Jurnal Bina Praja 8 (2) (2016): 175-185 p-ISSN: 2085-4323 | e-ISSN: 2503-3360 Jurnal Bina Praja Journal of Home Affairs Governance Jurnal Bina Praja VOLUME 8 | ISSUE 2 | NOVEMBER 2016 e-ISSN: 2503-3360 | p-ISSN: 2085-4323 Accredita on Number: 735/AU2/P2MI-LIPI/04/2016 Valid thru: 24 April 2019 Jakarta, p-ISSN: 2085-4323 Bina Praja Vol. 8 Iss. 2 pp. 175-340 Accreditation Number November 2016 e-ISSN: 2503-3360 P : R D A M H A 735/AU2/P2MI-LIPI/04/2016 R I http://jurnal.kemendagri.go.id/index.php/jbp/index The Effects of Social Capital for the Management of Environment Cleanliness in Adipura Programme Ida Bagus Made Agung Dwijatenaya 1, *, Mutiara Kartika Dewi 2 1 Quality Assurance Agency (BPM) Universitas Kutai Kartanegara Jalan Gunung Kombeng No. 27 Tenggarong, Kutai Kartanegara – East Kalimantan 75512 2 Regional Research and Development Agency (Balitbangda) of Kutai Kartanegara Regency Regent Received:Office Complex, 1 July Bappeda2016; Accepted: Building 7 4thOctober Floor, 2016; Jl. Wolter Published Monginsidi, online: Timbau 30 November Village, 2016 Tenggarong DOI: 10.21787/jbp.08.2016.175-185 Abstract Social capital is a decisive factor in the management of environment cleanliness in Adipura Programme. Tenggarong optimized.City in achieving This research clean city aims has to attemptedanalyse the various effects strategies,of social capital including for the by management considering theof environmental community social cleanliness. capital Thefactor. instrument Adipura Award used is for the Tenggarong questionnaire. City isThe unsustainable, sampling collection indicating technique that the uses role the of community simple random social sampling capital is method, not yet with the sample of 100 respondents. The analysis instrument used to test the hypotheses is Product Statistics and Service Solution (SPSS) Program version 13.0 for windows. The research result shows that community social capital positively theand managementsignificantly affectsof environment the management cleanliness. of environmental It is recommended cleanliness. to Kutai Trust Kertanegara element positively Government and significantlyto always optimize affects the management of environment cleanliness. Cooperation and social norm elements positively but not significantly affect the active role of community. Community Social Capital should be used optimally. Keywords: social capital, environment cleanliness, Adipura programme. I. Introduction welfare. Managing environmental cleanliness is determined by various factors. One that determines adage that has been understood by the community. the successful management of environmental A healthyCleanliness community is the is base one ofof health,the indicators so is the of cleanliness is a factor of community social capital. people’s welfare. To that end, the management of urban environmental cleanliness becomes one contribute to the management of environmental Community social capital has been shown to of the government programs that continue to be cleanliness, as the research result of Yuanjaya encouraged. The issues of a city are indeed very (2015). As explained by the Regulation of the issue. The government, through the Ministry of Ministry of Environment Number 6 of 2014 on the Environment,complex, including is always the attemptingenvironmental to improve cleanliness the 2 that Adipura Programme aims to build active Guidelines of Adipura Programme, Chapter II Article performance of urban environmental management, community participation. known as Adipura Programme. Adipura will succeed The fact shows that Adipura Award obtained depends on community participation. by Tenggarong City is unsustainable. Adipura Award Tenggarong City is one of the cities that once Adipuraobtained Awardby Tenggarong in 2016 City,was namelynot met. in To1994, realize 1995, a 1996, and 2014. The expectation of obtaining citywon isan clean, Adipura comfortable, Award. Tenggarong and at ease City which community in the clean city for Adipura Programme, various strategies endis expecting able to thepush award for the to achievementbe sustainable, of sopublic the have been pursued, including by considering the * Corresponding Author © 2016 Ida Bagus Made Agung Dwijatenaya, Phone : +62 813 5032 1841 Mutiara Kartika Dewi Email : [email protected] This work is licensed under the Creative 175 Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International License. factor of community social capital. cleanliness of the environment. Hygienic behaviour The issues of social capital that include an can be manifested if public awareness towards the element of trust, cooperation, and social norms environment grows and develops. Environmental have a very big role in managing environmental awareness according to Zen in