Published online: 2021-06-15 THIEME 250 OriAyurveda ginal Article Gargle Regimen in Radiotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis Wanjarkhedkar et al. THIEME 250 Ori Ayurvedaginal Article Gargle Regimen in Radiotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis Wanjarkhedkar et al. SupportiveAn A yurvedaand Palliative Care Gargle Regimen in Management of Radiotherapy-inducedAn Ayurveda Gargle Regimen Oral Mucositis in Management of Radiotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis Pankaj Wanjarkhedkar1, Sonali Pingley2 Shaileshkumar Shende2 Dhananjay Kelkar3 AmitPankaj P arasnisWanjarkhedkar3 Mahesh1, SambhusSonali Pingley3 Girish2 PhadakeShaileshkumar3 Sachin Shende Hingmire2 Dhanan4 Padmajjay Kelkar Kulkarni3 4 AmitChetan Parasnis Deshmukh3 Mahe4 sh Sambhus3 Girish Phadake3 Sachin Hingmire4 Padmaj Kulkarni4 Chetan Deshmukh4 1Department of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, Deenanath Address for correspondence Pankaj Wanjarkhedkar, MD Ayurveda, Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, Department of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, Deenanath 1Department of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, Deenanath Address for correspondence Pankaj Wanjarkhedkar, MD Ayurveda, India Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Near Mhatre Bridge, Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, Department of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, Deenanath 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Erandawne, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India India Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Near Mhatre Bridge, Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India (e-mail: [email protected]). 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Erandawne, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India 3Department of Surgical Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India (e-mail: [email protected]). Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India 3Department of Surgical Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar 4Department of Medical Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India 4Department of Medical Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital Soutand hResearch Asian Center,J Cancer Pune, 2021;9:250–252. Maharashtra, India South Asian J Cancer 2021;9:250–252. Abstract Background Radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) in patients with head and Abstract Bacneckkground cancer may Radiotherapy-induced lead to significant morbidity. oral mucositis OM may (RIOM) result in in patients erythema, with ulceration, head and neckand pseudomembrane cancer may lead to formation. significant The morbidity. usual time OM ofmay onset result is insecond erythema, or third ulceration, week of andradiotherapy pseudomembrane (RT), after formation. the doses ofThe 16 usual to 18 time Gy. ofOM onset may iscause second severe or third pain, week signifi of- radiotherapycant weight loss, (RT), increased after the resourcedoses of use,16 to interruption 18 Gy. OM ormay discontinuation cause severe pain,of the signifi treat- cantment, weight and added loss, increasedcost of supportive resource care.use, interruption or discontinuation of the treat- ment,Materials and and added Methods cost of supportivePatients who care. underwent RT and chemoradiation (CTRT) for head andMaterials neck squamous and Methods cell carcinoma Patients (HNSCC)who underwent from 2015 RT and to 2016 chemoradiation were included. (CTRT) The patientsfor head andwho neck were squamous treated with cell the carcinoma add-on (HNSCC)Ayurveda from gargle 2015 regimen to 2016 (AGR) were of included. sapthachhadadi The patients gan- Dr. Pankaj Wanjarkhedkar whodoosham were were treated evaluated with the against add-on patients Ayurveda treated gargle with regimen standard (AGR) symptomatic of sapthachhadadi care (SSC). gan- Dr. Pankaj Wanjarkhedkar dooshamStatistical were Analysis evaluated Chi against-square patients test was treated used towith compare standard the symptomatic difference betweencare (SSC). the Statisticaltwo groups Analysis in the present Chi-square study with test SPSSwas used (SPSS to version compare 20 thefor Windowsdifference package between SPSS the twoScience, groups Chicago, in the presentIL, USA). study software. with SPSS (SPSS version 20 for Windows package SPSS Keywords Science,Result Chicago,Grade III toIL, IVUSA). OM software.was lower in the AGR group when compared with the SSC K►eywords oral mucositis Resultgroup (pGr < ade0.001). III to Onset IV OM of was OM lower was insignificantly the AGR group delayed when in comparedpatients from with the the