate) on a smooth behavior measurements were made by gently plac- surface versus a rough surface (Sharp & Gray 1962). ing sea urchins onto their aboral side and recording Whether seagrass blades may function as smooth the length of time required for an individual to lift its surfaces and sand particles as a rough surface is not oral surface to attain a 90º angle with the substrate known, nor is the righting response of L. variegatus (Percy 1973). Size measurements (diameter) of each in either seagrass beds or sand patches. Finally, L. individual were made by taking a digital image of variegatus is well known for its covering behavior, each urchin adjacent a ruler and then later using holding materials such as small shells, pebbles, and Image J software (Schneider et al. 2012). seagrass blades on its aboral surface (Field 1892, In studies conducted in 2014, ambient seawater Amato et al. 2008). As both the spines and tube temperature was measured using a YSI 85 meter Challener & McClintock: In situ righting behavior of a common sea urchin 35 (YSI) and salinity was measured using a Vital Sine™ without covering material and on sand or seagrass SR6 salinity refractometer. In 2015, ambient seawater patches, we repeated the above experiment in 2015 temperature, dissolved oxygen, and salinity were and at the same time measured in situ currents. We measured using a YSI Professional Plus multipara- again employed a 2 × 2 factorial design to examine 4 meter water quality meter (YSI). Measurements were sea urchin treatments: (1) presence of covering mate- made at the beginning and end of each set of righting rial (mean test diameter 3.60 ± 0.17 cm, n = 15) and observations. a substrate of seagrass, (2) absence of covering mate- rial (mean test diameter 3.49 ± 0.21 cm, n = 15) and a substrate of seagrass, (3) presence of covering mate- Effects of body size and presence of covering rial (mean test diameter 3.70 ± 0.20 cm, n = 15) and materials on righting a substrate of sand, and (4) absence of covering mate- rial (mean test diameter 3.66 ± 0.17 cm, n = 15) and a In 2014, we employed a 2 × 2 factorial design to as- substrate of sand. Linear water velocities were ap- sess whether body size (test diameter) and the pres- proximated using a Geopacks MFP51 stream flow - ence/ absence of covering material impacted righting meter that was placed within 0.1 m of the sea urchin times in small and large L.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages8 Page
-
File Size-