Neolaka (2008) is cleanliness. Mutual assistance, which is a routine an attempt to involve every citizen in growing and fostering awareness to preserve the environment to diminish. Based on the objective circumstance, based on the value, that is the value of the activity of Tenggarong City community, has begun environment itself with the philosophy of living in and cleanliness norm as the elements of social peace with the natural environment. The awareness capitalit appears have thatbeen confidencereduced. To (trust),that end, cooperation, community to manage environmental cleanliness cannot be social capital to carry out various environmental activities needs to be developed. Based on the management is not solely carried out by the janitor alone.separated However, from togood optimize waste the management. social capital ownedWaste the effect of social capital on the management of by Tenggarong community will be able to encourage above explanation, needed an in-depth study on the preservation of sustainable environmental cleanliness. environmental cleanliness in Tenggarong City. andFurthermore, norms) for the the research management questions of environmental are (1) how associated with prosperity or poverty, agribusiness is the influence of social capital (trust, cooperation, developmentVarious studies productivity, have shown and performance. that social capital Social is the management of environmental cleanliness? cleanliness? (2) how is the influence of trust in the welfare of the community as the results of capital affects positively and significantly towards (3) how is the influence of cooperation on the (2012); and Rohmani, et al. (2015). Meanwhile, environmentalmanagement of cleanliness? environmental cleanliness? and (4) theresearch research by Suandi result (2007);of Pramono Cahyono (2012) and stated Adhiatma that how is the influence of norms on the management of of socialSocial organization capital according such toas Putnamtrust, norms, in Winarni and (2011)that social shows capital that does social not significantlycapital linkages affect with the (2011) is defined to refer to the characteristics household poverty. Research result of Winarni community by facilitating coordinated actions. To putnetworks it simply, that it cancan be improve stated thatthe social efficiency capital of is a (Sedana,productivity 2013). are Accordinglow. Social tocapital research has aby significant Andrews characteristic of a social organization that facilitates (2011),influence the on socialthe developmentcapital of communities of agribusiness and organizations positively affects the performance of the government. Realizing the positive impact of capitalcoordination depicts and the cooperation value of forsocial mutual relationships, benefit. social capital, it is advisable to make use of social trust,Furthermore, and norms ofaccording mutual reciprocityto Coleman, between social capital in community and organization. the individual and society. Social relation is an In addition to physical capital and skill or important element in the social capital and is a intelligence capital (human capital), the social resource (Kitchen, et al., 2012). capital of the community will be able to encourage the community to manage the cleanliness of the et al. (2103) Social capital is the resources that environment on an ongoing basis. As the study are accessedAccording by to individuals Fujiwara and and Kawachi groups inin Thobias, a social structure, which facilitates cooperation, collective role that is no less important to physical, skill or action, and maintenance of norms. finding of Widodo (2014) that social capital has a According to Hasbullah as quoted by Syafril thatintelligence is able to(human encourage capital) people capitals. to always Furthermore, keep the lies in how the community ability in a group to work commitmentthe finding stated and consistency that social tocapital the sustainabilityhas a power togetherHadi (2014) to build that athe network point ofto socialachieve capital a common study of waste management, which has been running. the goal. The cooperation is characterized by a pattern result of Trajuningsih study (2015) showed that the change of social capital consisting of elements and built on trust, supported by positive and strong of trust, norms, and networks has an impact on the of the interrelation of reciprocity and mutual benefit waste management system. (2011) describes the elements of social capital are Active involvement of all elements of the (1)norms the andsocial social fabric, values. (2) trust,Furthermore, (3) social Arsyad, reciprocity, et al. community (stakeholders) in the management Positive behaviour norm as one of the elements plays a very important role in Adipura Programme. of(4)