AGRSSC ► orAyurvedaal mucositis gargle group ((pp << 0.001).0.001). Onset of OM was significantly delayed in patients from the AGR ► Aregimenyurveda gargle groupConclusion (p < 0.001). The AGR with sapthachhadadi gandoosham is effective in delaying the ► regimensapthachhadadi Conclusiononset and reducing The AGR severity with sapthachhadadi of OM in HNSCC, gandoosham without iscompromising effective in delaying the rate the of ► sapgandooshamthachhadadi onsetlocoregional and reducing recurrence. severity of OM in HNSCC, without compromising the rate of gandoosham locoregional recurrence. Introduction undergoing radiation/radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradia- undergoingtion (CTRT). radiation/radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradia- OrIntalroduction mucositis (OM) is one of the most common acute toxici- tionOM (CTRT). may cause significant morbidity during RT in HNSCC ties in patients with neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the most common acute toxici- patients,OM may which cause is significantone of the morbidity most common during acute RT in adverse HNSCC ties in patients with neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), patients, which is one of the most common acute adverse DOI https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726138 ISSN 2278-330X. © 2021. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative DOI https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726138 ISSN 2278-330X. © 2021. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. How to cite this article: Wanjarkhedkar P, Pingley S, Shende S, Kelkar Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative D, Parasnis A, Sambhus M, Phadake G, Hingmire S, Kulkarni P, Deshmukh and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents How to cite this article: Wanjarkhedkar P, Pingley S, Shende S, Kelkar Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying C. An Ayurveda Gargle Regimen in Management of Radiotherapy may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or D, Parasnis A, Sambhus M, Phadake G, Hingmire S, Kulkarni P, Deshmukh and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents - induced Oral Mucositis South Asian J Cancer 2021;9(4):250–252. built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). C. An Ayurveda Gargle Regimen in Management of Radiotherapy may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd A-12, Second - induced Oral Mucositis South Asian J Cancer 2021;9(4):250–252. built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India Ayurveda Gargle Regimen in Radiotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis Wanjarkhedkar et al. 251 effects of RT. OM may result in erythema, ulceration, pseu- Patients in both the groups received saline and baking soda domembrane formation. The usual time of onset is second or gargle as prophylactic treatment. Once mucositis was devel- third week of RT after the doses of 16 to 18 Gy. OM is asso- oped, treatment prescribed in both the groups was NSAIDs ciated with severe pain, significant weight loss, increased (non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs), topical anesthetics, resource use, interruption or discontinuation of the treat- and steroids as per the standard of care. ment, and added cost of supportive care. Preventive strate- Patients were followed till completion of 3 years post RT to gies are, therefore, valuable.1 detect any locoregional/systemic recurrences. Ayurveda, the ancient Indian system of medicine, has tra- ditionally recommended topical gargle termed “gandoosham” Results in Sanskrit for the management of mucositis in general.2 This low-cost regimen may be an effective intervention to reduce Out of 62 patients, 32 were treated with add-on AGR and the incidence and severity of OM and, thus, may positively 30 patients were on SSC. Patients received either type of contribute in the management of RT-induced OM in HNSCC. RT—conventional radiotherapy (CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). CRT was received by 46.7% patients in the SSC group and 65.6% patients in the AGR group, while Materials and Methods those treated with IMRT were 53.3% patients in the SSC group Patients who received RT and CTRT for HNSCC from 2015 to and 34.4% patients in the AGR group. 2016 were reviewed. Comparative analysis of the patients The field of irradiation was unilateral for 26.7% patients who were treated with the add-on Ayurveda gargle regimen in the SSC group and 28.1% patients in the AGR group, while (AGR) (►Table 1) and patients on chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% it was bilateral for 73.3% patients in the SSC group and 71.9% weight/volume gargle as standard